1
|
Saksida A, Rebesco R, Colombani A, Pintonello S, Tonon E, Santoro AM, Orzan E. The timeline of non-vocal and vocal communicative skills in infants with hearing loss. Front Pediatr 2024; 11:1209754. [PMID: 38283402 PMCID: PMC10811201 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1209754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The study investigates what is the link between early verbal and non-vocal abilities, when does predominantly verbal communicative style occur after the intervention with cochlear implants (CI) or hearing aids (HA), and how predictive it is of later linguistic development in deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) infants and children. Methods Cohort: children with moderate-to-profound hearing impairment (N = 49, 20 girls, mean age at HA or CI intervention = 15 months, range: 4-35 months). Measures Receptive and productive vocabulary at 24 and 36 months and video analysis at 12 months post-intervention. Analysis: Predictive values of total and verbal responses to communicative turns for later vocabulary development were assessed, as well as the relative time course of the development of vocal/verbal communication in DHH children. Results Vocabulary at 24 months is predicted by auditory responses at 12 months, as well as by overall responsiveness before intervention. Non-vocal responses decline and overall verbal responses increase significantly between 6 and 12 months after intervention. The trend is delayed in children with delayed (>12 months of age) treatment with CI or HA. Conclusions Age of intervention affects the development of vocal/verbal communicative style. Language development, in particular, vocabulary growth, can be further stimulated by the enhancement of preverbal (both vocal and non-vocal) communicative skills.
Collapse
|
2
|
Timar M, Saki N, Bayat A, Hanafi M. Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Pediatrics with Inner Ear Malformations in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Ahvaz. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 75:197-203. [PMID: 37206753 PMCID: PMC10188708 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-022-03339-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation (CI) has been successful in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) over the last few years. This study assessed the auditory and speech performance results of pediatrics with inner ear malformations (IEMs) following cochlear implantation at the Ahvaz cochlear implantation center and compared the outcomes of various malformations. All pediatrics with IEMs undergoing CI were included in the study. This retrospective study was performed on pediatrics with congenital IEMs who underwent cochlear implantation in Ahvaz cochlear implantation center between 2014 and 2019. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores are two of the most frequently administered tests. The CAP with ranging from 0 (displays no awareness of environmental sounds) to 7 (can use the telephone with a familiar talker), was used to measure the speech perception performance of the implanted children. Furthermore, SIR consists of five performance categories ranging from "prerecognizable words in spoken language" to "connected speech is intelligible to all listeners". Finally, the study included 22 patients. The evaluation of the CT-Scan revealed three types of inner ear malformation: Incomplete Partition (IP)-I in 2 (9.1%), IP-II in 12 (54.5%), and common cavity in 8 (36.4%) individuals. The results were shown that the median CAP score preoperative was 0.5 (interquartile range (IQR): 0-2) and postoperative was 3.5 (IQR: 3-7). There were statistically significant differences in CAP scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative (p value = 0.036). The results were shown that the median SIR score preoperative was 1 (IQR: 1-5) and postoperative was 2 (IQR: 1-5). There were statistically significant differences in SIR scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative (p value = 0.001). Following a thorough preoperative screening, patients with specific IEMs can be candidates for CI and not a contraindication. There were statistically significant differences in CAP and SIR scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative in the common cavity and IP-II groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Timar
- Hearing Research Center, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Nader Saki
- Hearing Research Center, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
- Associate Professor of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medicine of School, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Arash Bayat
- Hearing Research Center, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
- Associate Professor of Audiology, Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Mohammadghasem Hanafi
- Hearing Research Center, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brain MRI findings of prelingually deaf children and cochlear implant outcome: Preliminary results. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 162:111302. [PMID: 36122419 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the incidence of brain abnormalities in a cohort of prelingually deaf children and whether these abnormalities can impact the hearing outcomes of patients eligible for cochlear implantation (CI). METHODS We performed a retrospective review of consecutive medical charts of prelingually deaf children under 12 years of age who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during their preoperative workup for CI surgery. We used the category of auditory performance (CAP) test and the speech intelligibility rating (SIR) test to assess the hearing and speech performance of the children, respectively. RESULTS The MRIs of 285 patients, 174 boys and 111 girls with a mean age of 36.4 (±16) months, were evaluated for this study. We identified 31 patients with abnormal findings (10.88%): (17/31) (54.8%) had MRI brain abnormalities, (9/31) (29%) had inner ear anomalies, and (5/31) (16.1%) had both inner ear and brain abnormalities. The most frequent inner ear anomaly was an enlarged vestibular aqueduct, while white matter lesions were the most common brain abnormality. The CAP and SIR mean score of patients with inner ear anomalies was slightly, but not significantly, higher than those of patients with brain abnormalities. CONCLUSION CAP and SIR scores were not significantly different in children with brain abnormalities than inner ear anomalies. These patients can still benefit from CI to improve their overall hearing and speech performance.
