1
|
Jacquemyn X, Van den Eynde J, Caldonazo T, Brown JA, Dokollari A, Serna-Gallegos D, Clavel MA, Pibarot P, Sultan I, Sá MP. Late Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with Balloon-Versus Self-Expandable Valves: Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-To-Event Data. Cardiol Clin 2024; 42:373-387. [PMID: 38910022 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2024.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
Self-expanding valves (SEV) and balloon-expandable valves (BEV) for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have their own features. There is a growing interest in long-term outcomes with the adoption of lifetime management in younger patients. To evaluate late outcomes in TAVI with SEV versus BEV, we performed a study-level meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data published by May 31, 2023. We found no statistically significant difference in all-cause death after TAVI with SEV versus BEV. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xander Jacquemyn
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Tulio Caldonazo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - James A Brown
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aleksander Dokollari
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, St. Boniface Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnepeg, Canada
| | - Derek Serna-Gallegos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marie-Annick Clavel
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Philippe Pibarot
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Ibrahim Sultan
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michel Pompeu Sá
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kikuchi S, Minamimoto Y, Matsushita K, Cho T, Terasaka K, Hanajima Y, Nakahashi H, Gohbara M, Kimura Y, Yasuda S, Okada K, Matsuzawa Y, Iwahashi N, Kosuge M, Ebina T, Morel O, Ohlmann P, Uchida K, Hibi K. Impact of New-Onset Right Bundle-Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Permanent Pacemaker Implantation. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e032777. [PMID: 38639357 PMCID: PMC11179913 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.032777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A delayed and recurrent complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) is a life-threatening complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Post-TAVR evaluation may be important in predicting delayed and recurrent CAVB requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). The impact of new-onset right bundle-branch block (RBBB) after TAVR on PPI remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS In total, 407 patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR were included in this analysis. Intraprocedural CAVB was defined as CAVB that occurred during TAVR. A 12-lead ECG was evaluated at baseline, immediately after TAVR, on postoperative days 1 and 5, and according to the need to identify new-onset bundle-branch block (BBB) and CAVB after TAVR. Forty patients (9.8%) required PPI, 17 patients (4.2%) had persistent intraprocedural CAVB, and 23 (5.7%) had delayed or recurrent CAVB after TAVR. The rates of no new-onset BBB, new-onset left BBB, and new-onset RBBB were 65.1%, 26.8%, and 4.7%, respectively. Compared with patients without new-onset BBB and those with new-onset left BBB, the rate of PPI was higher in patients with new-onset RBBB (3.4% versus 5.6% versus 44.4%, P<0.0001). On post-TAVR evaluation in patients without persistent intraprocedural CAVB, the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that new-onset RBBB was a statistically significant predictor of PPI compared with no new-onset BBB (odds ratio [OR], 18.0 [95% CI, 5.94-54.4]) in addition to the use of a self-expanding valve (OR, 2.97 [95% CI, 1.09-8.10]). CONCLUSIONS Patients with new-onset RBBB after TAVR are at high risk for PPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinnosuke Kikuchi
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Yugo Minamimoto
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Kensuke Matsushita
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Tomoki Cho
- Cardiovascular CenterYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Kengo Terasaka
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Yohei Hanajima
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Hidefumi Nakahashi
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Masaomi Gohbara
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Yuichiro Kimura
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Shota Yasuda
- Cardiovascular CenterYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Kozo Okada
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Yasushi Matsuzawa
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Noriaki Iwahashi
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Masami Kosuge
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Toshiaki Ebina
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Olivier Morel
