Transradial access for cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: A meta-analysis and systematic review

PURPOSE

Transradial access (TRA) for diagnostic and interventional neurointerventional procedures has recently gained traction over transfemoral access (TFA) in the neurointerventional community. This meta-analysis aims to assess and summarize the utility of TRA in cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed utilizing Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Using PRISMA guidelines, records were extracted with the following search terms: transradial approach, transradial access, radial access, cerebral angiogram, cerebral angiography, neurointervention, and neuroendovascular. The primary outcomes assessed were case success rate, complication rate, and crossover rate from TRA to TFA. Secondary analysis was performed on procedure time, fluoroscopy time, fluoroscopy time per vessel (diagnostic procedures only), contrast dose, radial artery diameter, distal radial artery diameter, and patient preference for TRA over TFA.

RESULTS

Sixty-two full-text articles were analyzed for this meta-analysis, representing 12,927 diagnostic and interventional TRA access patients. Our analysis revealed a combined diagnostic and interventional case success rate of 95.9% and complication rate of 3.5%, with crossover to TFA occurring in 4.9% of cases.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that TRA access for diagnostic angiography and neurointerventional procedures is a safe and effective approach, though determining a true complication rate is challenging as the definition of TRA complications has changed in various publications over time.

The Clinical Impact of Access Site Selection for Successful Thrombolysis and Intervention in Acute Critical Lower Limb Ischaemia (RAD-ALI Registry)

Background: Acute limb ischaemia (ALI) is of great clinical importance due to its consequent serious complications and high comorbidity and mortality rates. The purpose of this study was to compare the acute success and complication rates of CDT performed via transradial, transbrachial, and transfemoral access sites in patients with acute lower limb vascular occlusion and to investigate the 1-year outcomes of CDT and MT for ALI. Methods: Between 2008 and 2019, 84 consecutive patients with ALI were treated with CDT in a large community hospital. Data were collected and retrospectively analysed. The primary ("safety") endpoints encompassed major adverse events (MAEs), major adverse limb events (MALEs), and the occurrence of complications related to the access site. Secondary ("efficacy") endpoints included both technical and clinical achievements, treatment success, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, procedure time, and the crossover rate to an alternative puncture site. Results: CDT was started with radial (n = 17), brachial (n = 9), or femoral (n = 58) access. CDT was technically successful in 74/84 patients (88%), but additional MT and angioplasty and/or stent implantation was necessary in 17 (20.2%) and 45 cases (53.6%), respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 74/84 cases (88%). The mortality rate at 1 year was 14.3%. The cumulative incidence of MAEs and MALEs at 12 months was 50% and 40.5%, respectively. After conducting multivariate analysis, history of Rutherford stage IIB (hazard ratio [HR], 3.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-8.41; p = 0.0025), occlusion of the external iliac artery (HR, 27.52; 95% CI, 2.83-267.33; p = 0.0043), being a case of clinically unsuccessful thrombolysis (HR, 7.72; 95% CI, 2.48-23.10; p = 0.0004), and the presence of diabetes mellitus (HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.01-4.71; p = 0.047) were independent predictors of a high MAE mortality rate at 12 months. For MALEs, statistically significant differences were detected with the variables history of Rutherford stage IIB (HR, 4.30; 95% CI, 1.99-9.31; p = 0.0002) and external iliac artery occlusion (HR, 31.27; 95% CI, 3.47-282.23; p = 0.0022). Conclusions: Based on the short-term results of CDT, acute limb ischaemia can be successfully, safely, and effectively treated with catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy with radial, brachial, or femoral access. However, radial access is associated with fewer access site complications. A history of Rutherford stage IIB, occlusion of external iliac artery, unsuccessful thrombolysis, and the presence of diabetes mellitus were independently associated with an increased risk of MAEs. A history of Rutherford stage IIB and external iliac artery occlusion are independent predictors of MALEs.