Collapse
|
4
|
Colombani A, Saksida A, Pintonello S, De Caro F, Orzan E. Assessment of Communication Abilities in Four Children with Early Bilateral CIs in Clinical and Home Environments with LENA System: A Case Report. CHILDREN 2022; 9:children9050659. [PMID: 35626836 PMCID: PMC9140017 DOI: 10.3390/children9050659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Children’s language acquisition is underpinned by the quantity and quality of linguistic stimulation. Early diagnosis and cochlear implantation (CI), along with a family-centered intervention, are regarded as critical factors in providing appropriate language stimulation and thus supporting successful language outcomes in children with sensory neural hearing loss (SNHL). Considering the lack of tools to assess early language skills and open issues regarding the early predictors of CI outcomes, our goal was to evaluate the potential usability of the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) system as an early assessment and/or predictive tool. Clinical video recordings, LENA home recordings, and vocabulary scores were used to assess the progression of communication abilities of four children with CIs (6–35 m.o.). The data revealed a positive correlation between the estimated mean length of utterance (EMLU), vocal conversational turns (CT) in clinical video recordings, and receptive vocabulary, as well as the CT count in LENA being a significant predictor of productive vocabulary. These findings lead us to conclude that the LENA system has the potential to be used as an additional (tele-)measure in the early assessment of communication abilities of children with CI, as well as as a tool in the research of early predictors of CI outcomes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bantwal AR, Deshpande R, Indurkar R, Bhatnagar S, Wadhera M, Sridhara A, Lalwani N, Agarwal A, Oza RK, Narayan N, Sasidharan P, Mallikarjun B, Saha C, Bhale P, Deshpande S, Mandke K. A study of self-perception and communication success as perceived by adolescents with cochlear implants and their significant others. Cochlear Implants Int 2021; 22:203-215. [PMID: 33634749 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1875577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objectives of this prospective, cross-sectional study were to compare self-perception and communication-success ratings of adolescents with cochlear implant (AWCI) and their caregivers (C-AWCI) and to explore associations with age at CI, implant age, and chronological age. METHOD Fourteen CI centers across India participated. The Think About it Quiz (TAIQ), Self Assessment of Communication-Adolescent (SAC-A), and Significant Other Assessment of Communication-Adolescent (SOAC-A) were translated into five languages. Data were collected from 173 AWCI aged 10;0-19;6 years and an associated caregiver for each participant. RESULTS On the TAIQ, self-ratings by AWCI were significantly lower than the ratings by C-AWCI. Peer acceptance correlated with athletic competence for both groups. For the SAC-A versus SOAC-A, there was no significant difference between AWCI and C-AWCI ratings. Except for a negative correlation between peer-acceptance and chronological age for caregiver ratings, no other associations were found between any other ratings and age at CI, implant age, and chronological age. CONCLUSIONS Caregiver judgments of their adolescents with CI were not in equal agreement with self-ratings by the adolescents across various aspects of performance. Caregivers appeared to underestimate the self-perception issues faced by adolescents with CI but had excellent agreement with their adolescents' self-rating of communication success. The inclusion of activities to improve children's participation in sports could possibly improve peer acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuradha R Bantwal
- Dr. Kirtane's Clinic, 1st Floor, Amar Bhuvan, Opera House, Mumbai, India
| | - Rashmi Deshpande
- Medikeri's Super Speciality ENT Center, Basavanagudi, Bangalore, India
| | - Rewa Indurkar
- Mandke Hearing Services, 964 Sadashiv Peth, Pune, India
| | - Salaj Bhatnagar
- Nobel Hearing Clinic, 201 Rounak Plaza Building, South Tikoganj, Indore, India
| | - Meenakshi Wadhera
- Meenakshi Speech and Hearing Clinics Pvt Ltd, 27 Babar Road, Bengali Market, Delhi, India
| | - Aditya Sridhara
- Speech and Hearing Centre, 102, Balaji Heights, Geeta Bhawan Main Road, Indore, India
| | - Neera Lalwani
- AURED, King George Vth Memorial, Anand Niketan, Dr E Moses Road, Mahalakshmi, Mumbai, India
| | - Asha Agarwal
- Asha Speech and Hearing Clinic, 15/76, Block 15, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Ramesh K Oza
- Shruti School, 6 Lila Griha, Vithaldas Nagar, North Avenue, Santacruz West, Mumbai, India
| | - Neevita Narayan
- SpHear Speech & Hearing Clinic 32, Basement, Lajpat Nagar 3, New Delhi, India
| | - P Sasidharan
- Dr. Manoj's ENT Super Speciality Institute, 2/44-A, East Hill Junction West Hill Post, Kozhikode, India
| | - B Mallikarjun
- PHC Hearing Health Care, 5, Palm Spring 2nd Floor, Behind Mudra, Near Parimal Garden, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Chandan Saha
- Decibel Hearing Clinic, 391/131, Prince Anwar Shah Road, Kolkata, India
| | - Priya Bhale
- Rajeev Speech and Hearing Clinic, 107, Samarthnagar, Aurangabad, India
| | - Shweta Deshpande
