Angiographic and clinical outcomes of antegrade versus retrograde techniques for chronic total occlusion revascularizations: Insights from the PRISON IV trial

Short- and long-term outcomes of antegrade versus retrograde approaches in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) involves severe coronary artery blockage that impairs blood flow and affects 15-20 % of patients undergoing coronary angiography and over 40 % with diabetes or heart failure. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is used to restore blood flow in such cases. The retrograde approach, developed due to lower success with the antegrade method in complex cases, improves outcomes but increases complications. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of both approaches to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus until June 5, 2024, to find studies comparing antegrade and retrograde approaches in CTO-PCI patients. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using R software (version 4.4.1), with significance set at p < 0.05. Random-effects models were used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 22 observational studies with 49,152 CTO-PCI patients: 35,844 in the antegrade arm and 13,308 in the retrograde arm. The antegrade approach showed significantly lower risks of in-hospital outcomes, including mortality [RR: 0.45; p < 0.001], myocardial infarction [RR: 0.37; p < 0.001], major adverse cardiovascular events [RR: 0.34; p < 0.001], and cerebrovascular events [RR: 0.50; p = 0.011]. Long-term outcomes, such as all-cause mortality [RR: 0.71; p = 0.157] and myocardial infarction [RR: 0.76; p = 0.438], were comparable between both approaches.

CONCLUSION

The antegrade technique shows better outcomes and procedural advantages over retrograde revascularization, though long-term outcomes are similar. Further studies, especially randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Antegrade approach versus retrograde approach percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Retrograde approach has notably improved success rates of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, longer procedural time, increase use of fluoroscopy and contrast dye have been reported in retrograde techniques in CTO PCI. We aimed to study in-hospital and long-term outcomes of retrograde approach versus antegrade approach in CTO PCI.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, WOS, and Cochrane Central until June 2023 to include all relevant studies that compared retrograde approach versus antegrade approach in patients with CTO PCI. We synthesized the outcome data using a random-effects model, expressing the effect estimates as odds ratios (OR) or mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies comprising 21,276 patients were included in the analysis. Regarding in-hospital outcomes, antegrade approach was associated with lower odds of MACE (OR= 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.23 to 0.51), all-cause mortality (OR= 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.19 to 0.64), MI (OR= 0.36, 95 % CI: 0.25 to 0.53), urgent pericardiocentesis (OR= 0.27, 95 % CI: 0.16 to 0.46), CIN (OR= 0.46, 95 % CI: 0.33 to 0.65), procedural complications (OR= 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.33 to 0.83), target vessel perforation (OR= 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.32 to 0.64). while antegrade was associated with higher success rates (OR= 1.16, 95 % CI: 1.1 to 1.22).

CONCLUSION

Compared to antegrade technique, retrograde was associated with higher risk for in-hospital and long-term adverse events, and preferably should be performed in more complex CTO lesions.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Antegrade and Retrograde Techniques for Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularizations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) present significant challenges in interventional cardiology. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of retrograde versus antegrade techniques in CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched through June 20, 2024. Studies comparing outcomes between antegrade and retrograde methods for CTO-PCI were included. Primary outcomes were procedural and technical success. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction. The final analysis included seventeen studies. The antegrade approach showed a 5% higher likelihood of technical success (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.09) and 14% higher odds of procedural success (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.10-1.19) compared to the retrograde approach. The antegrade group also demonstrated lower risks of MACE, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.26-0.63). This meta-analysis suggests that the antegrade approach in CTO-PCI is associated with higher success rates and lower risks of adverse outcomes compared to the retrograde approach. However, the retrograde technique remains crucial for complex lesions and patients with multiple comorbidities.

Latest developments in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention

INTRODUCTION

Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO PCI) is now performed with high success rates and acceptable complication rates.

AREAS COVERED

We describe recent clinical and technological developments in CTO PCI from 2018 to 2020.

EXPERT OPINION

After publication of six randomized controlled trials, improving patient symptoms remains the principal indication for CTO PCI. Although good outcomes can be achieved with CTO PCI at experienced centers, success rates are significantly lower at less experienced centers, despite increased use in CTO crossing algorithms and development of novel and improved equipment and techniques.

Outcomes with retrograde versus antegrade chronic total occlusion revascularization

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of retrograde versus antegrade approach in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

The retrograde approach has increased the success rate of CTO PCI but has been associated with a higher risk for complications.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of studies published between 2000 and August 2019 comparing the in-hospital and long-term outcomes with retrograde versus antegrade CTO PCI.

RESULTS

Twelve observational studies (10,240 patients) met our inclusion criteria (retrograde approach 2,789 patients, antegrade approach 7,451 patients). Lesions treated with the retrograde approach had higher J-CTO score (2.8 vs. 1.9, p < .001). Retrograde CTO PCI was associated with a lower success rate (80.9% vs. 87.4%, p < .001). Both approaches had similar in-hospital mortality, urgent revascularization, and cerebrovascular events. Retrograde CTO PCI was associated with higher risk of in-hospital myocardial infarction (MI; odds ratio [OR] 2.37, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.7, 3.32, p < .001), urgent pericardiocentesis (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.41-4.51, p = .002), and contrast-induced nephropathy (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.47-3.08; p < .001). During a mean follow-up of 48 ± 31 months retrograde crossing had similar mortality (OR 1.79, 95% CI 0.84-3.81, p = .13), but a higher incidence of MI (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.1-3.88, p = .02), target vessel revascularization (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.49-2.46, p < .001), and target lesion revascularization (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.33-3.28, p = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with antegrade CTO PCI, retrograde CTO PCI is performed in more complex lesions and is associated with a higher risk for acute and long-term adverse events.