Predicting Contrast-induced Renal Complications

Chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease and overlaps with other risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes. Percutaneous coronary intervention is a cornerstone of therapy for coronary artery disease and requires contrast media, which can lead to renal injury. Identifying patients at risk for contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) is critical for preventing kidney damage, which is associated with both short- and long-term mortality. Determination of the potential risk for CA-AKI and a new need for dialysis using validated risk prediction tools identifies patients at high risk for this complication. Identification of patients at risk for renal injury after contrast exposure is the first critical step in prevention. Contrast media volume, age and sex of the patient, a history of chronic kidney disease and/or diabetes, clinical presentation, and hemodynamic and volume status are factors known to predict incident contrast-induced nephropathy. Recognition of at-risk patient subpopulations allows for targeted, efficient, and cost-effective strategies to reduce the risk of renal complications resulting from contrast media exposure.

Predicting difficult transradial approach guiding into left internal carotid artery on unruptured intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The transradial approach (TRA) is less invasive than the transfemoral approach (TFA), but the higher conversion rate represents a drawback. Among target vessels, the left internal carotid artery (ICA) is particularly difficult to deliver the guiding catheter to through TRA. The purpose of this study was thus to explore anatomical and clinical features objectively predictive of the difficulty of delivering a guiding catheter into the left ICA via TRA.

METHODS

Among 78 consecutive patients who underwent coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysms through TRA in a single institution between March 1, 2021, and August 31, 2022, all 29 patients (37%) who underwent delivery of the guiding catheter into the left ICA were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and anatomical features were analyzed to assess correlations with difficulty in guiding the catheter into the left ICA.

RESULTS

Of the 29 aneurysms requiring guidance of a catheter into the left ICA, 9 aneurysms (31%) required conversion from TRA to TFA. More acute innominate-left common carotid artery (CCA) angle (P < 0.001) and older age (P = 0.015) were associated with a higher conversion rate to TFA. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that optimal cutoff values for the innominate-left CCA angle and age to distinguish between nonconversion and conversion to TFA were 16° (area under the curve [AUC], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.00) and 74 years (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A more acute innominate-left CCA angle and older age appear associated with difficulty delivering the guiding catheter into the left ICA for neurointervention through TRA.

Short-term risk of periprocedural stroke relative to radial vs. femoral access: systematic review, meta-analysis, study sequential analysis and meta-regression of 2,188,047 real-world cardiac catheterizations

OBJECTIVES

To verify whether transradial (TRA) compared to transfemoral (TFA) cardiac catheterization reduces the risk of periprocedural stroke (PS).

METHODS

We reviewed (CRD42021277918) published real-world cohorts reporting the incidence of PS within 3 days following diagnostic or interventional catheterization. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions of odds ratios (OR) performed using the DerSimonian and Laird method were checked for publication bias (Egger test) and adjusted for false-positive results (study sequential analysis SSA).

RESULTS

The pooled incidence of PS from 2,188,047 catheterizations (14 cohorts), was 193 (105 to 355) per 100,000. Meta-analyses of adjusted estimates (OR = 0.66 (0.49 to 0.89); p = 0.007; I² = 90%), unadjusted estimates (OR = 0.63 (0.51 to 0.77; I² = 74%; p = 0.000)), and a sub-group of prospective cohorts (OR = 0.67 (0.48 to 0.94; p = 0.022; I² = 16%)) had a lower risk of PS in TRA (without indication of publication bias). SSA confirmed the pooled sample size was sufficient to support these conclusions. Meta-regression decreased the unexplained heterogeneity but did not identify any independent predictor of PS nor any effect modifier.

CONCLUSION

Periprocedural stroke remains a rare and hard-to-predict adverse event associated with cardiac catheterization. TRA is associated with a 20% to 30% lower risk of PS in real-world/common practice settings. Future studies are unlikely to change our conclusion.

