Design, synthesis, evaluation, and structure of vitamin D analogues with furan side chains

The Centennial Collection of VDR Ligands: Metabolites, Analogs, Hybrids and Non-Secosteroidal Ligands

Since the discovery of vitamin D a century ago, a great number of metabolites, analogs, hybrids and nonsteroidal VDR ligands have been developed. An enormous effort has been made to synthesize compounds which present beneficial properties while attaining lower calcium serum levels than calcitriol. This structural review covers VDR ligands published to date.

Vitamin D and Its Synthetic Analogs

For many individuals, in particular during winter, supplementation with the secosteroid vitamin D₃ is essential for the prevention of bone disorders, muscle weakness, autoimmune diseases, and possibly also different types of cancer. Vitamin D₃ acts via its metabolite 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ [1,25(OH)₂D₃] as potent agonist of the transcription factor vitamin D receptor (VDR). Thus, vitamin D directly affects chromatin structure and gene regulation at thousands of genomic loci, i.e., the epigenome and transcriptome of its target tissues. Modifications of 1,25(OH)₂D₃ at its side-chain, A-ring, triene system, or C-ring, alone and in combination, as well as nonsteroidal mimics provided numerous potent VDR agonists and some antagonists. The nearly 150 crystal structures of VDR’s ligand-binding domain with various vitamin D compounds allow a detailed molecular understanding of their action. This review discusses the most important vitamin D analogs presented during the past 10 years and molecular insight derived from new structural information on the VDR protein.

Synthesis and biological activity of two C-7 methyl analogues of vitamin D

Two novel vitamin D analogues of the hormone 1α,25-(OH)2D3 modified at C-7, namely, 7-methyl-1α,25-(OH)2D3 (12) and 7-methyl-1α,25-(OH)2-19-nor-D3 (26), were synthesized and biologically evaluated to gain further insights into the structure-function relationships of vitamin D. Key steps in the synthesis of 12 include the functionalization at C-7 by an efficient regioselective hydrostannylation of an allene precursor, and the construction of the triene framework by a palladium-catalyzed intramolecular cyclization-Suzuki-Miyaura coupling cascade. Since the calcitriol analogue 12 was prone to conversion into its previtamin D form by thermal equilibration, the corresponding 19-nor-compound 26 was also synthesized. The diene moiety of compound 26 was constructed by a modified Julia coupling. UV data as well as X-ray analysis indicate that introduction of the methyl group at C-7 results in a significant deviation from planarity of the 5,7-diene moiety. The new vitamin D analogues 12 and 26 retained good VDR binding ability.

Structural considerations of vitamin D signaling

Crystal structures represent the static picture in the life of a molecule giving a sneak preview what it might be in reality. Hence, it is very hard to extrapolate from these photos toward dynamic processes such as transcriptional regulation. Mechanistically VDR may be considered as molecular machine able to perform ligand-, DNA- and protein recognition, and interaction in a multi-task manner. Taking this into account the functional net effect will be the combination of all these processes. The long awaited answer to explain the differences in physiological effects for various ligands was one of the biggest disappointment that crystal structures provided since no substantial distinction could be made for the conformation of the active VDR-ligand complexes. This may have come from the limitation on the complexity of the available ligand-VDR structures. The recent studies with full length VDR-RXRα showed somewhat more comprehensive perspective for the 3D organization and possible function of the VDR-RXRα-cofactor complex. In addition to in vitro approaches, also computational tools had been introduced with the aim to get understanding on the mechanic and dynamic properties of the VDR complexes with some success. Using these methods and based on measurable descriptors such as pocket size and positions of side chains it is possible to note subtle differences between the structures. The meaning of these differences has not been fully understood yet but the possibility of a “butterfly effect” may have more extreme consequences in terms of VDR signaling. In this review, the three functional aspects (ligand-, DNA- and protein recognition, and binding) will be discussed with respect to available data as well as possible implication and questions that may be important to address in the future.