SAPIEN S3 valve deployment in the pulmonary position using the gore DrySeal sheath to protect the tricuspid valve

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement: A Review of Current Valve Technologies

Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement was first performed by Dr Philip Bonhoeffer, who implanted a Medtronic Melody valve in a human in 2000. Over the past 2 decades, there have been many advances in transcatheter pulmonary valve technology. This includes the use of the SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve in the pulmonary position, modifications and refinements to valve implantation procedures, and development of self-expanding valves and prestents to treat large diameter native or patched right ventricular outflow tracts. This article reviews the current transcatheter pulmonary valve technologies with a focus on valve design, screening process, implant procedure, and clinical outcomes.

Transcatheter Systemic AV Valve-in-Valve Implantation in a Patient With LTGA and Ebstein Anomaly

We present the first in-human transcatheter systemic atrioventricular valve-in-valve implantation in a 37-year-old patient with Ebstein anomaly, levo-transposition of the great arteries, and prior systemic valve replacement. She had severe bioprosthetic valve regurgitation and reduced systolic function. She had high surgical risk and was planned for transcatheter intervention. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement With the Sapien Prosthesis

BACKGROUND

There are limited published data focused on outcomes of transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) with either a Sapien XT or Sapien 3 (S3) valve.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to report short-term outcomes in a large cohort of patients who underwent TPVR with either a Sapien XT or S3 valve.

METHODS

Data were entered retrospectively into a multicenter registry for patients who underwent attempted TPVR with a Sapien XT or S3 valve. Patient-related, procedural, and short-term outcomes data were characterized overall and according to type of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) anatomy.

RESULTS

Twenty-three centers enrolled a total of 774 patients: 397 (51%) with a native/patched RVOT; 183 (24%) with a conduit; and 194 (25%) with a bioprosthetic valve. The S3 was used in 78% of patients, and the XT was used in 22%, with most patients receiving a 29-mm (39%) or 26-mm (34%) valve. The implant was technically successful in 754 (97.4%) patients. Serious adverse events were reported in 67 patients (10%), with no difference between RVOT anatomy groups. Fourteen patients underwent urgent surgery. Nine patients had a second valve implanted. Among patients with available data, tricuspid valve injury was documented in 11 (1.7%), and 9 others (1.3%) had new moderate or severe regurgitation 2 grades higher than pre-implantation, for 20 (3.0%) total patients with tricuspid valve complications. Valve function at discharge was excellent in most patients, but 58 (8.5%) had moderate or greater pulmonary regurgitation or maximum Doppler gradients >40 mm Hg. During limited follow-up (n = 349; median: 12 months), 9 patients were diagnosed with endocarditis, and 17 additional patients underwent surgical valve replacement or valve-in-valve TPVR.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute outcomes after TPVR with balloon-expandable valves were generally excellent in all types of RVOT. Additional data and longer follow-up will be necessary to gain insight into these issues.