1
|
Bienek S, Kusmierczuk M, Schnorr B, Gemeinhardt O, Bettink S, Scheller B. One single drug-coated balloon for all shapes/diameters? Neointimal proliferation inhibition in porcine peripheral arteries. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0280206. [PMID: 36706120 PMCID: PMC9882906 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long diseased vessel segments of peripheral arteries may display irregular shapes with different diameters. The aim of this study was to investigate inhibition of neointimal proliferation in porcine peripheral vessels with different diameters covered by one single hyper-compliant drug-coated balloon (HCDCB), compared to conventional drug-coated balloons (DCB), each selected according to the respective vessel diameter. METHODS AND RESULTS Neointimal proliferation was stimulated in proximal and distal segments of the peripheral arteries by balloon overstretch and stent implantation. Inhibition of neointimal proliferation by one single HCDCB was compared to two vessel diameter-adjusted DCB per artery and to one single uncoated hyper-compliant balloon (HCB). Sixteen HCB, 16 HCDCB, and 32 DCB were used in 16 arteries each. Quantitative angiography (QA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and histology showed a similar anti-restenotic effect for one HCDCB compared to two vessel diameter-adjusted DCB in narrow distal and wider proximal segments (QA diameter stenosis: 18.7±12.3% vs. 22.8±15.5%, p = 0.535; OCT area stenosis: 21.4±11.6% vs. 23.6±12.3%, p = 0.850; histomorphometry diameter stenosis: 27.5±7.1% vs. 26.9±8.0%, p = 0.952) and indicated significant inhibition of neointimal proliferation by HCDCB vs. uncoated HCB (QA diameter stenosis: 18.7±12.3% vs. 30.3±16.7%, p = 0.008; OCT area stenosis: 21.4±11.6% vs. 34.7±16.0%, p = 0.004; histomorphometry diameter stenosis: 27.5±7.1% vs. 32.5±8.5%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS HCDCB were found to be similar effective as DCB in inhibiting neointimal proliferation in vessel segments with different diameters. One single long HCDCB may allow for treatment of segments with variable diameters, and thus, replace the use of several vessel diameter-adjusted DCB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Beatrix Schnorr
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ole Gemeinhardt
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bettink
- Clinical and Experimental Interventional Cardiology, University of Saarland, Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Bruno Scheller
- Clinical and Experimental Interventional Cardiology, University of Saarland, Homburg, Saar, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cao Z, Li J, Fang Z, Feierkaiti Y, Zheng X, Jiang X. The factors influencing the efficiency of drug-coated balloons. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:947776. [PMCID: PMC9602405 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.947776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The drug-coated balloon (DCB) is an emerging percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) device that delivers drugs to diseased vessels to decrease the rate of vascular stenosis. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that DCBs tend to have both good safety and efficacy profiles, leading to extended application indications in the clinic, including in-stent restenosis (ISR) for metal stents such as drug-eluting stents (DESs), small vascular disease, bifurcation disease, large vascular disease, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and high bleeding risk. However, some previous clinical data have suggested that DCBs performed less effectively than DESs. No studies or reviews have systematically discussed the improvement strategies for better DCB performance until now. Drug loss during the process of delivery to the target lesion and inefficient delivery of the coating drug to the diseased vascular wall are two key mechanisms that weaken the efficiency of DCBs. This review is the first to summarize the key influencing factors of DCB efficiency in terms of balloon structure and principles, and then it analyzes how these factors cause outcomes in practice based on current clinical trial studies of DCBs in the treatment of different types of lesions. We also provide some recommendations for improving DCBs to contribute to better DCB performance by improving the design of DCBs and combining other factors in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Cao
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Cardiovascular Research Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Hubei Key Laboratory of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Cardiovascular Research Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Hubei Key Laboratory of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Zhao Fang
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Cardiovascular Research Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Hubei Key Laboratory of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yushanjiang Feierkaiti
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Cardiovascular Research Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Hubei Key Laboratory of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaoxin Zheng
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Cardiovascular Research Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Hubei Key Laboratory of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China,*Correspondence: Xiaoxin Zheng,
| | - Xuejun Jiang
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Cardiovascular Research Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Hubei Key Laboratory of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China,Xuejun Jiang,
| |
Collapse
|