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d’Activité Médico‐Chirurgicale Cardio‐Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier UniversitaireStrasbourgFrance
| | - Patrick Ohlmann
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d’Activité Médico‐Chirurgicale Cardio‐Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier UniversitaireStrasbourgFrance
| | - Keiji Uchida
- Cardiovascular CenterYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Kiyoshi Hibi
- Division of CardiologyYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
- Department of CardiologyYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Batta A, Hatwal J. Risk of permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Which factors are most relevant? World J Cardiol 2024; 16:49-53. [PMID: 38456072 PMCID: PMC10915891 DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i2.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a formidable treatment option for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis ahead of surgical aortic valve replacement. The encouraging results from large randomized controlled trials has resulted in an exponential rise in the use of TAVR even in the low-risk patients. However, this is not without challenges. Need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) post-TAVR remains the most frequent and clinically relevant challenge. Naturally, identifying risk factors which predispose an individual to develop high grade conduction block post-TAVR is important. Various demographic factors, electrocardiographic features, anatomic factors and procedural characteristics have all been linked to the development of advanced conduction block and need for PPM following TAVR. Amongst these electrophysiological variables, most notably a prolonged QRS > 120 ms regardless of the type of conduction block seems to be one of the strongest predictors on logistic regression models. The index study by Nwaedozie et al highlights that patients requiring PPM post-TAVR had higher odds of having a baseline QRS > 120 ms and were more likely to be having diabetes mellitus that those who did not require PPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akash Batta
- Department of Cardiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana 141001, Punjab, India.
| | - Juniali Hatwal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sugiyama Y, Miyashita H, Yokoyama H, Ochiai T, Shishido K, Jalanko M, Yamanaka F, Vähäsilta T, Saito S, Laine M, Moriyama N. Risk Assessment of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Preexisting Right Bundle Branch Block. Am J Cardiol 2024; 213:151-160. [PMID: 38103766 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Preexisting right bundle branch block (RBBB) is the strongest predictor for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, the risk assessment for new PPI and effective procedural strategy for preventing new PPI in patients with preexisting RBBB are still unclear. This study stratified the new PPI risk after TAVI and investigated the impact of implantation strategy in a preexisting RBBB cohort. We analyzed 237 patients with preexisting RBBB who underwent TAVI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of new PPI. Multivariate analyses investigating predictors for new PPI were performed. The overall PPI rate was 33.3%. Significant baseline predictors for new PPI were combination of RBBB, left anterior or posterior fascicular block, and first-degree atrioventricular block (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 5.04), high calcium volume of noncoronary cusp (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.05 to 4.10), and membranous septum (MS) length <2 mm (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.75) in the univariate analysis and MS length <2 mm (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.82) in the multivariate analysis. On the multivariate analysis including procedural variables, predilatation (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.01 to 5.83), self-expanding valves (Corevalve, Evolut R, and Evolut Pro/Pro+; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) or mechanical expanding valves (Lotus/Lotus Edge; Boston Scientifics, Marlborough, Massachusetts) (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.31 to 6.91), and implantation depth > MS length (OR 4.27, 95% CI 1.81 to 10.08) were significantly associated with new PPI. The incidence of new PPI increased according to the number of baseline predictors (0: 20.9%, 1: 34.3%, and ≥2: 52.0%) and procedural predictors (0: 3.7%, 1: 20.9%, 2: 40.5%, and 3: 60.0%). New PPI risk in a preexisting RBBB subset could be stratified by baseline factors. Device selection and implantation strategy considering MS length could prevent new PPI even in these high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi Sugiyama
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan; Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hirokazu Miyashita
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan.