Radial versus femoral secondary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the risk of procedural complications after TAVR using secondary radial access (RA) versus femoral access (FA) through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) entails both large-bore arterial access for device delivery and secondary arterial access for hemodynamic and imaging assessments. It is unknown whether RA versus FA for this secondary access reduces the risk of procedural complications.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for observational studies comparing TAVR procedural complications in RA versus FA. Event rates were compared via weighted summary odds ratios using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Six manuscripts encompassing 6132 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that RA reduced the risk of major vascular complications (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.77, p < 0.001, I² 0%) and major/life-threatening bleeding (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.36-0.59, p < 0.001, I² 0%) as compared to FA for secondary TAVR access. We also observed a reduction 30-day mortality (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.79, p = 0.001, I² 0%), acute kidney injury (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34-0.60, p < 0.001, I² 0%), and stroke and transient ischemic attack (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.67, p < 0.001, I² 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

RA reduced the risk of major vascular and bleeding complications when compared to FA for secondary access in TAVR. RA is associated with reduced risk of other adverse outcomes including mortality, but these associations may be related to selection bias and confounding given the observational study designs.

Access Route for Endovascular Neurointervention - Transfemoral to Transradial: Is it Worth the Effort and are we Ready for the Change?

Transfemoral access for neurointerventions has been a time-tested technique of entering the vascular network of the body and reaching the intended targets. However, it has its own share of shortcomings in the form of long admission times leading to increased costs, patient inconvenience and local (though infrequent) adverse affects. Transradial route has taken the interventional cardiology domain by storm and is staring now at other vascular domains especially neurointervention. It has shown better outcomes than the transfemoral route in many aspects. The current article discusses the vascular access perspectives with an exhaustive overview of the transradial route concerning its historical perspectives, its requirement in the current clinical scenario, the procedure per se including the adverse effects and whether it has the real world charm to displace the transfemoral route into the backseat. Transradial access in neurointervention is here to stay, however it would require training, certain modifications in the standard catheters that one currently uses for cerebral procedures and constant practice by the operator to cross the learning curve and attain a certain level of competence before he becomes comfortable with the technique.

Total Radial Artery Occlusion Following Transradial Access: Complete Recanalization via the Anatomical Snuffbox

Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is a common complication of procedures requiring transradial access. While radial artery occlusion is most often asymptomatic, there is an elevated prevalence of ischemia in patients with inadequate palmar arch blood supply. Furthermore, treatment options for RAO remain severely limited. We describe a novel technique using distal transradial access in the anatomic snuffbox to recanalize a totally occluded thrombosed radial artery.

The Rise of Transradial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in Australia

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via transradial artery access (TRA) or transfemoral artery access (TFA).

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, evidence for the benefit of TRA for PCI has grown, leading to a steady uptake of TRA around the world. Despite this, the topic remains controversial with contrary evidence to suggest no significant benefit over TFA.

METHODS

A retrospective study of consecutive ACS patients from 2011 to 2017 who underwent PCI via TRA or TFA. The primary outcome was Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularisation (TLR), or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding events scored 2 or higher, haematoma formation, and stent thrombosis, in addition to all individual components of MACE.

RESULTS

We treated 3624 patients (77% male), with PCI via TFA (n = 2391) or TRA (n = 1233). Transradial artery access was associated with a reduction in mortality (3% vs 6.3%; p < 0.0001), MI (1.8% vs 3.9%; p=0.0004), CABG (0.6% vs 1.5%; p=0.0205), TLR (1% vs 2.9%; p < 0.0001), large haematoma (0.4% vs 1.8%; p=0.0003), BARC 2 (0.2% vs 1.1%; p=0.0029), and BARC 3 events (0.4% vs 1.0%; p=0.0426). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, TFA, age ≥ 75, prior PCI, use of bare metal stents, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and multivessel coronary artery disease were associated with an increased risk of MACE.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limitations secondary to the observational nature of our study and multiple confounders, our results are in line with results of major trials and, as such, we feel that our results support the use of TRA as the preferred access site in patients undergoing PCI for ACS to improve patient outcomes.

