Stereoselective and isozyme-selective drug interactions

Enantioselective inhibition of human CYP2C19 by the chiral pesticide ethofumesate: Prediction of pesticide-drug interactions in humans

Ethofumesate is a chiral herbicide that may display enantioselective behavior in humans. For this reason, the enantioselective potential of ethofumesate and its main metabolite ethofumesate-2-hydroxy to cause pesticide-drug interactions on cytochrome P450 forms (CYPs) has been evaluated by using human liver microsomes. Among the evaluated CYPs, CYP2C19 had its activity decreased by the ethofumesate racemic mixture (rac-ETO), (+)-ethofumesate ((+)-ETO), and (-)-ethofumesate ((-)-ETO). CYP2C19 inhibition was not time-dependent, but a strong inhibition potential was observed for rac-ETO (IC₅₀ = 5 ± 1 μmol L^-1), (+)-ETO (IC₅₀ = 1.6 ± 0.4 μmol L^-1), and (-)-ETO (IC₅₀ = 1.8 ± 0.4 μmol L^-1). The reversible inhibition mechanism was competitive, and the inhibition constant (K_i) values for rac-ETO (2.6 ± 0.4 μmol L^-1), (+)-ETO (1.5 ± 0.2 μmol L^-1), and (-)-ETO (0.7 ± 0.1 μmol L^-1) were comparable to the K_i values of strong CYP2C19 inhibitors. Inhibition of CYP2C19 by ethofumesate was enantioselective, being almost twice higher for (-)-ETO than for (+)-ETO, which indicates that this enantiomer may be a more potent inhibitor of this CYP form. For an in vitro-in vivo correlation, the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) guideline on the assessment of drug-drug interactions used in the early stages of drug development was used. The FDA's R₁ values were estimated on the basis of the obtained ethofumesate K_i and distribution volume, metabolism, unbound plasma fraction, gastrointestinal and dermal absorption data available in the literature. The correlation revealed that ethofumesate probably inhibits CYP2C19 in vivo for both chronic (oral) and occupational (dermal) exposure scenarios.

Bioanalysis of chiral compounds during drug development using a tiered approach

Significant differences in the pharmacodynamic activity and pharmacokinetic properties could exist for a pair of enantiomeric drugs. In order to evaluate the activity, toxicity, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion properties of the individual enantiomers, and any potential for chiral inversion caused by the biotransformation process, chiral bioanalytical assays are necessary for individual enantiomers and/or their metabolites for in vivo samples. However, development and validation of chiral quantitative assays are highly challenging in comparison to typical nonchiral assays. Therefore, a tiered approach should be used to address specific needs arising in different scenarios of chiral drug development, including development of racemate or fixed-ratio (nonracemic) enantiomers, development of a single enantiomer, racemic switches, and quantitation of enantiomeric metabolites. The choice of a nonchiral quantitative assay, a chiral qualitative assay, or a chiral quantitative assay should be based on the development strategy and on the molecular properties of the drug candidate.

Regiospecific and stereospecific triangulation of the structures of metabolites formed by sequential metabolism at multiple prochiral centers

Structures of in vivo secondary metabolites of a norbornane-containing drug candidate with multiple prochiral centers were triangulated, in a regio- and stereospecific fashion, using in vitro metabolism data from synthetic primary metabolites and in vivo metabolism data from the separate administration of a radiolabeled primary metabolite, [(14)C]-(S)-2-((1R,2S,4R,5S)-5-hydroxybicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ylamino)-5-isopropyl-5-methylthiazol-4(5H)-one (M1). A mass balance study on the 11β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 enzyme inhibitor [(14)C]-(S)-2-((1S,2S,4R)-bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ylamino)-5-isopropyl-5-methylthiazol-4(5H)-one (AMG 221) in rats was dosed at 2 mg/kg. Radioactivity was excreted mainly in urine. Metabolites of AMG 221 were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography with radiometric detection and characterized by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). LC-MS/MS revealed at least 38 metabolites. Seven monohydroxylated metabolites mediated formation of the other 31 metabolites. Twenty-eight metabolites were identified regio- and stereo-specifically. Little parent drug was observed in urine or feces. Monohydroxy metabolite M1 was the major metabolite comprising 17 to 24% of excreted dose, and seven monohydroxy metabolites comprised 29 (male) and 37% (female) of dose. Of 11 quantifiable isobaric dihydroxy metabolites that comprised 8.3 (male) and 24% (female) of dose, 10 were identified regio- and stereospecifically by triangulation. A single trihydroxy metabolite comprised approximately 10% of dose. Complex secondary metabolism of drugs with multiple prochiral centers can be elucidated in a regio- and stereospecific fashion without NMR through synthesis and in vitro and in vivo studies on the metabolism of chiral primary oxidation products.

