1
|
Lehtoranta S, Tampio E, Rasi S, Laakso J, Vikki K, Luostarinen S. The implications of management practices on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in biogas production. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 366:121884. [PMID: 39032250 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
Biogas production is seen as one of the key measures in circular economy providing several benefits for the environment. In practice, however, these benefits may not be achieved if the production is not implemented and managed in ways that reduce gaseous emissions. Thus, this study aimed at highlighting how different management practices impact the climate during the life cycle of biogas production in comparison to management without biogas production (reference). Advanced, more emission-reducing practices resulted in 97-107% and conventional practices in 57-75% less emissions when biogas was utilized as transport fuel. If biogas was utilized in CHP (combined heat and power production), the emission reductions were 67-74% and 13-30%, respectively. This reflects the fact that inefficient practices can lead to minimal emission reduction without achieving the desired climate benefit in comparison to the reference. On the European level, this may also mean that the emission reduction demands of RED II (Renewable Energy Directive) regulation are not met. Therefore, when supporting biogas production with public funds, assurance of using emission-reducing practices should be made a prerequisite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lehtoranta
- Finnish Environment Institute (Syke), Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - E Tampio
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland
| | - S Rasi
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland
| | - J Laakso
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland
| | - K Vikki
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland
| | - S Luostarinen
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luo T, Shen B, Mei Z, Hove A, Ju K. Unlocking the potential of biogas systems for energy production and climate solutions in rural communities. Nat Commun 2024; 15:5900. [PMID: 39003261 PMCID: PMC11246535 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50091-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024] Open
Abstract
On-site conversion of organic waste into biogas to satisfy consumer energy demand has the potential to realize energy equality and mitigate climate change reliably. However, existing methods ignore either real-time full supply or methane escape when supply and demand are mismatched. Here, we show an improved design of community biogas production and distribution system to overcome these and achieve full co-benefits in developing economies. We take five existing systems as empirical examples. Mechanisms of synergistic adjusting out-of-step biogas flow rates on both the plant-side and user-side are defined to obtain consumption-to-production ratios of close to 1, such that biogas demand of rural inhabitants can be met. Furthermore, carbon mitigation and its viability under universal prevailing climates are illustrated. Coupled with manure management optimization, Chinese national deployment of the proposed system would contribute a 3.77% reduction towards meeting its global 1.5 °C target. Additionally, fulfilling others' energy demands has considerable decarbonization potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Luo
- Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu, China
| | - Bo Shen
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
| | - Zili Mei
- Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu, China
| | - Anders Hove
- The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford, UK
| | - Keyi Ju
- Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Michael Fredenslund A, Gudmundsson E, Maria Falk J, Scheutz C. The Danish national effort to minimise methane emissions from biogas plants. WASTE MANAGEMENT (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 157:321-329. [PMID: 36592586 DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
In total, 69 biogas plants representing 59 % of Danish biogas production participated in a national effort to reduce methane (CH4) emission. Measurements in terms of total plant CH4 emissions, quantification of emissions from point sources, leak surveys and conceptual design plans to mitigate emissions were performed. Plant-level CH4 emission rates varied between 1.3 and 81.2 kg CH4 h-1, and CH4 losses expressed in percentages of production varied between 0.3 and 40.6 %. Agricultural plants generally had lower CH4 loss rates compared to wastewater treatment plants. Biogas plants with a smaller gas production emitted a larger fraction of their production compared to larger plants, which was partly explained by the absence of gas collection from digestate storage tanks at smaller plants. A very commonly observed source of emission was pressure relief valves, where this source of leakage was observed at 53 % of the plants. A national emission factor (sum of CH4 emissions/sum of CH4 productions) was determined at 2.5 % for the Danish biogas production, whereof it was 2.1 % for agricultural biogas production and 6.7 % for biogas production at wastewater treatment plants. Measurements of total CH4 emissions at six plants performed before and after implementation of mitigating actions showed that emissions were reduced by 46 % by carrying out relatively minor technical fixes and adjustments. An economic evaluation showed that, in some cases, mitigating actions could be economically beneficial for the biogas plant (positive net present value over a 10 year time frame), due to an increase in revenue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Michael Fredenslund
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Sustain, Bygningstorvet, Building, 115, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | | | - Julie Maria Falk
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Sustain, Bygningstorvet, Building, 115, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Scheutz
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Sustain, Bygningstorvet, Building, 115, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baldé H, Wagner-Riddle C, MacDonald D, VanderZaag A. Fugitive methane emissions from two agricultural biogas plants. WASTE MANAGEMENT (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 151:123-130. [PMID: 35944429 DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
This study quantified fugitive methane (CH4) losses from multiple sources (open digestate storages, digesters and flare) at two biogas facilities over one year, providing a much needed dataset integrating all major loss pathways and changes over time. Losses of CH4 from Facility A were primarily from digestate storage (5.8% of biogas CH4), followed by leakage/venting (5.5%) and flaring (0.2%). At Facility B, losses from digestate storage were higher (10.7%) due to shorter hydraulic retention time and lack of a screwpress. Fugitive emissions from leakage were initially 3.8% but were reduced to 0.6% after the dome membrane was repaired at Facility B. For biogas to have a positive impact on greenhouse gas emissions and provide a low-carbon fuel, it is important to minimize fugitive losses from digestate storage and avoid leakage during abnormal operation (leakage, roof failure).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hambaliou Baldé
