Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma with pseudoprogression during nivolumab therapy and the usefulness of tumor markers: A case report

Clinical perspectives on serum tumor marker use in predicting prognosis and treatment response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The optimal positioning and usage of serum tumor markers (STMs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) care is still unclear. This review aimed to provide an overview of the potential use and value of STMs in routine advanced NSCLC care for the prediction of prognosis and treatment response. Radiological imaging and clinical symptoms have shown not to capture a patient's entire disease status in daily clinical practice. Since STM measurements allow for a rapid, minimally invasive, and safe evaluation of the patient's tumor status in real time, STMs can be used as companion decision-making support tools before start and during treatment. To overcome the limited sensitivity and specificity associated with the use of STMs, tests should only be applied in specific subgroups of patients and different test characteristics should be defined per clinical context in order to answer different clinical questions. The same approach can similarly be relevant when developing clinical applications for other (circulating) biomarkers. Future research should focus on the approaches described in this review to achieve STM test implementation in advanced NSCLC care.

The treatment of advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a pathological subtype of non-small cell lung cancer. Although the incidence of PSC in lung cancer is very low, it is an aggressive cancer, leading to a poor prognosis. Currently, there is no standard treatment for advanced PSC. Targeted therapy can be used for patients with MET exon 14 mutations and patients with other driver gene mutations may also benefit from treatment. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors also provides potential options for advanced PSC treatment, but more clinical data is needed. Additionally, more research may be warranted to explore the effects of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. In this review, the authors summarize the research regarding the treatment of advanced PSC.

Case Series of Pleomorphic Carcinoma of the Lung Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

AIM

We report, herein, three cases of pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Case 1: A 73-year-old man was diagnosed as having pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung and treated with pembrolizumab alone. However, he showed no response and died 4 months after the initiation of the treatment. Case 2: A 66-year-old man was diagnosed as having pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung. He was started on a combination regimen of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel, and a remarkable response was observed. Case 3: A 49-year-old man was diagnosed as having pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung. He was started on pembrolizumab monotherapy as second-line treatment. Eleven months after the treatment initiation, computed tomography revealed the decrease of tumor diameter.

CONCLUSION

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is expected to improve the prognosis of patients with pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung.

Immune response evaluation criteria in solid tumors for assessment of atypical responses after immunotherapy

In 2017, immune response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (iRECIST) were introduced to validate radiologic and clinical interpretations and to better analyze tumor’s response to immunotherapy, considering the different time of following and response, between this new therapy compared to the standard one. However, even if the iRECIST are worldwide accepted, to date, different aspects should be better underlined and well reported, especially in clinical practice. Clinical experience has demonstrated that in a non-negligible percentage of patients, it is challenging to determine the correct category of response (stable disease, progression disease, partial or complete response), and consequently, to define which is the best management for those patients. Approaching radiological response in patients who underwent immunotherapy, a new uncommon kind of target lesions behavior was found. This phenomenon is mainly due to the different mechanisms of action of immunotherapeutic drug. Therefore, new groups of response have been described in clinical practice, defined as “atypical responses,” and categorized into three new groups: pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, and dissociated response. This review summarizes and reports these patterns, helping clinicians and radiologists get used to atypical responses, in order to identify patients that respond best to treatment.

Anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab plus doxorubicin showed durable response in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: Case report and literature review

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is characterized by dismal prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. The immune checkpoint inhibitors showed promising efficacy in the treatment of PSC. Camrelizumab is a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor; however, current evidence of its efficacy in PSC is lacking.

CASE SUMMARY

A 47-year-old female non-smoker presented with central-type masses in the right upper and lower lobes. PSC (cT4N2M0, stage IIIB) with positive expression of programmed death ligand-1 was diagnosed. First-line camrelizumab plus doxorubicin and cisplatin was introduced, followed by camrelizumab monotherapy due to grade 4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia during the combination therapy. The lesions indicated a partial remission which endured for more than 20 months.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab plus doxorubicin and cisplatin regimen is a promising option for PSC patients. Further high-quality trials are warranted.

Radiomics, Tumor Volume, and Blood Biomarkers for Early Prediction of Pseudoprogression in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition

PURPOSE

We assessed the predictive potential of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT-based radiomics, lesion volume, and routine blood markers for early differentiation of pseudoprogression from true progression at 3 months.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

112 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibition were included in our study. Median follow-up duration was 22 months. 716 metastases were segmented individually on CT and 2[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-PET imaging at three timepoints: baseline (TP0), 3 months (TP1), and 6 months (TP2). Response was defined on a lesion-individual level (RECIST 1.1) and retrospectively correlated with FDG-PET/CT radiomic features and the blood markers LDH/S100. Seven multivariate prediction model classes were generated.

