Overinflation of balloon-expandable valves for transcatheter treatment of pure noncalcified native aortic regurgitation: How much oversizing is needed and achievable?

Performance of balloon-expandable transcatheter bioprostheses in inoperable patients with pure aortic regurgitation of a native valve: The BE-PANTHEON international project

BACKGROUND

The off-label utilization of transcatheter heart valve (THV) devices for the treatment of inoperable or high-surgical risk patients with pure native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) has demonstrated suboptimal outcomes, both with self- and balloon-expandable (BE) devices. The aim of this study is to compare the use of different BE scaffolds in treating pure NAVR.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with pure severe NAVR who were deemed to be at high-risk and were treated with last-generation BE-THVs among seventeen Centers in Europe and US. Technical and device success rates were the primary objectives.

RESULTS

Between February 2018 and July 2023, among 144 patients, 41 (28 %) received a MyVal device and 103 (72 %) were treated with a Sapien THV. Patients treated with a MyVal THV had an extra-large annulus more frequently compared to the Sapien group (49%vs.20 %, p < 0.001). Technical and device success rates were 90 % and 81 %, respectively, p > 0.1. The rate of THV migration/embolization (MyVal 4.9%vs. Sapien 11 %, p = 0.4) and second valve needed (4.9%vs.7.8 %, p = 0.7) were numerically lower in the MyVal group, whereas the rate of at least moderate paravalvular leak (15%vs.7.8 %, p = 0.2) and permanent pacemaker implantation (25%vs.18 %, p = 0.16) were numerically higher in the Myval group.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label use of BE devices for pure NAVR represents a potential alternative in high-risk patients in the absence of dedicated devices. However, BE in NAVR is associated with suboptimal outcomes. The availability of larger THV sizes may introduce transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an effective treatment for patients traditionally deemed unsuitable.

NON-STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

AR = aortic regurgitation, BE = balloon-expandable, NAVR = native aortic valve regurgitation, PM = pacemaker, TAVR = transcatheter aortic valve replacement, THV = transcatheter heart valve, TVEM = transcatheter valve embolization and migration, VARC-3 = Valve Academic Research Consortium 3.

Simultaneous Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Native Valve Replacement: A Step-by-Step Procedural Approach

Multivalvular heart disease (MVHD) is present in one-third of patients with valvular heart disease (VHD). Compared to single VHD patients, these patients have a more significant hemodynamic impact and are often left under medical treatment. Most importantly, when undergoing multiple valve interventions, they show worse rates of heart failure and mortality. The guidelines-supported interventions in patients with MVHD in combined aortic regurgitation and mitral stenosis include percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy, open mitral commissurotomy, or surgical mitral valve replacement followed by transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement, trying to minimize the increased mortality risk of double-valve replacement. Simultaneous transcatheter valve replacement (STVR) for native MVHD is still off-label and not yet considered in clinical guidelines since the evidence of its results is limited to a few cases reported worldwide. However, fully percutaneous transfemoral STVR seems promising for MVHD patients thanks to its minimal invasiveness, the continuous improvement of the transcatheter heart valve devices, the likely shorter length of stay and the fastest recovery. To our knowledge, this is the first case ever reported of fully percutaneous STVR for native MVHD in aortic regurgitation and mitral stenosis. Deep understanding of both pathologies and their interactions, not only from a pathological point of view but from the procedural planning and procedural steps point of view is mandatory. Hereby we present the specific STVR procedural planning considerations, a step-by-step guide on how to perform an aortic and mitral STVR and its critical considerations, as well as the procedural and follow-up results.

Case Report: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using balloon-expandable bioprosthesis in patients with severe pure aortic regurgitation on noncalcified native valves: a series of cases

Background

For individuals with pure aortic regurgitation (AR), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is cautiously recommended only for those with a high or prohibitive surgical risk. We aimed to describe the results of a case series of transcatheter implantation of a balloon-expandable aortic valve bioprosthesis (BEV) for the treatment of noncalcified native valve AR.

Methods

From February 2022-November 2022, we performed TAVI in patients with severe pure AR. Cases were indicated on the basis of symptoms, high/prohibitive surgical risk, or patient refusal of conventional treatment.

Results

Five patients underwent successful TAVI. The mean age was 81.9 ± 6.6 years, 3 (60%) female and 5 (100%) in NYHA class III or IV. The baseline echocardiogram showed an ejection fraction of 49.0 ± 10.6% and left ventricular end-systolic diameter 28.5 ± 4.7 mm/m². The average area of the aortic annulus was 529.1 ± 47.0mm² and the area oversizing index was 17.6 ± 1.2%. In the 30-day follow-up, there were no cases of prosthesis embolization, annulus rupture, stroke, acute myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, hemorrhagic complication or death. One patient required a permanent pacemaker and another had a minor vascular complication. The clinical follow-up were 19.8 months (16.7-21.8). During this period, all patients remained alive and in NYHA class I or II. One of the patients developed a moderate paravalvular leak.

Conclusion

TAVI with a BEV proved to be safe and effective in this small case series of patients with noncalcified native valve AR in a follow-up longer than 1 year.

Clinical outcomes of TAVI with the Myval balloon-expandable valve for non-calcified aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in non-calcified aortic regurgitation (NCAR) is an off-label procedure. The balloon-expandable Myval includes extra-large sizes (30.5 mm and 32 mm) of interest in this setting.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of Myval in NCAR.

METHODS

This was an international, multicentre, observational study that enrolled all consecutive patients with symptomatic severe NCAR undergoing TAVR with the Myval device. The images were centrally analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients were recruited, 64.6% were men, the mean age was 78.4±7.5 years, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 2.7±1.7%. Aortic root dilatation was present in 59.3% of patients, 7.1% were bicuspid, and the mean annular area was 638.6±106.0 mm2. The annular area was beyond the recommended range for extra-large sizes in 2.6% of cases, and additional volume was added in 92% (median 4 cc, up to 9 cc). The extra-large sizes were used in 95 patients (84.1%), and the mean oversizing was 17.9±11.0%. The technical success rate was 94.7%; the rate of residual ≥moderate aortic regurgitation was 8.9%, and the pacemaker rate was 22.2%. There were no cases of annular rupture, cardiac tamponade, or aortic dissection, but in 4 patients (3.5%) valve embolisation occurred (1 antegrade and 3 ventricular), all in cases with a tapered left ventricle outflow tract (p=0.007). Thirty-day and 1-year mortality were 5.3% and 9.7%, respectively. Technical success was associated with better survival (97.1% vs 72.7%; p=0.012), and valve embolisation was the main determinant of mortality (p=0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Myval is a feasible and safe option for selected non-operable patients with NCAR and demonstrated good midterm outcomes and lack of impact of oversizing on device durability.