Enantiomer–enantiomer interaction of ifosfamide in the rat

The objective of this study was to study the enantiomer-enantiomer interaction of ifosfamide (IFA) in a rat model. Following intravenous administration of individual IFA enantiomers or pseudo-racemates to male Sprague-Dawley rats, two enantiomers and their metabolites, 4-hydroxyIF (HOIF), N2-dechloroethylIF (N2D), N3-dechloroethylIF (N3D), and isophosphoramide (IPM), were quantified using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and isotope dilution techniques. In addition, the mutual inhibition in the metabolism between two stereoisomers was also investigated in vitro using rat liver microsomes. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar between (R)-IFA and (S)-IFA when individual enantiomers were intravenously administered to rats separately. However, in the rats administered with the IFA racemate, half-life, mean residence time (MRT), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values of (S)-IFA were significantly increased with total body clearance (CLT) being decreased. No significant difference in volumes of distribution (Vss), and renal clearance (CLr) and blood cell partition was observed between two enantiomers regardless of (R)-IFA and (S)-IFA being administered separately or in combination as a racemate. The results from the in vitro metabolism and inhibition experiment suggested that each IFA enantiomer inhibited the metabolism of its antipode in a competitive manner. It is concluded that the enantiomeric interaction of IFA mainly occurred in the process of metabolism with (S)-IFA being affected to a larger extent.

Stereoselectivity in drug metabolism

Many chiral drugs are used as their racemic mixtures in clinical practice. Two enantiomers of a chiral drug generally differ in pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic properties as a consequence of the stereoselective interaction with optically active biological macromolecules. Thus, a stereospecific assay to discriminate between enantiomers is required in order to relate plasma concentrations to pharmacological effect of a chiral drug. Stereoselective metabolism of drugs is most commonly the major contributing factor to stereoselectivity in pharmacokinetics. Metabolizing enzymes often display a preference for one enantiomer of a chiral drug over the other, resulting in enantioselectivity. The structural characteristics of enzymes dictate the enantiomeric discrimination associated with the metabolism of chiral drugs. The stereoselectivity can, therefore, be viewed as the physical property characteristic that phenotypes the enzyme. This review provides a comprehensive appraisal of stereochemical aspects of drug metabolism (i.e., enantioselective metabolism and first-pass effect, enzyme-selective inhibition or induction and drug interaction, species differences and polymorphic metabolism).

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacogenetic Tests as Tools in Pharmacovigilance

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and pharmacogenetic tests play a major role in minimising adverse drug reactions and enhancing optimal therapeutic response. The response to medication varies greatly between individuals, according to genetic constitution, age, sex, co-morbidities, environmental factors including diet and lifestyle (e.g. smoking and alcohol intake), and drug-related factors such as pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions. Most adverse drug reactions are type A reactions, i.e. plasma-level dependent, and represent one of the major causes of hospitalisation, in some cases leading to death. However, they may be avoidable to some extent if pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic factors are taken into consideration. This article provides a review of the literature and describes how to apply and interpret TDM and certain pharmacogenetic tests and is illustrated by case reports. An algorithm on the use of TDM and pharmacogenetic tests to help characterise adverse drug reactions is also presented. Although, in the scientific community, differences in drug response are increasingly recognised, there is an urgent need to translate this knowledge into clinical recommendations. Databases on drug-drug interactions and the impact of pharmacogenetic polymorphisms and adverse drug reaction information systems will be helpful to guide clinicians in individualised treatment choices.

