Antithrombotic strategies in patients needing oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta‐analysis

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease With Recent or Remote Events: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Ongoing debate remains regarding optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the following: (i) dual-pathway therapy (DPT; oral anticoagulant [OAC] plus antiplatelet) vs triple therapy (OAC and dual-antiplatelet therapy) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and (iii) OAC monotherapy vs DPT at least 1 year after PCI or ACS. Following a 2-stage process, we identified systematic reviews published between 2019 and 2022 on these 2 clinical questions, and we updated the most comprehensive search for additional RCTs published up to October 2022. Outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), death, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding. We estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.

Results

Based on 6 RCTs (n = 10,435), DPT reduced major bleeding (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.52-0.73) and increased stent thrombosis (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02-2.36), vs triple therapy after PCI or medically-managed ACS, with no significant differences in MACE and death. In 2 RCTs (n = 2905), OAC monotherapy reduced major bleeding (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.91) vs DPT in AF patients with remote PCI or ACS, with no significant differences in MACE or death.

Conclusions

In patients with AF and coronary artery disease, using less-aggressive antithrombotic treatment (DPT after PCI or ACS, and OAC alone after remote PCI or ACS) reduced major bleeding, with an increase in stent thrombosis with recent PCI. These results support a minimalist yet personalized antithrombotic strategy for these patients.

Antithrombotic Therapy Optimization in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) poses numerous challenges. Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT), which combines dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with oral anticoagulation (OAC), provides anti-ischemic protection but increases the risk of bleeding. Therefore, TAT is generally limited to a short phase (1 week) after PCI, followed by aspirin withdrawal and continuation of 6-12 months of dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT), comprising OAC plus clopidogrel, followed by OAC alone. This pharmacological approach has been shown to mitigate bleeding risk while preserving adequate anti-ischemic efficacy. However, the decision-making process remains complex in elderly patients and those with co-morbidities, significantly influencing ischemic and bleeding risk. In this review, we discuss the available evidence in this area from randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses for post-procedural antithrombotic therapies in patients with non-valvular AF undergoing PCI.

Individualization of Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Coronary Stenting: A Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Review

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is the cornerstone of post-percutaneous coronary intervention treatment to prevent stent thrombosis and reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The selection of an optimal DAPT regimen, considering the interplay of various antiplatelet agents, patient profiles, and procedural characteristics, remains an evolving challenge. Traditionally, a standard duration of 12 months has been recommended for DAPT in most patients. While contemporary guidelines provide general frameworks, DAPT modulation with longer or shorter treatment courses followed by aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy are evolving towards an individualized strategy to optimize the balance between efficacy and safety. This review comprehensively examines the current landscape of DAPT strategies after coronary stenting, with a focus on emerging evidence for treatment individualization.

Edoxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention: ENCOURAGE-AF design

Approximately one fifth of patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergo a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Current guidelines recommend different combinations and durations of triple or dual antithrombotic therapy for these patients but data on the implementation of these recommendations in clinical routine are scarce. ENCOURAGE-AF is a prospective, non-interventional, non-comparative, multicentre study. Approximately 720 patients will be consecutively enrolled from 70 participating sites across Germany. Patients with non-valvular AF treated with edoxaban, who have undergone successful PCI, have no planned elective cardiac intervention during the study period, have capability, availability, and willingness for follow-up by telephone interview during the study, are aged ≥ 18 years with life expectancy ≥ 1 year, and provide written informed consent, will be included. Eligible patients will be enrolled between 4- and 72-h after completing a successful PCI. Duration of exposure to and dosing regimens of edoxaban, antiplatelet agents and other concomitant medications of interest will be monitored in line with the clinical practice. Physician- and patient-reported clinical events, adverse drug reactions, patient quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) and health resource utilisation (HRU) parameters will be evaluated at 30 days and 1-year post-PCI. The ENCOURAGE-AF non-interventional study will provide insights into the patterns of edoxaban usage in combination with antiplatelet treatment and other concomitant medications in AF patients with a successful PCI over a 1-year time period during routine clinical practice in Germany. The effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in this patient population, as well as patients' quality of life and HRU will be evaluated.Trial registration: Clinicaltrial.gov NCT04519944, registered on 20 August 2020.

Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients at high bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: a case report

Background

Choosing antithrombotic therapy for patients at high bleeding risk, particularly those requiring long-term anticoagulant therapy, who have acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is becoming increasingly complex.

Case summary

A 78-year-old women was hospitalized with chest pain and a diagnosis of non-ST-elevation ACS was made. It was decided that the patient should undergo coronary angiogram with a view for angioplasty. Subsequently, she underwent successful PCI to the left anterior descending artery. Shortly after PCI, she was noted to be in atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, she had per rectal bleeding and acute kidney injury, which were managed conservatively. Aspirin and ticagrelor were stopped and she was discharged on dual antithrombotic therapy with clopidogrel and apixaban.

Discussion

Available evidence, driven mainly from expert consensus documents, advocates a case-by-case comprehensive evaluation that integrates patient- and procedure-related factors to assess patients for thrombotic and bleeding tendencies to identify those who may gain most net clinical benefit of antithrombotic combination therapy. In general, if thrombotic drivers prevail, an augmented antithrombotic regime with a view for a longer duration should be planned, and if bleeding drivers prevail, a de-escalated regime with a view for a shorter duration should be sought.

An update on antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients in long-term ambulatory setting after percutaneous coronary intervention: where do we go from here?

INTRODUCTION

In the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it is unclear which combination of antithrombotic drugs is preferable and which is the optimal duration of treatment.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the available evidence in this area resulting from single studies and meta-analyses. In the absence of direct head-to-head comparisons between different non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC), the authors review the available studies with NOACS in these patients and derived indirect comparisons.

EXPERT OPINION

In patients with AF who undergo PCI, a dual antithrombotic strategy which includes a NOAC plus single antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor (preferably clopidogrel) should be considered as the preferred treatment option in most cases. Oral anticoagulation associated with dual antiplatelet therapy (triple antithrombotic therapy) should be offered for no longer than 30 days to patients with very high thrombotic and low hemorrhagic risk. It is unclear whether the dual antithrombotic strategy should be continued beyond 12 months in patients at high risk of thrombotic events. Additional data from adequately powered controlled studies are needed to support the long-term efficacy of this strategy and to establish the best patient-tailored approach in this complex scenario.