| | - Hiroaki Yokoyama
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ochiai
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| | - Koki Shishido
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| | - Mikko Jalanko
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Futoshi Yamanaka
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| | - Tommi Vähäsilta
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Shigeru Saito
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| | - Mika Laine
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Noriaki Moriyama
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sá MP, Serna-Gallegos D, Sultan I. Reducing the Burden of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Cusp Overlap, Implantation Depth, and Membranous Septum Length. Am J Cardiol 2024; 213:184-185. [PMID: 38181861 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.12.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Pompeu Sá
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Derek Serna-Gallegos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ibrahim Sultan
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Veulemans V, Maier O, Zeus T. Factors Influencing Implantation Depth During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Interv Cardiol 2024; 19:e01. [PMID: 38464494 PMCID: PMC10918527 DOI: 10.15420/icr.2023.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Optimised implantation depth (OID) is crucial to obtain the best haemodynamic and clinical outcome during transcatheter heart valve (THV) deployment. OID ensures a better haemodynamic profile and is associated with a potential reduction in permanent pacemaker implantations, both of which are important during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Apart from patient-related anatomic conditions, many factors, such as THV and wire selection, as well as implantation strategies, can be controlled by the operator and facilitate the implantation process. However, there are only limited data dealing with predictors for OID. Therefore, the aim of this review was to outline factors and tools that might influence the final implantation depth during TAVR procedures, potentially influencing the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Veulemans
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Oliver Maier
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tobias Zeus
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abdelshafy M, Elkoumy A, Elzomor H, Abdelghani M, Campbell R, Kennedy C, Kenny Gibson W, Fezzi S, Nolan P, Wagener M, Arsang-Jang S, Mohamed SK, Mostafa M, Shawky I, MacNeill B, McInerney A, Mylotte D, Soliman O. Predictors of Conduction Disturbances Requiring New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the Evolut Series. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4835. [PMID: 37510950 PMCID: PMC10381756 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Conduction disturbance requiring a new permanent pacemaker (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has traditionally been a common complication. New implantation techniques with self-expanding platforms have reportedly reduced the incidence of PPM. We sought to investigate the predictors of PPM at 30 days after TAVI using Evolut R/PRO/PRO+; (2) Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent TAVI with the Evolut platform between October 2019 and August 2022 at University Hospital Galway, Ireland, were included. Patients who had a prior PPM (n = 10), valve-in-valve procedures (n = 8) or received >1 valve during the index procedure (n = 3) were excluded. Baseline clinical, electrocardiographic (ECG), echocardiographic and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) parameters were analyzed. Pre-TAVI MSCT analysis included membranous septum (MS) length, a semi-quantitative calcification analysis of the aortic valve leaflets, left ventricular outflow tract, and mitral annulus. Furthermore, the implantation depth (ID) was measured from the final aortography. Multivariate binary logistic analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to identify independent predictors and the optimal MS and ID cutoff values to predict new PPM requirements, respectively; (3) Results: A total of 129 TAVI patients were included (age = 81.3 ± 5.3 years; 36% female; median EuroSCORE II 3.2 [2.0, 5.4]). Fifteen patients (11.6%) required PPM after 30 days. The patients requiring new PPM at 30 days were more likely to have a lower European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, increased prevalence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) at baseline ECG, have a higher mitral annular calcification severity and have a shorter MS on preprocedural MSCT analysis, and have a ID, as shown on the final aortogram. From the multivariate analysis, pre-TAVI RBBB, MS length, and ID were shown to be predictors of new PPM. An MS length of <2.85 mm (AUC = 0.85, 95%CI: (0.77, 0.93)) and ID of >3.99 mm (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.79, (95% confidence interval (CI): (0.68, 0.90)) were found to be the optimal cut-offs for predicting new PPM requirements; (4) Conclusions: Membranous septum length and implantation depth were found to be independent predictors of new PPM post-TAVI with the Evolut platform. Patient-specific implantation depth could be used to mitigate the requirement for new PPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Abdelshafy
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
- CORRIB Core Lab, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland; (S.A.-J.); (S.K.M.)
- Department of Cardiology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11311, Egypt; (M.A.); (M.M.); (I.S.)
| | - Ahmed Elkoumy
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
- CORRIB Core Lab, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland; (S.A.-J.); (S.K.M.)
- Islamic Center of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt
| | - Hesham Elzomor
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
- CORRIB Core Lab, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland; (S.A.-J.); (S.K.M.)
