Development and validation of a risk scoring system based on baseline angiographic results by visual estimation for risk prEdiction of side‐branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation InterVEntion: The baseline V‐RESOLVE score

A New Scoring System Predicting Side-Branch Occlusion in Patients Undergoing Left Main Bifurcation Intervention: The LM V-RESOLVE Score

BACKGROUND

The risk of side-branch (SB) occlusion is pivotal for decision making of stenting strategies during unprotected left main (LM) bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Accordingly, this study aimed to develop a scoring system for predicting SB occlusion during unprotected LM bifurcation PCI.

METHODS

A total of 855 consecutive patients undergoing unprotected LM bifurcation PCI with provisional strategy at Fuwai Hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were recruited. A prediction model was selected by means of all-subsets logistic regression, and a multivariable risk score (Left Main Visual Estimation for Risk Prediction of Side Branch Occlusion in Coronary Bifurcation Intervention [LM V-RESOLVE]) was then established with incremental weights attributed to each component variable based on its estimate coefficients. SB occlusion was defined as any decrease in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade or absence of flow in SB after main vessel (MV) stenting.

RESULTS

SB occlusion occurred in 19 LM bifurcation lesions (2.22%). In multivariable model, 3 variables, including MV/SB diameter ratio, MV plaque ipsilateral to SB, and baseline diameter stenosis of SB, were independent predictors for SB occlusion (model C-statistic 0.829, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.735-0.923, with good calibration). The risk score had a C-statistics of 0.830 (95% CI 0.738-0.923) with good calibration. Satisfactory discriminative ability of the risk score was also preserved in external validation (C-statistic 0.794, 95% CI 0.691-0.896).

CONCLUSIONS

The LM bifurcation-specific novel scoring system, LM V-RESOLVE, based on 3 simple baseline angiographic findings, could help to rapidly discriminate lesions at risk of SB occlusion during LM bifurcation PCI.

A Novel Strategy to Simplify the Procedures in Treating Complicated Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: From a Bench Test to Clinical Application

Background

Although provisional stenting strategy based on jailed balloon side branch (SB) protection could be useful for high-risk bifurcation lesion in certain clinical scenarios, its complexity still gives rise to procedure complications. We proposed a novel strategy, the jailed balloon proximal optimization technique (JB-POT), to simplify the procedures in treating complex coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs). The present study was designed to verify the safety and efficacy of JB-POT under bench testing and clinical circumstances.

Methods

After a stent was deployed in main vessel (MV) with a balloon jailed in SB, POT and post-dilation of the stent were performed without retrieving the jailed balloon. A re-POT was performed 2 mm away from SB branching point to minimize proximal stent malapposition. The JB-POT procedure was performed on 10 samples of a silicone bifurcation bench model, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) was utilized to evaluate stent deployment. From December 2018 to July 2021, a total of 28 consecutive patients with true CBLs treated with JB-POT were enrolled. Immediate procedure results were observed, and clinical follow-ups were performed.

Results

The bench test showed that JB-POT did not induce significant stent malapposition, underexpansion or distortion, as indexed by the malapposition rate, minimum stent area (MSA), eccentricity index and symmetry index determined through OCT. Under clinical circumstances, JB-POT did not induce significant malapposition, underexpansion or distortion. Among the 30 lesions, there was no primary endpoint event defined as SB occlusion, need to rewire the SB with a polymer-covered guide wire, or failure to retrieve a jailed wire or balloon. One rewiring event and 0 double stenting events occurred as secondary endpoint events. One patient died of heart failure in the 8th month after discharge.

Conclusions

The JB-POT protocol, which tremendously simplifies the current standard provisional stenting procedure in complicated bifurcation lesions, shows acceptability in safety and efficacy. Hence, it might become an applicable strategy for treating high-risk bifurcation lesions, especially those with multiple risked SBs.

Asia Pacific consensus document on coronary bifurcation interventions

Coronary bifurcation intervention is common but complex. Progress in this field has been made in recent years with considerable contribution from the Asia Pacific (APAC) region. However, the standard of practice varies across the APAC region due to differences in culture, socioeconomic state and healthcare set-up. Practice may also differ from the rest of the world. Hence, a panel of experts was invited to discuss topics relevant to bifurcation intervention in order to make a concerted effort to achieve consensus that is applicable within the region and in line with available evidence.

Noncalcified plaque burden quantified from coronary computed tomography angiography improves prediction of side branch occlusion after main vessel stenting in bifurcation lesions: results from the CT-PRECISION registry

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incremental value of quantitative plaque features measured from computed tomography angiography (CTA) for predicting side branch (SB) occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention.

METHODS

We included 340 patients with 377 bifurcation lesions in the post hoc analysis of the CT-PRECISION registry. Each bifurcation was divided into three segments: the proximal main vessel (MV), the distal MV, and the SB. Segments with evidence of coronary plaque were analyzed using semi-automated software allowing for quantitative analysis of coronary plaque morphology and stenosis. Coronary plaque measurements included calcified and noncalcified plaque volumes, and corresponding burdens (respective plaque volumes × 100%/vessel volume), remodeling index, and stenosis.

RESULTS

SB occlusion occurred in 28 of 377 bifurcation lesions (7.5%). The presence of visually identified plaque in the SB segment, but not in the proximal and distal MV segments, was the only qualitative parameter that predicted SB occlusion with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.792. Among quantitative plaque parameters calculated for the SB segment, the addition of noncalcified plaque burden (AUC 0.840, p = 0.003) and low-density plaque burden (AUC 0.836, p = 0.012) yielded significant improvements in predicting SB occlusion. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, optimal cut-offs for noncalcified plaque burden and low-density plaque burden were > 33.6% (86% sensitivity and 78% specificity) and > 0.9% (89% sensitivity and 73% specificity), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CTA-derived noncalcified plaque burden, when added to the visually identified SB plaque, significantly improves the prediction of SB occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03709836 registered on October 17, 2018.

Accuracy of RESOLVE score derived from coronary computed tomography versus visual angiography to predict side branch occlusion in percutaneous bifurcation intervention

INTRODUCTION

Visually estimated angiographic V-RESOLVE score was developed as a simple and accurate prediction tool for side branch (SB) occlusion in patients undergoing coronary bifurcation intervention. Data on the use of coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA) for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in bifurcation lesions is scarce.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to validate the ability of quantitative CTA-derived RESOLVE score for predicting SB occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention and to compare its predictive value with that of the angiography-based V-RESOLVE score.

METHODS

We included 363 patients with 400 bifurcation lesions. Angiographic V-RESOLVE score and CTA-derived RESOLVE score were calculated utilizing the weights from the QCA-based RESOLVE score. The scoring systems were divided into quartiles, and classified as the non-high-risk group and the high-risk group. Accuracy was assessed using areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC). SB occlusion was defined as any decrease in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade (including the absence of flow) in the SB after main vessel stenting.

RESULTS

In total, 28 SB occlusions (7%) occurred. CTA-derived RESOLVE and V-RESOLVE scores achieved comparable predictive accuracy (0.709 vs. 0.752, respectively, p = 0.531) for predicting SB occlusion, and the analysis of AUC for each constituent element of the scores did not show any significant difference between CTA and visual angiography. The total net reclassification index was -18.6% (p = 0.194), and there were no significant differences in the rates of SB occlusion in the non-high-risk group (4.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.510) and the high-risk group (13.8% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.384) between CTA-derived RESOLVE and V-RESOLVE scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative CTA-derived RESOLVE score is an accurate and reliable alternative to the visually estimated angiographic V-RESOLVE score for prediction of SB occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03709836.