Influence of novel X‐ray imaging technology on radiation exposure during chronic total occlusion procedures

On-line estimated peak skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion using new patient dose mapping technology

BACKGROUND

X-ray exposure during complex percutaneous coronary intervention is a very important issue.

AIM

To reduce patient peak skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention procedures for chronic total occlusion using on-line estimated peak skin dose software (Dose Map).

METHODS

Throughout the procedure, Dose Map provided a map of local cumulative peak skin dose. This map was displayed in-room from 1Gy cumulative air kerma, and was updated every 0.5Gy. The operator's actions to minimize deterministic risks following map notification were collected. Skin reaction was evaluated 3 months after the procedure. A comparison with our historical X-ray exposure data (207 patients from January 2013 to July 2014) was performed.

RESULTS

From November 2015 to October 2016, 97 patients (Japanese chronic total occlusion score 2.1±1.1; 100 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures for chronic total occlusion) were prospectively enrolled. Fluoroscopy time was 40.8 (21.6-60.3) minutes, cumulative air kerma 1884 (1144-3231) mGy, estimated peak skin dose 962 (604-1474) mGy and kerma area product 115.8 (71.5-206.7) Gy.cm². Cumulative air kerma was>3Gy in 28% of cases, and>5Gy in 11% of cases. In 68% of cases, at least one action was taken by the operator after map notification to optimize skin dose distribution. Main changes included: gantry angulation (52%); field of view (25%); and collimation (13%). No skin injuries were observed at follow-up. In comparison with our chronic total occlusion historical radiation data, median cumulative air kerma and kerma area product were reduced by 31% and 33%, respectively (P<0.005.

CONCLUSION

Online skin dose mapping software allows the distribution of patient skin dose during complex percutaneous coronary intervention procedures, and may minimize X-ray exposure.

Impact of dose reducing software on patient and staff temple dose during fluoroscopically guided pacemaker insertion, closure devices implantation and coronary angiography procedures

The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of dose reducing software (ClarityIQ) on patient and staff dose during fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures. Dose measurements were collected in a room without dose reducing software (n = 157) and compared with similar procedures performed in two rooms with the software (n = 1141). Procedures included diagnostic coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, deployment of cardiac closure devices (for occlusion of atrial septal defect, patent foramen ovale, and atrial appendage) and insertion of permanent pacemakers. The dose reducing software was found to be effective in reducing patient and staff dose by approximately 50%. This study has added to the limited literature reporting on the capability of dose reducing software to decrease radiation exposure during the implantation of cardiac closure devices, as well as demonstrating a reduction in dose to the cardiologist and nursing staff. Administrators should ensure timely upgrades to angiographic equipment to safeguard patients and staff against the potentially adverse effects of radiation exposure. Regardless of the use of dose reducing software, the mean occupational dose during closure devices was in descending order scout > scrub > cardiologist. Scrub nurse dose was found to be higher than the cardiologist during closure devices (0.98/0.26 μSv) and diagnostic coronary angiograms (1.51/0.82 μSv). Nursing staff should be aware that their levels of radiation dose during some cardiac procedures may come close to or even exceed that of the cardiologist.

Radiation exposure during angiographic interventions in interventional radiology - risk and fate of advanced procedures

PURPOSE

Advanced angiographic procedures in interventional radiology are becoming more important and are more frequently used, especially in the treatment of several acute life-threatening diseases like stroke or aortic injury. In recent years, technical advancement has led to a broader spectrum of interventions and complex procedures with longer fluoroscopy times. This involves the risk of higher dose exposures, which, in rare cases, may cause deterministic radiation effects, e.g. erythema in patients undergoing angiographic procedures. Against this background, these procedures recently also became subject to national and international regulations regarding radiation protection. At the same time, individual risk assessment of possible stochastic radiation effects for each patient must be weighed up against the anticipated benefits of the therapy itself. Harmful effects of the administered dose are not limited to the patient but can also affect the radiologist and the medical staff. In particular, the development of cataracts in interventionalists is a rising matter of concern. Furthermore, long-term effects of repeated and prolonged x-ray exposure have long been neglected by radiologists but have come into focus in the past years.

CONCLUSIONS

With all this in mind, this review discusses different efforts to reduce radiation exposition levels for patients and medical staff by means of technical, personal as well as organizational measures.

Reducing fluoroscopic and cineangiographic contribution to radiation exposure for chronic total coronary occlusion interventions

BACKGROUND

The treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) carries the highest radiation exposure among percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In order to minimize radiation damage, we need to understand and optimize the contribution of all components of radiation exposure.

METHODS

A total of 1000 CTO procedures performed between 2011 and 2020 were compared according to implemented radiation modifications. Group 1 used the original set-up of the X-ray equipment (Artis Zee, Siemens). In group 2 a modified protocol aimed at reducing the fluoroscopy exposure, in group 3 further modifications aimed at reducing cineangiographic exposure.

RESULTS

Despite an increased lesion complexity, Air Kerma (AK) was reduced from 2619 mGy (1653-4574) in group 1 to 2178 mGy (1332-3500; p < 0.001) in group 2 by mainly reducing fluoroscopic contribution by 54.1%, the cineangiographic contribution was lowered by only 6.6%. In group 3 AK dropped drastically to 746 mGy (480-1225; p < 0.001) mainly by reducing the cineangiographic contribution by 53.4%, still there was a further reduction of fluoroscopy contribution of 8.2%. This also led to a reduction of the skin entry dose from 1038 mGy (690-1589) in group 2 to 359 mGy (204-591; p < 0.001) in group 3. This was achieved both in normal weight and obese patients, and both in antegrade and retrograde procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that by modifying both the fluoroscopic and cineangiographic contribution to radiation exposure a drastic reduction of radiation risk can be achieved, even in obese patients. Currently accepted radiation thresholds may no longer be a limit for CTO PCI.