Multisociety expert consensus systems of care document 2019 AATS/ACC/SCAI/STS expert consensus systems of care document: Operator and institutional recommendations and requirements for transcatheter mitral valve intervention: A Joint Report of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, the American College of Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Contemporary Review of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions for Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common form of valvular heart disease in the United States, and there are established guidelines for indications for requiring mitral valve surgeries. However, there is an unmet clinical need for a subset of high-risk MR patients, especially those with advanced age, heart failure and/or secondary MR. Following the successes of transcatheter aortic valve replacements, significant advances have occurred over the last decade in transcatheter mitral valve interventions in order to manage these patients in both clinical practice and trials. The three main types of these interventions include a transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, percutaneous mitral annuloplasty (both direct and indirect) and transcatheter mitral valve replacement (including when applied to a prior prosthetic valve, annuloplasty ring and mitral annuloplasty ring). This review aims to discuss the contemporary techniques, evidence, indications, multimodality imaging evaluations and outcomes of the various transcatheter mitral valve interventions.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United Arab Emirates: Real-world, Single-centre Experience from an Emerging Programme

Background

Data on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the Middle East, particularly in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), are limited. Whether centres with a low volume of patients requiring the procedure can achieve similar outcomes as those reported in pivotal clinical trials remains unclear. This study evaluates procedural outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR in a newly established programme in the UAE.

Methods

Procedural outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR at a single centre in the UAE between January 2016 and November 2021 were compared with those at centres in the lowest quartile (Q1) of procedural volume in the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry, which covers centres in the US.

Results

Among the 183 patients included in the study, the median age was 76 years (interquartile range [IQR] 71-82), and 42.1% of patients were women, with a median Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score of 4.6 (IQR 2.9-7.5). Most of the patients (93.3%) received a balloon-expandable valve. All-cause death within 30 days, stroke and major vascular complications occurred in 0.6%, 0.6% and 2.2% of patients, respectively, compared with 3.1%, 2.2% and 4% in patients treated at Q1 hospitals.

Conclusion

Patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR at an emerging centre in the Middle East had favourable outcomes compared with those performed at Q1 hospitals in the US. These findings suggest that careful patient selection for TAVR is critical and may help optimise patient outcomes, especially when procedural volumes are low.

Trends, Predictors and In-Hospital Outcomes of the Next Day Discharge Approach After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair

Early discharge strategies are associated with lower cost and resource utilization during hospitalization, as such we sought to evaluate trends, predictors and outcomes of the next day discharge (NDD) approach after transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) procedures with the MitraClip device. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried between 2013 and 2018 for patients undergoing TMVR using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 procedure code '3597' and ICD-10 procedure code '02UG3JZ'. Patients undergoing TMVR were stratified into two groups, determined by hospital length of stay (LOS) [≤1 day, NDD versus >1-day, non-NDD]. Overall, 22,035 patients underwent TMVR with 35.7% (n  = 7,870) belonging to the NDD group (mean age 78.1 ± 9.7 years, women 45%). From 2013 to 2018, the proportion of patients being discharged using the NDD approach trended upward from 18.3% to 46.0%. Amongst demographic and social factors, female sex, black race, and low median household income were predictive of non-NDD (p <0.05 for all). Amongst clinical factors, anemia, iron deficiency anemia, major depressive disorder, thrombocytopenia, obesity and end stage renal disease were some predictors of non-NDD (p <0.05 for all). In the non-NDD group there was a downward trend of pooled post-procedure complications, post procedure cardiogenic shock, vascular complications, acute kidney injury, mechanical circulatory support use, acute respiratory distress and postoperative ischemic stroke and (p for trend <0.001 for all). Despite the overall downward trend, complications began increasing in 2017-18. In conclusion, these trends may reflect improving operator experience, advancement in vascular access device closures and techniques, and prioritization of decreasing length of stay. Ideally, the feasibility and safety of this approach should be confirmed in larger-sized multicenter, randomized trials.

