Capecitabine-related liver lesions: sinusoidal dilatation mimicking liver metastasis

Oxaliplatin‑induced changes in splenic volume and liver fibrosis indices: retrospective analyses of colon cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy

The aim of our study was to evaluate the association between increased splenic volume (SV) and liver fibrosis indices in colon cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who received adjuvant oxaliplatin-based regimens with the diagnosis of stage II and III colon cancer were evaluated. Splenic volume measurements, liver function tests, platelet count, and non-invasive liver fibrosis indices [NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), AST to platelet ratio (APRI), and Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4)] were measured before and after treatment. A 30% increase in SV after chemotherapy compared to baseline was considered increased SV. The rate of increase in SV was 57.7% in the whole group. An increase in SV was shown at a higher rate in patients treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) than those treated with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) (66.3% vs. 36.8%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, the CAPOX regimen (OR: 2.831, 95% CI: 1.125-7.121; p = 0.027), and higher post-treatment FIB-4 score (OR: 3.779; 95% CI:1.537- 9.294, p = 0.004) were determined as independent risk factors for the increased SV. Our study revealed that increased SV had a significant association with higher FIB-4 score in patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

FOLFOX and capecitabine-induced hepatic granuloma mimicking metastasis in a rectal cancer patient

A 49-year-old male carcinoma rectum patient was treated with neoadjuvant FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine, surgery and adjuvant FOLFOX. On follow-up, the patient developed a metabolically active liver lesion mimicking metastasis. Liver biopsy and histopathology showed sinusoidal dilatation with non-caseating granulomas. Follow-up fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography CT scan demonstrated increase in size of the lesion with metabolic activity suspicious of metastasis. The patient underwent segmental liver resection and histopathology showed non-necrotising granuloma with no evidence of malignancy. It is crucial to consider potential side effects of chemotherapeutic agents and have an unbiased approach when evaluating new liver lesions during post treatment follow-up of colorectal cancer. A multidisciplinary tumour board approach comprising of gastroenterologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and surgeons is suggested in the management of such patients. The patient is currently doing well and on regular follow-up.