Transseptal puncture to facilitate device closure of "long-tunnel" patent foramen ovale

Patent Foramen Ovale Percutaneous Closure: Evolution and Ongoing Challenges

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) concerns nearly a quarter of the general population and incidence may reach up to 50% in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Recent randomized clinical trials confirmed that percutaneous closure of PFO-related stroke reduces the risk of embolic event recurrence. PFO also comes into play in other pathogenic conditions, such as migraine, decompression sickness or platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome, where the heterogeneity of patients is high and evidence for closure is less well-documented. In this review, we describe the current indications for PFO percutaneous closure and the remaining challenges, and try to provide future directions regarding the technique and its indications.

Long-term clinical outcomes for patients with uncrossable patent foramen ovale

Introduction

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is performed in selected patients with cryptogenic stroke to prevent recurrence. The prognosis of patients with uncrossable PFO after failed guidewire or catheter passage during the procedure remains unknown. We compared the long-term prognosis between uncrossable PFO and successful PFO closure in patients with high-grade PFO shunts.

Methods

We analyzed patients who underwent PFO closure for stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) prevention at Gachon University Gil Medical Center between April 2010 and March 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent stroke or TIA. Secondary outcomes included stroke, TIA, all-cause death, and a composite of stroke, TIA, and all-cause death.

Results

Of 286 patients, 245 were included in the analysis after excluding those with transseptal puncture technique usage or concurrent atrial septal defect. Among them, 82 had uncrossable PFO, and 163 underwent successful PFO closure. Large shunts were more prevalent in the PFO closure group compared to the uncrossable PFO group (62.0% vs. 34.1%, P < 0.001), and resting shunts were also more common in the PFO closure group (17.8% vs. 2.4%, P < 0.001). Stroke or TIA occurred in 2 patients (2.4%) in the uncrossable PFO group and 8 patients (4.9%) in the PFO closure group (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-6.81; P = 0.647). Additionally, no disparities in the occurrence of stroke or TIA were found in subgroups divided by baseline characteristics, RoPE score, or shunt grade.

Conclusion

Clinical outcomes for patients with uncrossable PFO seem similar to those with successful PFO closure.

Advances in Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: From the Procedure to the Echocardiographic Guidance

Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure by traditional, double disc occluder devices was shown to be safe for patients with PFO, and more effective than prolonged medical therapy in preventing recurrent thromboembolic events. The novel suture-mediated “deviceless” PFO closure system overcomes most of the risks and limitations associated with the traditional PFO occluders, appearing to be feasible in most interatrial septum anatomies, even if data about its long-term effectiveness and safety are still lacking. The aim of the present review was to provide to the reader the state of the art about the traditional and newer techniques of PFO closure, focusing both on the procedural aspects and on the pivotal role of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patient’s selection, peri-procedural guidance, and post-interventional follow-up.

Simplified percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect with use of plain fluoroscopy: Single operator experience in 110 consecutive patients

Objective

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and atrial septal defect (ASD) is routinely performed under general anesthesia or deep sedation and use of transesophageal (TEE) or intracardiac echocardiography, incurring longer duration and higher cost. We have used a simplified, economical, fluoroscopy-only guided approach with local anesthesia, and herein report our data.

Methods

The study includes 112 procedures in 110 patients with PFO (n = 75) or ASD (n = 35), with use of an Amplatzer occluder, heparin and prophylactic antibiotics. Balloon sizing guided ASD-device selection. All patients received aspirin and clopidogrel for 6 months, when they all underwent TEE.

Results

All PFOs but one (98.7%) and all (100%) ASDs were successfully closed with only one complication (local pseudoaneurysm). At the 6-month TEE, there was no residual shunt in PFO patients, but 2 ASD patients had residual shunts. During long-term (4.3-year) follow-up, no stroke recurrence in PFO patients, and no other problems were encountered. Among 54 patients suffering from migraine, symptom relief or resolution was reported by 45 (83.3%) patients.

Conclusion

Percutaneous placement of an Amplatzer occluder was safe and effective with use of local anesthesia and fluoroscopy alone. There were no recurrent strokes over >4 years. Migraine relief was reported by >80% of patients.

Transseptal Techniques for Emerging Structural Heart Interventions

The development of new transseptal transcatheter interventions for patients with structural heart disease is fueling increasing interest in transseptal puncture techniques. The authors review contemporary transseptal puncture indications and techniques and provide a step-by-step approach to challenging transseptal access and procedural complications.

Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale: Devices and Technique

Transcatheter closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) reduces the risk of recurrent cryptogenic stroke compared with medical therapy. PFO closure is a prophylactic procedure, and will not provide the patient with symptomatic improvement, except in cases of hypoxemia due to right-to-left shunt or possibly migraine headaches. Therefore, appropriate patient selection is critical, and procedural safety is paramount. Herein, we review key characteristics of the devices currently available for transcatheter PFO closure within the United States, and highlight key technical aspects of the PFO closure procedure that will maximize procedural success.

PFO "angioplasty": The preparation of a very stiff and long tunnel for device closure

INTRODUCTION

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is a widely performed procedure. Understanding the anatomy is mandatory in order to perform the procedure successfully. The degree of overlap between the septum primum and secundum is called the tunnel. In particular, long and stiff tunnels may prevent the correct positioning of devices that have a fixed distance between the right and left atrial discs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated retrospectively 361 patients with PFO closure between January 2012 and June 2014 in our institution and were treated due to previous history of ischemic stroke. By TEE, the overlap between septum primum and secundum is usually better seen on the bicaval view that is obtained at 75-90° midesophageal views. Tunnel length and PFO opening were measured. Twelve subjects (median age 35 years; range 30-58 years; three females) showed a long (median 22 mm; range 15-32 mm) and rigid tunnel (median opening 2 mm; range 1-4 mm).

RESULTS

Angioplasty of the tunnel was performed by using peripheral angioplasty balloons with a length ranging from 4 to 8 cm and a diameter between 8 and 12 mm. After angioplasty, the tunnel appeared shorter (12 mm; range 8-16 mm) and less rigid (median opening 8 mm; range 7-12 mm). The following devices were implanted: 25 mm Amplatzer PFO occluder in three patients; 25 mm Gore septal occluder in nine subjects. Median fluoroscopy time was 8 min (range 6-10 min). No complications occurred. At a median follow-up of 12 months (range 2-18 months), no problems occurred and all subjects but one (trivial residual shunting) showed a complete closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Angioplasty of a PFO rigid and stiff tunnel is a feasible and safe option. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.