Comparison between two protocols for deflation of the TR band following coronary procedures via the radial route

Aim

Coronary interventions are increasingly being performed via the radial rather than femoral route because of the lower complication rate. Compression devices such as the TR band are used to achieve hemostasis after the procedure. At present, there are no clear protocols for the deflation of the band. In this study we compared two protocols (early deflation with increased intervals vs. late deflation with smaller intervals) in terms of total time to band removal and complications, and patient and staff satisfaction.

Methods

All patients who underwent a transradial coronary procedure and had a TR band fitted were enrolled into the study. The TR band was applied using the patent hemostasis method (2 ml air pushed in after the radial pulse appears on pulse oximetry after full occlusion with 16 ml air). Patients were randomly assigned to either protocol. Protocol 1 involved removal of 2 ml of air starting 1 hour after the sheath removal and then removal of 2 ml every 30 minutes until the band came off. Protocol 2 involved removal of 4 ml of air 2 hours after the sheath removal and then further 4 ml of air every 15 minutes until the band came off. Patient and staff satisfaction was measured with a visual analogue scale.

Results

A total of 174 patients were recruited (mean age, 60 ± 11 years; 127 male, 47 female). The baseline characteristics including total heparin dose and type of procedure, in the two arms were the same. Protocol 2 (n = 84) was associated with a significantly lower time to TR band removal as compared to protocol 1 (n = 90; 201 ± 43 min vs. 274 ± 54 min; p < 0.001). There was no difference in complications such as bleeding or hematoma formation between the two groups. Patient satisfaction was the same between the two groups. However, the staff preferred protocol 1 (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

A protocol of delayed initiation of TR band deflation followed by quick deflations is associated with a lower time to band removal with no increase in bleeding complications or patient satisfaction. However, the staff preferred longer intervals between deflations.

Transradial approach and its variations for neurointerventional procedures: Literature review

Background:

The transfemoral approach (TFA) has been the standard in neuroradiology over the years. However, the transradial approach (TRA) and its variants offer several benefits over the TFA.

Methods:

Review of the literature about TRA and its variations. We present our results for different neurointerventional procedures at our institution between January 2018 and December 2019.

Results:

We wrote an educational review describing anatomical and technical aspects, advantages, and complications of this approach. In the past year we increased the percentage of neurointerventional procedures performed through radial or ulnar arteries.

Conclusion:

There are clearly proven benefits of employing a wrist approach in patients for neurointerventional procedures and its utilization should especially be considered on a daily basis.

Transition to Transradial Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy—Lessons Learned and Comparison to Transfemoral Access in a Single-Center Case Series

BACKGROUND

Trends in mechanical thrombectomy have emphasized larger bore aspiration catheters that may be difficult to deploy from a radial access point due to size constraints or need to obtain sheathless access. As such, many neurointerventionists are reticent to attempt thrombectomy through transradial access (TRA) for fear of worse outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether mechanical thrombectomy could be achieved safely and effectively through the transradial route.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy at our academic institute between January 2018 and January 2019, which corresponded to a time when we began to transition to TRA for neurointerventions, including mechanical thrombectomy. We compared the procedural details and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy using TRA with those using transfemoral access (TFA).

RESULTS

During the study period, 44 patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy with TRA and 129 with TFA. There was no statistically significant difference in door-to-access time, door-to-reperfusion time, or first-pass recanalization rate. There was no significant difference in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge, mRS score at last follow-up, or length of stay. There were 7 access-site complications in the TFA group and none in the TRA group. One patient in the TRA group required crossover to TFA.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical thrombectomy can be performed safely and effectively from a TRA site without compromising recanalization times or rates. TRA has superior access-site complication profiles compared to TFA.

