Five-year follow-up of the endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent versus the paxlitaxel-eluting stent in de novo coronary lesions with a high risk of coronary restenosis

The 2010s in clinical drug-eluting stent and bioresorbable scaffold research: a Dutch perspective

Dutch researchers were among the first to perform clinical studies in bare metal coronary stents, the use of which was initially limited by a high incidence of in-stent restenosis. This problem was greatly solved by the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES). Nevertheless, enthusiasm about first-generation DES was subdued by discussions about a higher risk of very-late stent thrombosis and mortality, which stimulated the development, refinement, and rapid adoption of new DES with more biocompatible durable polymer coatings, biodegradable polymer coatings, or no coating at all. In terms of clinical DES research, the 2010s were characterised by numerous large-scale randomised trials in all-comers and patients with minimal exclusion criteria. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were developed and investigated. The Igaki-Tamai scaffold without drug elution was clinically tested in the Netherlands in 1999, followed by an everolimus-eluting BRS (Absorb) which showed favourable imaging and clinical results. Afterwards, multiple clinical trials comparing Absorb and its metallic counterpart were performed, revealing an increased rate of scaffold thrombosis during follow-up. Based on these studies, the commercialisation of the device was subsequently halted. Novel technologies are being developed to overcome shortcomings of first-generation BRS. In this narrative review, we look back on numerous devices and on the DES and BRS trials reported by Dutch researchers.

The State of Art of Regenerative Therapy in Cardiovascular Ischemic Disease: Biology, Signaling Pathways, and Epigenetics of Endothelial Progenitor Cells

Ischemic heart disease is currently a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Nevertheless, the actual therapeutic scenario does not target myocardial cell regeneration and consequently, the progression toward the late stage of chronic heart failure is common. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are bone marrow-derived stem cells that contribute to the homeostasis of the endothelial wall in acute and chronic ischemic disease. Calcium modulation and other molecular pathways (NOTCH, VEGFR, and CXCR4) contribute to EPC proliferation and differentiation. The present review provides a summary of EPC biology with a particular focus on the regulatory pathways of EPCs and describes promising applications for cardiovascular cell therapy.

Endothelial progenitor cells in cardiovascular diseases

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death in both developed and developing countries. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are derived from hematopoietic stem cells with powerful function of angiogenesis. There are many studies on the relation between coronary heart disease and circulating EPCs. In this review, we discuss biological characteristics of endothelial progenitor cells, some influencing factors of the number and function of EPCs, and the role of EPCs in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. At last, we bring some perspectives on the future of endothelial progenitor cell therapy.

9-year clinical follow-up of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with Genous or TAXUS Liberté stents

Objectives

This matched-cohort retrospective study investigated the long-term (9-year) safety and efficacy outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with Genous (n = 102) versus TAXUS Liberté (n = 101) stents in 2006–2008.

Background

In the era of off-label use of drug-eluting stents for pPCI in patients with STEMI, the use of first-generation Genous stents (endothelial progenitor cell capture stents that have a passive coating and accelerate re-endothelialization) was proposed.

Methods

The primary endpoint was 9-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including all-cause death, re-infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stroke. The secondary endpoints were the separate primary endpoint events at pre-defined time-points (in-hospital, 6 months, and yearly) and stent thrombosis. Time-dependent 9-year composite MACCE, all-cause death, and TVR were compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate Cox regression models.

Results

Propensity score analysis confirmed the comparability of the groups. Patients in the Genous and TAXUS groups had 7 and 1 acute definitive stent thrombosis events, respectively (p<0.001). There was a trend towards higher in-hospital MACCE in the Genous group (10.8%) versus the TAXUS group (4.0%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 9-year MACCE was significantly worse in the Genous than in the TAXUS group. The in-hospital, 6-month, 1-year, and 9-year mortality rates were 7.8%, 8.8%, 9.8%, and 23.5% in the Genous group and 2.0%, 3.0%, 4.0%, and 16.8% in the TAXUS group.

Conclusions

Higher peri-procedural, in-hospital, and short-term mortality led to worse outcomes for first-generation Genous stents versus TAXUS Liberté stents for pPCI in STEMI. TAXUS Liberté stents had more favorable 9-year clinical outcomes.