An abnormal clinical Allen's Test is not a contraindication for free radial forearm flap

Modification of the single-tube radial forearm phalloplasty technique to allow for urinary meatal reconstruction: A report of two cases

The free radial forearm flap is the gold standard technique for transgender phalloplasty due to superior complication rates compared to other methods. However, reconstruction of the urinary tract, including urethral lengthening and creation of a pars pendula urethra within the flap, carries a high rate of complications. The risk of complications and a lack of desire for standing urination are reasons patients elect for single-tube phalloplasty. However, to date, single-tube phalloplasties lack creation of a urinary meatus, which affects the aesthetics of the reconstruction. The purpose of this report is to describe a technique for creating an aesthetic urinary meatus in single-tube phalloplasty. We herein describe the technique in the use of two healthy transgender males (ages 31 and 39). Both patients did not desire micturition through the neophallus, but still desired the appearance of a meatus at the tip of the neophallus. Single-tube radial forearm phalloplasty was performed for both patients. The radial forearm flaps for each patient were 14 × 15 cm. Meatoplasty was performed at the time of flap elevation utilizing an intact 1 × 4 cm intact strip of ulnar sided skin during flap tubularization. This strip of skin was then invaginated to create a neomeatal pouch. The postoperative course was uncomplicated for both patients following at 5-day hospital stay for flap monitoring. Follow up time was 7 and 8 months. The neomeatal pouch persisted in both patients and the patients were satisfied with the appearance of the tips of the neophalluses.

[Scapular flap, an alternative to the radial forearm flap in phalloplasty: Advantages and limitations]

INTRODUCTION

Antebrachial phalloplasty is considered as the standard technique in total penile reconstruction. This technique allows the creation of a phallus and a neourethra in one step at the cost of significant sequelae of the donor site. Thus, this technique has been replaced in some centers by other techniques such as the MSLD flap or the ALT flap. However, in Western populations, these techniques require the addition of a technique dedicated to the urethroplasty. The scapular flap is a technique that is not widely described in the literature and, like the antebrachial flap, allows the creation of a phallus and a urethra in one step according to the "tube within tube" technique.

AIM

The aim of the study was to detail this technique, to study its vascularization and to adapt the measurements of the flap to a western population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six cadaveric dissections were performed in the laboratory. Intravascular injection of colored latex allowed easier identification of the vessels of interest and study of the subcutaneous vascular tree. Scapular flaps of variable size were raised to adapt the size to a Western population.

RESULTS

Six dissections were performed in Caucasian subjects. The scapular circumflex artery was constant and had a mean diameter of 3.5mm (3.3mm-3.8mm). The mean pedicle length was 7.3cm (6.8cm-8.1cm). The size of the flaps was adapted to the subcutaneous tissue and flaps of at least 14×16cm allowed the "tube within tube" technique to be performed.

CONCLUSION

The scapular flap has the advantage of allowing phalloplasty with urethroplasty to be performed at the same time. The pedicle is constant and of good diameter. In addition, the sequelae of the donor site are minimal. On the other hand, the pedicle used is short and the flap cannot be surgically reinnervated. Nevertheless, the restoration of a protective sensitivity allows the implantation of a penile prosthesis.

Prevention and Management of Complications of Tissue Flaps

In this article, we discuss 4 common free flaps performed in reconstructive surgery: the anterolateral thigh flap, the radial forearm flap, the fibula flap, and the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous/deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Donor and recipient complications for each flap type and strategies on how to prevent and manage such complications are discussed.