“Blind” pericardiocentesis: A comparison of different puncture directions

Cardiac Tamponade: A Case for Point-of-Care Ultrasound

•

POCUS is increasingly being used in the evaluation of critically ill patients.

•

POCUS can shorten pulse check duration and prognosticate outcomes in cardiac arrest.

•

POCUS can identify the etiology of cardiac arrest after the first image.

•

POCUS can be used without delay or interrupting treatment.

A novel in-plane technique ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis via subcostal approach

Background

Cardiac tamponade occurs when fluid or blood, fills the pericardial space, and causes hemodynamic compromise due to compression of the heart. It is a potentially life-threatening condition, that requires rapid recognition and immediate treatment. Formerly, blind or surgical techniques were used, and it is associated with complications. Medical technology development has enabled us to perform the procedure safely, with the assistance of ultrasound devices. This article will highlight the novel use of an in-plane subcostal technique, as a safe option for pericardiocentesis in cardiac tamponade.

Case presentation

A 50-year-old man presented to the emergency department (ED) with shortness of breath and shock. He was intubated for respiratory distress. His bedside echocardiography showed cardiac tamponade. Ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis was carried out using an in-plane technique, at the subcostal region, with a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer. This particular method provided full visualization of needle trajectory throughout the procedure. It was successfully completed with no complications and patient’s hemodynamic status improved post-procedure. He was successfully discharged on day 13.

Conclusions

The in-plane subcostal pericardiocentesis is a safe, and simple approach that can be performed in the ED for patients with cardiac tamponade. We recommend this new in-plane method, with high-frequency linear transducer at the subcostal area as an alternative when cardiac window for other approaches cannot be visualized.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13089-022-00271-9.

Pericardial decompression syndrome: A complication of pericardiocentesis

Pericardial Decompression Syndrome (PDS) is an uncommon but life-threatening complication following pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade. We report PDS after pericardiocentesis in two patients that presented to the emergency department with cardiac tamponade. In both cases, pericardiocentesis was performed under ultrasound guidance using the left parasternal approach and approximately 1200-1500 mL of pericardial fluid was removed. Immediately after pericardiocentesis, the haemodynamic status of the patients improved. However, 2-3 h post decompression, both patients developed hypotension and pulmonary edema with reduced left ventricular function, suggestive of PDS. PDS is a condition that is described as paradoxical worsening of vital signs after successful decompression of the pericardium in the setting of acute tamponade. Three possible mechanisms explaining PDS are ischaemic, hemodynamic and autonomic processes. If PDS is unrecognized and untreated, it is associated with a high mortality rate secondary to pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock. If managed urgently, the cardiopulmonary dysfunction in PDS is usually transient and largely reversible with supportive care.

What is the ideal approach for emergent pericardiocentesis using point-of-care ultrasound guidance?

BACKGROUND

Traditionally performed using a subxiphoid approach, the increasing use of point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department has made other approaches (parasternal and apical) for pericardiocentesis viable. The aim of this study is to identify the ideal approach for emergency-physician-performed ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis as determined by ultrasound image quality, distance from surface to pericardial fluid, and likely obstructions or complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of point-of-care cardiac ultrasound examinations was performed in two urban academic emergency departments for the presence of pericardial effusions. The images were reviewed for technical quality, distance of effusion from skin surface, and predicted complications.

RESULTS

A total of 166 pericardial effusions were identified during the study period. The mean skin-to-pericardial fluid distance was 5.6 cm (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 5.2-6.0 cm) for the subxiphoid views, which was significantly greater than that for the parasternal (2.7 cm [95% CI 2.5-2.8 cm], P<0.001) and apical (2.5 cm [95% CI 2.3-2.7 cm], P<0.001) views. The subxiphoid view had the highest predicted complication rate at 79.7% (95% CI 71.5%-86.4%), which was significantly greater than the apical (31.9%; 95% CI 21.4%-44.0%, P<0.001) and parasternal (20.2%; 95% CI 12.8%-29.5%, P<0.001) views.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that complication rates with pericardiocentesis will be lower via the parasternal or apical approach compared to the subxiphoid approach. The distance from skin to fluid collection is the least in both of these views.

[Pericardiocentesis - step by step]

A pericardial effusion can be caused by malignant, infectious and autoimmune diseases or by trauma, such as a coronary artery rupture during a cath procedure. In the case of a cardiac tamponade a pericardiocentesis has to be performed immediately.Additionally, a pericardiocentesis may also be performed for diagnostic purposes. However, since histologic and microbiologic findings are rarely pointing to hitherto unsuspected results, the risk of the procedure must very carefully be weighed against its benefits. The risks of a pericardiocentesis include injuries to the lungs and liver as well as the heart itself, such as puncture of the right ventricle or the rupture of a coronary artery.This article is a step-by-step description of how to safely perform an ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis.

[Diagnostics and Invasive Techniques in the Treatment of Chest Trauma]

Chest Trauma is a complex injury pattern whose diagnostics and therapy demand everything from an emergency response team. Chest trauma subsumes thoracic injuries in all facets from the bounce mark of a seat belt to fatal rollover trauma with contusion or disruption of organs located in the thorax. Possible causes comprise blunt or penetrating trauma, as well as decelerations, chemical and thermal damage. Sonographic assessment according to a protocol plays a major role in diagnosis of underlying conditions and treatment indications. Therapeutic management may include invasive emergency techniques: Decompression of a tension pneumothorax is a fundamental life-saving intervention. Pericardiocentesis seldomly is necessary or possible in order to drain a cardiac tamponade. In case of traumatic cardiac arrest and under defined circumstances, resuscitative thoracotomy may be indicated. The out-of-hospital management may require transfusion of blood components. As with all procedures, which are performed seldomly but under emergency conditions, invasive techniques require clear communication, precise structured working procedures and especially continuous training, team briefing, and debriefing.

Left Internal Mammary Artery Transection: A Rare Complication of Pericardiocentesis

Pericardiocentesis is a procedure performed to aspirate fluid from the pericardial space. It is most often performed as an acute therapeutic procedure in cases of massive pericardial effusion or pericardial tamponade. Our case describes an unusual complication of pericardiocentesis leading to hemorrhagic pericardial effusion and hemodynamic compromise.