Anaesthesia for minimally invasive cardiac procedures in the catheterization lab

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The share of cardiac procedures performed in settings involving nonoperating room anaesthesia (NORA) continues to grow rapidly, and the number of publications related to anaesthetic techniques in cardiac catheterization laboratories is substantial. We aim to summarize the most recent evidence about outcomes related to type of anaesthetic in minimally invasive cardiac procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The latest studies, primarily focused on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr), demonstrate the need for reliable monitoring and appropriate training of the interdisciplinary teams involved in this high-risk NORA setting.

SUMMARY

Inappropriate sedation and concurrent inadequate oxygenation are main risk factors for claims involving NORA care. Current evidence deriving from TAVR shows that monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) is associated with shorter length of stay and lower mortality.

SCAI expert consensus update on best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) in April 2021

The current document commissioned by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) and endorsed by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and Heart Rhythm Society represents a comprehensive update to the 2012 and 2016 consensus documents on patient-centered best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Comprising updates to staffing and credentialing, as well as evidence-based updates to the pre-, intra-, and post-procedural logistics, clinical standards and patient flow, the document also includes an expanded section on CCL governance, administration, and approach to quality metrics. This update also acknowledges the collaboration with various specialties, including discussion of the heart team approach to management, and working with electrophysiology colleagues in particular. It is hoped that this document will be utilized by hospitals, health systems, as well as regulatory bodies involved in assuring and maintaining quality, safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of patient throughput in this high volume area.

A Narrative Review for Cardiac Anesthesiologists of the 2019 Expert Consensus on Operator and Institutional Recommendations for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Intervention

US Food and Drug Administration approval of the edge-to-edge clip repair device (MitraClip; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) in 2013 led to wide adoption of the device for treatment of severe primary mitral regurgitation in patients unsuitable for surgery. Demonstration of favorable outcomes in the setting of secondary mitral regurgitation by the Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation (COAPT) trial in 2019 provided an additional impetus to the transcatheter mitral interventional program. The role of the cardiac anesthesia service also is expanding to echocardiography services for these patients outside of the procedure room. Moreover, cardiac anesthesiologists serve on the multidisciplinary team that is involved in clinical decision-making pertaining to patient selection, optimization, and intervention. This document has direct implications for the cardiac anesthesiologist involved in the care of these patients because a broader understanding of pertinent issues is essential to function as an effective clinical member within the multidisciplinary team. As such, this narrative review serves to highlight the salient features of the "2019 AATS/ACC/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Systems of Care Document: Operator and Institutional Recommendations and Requirements for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Intervention: A Joint Report of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, the American College of Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons," focuses on issues pertinent to the cardiac anesthesiologist, and provides an outline for the clinical context and evolution of transcatheter mitral valve interventions.

Mitral Valve Surgical Volume and Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Outcomes: Impact of a Proposed Volume Requirement on Geographic Access

Background

There is an open Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National Coverage Decision for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVr) and a recent multisociety consensus document suggesting that TMVr centers should achieve prespecified mitral valve replacement or repair (MVRr). Yet, little is known about the MVRr volume–TMVr outcome relationship.

Methods and Results

Using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services administrative claims from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018, we computed the Pearson correlation coefficient and performed multivariable hierarchical modeling to estimate the MVRr volume to TMVr outcome relationship for mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Additionally, we assessed the impact of the consensus recommendations on geographic access to care by hospital referral region. Total annualized MVRr volume was <11 to 1552 (median 96, interquartile range 53, 167). One‐year survival, 1‐year heart failure hospitalization after TMVr were not correlated with MVRr volume. After patient risk‐adjustment for age, sex, and significant Elixhauser Comorbidities, there remained no significant correlation between institutional MVRr volume and 1‐year mortality (estimate −0.010, SE 0.047, P=0.834) or heart failure hospitalization (estimate −0.011, SE 0.045, P=0.808) after TMVr. Raising the restriction on TMVr from 20 to 40 MVRr/y results in ≈30 million individuals having to travel outside of their hospital referral region to undergo TMVr, with a disproportionate impact in the Midwest and Southeast.

Conclusions

There is no relationship between MVRr volumes and TMVr outcomes. Additionally, adoption of an annual MVRr volume ≥40 for performance of TMVr disproportionately impacts geographic access in the Midwest and Southeast and their large black and Hispanic populations.