Trimethoprim-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) associated with reactivation of human herpes virus-6 (HHV-6) leading to acute liver failure

Immunopathogenic Insights on Preferential Human Herpesvirus-6 Reactivation in Drug Rash With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION

Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) is a ubiquitous lymphotropic betaherpesvirus that can reactivate in drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Despite recent publications advancing our understanding of HHV-6 in DRESS, the exact role of HHV-6 in disease pathogenesis remains unclear.

METHODS

A scoping review with the PubMed query "(HHV 6 AND (drug OR DRESS OR DIHS)) OR (HHV6 AND (drug OR DRESS OR DIHS))" was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Articles containing original data on at least one DRESS patient with HHV-6 testing were included.

RESULTS

Our search returned a total of 373 publications, of which 89 met eligibility criteria. HHV-6 reactivation occurred in 63% of DRESS patients (n = 748), which was significantly more often than other herpesviruses. HHV-6 reactivation was associated with worse outcomes and greater severity in controlled studies. Case reports have demonstrated sometimes fatal HHV-6-related multi-organ involvement. Temporally, HHV-6 reactivation typically occurs 2 to 4 weeks after DRESS onset and has been linked to markers of immunologic signaling, such as OX40 (CD134), an HHV-6 entry receptor. Efficacy of antiviral or immunoglobulin treatment has only been demonstrated anecdotally, and steroid use may affect HHV-6 reactivation.

CONCLUSION

HHV-6 is implicated in DRESS more than in any other dermatologic condition. It is still unclear whether HHV-6 reactivation is cause or consequence of DRESS dysregulation. Similar pathogenic mechanisms precipitated by HHV-6 in other contexts may be relevant in DRESS. Future randomized controlled studies to assess effects of viral suppression on clinical outcomes is needed.

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS): Focus on the Pathophysiological and Diagnostic Role of Viruses

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a heterogeneous, multiorgan and potentially life-threatening drug-hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) that occurs several days or weeks after drug initiation or discontinuation. DHRs constitute an emerging issue for public health, due to population aging, growing multi-organ morbidity, and subsequent enhanced drug prescriptions. DRESS has more consistently been associated with anticonvulsants, allopurinol and antibiotics, such as sulphonamides and vancomycin, although new drugs are increasingly reported as culprit agents. Reactivation of latent infectious agents such as viruses (especially Herpesviridae) plays a key role in prompting and sustaining aberrant T-cell and eosinophil responses to drugs and pathogens, ultimately causing organ damage. However, the boundaries of the impact of viral agents in the pathophysiology of DRESS are still ill-defined. Along with growing awareness of the multifaceted aspects of immune perturbation caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the ongoing SARS-CoV-2-related disease (COVID-19) pandemic, novel interest has been sparked towards DRESS and the potential interactions among antiviral and anti-drug inflammatory responses. In this review, we summarised the most recent evidence on pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and clinical management of DRESS with the aim of increasing awareness on this syndrome and possibly suggesting clues for future research in this field.

Cortisol in Peripheral Blood Predicts the Severity and Prognosis in Patients with Liver Failure at 90 Days

Objective

To investigate the cortisol level in peripheral blood in evaluating the severity and prognosis of patients with liver failure.

Methods

A total of 211 inpatients with liver failure were enrolled in Beijing You ‘an Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University, from September 2018 to January 2020. They were divided into three groups according to the severity of liver failure: early-stage liver failure, medium-stage liver failure and end-stage liver failure. In all patients, peripheral venous blood was gathered to detect the level of peripheral cortisol and related biochemical indexes. Logistic regression was used to screen the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients at 90 days. A receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to reflect the value of cortisol on the prognosis of patients at 90 days. A model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) was accessed.

Results

Among these 211 patients with liver failure, aged from 19 to 70 years, the average level of cortisol was 351.26 ± 129.78 nmol/L for 101 cases with early-stage liver failure, 281.05 ± 81.31 nmol/L for 58 cases with medium-stage liver failure, and 189.21 ± 89.27 nmol/L for 52 cases with end-stage liver failure (P < 0.05). The level of cortisol in the survival group and the non-survival group was 339.26 ± 121.19 nmol/L and 192.71 ± 67.23 nmol/L, respectively (P < 0.05). The results of logistics regression analysis showed that the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of cortisol were 1.025 and 1.013–1.038 nmol/L (P < 0.05). MELD results showed that patients with higher MELD scores had lower cortisol content.

Conclusion

The level of cortisol is correlated with the severity of liver failure and decreases with the aggravation of liver failure, suggesting that the level of cortisol could be used as one of the indicators to evaluate the prognosis in patients with liver failure at 90 days.