RESULTS

Two-year (median) overall survival, progression-free survival, and immune progression-free survival were 69% (not reached), 24% (6 months), and 42% (16 months), respectively. At 3 months, 106 (16%) lesions had progressed, of which 30 (5%) were identified as pseudoprogression at 6 months. Patients with pseudoprogressive lesions and without true progressive lesions had a similar outcome to responding patients and a significantly better 2-year overall survival of 100% (30 months), compared with 15% (10 months) in patients with true progressions/without pseudoprogression (P = 0.002). Patients with mixed progressive/pseudoprogressive lesions were in between at 53% (25 months). The blood prediction model (LDH+S100) achieved an AUC = 0.71. Higher LDH/S100 values indicated a low chance of pseudoprogression. Volume-based models: AUC = 0.72 (TP1) and AUC = 0.80 (delta-volume between TP0/TP1). Radiomics models (including/excluding volume-related features): AUC = 0.79/0.78. Combined blood/volume model: AUC = 0.79. Combined blood/radiomics model (including volume-related features): AUC = 0.78. The combined blood/radiomics model (excluding volume-related features) performed best: AUC = 0.82.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive PET/CT-based radiomics, especially in combination with blood parameters, are promising biomarkers for early differentiation of pseudoprogression, potentially avoiding added toxicity or delayed treatment switch.

The potential mechanism, recognition and clinical significance of tumor pseudoprogression after immunotherapy

As immunotherapy has gained increasing interest as a new foundation for cancer therapy, some atypical response patterns, such as pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, have garnered the attention of physicians. Pseudoprogression is a phenomenon in which an initial increase in tumor size is observed or new lesions appear, followed by a decrease in tumor burden; this phenomenon can benefit patients receiving immunotherapy but often leads to premature discontinuation of treatment owing to the false judgment of progression. Accurately recognizing pseudoprogression is also a challenge for physicians. Because of the extensive attention on pseudoprogression, significant progress has been made. Some new criteria for immunotherapy, such as irRC, iRECIST and imRECIST, were proposed to accurately evaluate the response to immunotherapy. Many new detection indexes, such as ctDNA and IL-8, have also been used to identify pseudoprogression. In this review, the definition, evaluation criteria, mechanism, monitoring, management and prognosis of pseudoprogression are summarized, and diagnostic and treatment processes for patients with progression but with a suspicion of pseudoprogression are proposed; these processes could be helpful for physicians in clinical practice and enhances the understanding of pseudoprogression.

Immune checkpoint protein and cytokine expression by T lymphocytes in pleural effusion of cancer patients receiving anti-PD-1 therapy

OBJECTIVES

Pleural effusion (PE) occasionally develops in cancer patients during treatment with antibodies to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or to its ligand PD-L1 (hereafter, αPD-1 therapy). Such effusion often contains infiltrated mononuclear cells, although the types of immune cell present as well as the outcome of such patients have remained unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a multi-institutional, observational study to examine the clinical outcome of patients who develop PE after the onset of αPD-1 therapy. We compared the immune cell profiles and the immune status of lymphocytes in PE as determined by flow cytometry between nine patients who developed effusion during αPD-1 therapy (αPD-1 group) and 15 patients who developed PE during treatment with other anticancer agents (control group).

RESULTS

Most mononuclear cells in PE were lymphocytes in both the αPD-1 and control groups. The frequency of both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T lymphocytes expressing the immune checkpoint proteins TIM-3 or TIGIT as well as that of CD8⁺ T lymphocytes expressing PD-L1 were increased in the αPD-1 group compared with the control group. αPD-1 therapy continued for a substantial period after the emergence of PE in six of the nine patients in the αPD-1 group, and the frequency of CD4⁺ T lymphocytes in PE expressing the immune checkpoint protein LAG-3 or the cytokine interkeukin-17 was lower for these patients than for those who did not receive a sustained treatment benefit.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest a clinical benefit of continuing αPD-1 therapy in some patients who develop PE. We found that infiltrating T lymphocytes in PE manifest a more exhausted phenotype during αPD-1 therapy than during treatment with other cancer drugs, with subpopulations of these cells characterized by specific immune checkpoint protein and cytokine expression profiles possibly contributing to the antitumor immune response.