Mechanistic basis of adverse drugreactions: the perils of inappropriate dose schedules

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have long been recognised as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. They account for a substantial number of clinical consultations, hospital admissions and extended duration of in-patient stay as well as mortality. By far the most common ADRs are the concentration-dependent pharmacological reactions, the majority of which ought to be preventable. As a result of high concentrations of the parent drug and/or its metabolite(s), there is an augmentation of primary pharmacological activity and/or appearance of new and undesirable secondary pharmacological activity. Typically, these high concentrations result from administration of high doses in an attempt to maximise efficacy and/or modulation of the pharmacokinetics of a drug by either genetic or non-genetic factors. High plasma concentrations of parent drug may result from inherited impairment or drug-induced inhibition of its pharmacokinetic disposition. Conversely, inherited overcapacity or drug-induced induction of the metabolism of a drug may result in low concentrations of parent drug and frequently, rapid accumulation of its metabolites. Environmental, dietary and phytochemical factors may also influence the activity of drug metabolising enzymes. As with inherited polymorphisms of acetylation and cytochrome P450-based drug metabolising enzymes, polymorphisms of other conjugation reactions, such as glucuronidation, increasingly appear to be associated with drug toxicity. Diseases of organs involved in elimination of a drug also alter its pharmacokinetics, plasma concentration and, therefore, the profile of its concentration-dependent ADRs. Inherited mutations, concurrently administered drugs or presence of certain diseases may also alter the sensitivity of some pharmacological targets, accounting for a substantial number of ADRs and interactions. When there is enhanced pharmacodynamic sensitivity, plasma drug concentrations that are apparently within the normal 'non-toxic' range give rise to ADRs. Recent advances have also provided important insights into the wider scope of drug-drug interactions. Interactions that occur at P-glycoproteins, drug transporters and efflux pumps, at various transmembrane interfaces such as the gastrointestinal wall, renal tubules, hepatobiliary border and blood-brain barrier, are beginning to explain many non-metabolic interactions. These alter the systemic exposure to drugs and have so far, begun to explain unexpected neurotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. The function of these transporters is also genetically modulated. These advances, together with continued increased awareness and education of prescribers and pharmacists, offer great opportunities for substantially minimising concentration-related ADRs.

The importance of stereoselective determination of drugs in the clinical laboratory

About 56% of the drugs currently in use are chiral compounds, and 88% of these chiral synthetic drugs are used therapeutically as racemates. Only a few of these drugs qualify for a stereospecific determination in a clinical laboratory for therapeutic drug monitoring of patients. If the qualitative and quantitative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects are similar, the enantiomers do not need to be separated. However, if the metabolism of the different stereoisomers is handled by different enzymes which are either polymorphic or can be induced or inhibited, and if their pharmacodynamic effects have differences either in strength or in quality, enantiospecific analysis is urgently needed. Unfortunately, there are many racemic drugs where the stereospecificity of the metabolism and/or the pharmacodynamic effects of the enantiomers is not known today. For these drugs, there is a great need for studies concentrating on these differences to improve treatment of the patients.

Effect of omeprazole on oral and intravenous RS-methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the rat

The effect of omeprazole on oral and intravenous (iv) RS-methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics was studied in awake, freely moving rats, which were divided in four groups: oral RS-methadone (3 mg/kg) was given (a) to a control group (CO(oral)) (n = 65) and (b) to an omeprazole pretreated group (OP(oral)) (n = 77), and iv RS-methadone (0.35 mg/kg) was administered (c) to a control group (CO(iv)) (n = 86) and (d) to an omeprazole pretreated group (OP(iv)) (n = 86). Omeprazole (2 mg/kg) was given iv 2 h before RS-methadone. Plasma concentrations of RS-methadone (Cp) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and analgesic response by tail flick for 0-180 min (oral) and 0-120 min (iv). RS-Methadone rate of absorption (mean +/- SE) was faster in OP(oral) (k(01) = 0.31 +/- 0.04 min(-1)) than in CO(oral) (k(01) = 0.05 +/- 0.007 min(-1)), consequently plasma peak concentrations (C(max)) were greater (197.41 +/- 33.70 ng/mL versus 83.54 +/- 7.97 ng/mL) and the time to reach C(max) (t(max)) was shorter (11.23 +/- 1.32 min versus 39.18 +/- 1.74 min). Mean area under the Cp-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) and hence bioavailability of oral RS-methadone were increased by omeprazole without significant changes in the elimination. Omeprazole did not affect the pharmacokinetics of iv RS-methadone. The changes of the analgesic effect of RS-methadone as a function of time were similar in all four groups. In the CO(oral) group, Cp and analgesic effect were defined by the E(max) model. The relationship between Cp and drug effect in the OP(oral) group showed a counterclockwise hysteresis (k(e0) of 0.018 +/- 0.006 min(-1)). For the iv groups (CO(iv) and OP(iv)), the Cp-analgesic effect relationship was described by an E(max) sigmoid model and omeprazole did not affect the pharmacodynamic parameters. It is concluded that omeprazole causes an increase in the bioavailability of oral RS-methadone without modifying the analgesic response but affecting the Cp-effect relationship.

