Functional hemodynamics assessment during endovascular Tibio-pedal retrograde intervention of peripheral arterial disease

Tibio-pedal arterial pressure assessment during endovascular intervention to improve quality-of-life in patients with intermittent claudication

Objective

The aim of this study is to compare the quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes and the tibio-pedal arterial pressure post-endovascular intervention.

Background

Physiological assessment of peripheral arterial lesions is infrequently performed during endovascular interventions.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed all 343 patients with intermittent claudication who underwent an endovascular intervention via tibio-pedal artery access from October 2018 to May 2021. The baseline and post-intervention tibio-pedal arterial pressures from the pedal sheaths were measured. QOL was assessed using a pre-validated Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) score before and at 30-day after intervention. We compared the baseline tibio-pedal arterial pressure, post-intervention tibio-pedal arterial pressure, delta pressure (post-intervention minus baseline), baseline WIQ scores, 30-day WIQ scores, and delta score (30-day minus baseline).

Results

All 343 patients had successful tibio-pedal accesses. The average tibio-pedal arterial pressure at baseline was 87.0 ± 1.8 mmHg vs. 135.5 ± 1.7 mmHg post-intervention (p < 0.001). Average baseline and 30-day WIQ scores were summation (99.8 ± 3.3 vs. 115.0 ± 3.1, p < 0.001), walking distance (35.7 ± 1.3 vs. 42.5 ± 1.3, p < 0.001), walking speed (21.1 ± 0.9 vs. 23.6 ± 0.8, p = 0.036), stair climbing (4.7 ± 1.4 vs. 24.2 ± 1.4, p = 0.019), and symptoms (18.8 ± 0.2 vs. 20.1 ± 0.2, p < 0.001), respectively. When comparing the increased post-intervention tibio-pedal arterial pressure <60 mmHg vs. ≥60 mmHg, the average delta WIQ scores were all significantly improved with summation (10.0 ± 3.9 to 25.8 ± 5.5, p = 0.01), walking distance (4.1 ± 1.7 to 9.8 ± 2.5, p = 0.02), walking speed (1.5 ± 1.1 to 4.3 ± 1.5, p = 0.02), stair climbing (2.3 ± 1.8 to 9.4 ± 2.5, p = 0.02), and symptoms (1.0 ± 0.3 to 1.8 ± 0.4, p = 0.04), respectively.

Conclusion

Increasing the post-intervention tibio-pedal arterial pressure by 60 mmHg can enhance QOL as suggested by improvement of WIQ scores.

TRIACCESS Study: Randomized Comparison Between Radial, Femoral, and Pedal Access for Percutaneous Femoro-popliteal Artery Angioplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this randomized study was to compare the success and complication rates of different access sites for the treatment of superficial artery stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 180 consecutive patients were randomized in a prospective study to treat symptomatic superficial femoral artery stenosis via radial (RA), femoral (FA), or pedal artery (PA) access. Technical success was achieved in 96.7%, 100%, and 100% of the patients in the RA, FA, and PA groups, respectively (p=0.33). Secondary access sites were used in 30%, 3.3%, and 30% of the patients in the RA, FA, and PA access groups, respectively (p=0.0002). Recanalization for chronic total occlusion was performed in 34/36 (94.4%), 30/30 (100%), and 46/46 (100%) patients in the RA, FA, and PA groups, respectively (p=0.17). The X-ray dose was significantly lower in the PA group than that in the RA and FA access groups (63.1 vs 162 vs 153 Dyn, p=0.0004). The cumulative rates of access site complications in the RA, FA, and PA groups were 3.3% (0% major and 3.3% minor), 16.7% (3.3% major and 13.3% minor), and 3.3% (3.3% major and 0% minor) (p=0.0085), respectively. The cumulative incidence of MACEs at 6 months in the RA, FA, and PA groups was 5%, 6.7%, and 1.7%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of MALEs at 6 months in the RA, FA, and PA groups was 20%, 16.7%, and 9.2%, respectively (p=0.54).

CONCLUSION

Femoral artery intervention can be safely and effectively performed using radial, femoral, and pedal access, but radial and pedal access is associated with a lower access site complication rate and hospitalization. Pedal access is associated with a lower X-ray dose than that with radial and femoral access.

Direct transpedal pressure measurement during transpedal below-the-knee interventions in critical limb ischemia

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the distal pressure measurement during transpedal below-the-knee interventions in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and to assess the hemodynamic response after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

METHODS

The clinical and angiographic data of 137 consecutive patients treated via transpedal access in CLTI (Rutherford 4-6) were evaluated. Distal pedal pressure (PP) at the end of the pedal sheath was measured and the pedal-to-aortic pressure index (PAPI) was also calculated before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

Good angiographic results was achieved in 131 patients (95.6%) in the femoro-popliteal and at least in one below-the-knee artery. Significant differences were found in PP and PAPI between before- and after-intervention values (103.2 ± 41.6 mmHg vs. 138.2 ± 37.8 mmHg and 0.74 ± 0.29 vs. 1.03 ± 0.34), respectively. Post-procedural PP and PAPI were significantly higher in patients who underwent good and borderline/unsuccessful intervention 141.7 [135.8-147.6] versus 82.6 [33.8-131.5] mmHg and 1.05 [1-1.1] versus 0.53 [0.2-0.8], respectively. PP's are significantly different in various Rutherford classification groups. Among the studied parameters, postprocedural PAPI was found to have the best discriminatory power to predict 3-month amputation (c-statistic: 0.749, 95% CI: 0.546-0.952, p = .016, sensitivity: 57.1%, specificity: 92.3% using the cut-off criterion ≤0.58). Major adverse event was detected in 17 patients at 3 months follow up (12.4%), including 7 major amputations (5.1%).

CONCLUSION

Transpedal pressure and pedal-to-aortic pressure index significantly increased during transpedal below-the-knee angioplasty and final pressure and index correlates significantly with limb salvage.