Real‐world use of dupilumab for 53 patients with atopic dermatitis in Japan

Real-Life Experience of Tralokinumab for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Multicentric Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Tralokinumab, the first fully human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to interleukin-13, was safe and effective for treating atopic dermatitis (AD) in clinical trials, but real-life experience is still limited.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab in severe AD in a real-life multicenter prospective cohort.

METHODS

Adult patients with severe AD were enrolled between January 2022 and July 2022 and received tralokinumab subcutaneously for 16 weeks. Objective and subjective scores were collected at baseline, weeks 6 and 16. Adverse events were reported throughout the study.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included. An improvement of at least 75% on the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) was achieved in 66.7% of patients at week 16. The median objective and subjective scores at week 16 were significantly (p < 0.001) lower than those at baseline. Combination with cyclosporine was sometimes necessary at the beginning of treatment, and addition of upadacitinib was required for some patients with very severe disease during the treatment. The most frequent adverse events were flares of eczema (23.8%) and reactions at injection site (19.0%). No cases of conjunctivitis were reported. Four patients (19.0%) discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Tralokinumab is an effective first-line biotherapy for severe AD. However, therapeutic response may be progressive. Safety data were reassuring. Atopic dermatitis flares or reactions at the injection site may lead to discontinuation of treatment. A history of conjunctivitis on dupilumab is not a contraindication to the initiation of tralokinumab.

A Literature Review of Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with pruritus, characterized by recurrent eczema with exacerbations and remissions. AD impairs patients’ QOL and places a heavy burden on patients. Recently, dupilumab, an anti–IL-4Rα antibody, was approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe AD who are refractory to topical agents and/or conventional systemic therapy. Clinical trials of dupilumab for AD demonstrated high efficacy and tolerable safety profiles. Furthermore, real-world evidence of dupilumab for AD is accumulating. Most of these data show favorable effectiveness and safety profile; however, they also clarified issues, including conjunctivitis and facial redness. There are still a certain number of patients with significant failure. In this article, we review real-world evidence of dupilumab for AD, identify concerns specific to dupilumab, and discuss unmet needs and issues to be addressed in the future.

Association study of transition of laboratory marker levels and transition of disease activity of atopic dermatitis patients treated with dupilumab

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks signalling pathways of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, is effective in treating patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). We previously showed that transitions of serum thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) levels and eosinophil numbers were strongly associated with that of AD activity and that the transitions of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were weakly and not associated with that of AD activity, respectively, in patients treated without dupilumab.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to elucidate whether the association of the transition of laboratory marker levels and transition of disease activity in dupilumab-treated AD patients (present study) was different from that in patients who are not treated with dupilumab (previous study).

METHODS

Sixty AD outpatients treated with dupilumab were included in this study. Associations between the transition of the eczema area and severity index (EASI) score and those of above-mentioned laboratory marker levels were evaluated using a mixed effects model of EASI as the response variable, laboratory markers as fixed effects and patients as random effects.

RESULTS

The transitions of serum TARC and LDH levels were associated strongly with that of AD activity, but the transitions of serum IgE level and eosinophil numbers were associated with that of AD activity intermediately and weakly, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory markers are useful for evaluating the effects of treatments for AD, but the meaning of each laboratory marker depends on the drugs used for treatment.