Amphilimus- vs. zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the SUGAR trial

AIM

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at high risk of adverse events after percutaneous revascularization, with no differences in outcomes between most contemporary drug-eluting stents. The Cre8 EVO stent releases a formulation of sirolimus with an amphiphilic carrier from laser-dug wells, and has shown clinical benefits in diabetes. We aimed to compare Cre8 EVO stents to Resolute Onyx stents (a contemporary polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent) in patients with diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We did an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial at 23 sites in Spain. Eligible patients had diabetes and required percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 1175 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Cre8 EVO or Resolute Onyx stents. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. The trial had a non-inferiority design with a 4% margin for the primary endpoint. A superiority analysis was planned if non-inferiority was confirmed. There were 106 primary events, 42 (7.2%) in the Cre8 EVO group and 64 (10.9%) in the Resolute Onyx group [hazard ratio (HR): 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.96; Pnon-inferiority < 0.001; Psuperiority = 0.030]. Among the secondary endpoints, Cre8 EVO stents had significantly lower rate than Resolute Onyx stents of target-vessel failure (7.5% vs. 11.1%, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99; P = 0.042). Probable or definite stent thrombosis and all-cause death were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with diabetes, Cre8 EVO stents were non-inferior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to target-lesion failure composite outcome. An exploratory analysis for superiority at 1 year suggests that the Cre8 EVO stents might be superior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to the same outcome.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03321032.

Longitudinal Neointimal Distribution Pattern After Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Insights From Optical Coherence Tomography Study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Everolimus-eluting stents (EES) are established as latest generation drug eluting stents. However, optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment of neointimal distribution after EES implantation is lacking. We aimed to assess the longitudinal neointimal distribution pattern after EES implantation using OCT.

METHODS

Data from 3 prospective studies (HEAL-EES, REVER and RESERVOIR), including patients with EES implantation and OCT follow-up study, were merged. Analyzed stents were divided into 3 segments of equal length (distal, medial, proximal). Longitudinal neointimal distribution patterns were compared between the 3 segments using generalized estimating equation. Neointimal thickness (NIT), neointimal area obstruction, and uncovered or malapposed struts were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 86 patients (92 lesions) were analyzed. Time of OCT follow-up was 9.0 ± 1.5 months. NIT was 101.7 ± 65.4 μm and neointimal obstruction area was 12.2 ± 7.6%. The number of assessed struts was the same in all three segments. NIT tended to be higher at the medial segment (108.8 ± 71.1 μm) compared to distal (103.0 ± 63.4 μm) and proximal (93.3 ± 61.1 μm) (p = 0.076). Neointimal area obstruction was significantly different between the 3 segments (12.4 ± 7.5% [distal], 13.1 ± 7.7% [medial], 11.1 ± 7.5% [proximal]; p = 0.037). In the proximal segment, there was a significantly higher frequency of uncovered struts compared to medial and distal segments (3.9% vs. 2.1% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.009). The distribution of malapposed struts was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Distribution of neointimal hyperplasia seems to be different between stent segments, being higher in the medial segment as compared to proximal and distal. Whether this may reflect a response to local pre-interventional plaque burden centrally covered by the stent should be confirmed in a future study.

MANUSCRIPT SUMMARY

As optical coherence tomography based assessment of neointimal distribution after everolimus-eluting stent implantation is lacking, we analyzed data of 86 patients (92 lesions) from 3 prospective trials to evaluate neointimal distribution in distal, medial and proximal stent segments. Neointimal hyperplasia seemed to be different between the three segments, with a higher burden in the medial stent segment. Whether this reflects a response to local pre-interventional plaque burden centrally covered by the stent should be confirmed in a future study.

Non-polymer drug-eluting coronary stents

Cardiovascular complications are leading causes of most fatalities. Coronary artery disease and surgical failures contribute to the death of the majority of patients. Advanced research in the field of medical devices like stents has efficiently resolved these problems. Clinically, drug-eluting stents have proven their efficacy and safety compared to bare metal stents, which have problems of in-stent restenosis. However, drug-loaded stents coated with polymers have shown adverse effects related to the stability and deterioration of the polymer coating over time. This results in late stent thrombosis and immunogenicity. These reasons laid the foundation for the development of non-polymeric drug-eluting stents. This review focuses on non-polymer drug-eluting stents loaded with different drugs like anti-inflammatory agents, anti-thrombotic, anti-platelet agents, immune suppressants and others. Surface modification techniques on stents like crystalline coating; microporous, macroporous, and nanoporous coatings; and chemically modified self-assembled monolayers are described in detail. There is also an update on clinically approved products and those under development.