- Islamic Center of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt
| | - Mohammad Abdelghani
- Department of Cardiology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11311, Egypt; (M.A.); (M.M.); (I.S.)
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruth Campbell
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Ciara Kennedy
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
| | - William Kenny Gibson
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Simone Fezzi
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Philip Nolan
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Max Wagener
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Shahram Arsang-Jang
- CORRIB Core Lab, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland; (S.A.-J.); (S.K.M.)
- Discipline of Medicine, Clinical Science Institute, University of Galway, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland
| | - Sameh K. Mohamed
- CORRIB Core Lab, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland; (S.A.-J.); (S.K.M.)
| | - Mansour Mostafa
- Department of Cardiology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11311, Egypt; (M.A.); (M.M.); (I.S.)
| | - Islam Shawky
- Department of Cardiology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11311, Egypt; (M.A.); (M.M.); (I.S.)
| | - Briain MacNeill
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Angela McInerney
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Darren Mylotte
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
- Discipline of Medicine, Clinical Science Institute, University of Galway, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland
| | - Osama Soliman
- Discipline of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland; (M.A.); (A.E.); (H.E.); (R.C.); (C.K.); (W.K.G.); (S.F.); (P.N.); (M.W.); (B.M.); (A.M.)
- CORRIB Core Lab, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland; (S.A.-J.); (S.K.M.)
- CÚRAM Centre for Medical Devices, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rivera FB, Cha SW, Aparece JP, Gonzales JST, Salva WFC, Bantayan NRB, Carado GP, Sharma V, Al-Abcha A, Co ML, Collado FMS, Volgman AS. Sex differences in permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2023; 21:631-641. [PMID: 37608465 DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2023.2250719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence on the effect of sex on permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the role of sex among patients requiring PPMI post-TAVR. METHODS A literature search was conducted using the SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases for studies published until October 2022. Eligible studies included published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Observational Cohort Studies (OCS) articles that reported PPMI as an outcome of pacemaker status following TAVR. This study was performed per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Publication bias was estimated using a Funnel plot and Egger's test. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary endpoint was the sex difference in PPMI after TAVR, with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) extracted. RESULTS Data was obtained from 63 studies, and a total of 79,655 patients were included. The cumulative PPMI rate was 15.5% (95% CI, 13.6%-17.7%). The pooled analysis revealed that while there were more females than males undergoing TAVR (51.6%, 95% CI 50.4%-52.8%), males have a 14.5% higher risk for post-TAVR PPMI than females (OR 1.145, 95% CI 1.047-1.253, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Males are more likely to experience PPMI after TAVR than females. Further research needs to be done to better explain these observed differences in outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vikram Sharma
- Department of Cardiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Lowa City, IA, USA
| | - Abdullah Al-Abcha
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael Lawrenz Co
- Section of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alabdaljabar MS, Eleid MF. Risk Factors, Management, and Avoidance of Conduction System Disease after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4405. [PMID: 37445439 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR) is a rapidly developing modality to treat patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Conduction disease post TAVR is one of the most frequent and serious complications experienced by patients. Multiple factors contribute to the risk of conduction disease, including AS and the severity of valve calcification, patients' pre-existing conditions (i.e., conduction disease, anatomical variations, and short septum) in addition to procedure-related factors (e.g., self-expanding valves, implantation depth, valve-to-annulus ratio, and procedure technique). Detailed evaluation of risk profiles could allow us to better prevent, recognize, and treat this entity. Available evidence on management of conduction disease post TAVR is based on expert opinion and varies widely. Currently, conduction disease in TAVR patients is managed depending on patient risk, with minimal-to-no inpatient/outpatient observation, inpatient monitoring (24-48 h) followed by ambulatory monitoring, or either prolonged inpatient and outpatient monitoring or permanent pacemaker implantation. Herein, we review the incidence and risk factors of TAVR-associated conduction disease and discuss its management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mackram F Eleid
- Division of Interventional Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|