Stereochemistry and drug efficacy and development: relevance of chirality to antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs

Many drugs contain a chiral center or a center of unsaturation, or such centers result during metabolism of these drugs. Often such drugs are marketed as a mixture of the resultant enantiomers (racemates) or of geometric isomers, respectively. These enantiomers (molecules that are not superimposible on their mirror image) or geometric isomers may differ markedly from each other with regard to their pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic properties. This review deals primarily with drugs with chiral centers, and possible complications arising from the use of racemates are discussed. Recent developments in resolution of enantiomers, increased knowledge of the molecular structure of specific drug targets and a heightened awareness of several possible advantages of using single enantiomers rather than racemic mixtures of drugs have led to an increased emphasis on understanding the role of chirality in drug development. This has resulted in increased investigation of individual enantiomers early on in the development of drugs and in 'chiral switching', i.e. the replacement of a racemate of a drug which has already been approved or marketed by a single enantiomer. Although stereochemistry is an important matter to consider in drugs of virtually all classes, this review focuses on the relevance of chirality to antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs. Examples of the effects of chiral centers on the properties of antidepressants (tricyclics, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, viloxazine, bupropion, mianserin, venlafaxine, mirtazapine and reboxetine), antipsychotics and/or some of their metabolites are discussed.

Chirality and drugs used in psychiatry: nice to know or need to know?

1. Many drugs used to treat psychiatric disorders contain a chiral center or a center of unsaturation and are marketed as a mixture of the resultant enantiomers or geometric isomers, respectively. These enantiomers or geometric isomers may differ markedly with regard to their pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic properties. 2. Examples of the effects of chiral centers or geometric centers on such properties are given for drugs from the following classes: antidepressants (tricyclics, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, viloxazine, bupropion, trazodone, mianserin, venlaflaxine); benzodiazepines, zoplicone, and antipsychotics. 3. As described in this review, there are several notable examples of psychiatric drugs currently available where the individual enantiomers or geometric isomers differ considerably with regard to factors such as effects on amine transport systems, interactions with receptors and metabolizing enzymes, and clearance rates from the body. Indeed, relatively recent developments in analytical and preparative resolution of racemic and geometric drug mixtures and increased interest in developing new drugs which interact with specific targets, which have been described in detail at the molecular level, have resulted in increased emphasis on stereochemistry in drug development.

Enantioselective assays in comparative bioavailability studies of racemic drug formulations: nice to know or need to know?

The importance of enantiospecific assays in studying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and drug-drug interactions of racemic drugs is widely recognized. Use of such assays in comparative bioavailability studies, however, remains controversial. This commentary proposes a PK/PD-based rationale for deciding whether an enantioselective assay is important in such studies. Racemic drugs are divided into three major categories: those with negligible or nonenantioselective first-pass metabolism (category I), those where the first-pass metabolism of the less-active enantiomer is predominant (category II), and those where the first-pass metabolism of the more active and/or toxic enantiomer is predominant (category III). In addressing the need for assay selectivity, a simple analogy is made between these drug categories and the protein-binding phenomenon. Enantioselective assays are not essential for category I drugs, or for category II drugs in the majority of cases. A special consideration, however, is needed for those category II drugs that undergo racemic inversion that may be influenced by the dose level and/or the residence time of the drug formulation in the gastrointestinal tract. It is with category III drugs that enantioselective assays become important, especially when metabolism, distribution, and/or elimination processes of the active or toxic enantiomer are saturable, leading to variable enantiomeric ratios in the plasma. Factors contributing to these ratio changes include routes of administration, dose level, and input rate differences. In put rate differences are particularly relevant to bioavailability evaluation of category III drugs.

