Procedural outcomes with use of the flash ostial system in aorto-coronary ostial lesions

The Use of Bumper Wire Technique and Intravascular Ultrasound for Precise Aorto-Ostial Stenting

Background

Aorto-ostial interventions are challenging due to the limitations of contemporary equipment, imprecise ostial demarcation, and problematic ostial lesion characteristics. Suboptimal stent placement is common and portends worse clinical outcomes. Procedural and long-term outcomes of the bumper wire technique with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment have not been investigated.

Methods

A single-center retrospective study was conducted. Patients who underwent ostial lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the bumper wire technique between January 2019 and September 2020 were identified. The primary endpoint was to determine the geographic miss rate defined by inadequate ostial coverage or excess stent protrusion of > 2 mm by IVUS or angiography. The secondary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 6 months after PCI, defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization.

Results

In total, 45 patients were identified. The average age was 71.7 years old, and 85.4% were men. Indication for PCI was acute coronary syndrome in about a third of patients. Twenty-six patients had left main ostial lesions and 19 patients had right coronary artery ostial lesions. Geographic miss was detected in two patients (4.4%): one patient (2.2%) had excess proximal stent protrusion and one patient (2.2%) had an ostial miss. Six patients were lost to follow-up. TLF, stroke, or major bleeding were not observed in any of the patients.

Conclusion

The bumper wire technique is safe and efficient with low rates of geographic miss or adverse clinical outcomes. This is the first study to confirm precise aorto-ostial stent implantation with the bumper wire technique using IVUS confirmation.

Operator Experience and Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review was performed with the goal of summarizing the role of operator experience in the treatment of severe left main stenosis by percutaneous intervention techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial demonstrated that percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting had similar clinical outcomes for severe left main disease. However, PCI of the left main coronary stenosis is considered to be a high-risk intervention because of the large area of myocardium at jeopardy that can quickly cause hemodynamic compromise. Operator experience and familiarity with the use of hemodynamic support devices, plaque modification techniques, and intravascular imaging tools is associated with better clinical outcomes. In patients with severe left main stenosis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention by high-volume operators, the clinical outcomes are superior.

Aorto-Ostial Lesions: Battling an Old Foe

Aorto-ostial lesions (AOLs) entail several diagnostic and treatment challenges. The Flash Ostial System enables flaring of the overhanging stent, optimizing stent deployment in AOLs. Careful planning is essential to achieve optimal stent implantation and avoid early and late complications during the treatment of AOLs.