The initial experience of 2495 cases of the ulnar artery as default access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures at a single center: An observational study

Introduction

Upper limb arterial access is being increasingly used for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures. Radial artery access is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to femoral artery access. However, access to the radial artery is not always successful with reported crossover rates to other routes between 3% and 8%. Ulnar artery access is emerging an attractive option both as upfront access and rescue access in case of failure to obtain radial artery access.

Aims -

To assess and document the feasibility and safety of ulnar access as a default strategy.

Methods

2654 patients planned for coronary diagnostic and intervention procedureswere assessed for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were, all patients planned for coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with palpable ulnar pulse. Exclusion criteria included reverse Barbeau test type D, previous procedure resulting in radial artery occlusion/excision, hemodialysis patients having ipsilateral AV fistula and severe forearm deformities.

Results

2525 patients were found eligible, out of which 2495 (98.81%) were successfully cannulated. Procedure was completed in 2414 patients. Local site bleeding in 40 (1.6%) and acute loss of ulnar pulse noted in 33 (1.3%) out of 2495 patients. None of the patients had gangrene of access site, pseudo-aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula or neurological deficit post procedure.

Conclusion

The Ulnar artery access as a default access is safe and feasible option for patient undergoing coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures.

Acute Hand Ischemia and Digital Amputation After Transradial Coronary Intervention in a Patient With CREST Syndrome

The radial artery approach for coronary angiography and intervention is rapidly replacing the femoral artery approach, largely because it reduces bleeding and vascular access site complications. However, complications associated with transradial access warrant attention, notably radial artery occlusion. This report focuses on a case of radial artery occlusion after percutaneous coronary intervention in a 46-year-old woman with CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal dysfunction, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasia) syndrome, which ultimately led to acute hand ischemia necessitating amputation of her middle and index fingers.

Intra-Arterial Labetalol and Nitroglycerin in Preventing Radial Artery Spasm Following Transradial Angiography: A New Approach

Background: Radial artery spasm (RAS) resulted from decreasing blood flow and activation of vasomotor system leads to a decrease in artery diameter, perfusion and patency, and increase the risk of procedure failure. In this study, we investigated the effects of intra-arterial administration of nitroglycerin and labetalol on radial artery diameter, RAS, and pain intensity in patients undergoing diagnostic radial angiography. Methods: Sixty-four patients randomly enrolled into one of the nitroglycerin (150 μg) or labetalol (500 μg) groups. The radial artery size, and the incidence of RAS were measured before, immediately after puncture, and at the end of treatment. Pain intensity was evaluated using a visual-analog-scale (VAS) at the end of the procedure. Hemodynamic status before, and during the procedure was also recorded. Results: Labetalol causes a significantly larger increase in radial diameter than nitroglycerin immediately after intra-arterial injection (2.24±0.58 mm vs. 1.65±0.39 mm, P-value<0.001). The rate of RAS immediately after vasodilator administration in the labetalol group was 3.1% vs. 12.5% in the nitroglycerin group (P-value=0.355), but the overall incidence (immediately after administration+ at the end of procedure) did not show a statistically significant difference (53.125% vs 31.25% respectively, P-value=0.076). The VAS score did not show a significant difference between two groups (1.15±0.44 in nitroglycerin vs. 1.50±0.91, P-value=0.063). Conclusion: Labetalol increases radial artery diameter more than nitroglycerin. However, the efficacy of labetalol in terms of RAS incidence, and patients’ pain was similar to nitroglycerin. Therefore, intra-arterial labetalol could be considered as one of the therapeutic options in clinical practice in order to reduce RAS and procedure failure.

Predicting Contrast-Induced Renal Complications

Chronic kidney disease is a major risk factor for developing coronary artery disease, serving as an independent risk factor while overlapping with other risk factors. Percutaneous coronary intervention is a cornerstone of therapy for coronary artery disease and requires contrast media, which can contribute to renal injury. Identifying patients at risk for contrast-induced nephropathy is critical for preventing renal injury, which is associated with short- and long-term mortality. Determination of the potential risk for contrast-induced nephropathy and a new need for dialysis using validated risk prediction tools is a method of identifying patients at high risk for this complication.

Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Before, During, and After Transition to a Default Transradial Approach at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Transradial coronary intervention (TRI) lowers bleeding and mortality compared with transfemoral coronary intervention (TFI). There are limited data on outcomes as TFI operators transition to a default TRI practice. The aim of this study was to assess TFI and TRI outcomes before, during, and after the year TRI was first learned by femoral operators. Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center from 2006 to 2012 were included. In 2009, TRI was learned by all operators and then used as the default PCI approach from 2010 to 2012. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were collected. Predictors of major bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and mortality were determined by multivariable analysis; 1192 veterans were included. TRI rates were 9% (2006-2008), 65% (2009), and 90% (2010-2012). Incidence of 1-year MACE and mortality was 5.4% and 3.9%, respectively, in 2009, and 5.6% and 3%, respectively, during 2010 to 2012. Major bleeding remained at <1%. Age, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction were independently associated with major bleeding, whereas TRI was protective. Transition to default TRI is feasible over a short time period and associated with low rates of MACE and mortality and very low rate of major bleeding.

A novel predictor of radial spasm: arterial stiffness

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between radial artery spasm (RAS) and arterial stiffness (AS) measured by the oscillometric method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 123 consecutive patients scheduled for elective coronary angiography in a single default radial center were enrolled for the study. AS [namely, augmentation pressure; augmentation index (AIx); and pulse wave velocity] was assessed using a validated oscillometric device (Mobil-O-Graph NG 24 h PWA). Central arterial pressures were also recorded. In the cath lab, the number of puncture attempts, total procedural time (TPT), and largest catheter size were noted. If greater than two catheters were required to complete imaging, it was additionally specified. RAS was considered to exist if two or more of predefined clinical features were present.

RESULTS

RAS was observed in 20 (16.3%) patients. Patients were divided into two distinct groups in terms of the occurence of RAS. In the RAS(+) group, the proportion of hypertensive individuals was significantly higher, whereas there were fewer smokers. With respect to operational data, TPT (24.3±9.8 vs. 29.3±9.1 mins; P=0.038) and procedures carried out with more than one puncture attempts were significantly higher in the RAS(+) group. Among all oscillometric parameters, augmentation pressure, AIx, and PR were found to be higher in the RAS(+) group. According to multivariate analysis, TPT (P=0.029) and AIx (odds ratio: 1.044, 95% confidence interval=0.977-1.117; P=0.009) were found to be independent predictors of RAS.

CONCLUSION

Along with conventional risk factors, AS assessment, as a practical, noninvasive method, may help to predict RAS in angiographic procedures.

Contemporary trends in stroke complicating cardiac catheterisation

BACKGROUND

Stroke remains an important complication of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with high rates of in-hospital mortality.

AIMS

To evaluate the incidence of stroke over a 10-year period and assess the long-term influence of stroke following cardiac catheterisation and PCI on functional outcomes, based on modified Rankin score and mortality.

METHODS

The study was performed using a case-control design in a single tertiary referral centre. Patients were identified by correlating those patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation between October 2006 and December 2016 with patients who underwent neuroimaging within 7 days to identify possible cases of suspected stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

RESULTS

A total of 21 510 patients underwent cardiac catheterisation during the study period. Sixty (0.28%) patients experienced stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Compared to control patients, those who did experience cerebral ischaemic events were older (70.5 vs 64 years; P < 0.001), with higher rates of atrial fibrillation, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Stroke complicating cardiac catheterisation was associated with an increased risk of readmission, with a significantly higher hazard of readmission for stroke noted. Despite minimal functional impairment based on modified Rankin score, stroke was associated with a significant risk of early and cumulative mortality. Stroke incidence remained stable over the study period despite changes in procedural practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence and functional severity of stroke remains low despite evolving procedural practice with a stable incidence over time despite changes in procedural practice; however, post-procedural stroke confirms an increased mortality hazard.