Inhibition of tacrine oral clearance by cimetidine

Plasma tacrine, 1-hydroxytacrine, 2-hydroxytacrine, and 4-hydroxytacrine concentrations were measured in 12 healthy elderly subjects in this nonblinded two-period study to assess the effect of multiple doses of cimetidine on single-dose tacrine pharmacokinetics. Subjects received 40 mg tacrine (Cognex) alone and during multiple-dose cimetidine (300 mg four times a day) administration. Overall, tacrine and cimetidine were well tolerated by healthy elderly subjects. After coadministration of cimetidine with tacrine, plasma tacrine concentrations were approximately one-third higher than values after administration of tacrine alone; metabolite concentrations were also higher. Mean tacrine oral clearance was reduced by 30%; however, mean absorption rate and elimination half-life values were not affected by cimetidine. It was concluded that cimetidine inhibits first-pass hepatic extraction of tacrine by cytochrome P450 enzymes but has little effect on systemic drug clearance. Clinical considerations may dictate a reduction in tacrine dosage when tacrine is coadministered with cimetidine.

Interaction of meloxicam with cimetidine, Maalox, or aspirin

Meloxicam is a new enol carboxamide nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID). Preclinical studies have indicated that it possesses a high antiinflammatory potency and a low ulcerogenic potency. This open, randomized, crossover study was conducted to examine the effects of aspirin, the antacid Maalox (Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Cologne, Germany), and cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a single oral dose of meloxicam 30 mg in healthy male volunteers. Plasma concentrations of meloxicam were determined and subjected to noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. Meloxicam was well tolerated, and concomitant treatment with cimetidine or Maalox had little or no effect on the plasma concentration-time curves, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), or the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) of meloxicam. Concurrent treatment with aspirin increased plasma concentrations of meloxicam, increasing Cmax by approximately 25% and AUC0-infinity by 10%. These differences were not considered to be clinically relevant, and no adjustments of meloxicam dose should be required with coadministration of aspirin, Maalox, or cimetidine.

Stereochemical aspects of pharmacotherapy

Over the past 15 years stereoselectivity has become a well-recognized consideration in clinical pharmacology. Drugs that have an asymmetric center or plane of symmetry within their molecular structure are said to be chiral. They are available as pairs of nonsuperimposable mirror images, called enantiomers, that share essentially the same physicochemical properties. These three-dimensional structural differences, however, can translate into enantiospecific pharmacologic or pharmacokinetic properties, which may be important in understanding the clinical pharmacology of chiral drugs. Most chiral drugs are available as the racemate, in which equal proportions of the two enantiomers are administered concurrently. The pharmacologic and disposition properties of many chiral drugs are documented to be stereospecific, and this has influenced the regulatory requirements for the approval of new drug candidates. Due to this influence on new drug development, the possible issues surrounding racemic drugs will undoubtedly affect the types of pharmaceuticals that are used clinically in the next century. Accordingly, considerable advances have been made in producing optically pure drug. It should be emphasized, however, that stereochemically pure drugs are not necessarily superior to the respective racemates.

The effect of different calcium antagonists and a calcium agonist on the metabolism of propranolol by isolated rat hepatocytes

The influence of the dihydropyridine calcium entry blockers nicardipine, amlodipine, nifedipine, isradipine and of the dihydropyridine calcium entry promotor BAY K 8644 on the disappearance rate of propranolol by isolated rat hepatocytes was compared to the effect of diltiazem and verapamil, two non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and known inhibitors of hepatic cytochrome P450 mixed function oxidases. All compounds dose-dependently inhibited the disappearance rate of propranolol. Nicardipine and isradipine were more potent in inhibiting the disappearance rate of propranolol than the other dihydropyridines and than diltiazem and verapamil. The inhibitory effect of nicardipine on the disappearance rate of propranolol was not stereoselective and was not influenced by age.