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Ottawa, Ontario K1A0C6, Canada
| | | | | | - Andrew VanderZaag
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Ottawa, Ontario K1A0C6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reinelt T, McCabe BK, Hill A, Harris P, Baillie C, Liebetrau J. Field measurements of fugitive methane emissions from three Australian waste management and biogas facilities. WASTE MANAGEMENT (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 137:294-303. [PMID: 34823136 DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
A key environmental sustainability requirement for the treatment of organic waste via anaerobic digestion (AD) is the prevention of unwanted methane emissions in the production chain whenever possible. Identifying and quantifying these emissions has been frequently investigated, particularly in Europe. However, the challenges of climate change are also becoming vitally important in Australia. This novel study presents the results from emission measurement campaigns carried out at two biogas plants and one landfill site in Australia. An on-site approach consisting of leakage detection and emission quantification by a static chamber method was applied. Twenty-nine leakages were detected predominantly on the digesters (gastight covered anaerobic lagoons) of the biogas plants. Ten emission hot spots were found on the surface cover of a landfill site. Methane emission rates of 9.9 ± 2.3 kg h-1 (10.5 ± 2.4% CH4) for biogas plant A, 3.0 ± 1.9 kg h-1 (8.1 ± 5.2% CH4) for biogas plant B and 41-211 g h-1 for the two largest emission hot spots from the landfill were measured. Since not every single leakage or hot spot could be quantified separately, the stated overall emission rates had to be extrapolated. Importantly, the emission rates from the landfill should be interpreted carefully due to the limited overall area which could be practicably investigated. Leakages occurred at common components of the covered anaerobic lagoons such as the membrane fixation or concrete walls. Repairing these parts would increase the plant safety and mitigate negative environmental effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Reinelt
- Biochemical Conversion Department, DBFZ Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH, Torgauer Straße 116, D-04347 Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
| | - Bernadette K McCabe
- Centre for Agricultural Engineering (CAE), University of Southern Queensland (USQ), West Street, 4350 Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew Hill
- Centre for Agricultural Engineering (CAE), University of Southern Queensland (USQ), West Street, 4350 Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter Harris
- Centre for Agricultural Engineering (CAE), University of Southern Queensland (USQ), West Street, 4350 Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Craig Baillie
- Centre for Agricultural Engineering (CAE), University of Southern Queensland (USQ), West Street, 4350 Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jan Liebetrau
- Research and Development Department, Rytec GmbH, Pariser Ring 37, D-76532 Baden-Baden, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bakkaloglu S, Lowry D, Fisher RE, France JL, Brunner D, Chen H, Nisbet EG. Quantification of methane emissions from UK biogas plants. WASTE MANAGEMENT (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2021; 124:82-93. [PMID: 33610114 DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
The rising number of operational biogas plants in the UK brings a new emissions category to consider for methane monitoring, quantification and reduction. Minimising methane losses from biogas plants to the atmosphere is critical not only because of their contribution of methane to global warming but also with respect to the sustainability of renewable energy production. Mobile greenhouse gas surveys were conducted to detect plumes of methane emissions from the biogas plants in southern England that varied in their size, waste feed input materials and biogas utilization. Gaussian plume modelling was used to estimate total emissions of methane from ten biogas plants based on repeat passes through the plumes. Methane emission rates ranged from 0.1 to 58.7 kg CH4 hr-1, and the percentage of losses relative to the calculated production rate varied between 0.02 and 8.1%. The average emission rate was 15.9 kg CH4 hr-1, and the average loss was 3.7%. In general, methane emission rates from smaller farm biogas plants were higher than from larger food waste biogas plants. We also suggest that biogas methane emissions may account for between 0.4 and 3.8%, with an average being 1.9% of the total methane emissions in the UK excluding the sewage sludge biogas plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Bakkaloglu
- Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, United Kingdom; Sustainable Gas Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 1NA, United Kingdom..
| | - Dave Lowry
- Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca E Fisher
- Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, United Kingdom
| | - James L France
- Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, United Kingdom; British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Rd, Cambridge CB3 0ET, United Kingdom
| | - Dominik Brunner
- Laboratory for Air Pollution/Environmental Technology, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Empa, 8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
| | - Huilin Chen
- Centre for Isotope Research, Energy and Sustainability Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 6, 9747 AG Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Euan G Nisbet
- Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The biogas production technology has improved over the last years for the aim of reducing the costs of the process, increasing the biogas yields, and minimizing the greenhouse gas emissions. To obtain a stable and efficient biogas production, there are several design considerations and operational parameters to be taken into account. Besides, adapting the process to unanticipated conditions can be achieved by adequate monitoring of various operational parameters. This paper reviews the research that has been conducted over the last years. This review paper summarizes the developments in biogas design and operation, while highlighting the main factors that affect the efficiency of the anaerobic digestion process. The study’s outcomes revealed that the optimum operational values of the main parameters may vary from one biogas plant to another. Additionally, the negative conditions that should be avoided while operating a biogas plant were identified.
Collapse
|