Dosimetric advantages of stereotactic radiosurgery as a boost to adjuvant conventional radiotherapy in the setting of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid with skull base invasion

Treatment outcomes of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for adenoid cystic carcinoma: a case series of 55 patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze the treatment outcomes of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for adenoid cystic carcinoma patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted for 55 patients with 66 lesions. SRS intentions were categorized as definitive, adjuvant, salvage, and palliative. Tumor control was defined as local (within 50% isodose line), marginal (outside 50% isodose line), and distant (metastasis outside head/neck).

RESULTS

The median age was 60 years (range 21-85), with 53% males. Tumor origin was head/neck for 88% and trachea/lung for 12%. 61% were recurrent lesions. Median interval from diagnosis to SRS was 14 months. Preceding surgery was performed in 30%. SRS was administered as definitive (30 lesions), adjuvant (13), salvage (19), and palliative (4). SRS was used as a boost to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in 39%. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered in 26%. 5-, 10-, and 15-year local control rates were 60%, 33%, and 27%, respectively; local/marginal control rates were 29%, 13%, and 10%. For recurrent lesions treated with SRS without EBRT, 5-year local control rate was 14%, and local/marginal control rate was 5%. For recurrent lesions treated with SRS and EBRT, 5-year local control rate was 100%, and local/marginal control rate was 40%. The rate of distant failure after SRS was 40%. Older age and distant metastasis before SRS were negative factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

SRS provided a high rate of local tumor control, but marginal failure was frequent. Integrating SRS with added EBRT exhibits potential for enhancing local and local/marginal tumor control, particularly in recurrent cases.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent skull base polymorphous adenocarcinoma invading the cavernous sinus: illustrative case

BAKGROUND

Polymorphous adenocarcinomas (PACs) are rare tumors arising from the salivary glands. Radical resection and postoperative radiotherapy are the mainstays of treatment. However, complete tumor resection is not always achievable when the tumor invades the skull base. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) could be a less invasive alternative for treating skull base PACs.

OBSERVATIONS

A 70-year-old male with a history of surgery for a right palatine PAC presented with right visual impairment, diplopia, and ptosis. Imaging studies revealed tumor recurrence invading the right cavernous sinus (CS). SRS using a gamma knife was performed for this recurrence, prescribing a marginal dose of 18 Gy at a 50% isodose line. Five months after SRS, his symptoms were relieved, and the tumor was well-controlled for 55 months without any adverse events.

LESSONS

To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the world's first case of recurrent skull base PAC invading the CS that was successfully treated with salvage SRS. Thus, SRS may be an applicable treatment option for skull base PACs.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for skull base adenoid cystic carcinoma: A report of two cases

Background:

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is an uncommon salivary gland tumor with a relatively favorable prognosis. However, treating ACC is potentially challenging because radical resection is usually difficult once the skull base is involved due to the adjacent critical structures. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a less invasive alternative for surgically recalcitrant lesions.

Case Description:

We report two patients with three metastatic skull base ACCs who underwent SRS using the Gamma Knife with a marginal dose of 20 Gy to a 50% isodose line. All tumors were effectively controlled without any adverse events.

Conclusion:

This case report and our review of the literature suggest that SRS can be considered for local control of ACC invading the skull base when surgical resection is unsuitable or a postoperative residual lesion is suspected. Further, investigations on the accumulated subjects are warranted to confirm the role of SRS for the treatment of ACCs.