In Vivo Evaluation of the Synergic Effect of Metformin and mTOR Inhibitors on the Endothelial Healing of Drug-eluting Stents in Diabetic Patients

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Recent animal studies have shown metformin (MF) to impair endothelialization of drug-eluting stents (DES). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of MF on the healing of DES in human coronary arteries of patients with diabetes mellitus by optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

The RESERVOIR trial randomized 116 lesions in 112 patients with diabetes mellitus to amphilimus- or everolimus-eluting stents and included mandatory OCT at 9 months of follow-up. Patients were divided in 3 groups according to the glucose-lowering agents received: a) no MF; b) MF in noninsulin treated patients, and c) MF in insulin-treated patients. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of uncovered stents.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with 19 lesions did not receive MF, whereas MF was administered to 53 noninsulin treated patients (54 lesions) and 28 insulin-treated patients (28 lesions). Baseline characteristics were comparable, although noninsulin treated patients who received MF had better glycemic control (P < .01). By OCT, rates of uncovered struts were comparable between groups (3.07±4.80% vs 2.23±4.73% vs 3.43±6.69%, respectively; P = .48). Multivariate models confirmed that MF had no effect on the healing of DES (OR, 1.49, 95%CI, 0.71-3.08; P = .29). Similarly, quantitative angiography showed no effect of MF on late lumen loss, whereas patients treated with exogenous insulin had greater late lumen loss (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin use does not impair endothelial healing of DES in patients with both insulin- and noninsulin-treated diabetes mellitus. According to these results, MF should not be discouraged in these patients.

A Randomized Comparison of Reservoir-Based Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stents Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: The RESERVOIR Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of amphilimus-eluting stents (AES) with that of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

BACKGROUND

The AES is a polymer-free drug-eluting stent that elutes sirolimus formulated with an amphiphilic carrier from laser-dug wells. This technology could be associated with a high efficacy in patients with DM.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial. Patients with DM medically treated with oral glucose-lowering agents or insulin and de novo coronary lesions were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to AES or EES. The primary endpoint was the neointimal (NI) volume obstruction assessed by optical coherence tomography at 9-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 116 lesions in 112 patients were randomized. Overall, 40% were insulin-treated patients, with a median HbA1c of 7.3% (interquartile range: 6.7% to 8.0%). The primary endpoint, NI volume obstruction, was 11.97 ± 5.94% for AES versus 16.11 ± 18.18% for EES, meeting the noninferiority criteria (p = 0.0003). Pre-specified subgroup analyses showed a significant interaction between stent type and glycemic control (p = 0.02), with a significant reduction in NI hyperplasia in the AES group in patients with the higher HbA1c (p = 0.03). By quantitative coronary angiography, in-stent late loss was 0.14 ± 0.24 for AES versus 0.24 ± 0.57 mm for EES (p = 0.27), with a larger minimal lumen diameter at follow-up for AES (p = 0.02), mainly driven by 2 cases of occlusive restenosis in the EES group.

CONCLUSIONS

AES are noninferior to EES for the coronary revascularization of patients with DM. These results suggest a high efficacy of the AES and may support the potential benefit of this stent in patients with DM. (A Randomized Comparison of Reservoir-Based Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stents Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus [RESERVOIR]; NCT01710748).

Patient-tailored Drug-eluting Stent Choice - A Solution for Patients with Diabetes: Proceedings of Two Satellite Symposia Held at EuroPCR in May 2015 in Paris

Although second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have improved outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), important unmet needs remain. Two symposia at EuroPCR 2015 focused on two challenging scenarios. First, patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have generally inferior outcomes following PCI. The Cre8™ stent (manufactured by CID Spa, member of Alvimedica Group) has shown unique efficacy in subpopulations of patients with DM during clinical trials. A live case in a patient with diabetes illustrated the challenges of complex multivessel disease. Second, optimising stent selection towards devices that have demonstrated complete and early endothelialisation offers the potential to reduce the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. The Cre8™ DES features a polymer-free platform and has been associated with low rates of in-stent thrombosis.