Are Hetero-metallapentalenes Aromatic or Not? A DFT Investigation

Adaptive aromaticity in 16-valence-electron metallazapentalenes

According to Hückel's and Baird's rules, cyclic species are generally aromatic only either in the lowest singlet state (S₀) or in the lowest-lying triplet ππ* excited state (T₁). Thus, species with aromaticity both in S₀ and T₁ states (termed as adaptive aromaticity) are particularly rare. Herein, we carry out density functional theory (DFT) calculations to examine the aromaticity of 16e metallapentalenes containing heteroatoms (N, O). Interestingly, metallazapentalenes show adaptive aromaticity whereas metalloxapentalenes display nonaromaticity in the S₀ and T₁ states, which is supported by structural, magnetic, and electronic indices. In addition, a series of metallazapentalenes containing strong σ- or π-donor ligands are predicted to achieve adaptive aromaticity. Our findings expand the family of adaptive aromatics significantly, inviting experimental chemists to realize more hetero-metallapentalenes with adaptive aromaticity.

Assembly of a Dihydrideborate and Two Aryl Nitriles to Form a C,N,N′-Pincer Ligand Coordinated to Osmium

The C,N,N′-donor aryl-diimineborate pincer ligand of the complexes OsH₂{κ³-C,N,N-[C₆H₃RCH=NB(cat)N=CHC₆H₄R]}(PⁱPr₃)₂ (R = H, Me) has been generated in a one-pot procedure, by the reaction of the hexahydride OsH₆(PⁱPr₃)₂ with catecholborane (catBH) and two molecules of the corresponding aryl nitrile. The osmium–pincer bonding situation has been analyzed by means of atoms in molecules (AIM), natural bond orbital (NBO), and energy decomposition analysis coupled with the natural orbitals for chemical valence (EDA-NOCV) methods. According to the results, the complexes exhibit a rather strong electron-sharing Os–C bond, two weaker donor–acceptor N–Os bonds, and two π-back-donations from the transition metal to vacant π* orbitals of the formed metallacycles. In addition, spectroscopic findings and DFT calculations reveal that the donor units of the pincer are incorporated in a sequential manner. First, the central Os–N bond is formed, by the reaction of the dihydrideborate ligand of the intermediate OsH₃{κ²-H,H-(H₂Bcat)}(PⁱPr₃)₂ with one of the aryl nitriles. The subsequent oxidative addition of the o-C–H bond of the aryl substituent of the resulting κ¹-N-(N-boryl-arylaldimine) affords the Os–C bond. Finally, the second Os–N bond is generated from a hydride, an ortho-metalated N-boryl-arylaldimine, and the second aryl nitrile.