Transradial Approach for Complex Anterior and Posterior Circulation Interventions: Technical Nuances and Feasibility of Using Current Devices

BACKGROUND

Despite several studies analyzing the safety of transradial access (TRA) for neurointervention compared to transfemoral approach (TFA), neurointerventionalists are apprehensive about implementing TRA. From our positive institutional experience, we now utilize TRA first line for a majority of our cases. Here, we present our single-institution experience.

OBJECTIVE

To determine safety and feasibility of TRA for neurointervention.

METHODS

Through retrospective review of patients receiving TRA for anterior and posterior circulation cerebrovascular interventions at our institution between December 2015 and January 2018, we present our experience regarding this transition, while focusing on technique, complications, feasibility, indications, and limitations.

RESULTS

One hundred five procedures were performed on 92 patients (anterior circulation: 77%; posterior circulation: 23%). Radial artery access was achieved in all patients. Twenty-nine cases constituted mechanical thrombectomy, 33 cases represented intracranial aneurysms treatments, and 33 cases included interventions like angioplasty, balloon test occlusion, chemotherapy delivery, and thrombolysis. TRA was used as second-line access to TFA in 5 instances due to aortic arch anomalies and atherosclerotic disease. Minor access-site complications were seen in 2.85% of patients. Ten procedures (9.0%) could not be completed with TRA, with crossover to TFA occurring in 7 cases.

CONCLUSION

TRA is safe and feasible for the majority of neurointerventional procedures and provides decreased risk of major access-site complications compared to TFA. Perceived limitations of TRA can likely be eliminated via operator experience and engineering ingenuity; thus, there is a role for TRA for neurointervention, especially in patients with increased risk of access-site complications from TFA.

Radial and femoral access for interventional fellows performing diagnostic coronary angiographies: the LEARN-Cardiogroup II, a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Safety and efficacy of radial and femoral access for coronary angiography performed by cardiology fellows remain to be evaluated.

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective study, cardiology fellows selected the access site (among femoral, right and left radial artery) for coronary angiography. All bleeding events related to the access site and all complications (a composite of all bleedings and artery occlusion) were the co-primary safety end points. Success for each access site, procedural and radiological times and single components of primary outcome were the secondary ones.

RESULTS

Overall, 201 patients were enrolled. Fellows chose right radial, left radial or femoral access in 164 (82%), 20 (10%) and 17 (8%) cases, respectively. All-cause bleedings were lower in radial cohort (4 vs. 19%; P = 0.001) mainly driven by minor bleedings (4 vs. 18%, P = 0.012). Also, overall complications were less frequent with the radial approach (18 vs. 30%, P = 0.03) and radial artery occlusion did not differ between right vs. left side (4 vs. 5%, P = 0.76). Procedural time (minutes) was similar between radial and femoral site (23 ± 9 vs. 22 ± 10, P = 0.91), as well as time of X-ray exposure (6 ± 3 vs. 4 ± 2, P = 0.11), DAP (Gy/cm: 17 ± 11 vs. 18 ± 12, P = 0.74) and amount of contrast medium (ml: 106 ± 81 vs. 84 ± 43, P = 0.89). Success for access was significantly higher with radial artery (89 vs. 71%, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Radial artery is the most exploited access by cardiologist fellows, leading to reduction in minor bleedings and higher success compared with femoral access. No differences in procedural time and radiation exposures were recorded.

Sirens song or a bugle call to charge

Radial access for catheterization is associated with reduced bleeding and mortality across a spectrum of clinical conditions compared to femoral. Transradial technique is associated with a higher rate of access site failure but this is in those most likely to have a femoral-based complication. Improved outcomes will come with further radial technique refinement and not with a retreat to legacy femoral approaches.