Long-term outcomes of SMART stent implantation in patients with femoro-popliteal disease

The Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Lesions via Drug-Coated Balloon, Directional Atherectomy and Bare Metal Stent Angioplasty

Background

This study investigated the midterm primary patency of drug-coated balloons (DCBs), directional atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (DA), and bare metal stent (BMS) angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions.

Methods

This two-center retrospective cohort study included 105 patients (110 limbs) undergoing DCB, DA, and BMS angioplasty-32 patients (34 limbs), 31 patients (32 limbs), and 42 patients (44 limbs), respectively. The demographic, baseline, and procedure data were collected, and the complications and midterm outcomes (patency, amputation-free survival, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization rates) were analyzed.

Results

All three procedures achieved a 100% success rate. Significant improvements were noted in ankle brachial index, walking distance, and Rutherford classification at 30 days post-procedure (p < 0.001), with no differences or severe complications among the groups. The all-cause mortality rate during the follow-up period, was 5.5%, and amputation-free survival rates at 24 months were 97.0%, 90.6% and 90.9% in the DCB, DA, and BMS angioplasty groups, respectively. The primary patency rate for the DCB group (79.4%) exceeded those of the DA (56.2%) and BMS (52.2%) groups (p < 0.05), with no significant difference between the DA and BMS groups at 24 months. The secondary patency and clinically driven target lesion revascularization rates were similar among the three groups. A runoff number ≤1, Trans-Atlantic Intersociety Consensus (TASC) D, and severe calcification were found to be independent risk factors for primary patency.

Conclusions

The DCB procedure demonstrated superior primary patency, compared to both BMS and DA procedures, in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions.

Clinical Implications of Phenotypes of Hemodialysis Patients With Central Venous Occlusion or Central Venous Stenosis Defined by Cluster Analysis

Objective

This study aims to investigate the association between clinical factors of patients with central (superior vena cava, brachiocephalic, or subclavian) venous occlusion or central venous stenosis (CVO/CVS) and the difficulty of interventional recanalization as well as the duration of postoperative patency.

Methods

A total of 103 hemodialysis patients with CVO/CVS treated with endovascular treatment were enrolled. The two-step cluster analysis was selected to differentiate the cases into distinct phenotypes automatically. Differences in characteristics, the difficulty of interventional recanalization, and the duration of postoperative primary patency time between the two clusters were statistically compared.

Results

The 103 cases were divided into distinct two clusters by the two-step cluster analysis with 48 (46.6%) in cluster 1 and 55 (53.4%) in cluster 2. Compared to cluster 2, patients in cluster 1 have a higher proportion of blunt stump, side branches, occlusion lesions >2 cm, calcification, or organization. Moreover, the above four factors were, in turn, the most critical four predictors distinguishing 103 patients into two clusters. The remaining six factors were, in turn, occlusion located in the superior vena cava (SVC), duration of central venous catheterization (CVC), lesion location, vessel diameter, number of CVC, and previously failed lesion. Of the four most important factors, with the exception of occlusion lesions exceeding 2 cm, there were significant differences in the length of procedure time between the groups grouped by the remaining three factors. And there was a significant difference in the primary patency rate between the group with blunt stump and the group without blunt stump and also between the group with occlusion lesions ≥ 2 cm and the group with occlusion lesions <2 cm. The operation time of cluster 1 was longer than that of cluster 2. In terms of postoperative patency time, the primary patency time was significantly longer in the patients of cluster 2 compared with cluster 1 (P = 0.025).

Conclusion

Patients were divided into distinct two clusters. CVO/CVS of patients in cluster 1 was more challenging to be recanalized than that in cluster 2, and the primary patency time was significantly longer in the patients of cluster 2 compared with cluster 1. Blunt stump, side branches, occlusion lesions exceeding 2 cm, and calcification or organization are the four most critical predictors distinguishing 103 patients into two clusters.