Transcatheter pulmonary valve-in-valve implantation within the expandable Inspiris Resilia® bioprosthetic valve

Short- and Mid-Term Results of Pulmonary Valve Replacement with the Inspiris Valve

BACKGROUND

Various bioprosthetic valves are used off-label for pulmonary valve replacement (PVR), but there is no consensus on whether a particular valve is best for this application. Recently, the Inspiris Resilia valve (Edwards Lifesciences Inc) was approved for aortic valve replacement, and surgeons have begun using it for PVR. There is limited evidence on the performance of the Inspiris valve compared with other valves in the pulmonary position.

METHODS

This study reviewed all patients who underwent PVR with a size 19- to 29-mm Inspiris valve or Mosaic valve (Medtronic Inc) from 2007 to 2022 at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford (Palo Alto, CA). Midterm outcomes included freedom from moderate or severe pulmonary regurgitation (PR), a maximum Doppler gradient ≥36 mm Hg, and freedom from reintervention.

RESULTS

A total of 225 consecutive patients who underwent PVR with a size 19- to 29-mm Mosaic (n = 163) or Inspiris (n = 62) valve were included. There was no difference in baseline characteristics. Early postoperative gradients were low in both groups but higher in the Mosaic cohort, and neither group had more than mild PR on discharge. On univariable and multivariable analysis, Inspiris valves were significantly more likely to develop moderate or greater PR over time. There was no significant difference between the valves in freedom from reintervention or from a maximum gradient ≥36 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

Early and short-term gradients were similar in patients undergoing PVR with Inspiris and Mosaic valves, but significant PR was more common in patients who received an Inspiris valve. These preliminary findings suggest that the durability of the Inspiris valve in the pulmonary position may not be superior to that of other bioprosthetic valves used for PVR.

A Case of TAV-in-SAV in a Patient with Structural Valve Deterioration after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement with the INSPIRIS RESILIA Valve

The INSPIRIS RESILIA valve is designed to dilate its valve annulus in transcatheter aortic valve-in-surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV), a catheter therapy for biological valve deterioration. RESILIA tissue has improved anti-calcification properties. An 83-year-old man on hemodialysis undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a 25-mm INSPIRIS for severe aortic stenosis 22 months ago presented with general malaise. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed severe bioprosthetic stenosis (peak velocity: 3.5 m/s, mean pressure gradient: 32 mmHg, and effective orifice area: 0.45 cm2) and severely reduced left ventricular function (ejection fraction: 17%). Because redo-SAVR was extremely risky (society of thoracic surgeons [STS] risk score: 31%), the patient underwent transfemoral-TAV-in-SAV using a 26-mm SAPIEN 3️. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography showed that the internal diameter of the INSPIRIS had expanded from 22.2 mm to 24.2 mm. This case demonstrated the dilatable design of INSPIRIS but not the durability of RESILIA tissue.

Early Concerning Outcomes for the Edwards Inspiris Resilia Bioprosthesis in the Pulmonary Position

BACKGROUND

The Inspiris Resilia (Edwards Lifesciences LLC) bioprosthesis has gained widespread use in the aortic position; however no robust data are available about its use in the pulmonary position.

METHODS

We reviewed our outcomes for the Inspiris Resilia in the pulmonary position between August 2019 and October 2021.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (15 female patients [56%]; mean age, 22.26 ± 14.99 years) were included. The most common original pathology was tetralogy of Fallot (13 patients, 48%). Five patients (18.5%) had prior transcatheter interventions. The mean right ventricular end-diastolic volume index was 164.25 ± 45.1 mL/m2. Sternotomy or repeat sternotomy was the most common approach (21 patients, 77.8%). The standard technique for pulmonary valve replacement was used in 22 patients (81.5%), whereas the prosthesis was implanted as a conduit in the remaining 5 (18.5%). Trivial to mild prosthetic regurgitation was present in 6 patients (22.2%) at the time of discharge. There was no early mortality. Follow-up was complete in all patients (mean, 16 ± 8 months), with no late mortality or late reoperations. New prosthetic regurgitation developed in 13 patients (48%), all of whom underwent replacement with the standard surgical technique. No regurgitation occurred in the conduit cases. This progressed to moderate regurgitation in 6 patients (22%) and severe in 3 (11%). Three patients (11%) underwent transcatheter valve-in-valve after their surgical pulmonary valve replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

The early data regarding the Inspiris Resilia bioprosthesis use in the pulmonary position is concerning. The prosthesis design may not be suitable for low-pressure circulation, or modification of its implantation technique may be needed.

The first report of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation within the expandable Inspiris Resilia® bioprosthetic valve

A 61-year-old male who underwent aortic valve replacement with an Inspiris Resilia® aortic bioprosthetic through an upper partial sternotomy due to severe aortic valve stenosis was presented 1 year later to our hospital suffering from dyspnoea and chest pain. The transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated moderate haemodynamic structural valve deterioration with a mean gradient of 29 mmHg and a valve area of 0.9 cm2. Due to relatively high-risk of reoperation, valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement with Sapien 3® 29 mm, followed by balloon valvuloplasty, was successfully performed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published case of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement into a degenerated Inspiris Resilia® aortic valve.