Pilot phase experience of the International Quality Improvement Collaborative catheterization registry

Congenital heart disease cardiac catheterization at Uganda Heart Institute, a 12-year retrospective study of immediate outcomes

BACKGROUND

Cardiac catheterization is an invasive diagnostic and treatment tool for congenital heart disease (CHD) with potential complications.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the immediate outcomes of patients who underwent cardiac catheterization for CHD at the Uganda Heart Institute (UHI).

METHODS

The study was a retrospective chart review of 857 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization for CHD at UHI from 1st February 2012 to 30th June 2023. Precardiac catheterization clinical data, procedure details, and post-procedure data were recorded. The statistical software SPSS was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

We studied 857 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization for CHD at UHI. Females comprised 62.8% (n = 528). The age range was 3 days to 64 years, with a mean of 5.1 years (SD 7.4). Advanced heart failure was present in 24(2.8%) of the study participants. The most common procedures were patent ductus arteriosus device closure (n = 500, 58.3%), diagnostic catheterization (n = 194, 22.5%), and balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty (n = 114, 13.0%). PDA device closure had 89.4% optimal results while BPV had 75.9% optimal performance outcome. Adverse events occurred in 52 out of 857 study participants (6.1%). Clinically meaningful adverse events (CMAES) occurred in 3.9%, (n = 33), high severity adverse events in 2.9% (n = 25) and mortality in 1.5% (n = 13). Advanced heart failure at the time of cardiac catheterization, was significantly associated with clinically meaningful adverse events (OR 52 p-value < 0.001) and mortality (OR 564, p value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Many patients with CHD have benefited from the cardiac catheterization program at UHI with high optimal procedure outcome results. Patients with advanced heart failure at the time of cardiac catheterization have less favorable outcomes emphasizing the need for early detection and early intervention.

Evaluating Procedural Performance: A Composite Outcome for Aortic and Pulmonary Valvuloplasty in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization

Background

Safety events and technical success (TS) have been previously reported for aortic and pulmonary valvuloplasty, but a composite performance measure as a novel, patient-centered strategy has neither been developed nor been studied. This study aims to refine a procedural performance (PP) variable, a composite of TS and procedural safety, for isolated, standard-risk aortic and pulmonary valvuloplasty.

Methods

A multicenter review was performed using data from the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes registry. Data were collected for all cases of isolated balloon aortic and pulmonary valvuloplasty from 2014 through 2017. Patients were excluded if they were aged <1 month, were inpatient at the time of the procedure, or had significant comorbidities, such as Williams or Noonan syndrome. Criteria for TS were developed and categorized (optimal, satisfactory, and unsatisfactory) by expert consensus based on previous outcome research. Adverse events (AE) were categorized by severity (level 1-5) using established criteria. Level 4 and 5 severity AE were considered high-severity AE. Using criteria of TS and AE severity, PP was divided into 3 composite outcome classes. Factors correlating with class III (suboptimal) PP were analyzed.

Results

There were 169 cases of aortic and 270 cases of pulmonary valvuloplasty in the cohorts. In the aortic valvuloplasty cohort, a suboptimal PP (class III) occurred in 14% of cases, mostly due to high-severity AE (7%). No significant correlation between patient or case characteristics and PP was demonstrated. In the pulmonary valvuloplasty cohort, class III PP occurred in 9% of cases, predominantly due to residual valve gradient, which correlated with lower weight (P = .02).

Conclusions

We designed a composite variable of PP consisting of TS and safety as a comprehensive measure of outcome. Incorporating both TS and AE may better reflect patient outcome than each metric measured separately. PP indices may identify areas for further investigation and quality improvement.

Congenital Cardiac Catheterization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: The International Quality Improvement Collaborative Catheterization Registry

Background

No published data are available on the patient, procedural characteristics, and outcomes of congenital heart disease (CHD) cardiac catheterization performed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Objectives

The objective of this study was to describe procedural characteristics and patient outcomes of CHD cardiac catheterizations in LMICs.

Methods

Cases performed between January 2019 and December 2020 from 15 centers in the International Quality Improvement Collaborative Congenital Heart Disease Catheterization Registry (IQIC-CHDCR) data were included. The Procedural Risk in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization (PREDIC3T) classification was used to stratify risk. Outcomes of interest included mortality, severe adverse events (SAEs), and procedural efficacy. Procedural efficacy, based on technical and safety endpoints, was categorized into optimal, adequate, and inadequate for 5 common interventional procedures.

Results

There were 3,287 cases, of which 60% (n = 1,973) were interventional cases. Most of the cases (66%) were in patients between the ages of 1 to 18 years with a median patient age of 4 years. PREDIC3T risk class 1 and 2 were most common in 37% and 38% of cases, respectively. SAEs occurred in 2.8% while the death was reported within <72 hours post catheterization 1%. The majority of device implantation procedures patent ductus arteriosus (67%) and atrial septal defect (60%) had optimal procedure efficacy outcomes.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that congenital cardiac catheterization is safely performed in LMICs. Future work addressing predictors of SAEs and adverse procedural outcomes may help future quality improvement initiatives.