The Role of Invasive Hemodynamics in Guiding Contemporary Transcatheter Valvular Interventions

Recent advances in transcatheter interventions have refueled the interest in utilizing invasive hemodynamics in the catheterization laboratory. The authors review contemporary invasive techniques used to confirm valve disease and guide transcatheter valve interventions. They also discuss the available data and the remaining questions on the role of invasive hemodynamics in current practice and in the future.

Adjunctive use of fluoroscopy during MitraClip implantation reduces procedural complexity: The parallax technique

BACKGROUND

During MitraClip implantation sub-valvular correction of trajectory and/or alignment may increase adverse clip or leaflet events. With systematic adjunctive use of fluoroscopy ("Parallax technique"), we aimed to assess parameters that minimize the need for corrective measures and help increase procedural efficiency.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 30 patients without (Fl-) and 39 patients utilizing adjunctive fluoroscopy (Fl+) during MitraClip implantation. After establishing trajectory and supra-valvular alignment, the Parallax technique was utilized. Trajectory and alignment are maintained during advancement.

RESULTS

All patients had 3 or 4+ MR. There were no differences in baseline demographics. The average number of clips (Fl- vs Fl+) was 1.72 ± 0.8 vs 1.59 ± 0.5, p = .57. For the first clip, the need for sub-valvular alignment (80% vs. 36%, p = .0001), eversion with retraction back to left atrium (23% vs. 10%, p = .001) and the number of grasps (2.3 ± 1.2 vs 1.4 ± 0.9) was reduced. The time from transseptal puncture to first clip deployment (71 ± 21 vs 44 ± 16 min, p = .01) was reduced. Procedural success was achieved in all but one patient in the Fl- group (p = ns). There were no differences noted for in-hospital or 30-day outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic use of a simple and easy to implement "Parallax technique" was associated with reduced need for sub-valvular manipulation and was associated with improved procedural times. Further larger scale studies are needed to assess the applicability of the technique.

Hemodynamics rounds: Hemodynamics of mitral valve interventions

Mitral valvulopathy presents as regurgitation, stenosis, or mixed disease and can occur in both native and prosthetic valves. Such disease develops in conjunction with pathophysiologic changes in the left atrium (LA) and drives changes in LA compliance, pressure, and thus clinical syndromes. With advances in the understanding and treatment of structural heart disease and in the setting of higher-risk patient populations, less-invasive transcatheter approaches have become increasingly commonplace in the treatment of mitral valve disease. Over time, transcatheter mitral valve interventions have evolved to include paravalvular leak closure, mitral valve repair, and mitral valve replacement. Parallel to this evolution, advances in invasive intracardiac pressure monitoring, particularly at the level of the LA, have also occurred. These advances emphasize the unique interplay between mitral valve disease and LA function; account for limitations of noninvasive assessment; and guide beneficial outcomes in each area of transcatheter mitral valve intervention. As a result, continuous transseptal LA pressure monitoring has developed into an indispensable instrument in successful percutaneous mitral valve intervention, complementing traditional noninvasive assessment.