- BIG EARS Dept, TDH Ground Floor, TDH Building, KEM Hospital, Rasta Peth, Pune, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang S, Wang Y, Li Y, Wei Y, Han F, Ren H, Xu Y, Cui Y. Cochlear implantation in children with white matter lesions: Prediction of hearing outcomes by multiple regression analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e23355. [PMID: 33429729 PMCID: PMC7793319 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000023355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) white matter lesions have been reported in some preoperative cochlear implant children. However, the role of white matter lesions in predicting the hearing outcome is yet unclear. The present study investigated the outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in 40 children with white matter lesions.The data from children with white matter lesions were reviewed in this retrospective study. Based on brain MRI, the patients were divided into 3 groups: mild, moderate, and severe. The children were treated with unilateral CI and monitored for a follow-up period of at least 3 years. The main outcome measures were category of auditory performance (CAP) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR). MRI white matter lesions, age at implant, gender, physical impairment, and cognitive impairment were obtained from a research database to assess the correlation with long-term CAP and SIR outcome by multiple regression analysis.The data of children with white matter lesions were reviewed (18 females and 23 males). The mean age at implantation was 31.6 months. Strikingly, all children obtained better CAP and SIR scores. The age at implantation, brain white matters lesions on MRI, and cognitive and physical disabilities were associated with CAP and SIR scores. Multiple regression established a weak correlation between the degree of white matter lesions on brain MRI and long-term CAP and SIR, while cognitive impairment strongly accounted for long-term CAP and SIR outcome.The majority of the children with brain white matter lesions obtained a satisfactory postoperative effect. The cognitive impairment before CI is a major factor, and such factor should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sufang Wang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhenzhou Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou
| | - Yannan Wang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhenzhou Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou
| | - Yongxin Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yanyan Wei
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhenzhou Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou
| | - Fugen Han
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhenzhou Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou
| | - Hongbo Ren
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhenzhou Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou
| | - Ying Xu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhenzhou Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou
| | - Yanhong Cui
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhenzhou Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Omidvar S, Jeddi Z, Doosti A, Hashemi SB. Cochlear implant outcomes in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Comparison with controls. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 130:109782. [PMID: 31785496 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The coincidence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and hearing loss in the children has adverse effects in speech, cognition, communication and motor development. This can influence cochlear implant (CI) outcomes negatively. The aim of this study was to compare auditory, language, speech, cognition, communication and motor outcomes between CI children with versus without ADHD. METHODS Nineteen CI children with ADHD and twenty-three age and gender matched children without ADHD at the Shiraz CI center ranging in age from 37 to 60 months were participated in this cross-sectional study. The developmental quotient in auditory, receptive and expressive language, speech and cognition skills was evaluated through Newsha Developmental Scale. The Persian version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) was used to assess children's developmental status in fine and gross movements, communication, problem solving, and personal-social domains. A comparison of the results between two groups was made by the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS CI children with ADHD had significantly lower Newsha developmental quotients in cases of auditory, receptive and expressive language, speech and cognition skills compared to the control group (P = 0.027 to <0.001). A significant difference was observed between children with and without ADHD in fine and gross movements, communication, problem solving, and personal-social domains of ASQ at 60 months (P = 0.029 to 0.003). CONCLUSION Children with ADHD showed decreased ability in auditory, language, speech, cognition, motor and communication skills following CI compared to children without ADHD. It can guide clinician to provide these children with more specific rehabilitation program to improve their skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaghayegh Omidvar
- Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Zahra Jeddi
- Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Afsaneh Doosti
- Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Seyed Basir Hashemi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Khalili Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Havenga E, Swanepoel DW, le Roux T, Schmid B. Tele-intervention for children with hearing loss: A comparative pilot study. J Telemed Telecare 2016; 23:116-125. [PMID: 26670208 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x15617886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction This pilot study compared tele-intervention to conventional intervention for children with hearing loss in terms of communication performance, parental perceptions and clinician perceptions. Methods A within-subject design was employed, including 10 children with hearing loss and their parents who each received a structurally similar tele-intervention and conventional intervention session in a counterbalanced manner. Quality of communication performance was analysed using a modified Tait video analysis method. Parent and clinician perceptions were collected through rating-scale surveys and thematic analysis of qualitative responses. Results No significant difference ( p > 0.05) was found between tele-intervention and conventional intervention in terms of communication performance of children. Parent perceptions were not significantly different ( p > 0.05) between conventional and tele-intervention in terms of facilitating meaningful communication interaction. Significant differences were evident for parents' comfort level during the session, whether they found it to be a beneficial experience and whether they would like to continue receiving intervention through this method. Clinician perceptions of conventional and tele-intervention were not significantly different ( p > 0.05) and tele-intervention was deemed a valuable method of service delivery for clients. Discussion This study provides preliminary evidence that tele-intervention is effective for communication intervention and can be a valuable solution to typical barriers such as distance and the shortage of trained interventionists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estienne Havenga
- 1 Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- 1 Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa.,2 Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Australia.,3 Ear Science Institute Australia, Australia
| | - Talita le Roux
- 1 Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Brenda Schmid
- 4 Centre for Listening and Spoken Language, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mittal R, Raj A, Ramalingam WVBS. Hindi language tool for assessing pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79:1490-9. [PMID: 26194047 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.06.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2015] [Revised: 06/21/2015] [Accepted: 06/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Presently, in India, western material is mainly used for the assessment and planning of habilitation activities for paediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients. There is no assessment material available in Hindi. Therefore, the present study aimed to develop a parental questionnaire to assess auditory, speech and language skills of paediatric CI recipients in Hindi language for the age range of 3-7 years. METHOD Most commonly used assessment material/curricula used in Indian cochlear implant clinics and primary school Hindi language teachers were consulted during the development of the parental questionnaire. The developed questionnaire was then given to the parents of 50 normal hearing, Hindi speaking children in the age range of 3-7 years, five experienced speech and language pathologist working in the field of paediatric CI and to the same primary school Hindi language teachers who were consulted in the beginning to validate the content of the questionnaire. Based on the feedback from parents, personal observations and views from other professionals, the questionnaire was modified to incorporate the suggestions and the questionnaire was finalized. The final questionnaire has three subtests (1, 2 and 3) to assess auditory, language and speech skills of the CI recipients respectively. The final questionnaire was given to the Hindi speaking parents of 50 CI recipients in the age range of 3-7 years who fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Both the parents were asked to fill the final questionnaire together in the clinic at 0 (switch-on), 1, 6 and 12 months post switch-on of the implant. RESULT AND DISCUSSION All the cochlear implant recipients could be evaluated by the questionnaire and none of the recipient scored zero on the questionnaire at any time interval. The developed questionnaire had shown high reliability and internal consistency producing alpha values of 0.9201, 0.7425 and 0.9311 for the subtest 1, 2 and the entire questionnaire respectively. The alpha value was not calculated for subtest 3 as it was a rating scale and not much variation was noticed in this section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anoop Raj
- Head of the Department of ENT Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, 110002 India.
| | - W V B S Ramalingam
- Senior Consultant & Head of the Department BL Kapoor Super Speciality Hospital, Pusa Road, Rajendra Nagar, New Delhi 110005, India.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bille J, Ovesen T. Cochlear implant after bacterial meningitis. Pediatr Int 2014; 56:400-5. [PMID: 24274830 DOI: 10.1111/ped.12252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2013] [Revised: 07/05/2013] [Accepted: 10/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this retrospective case study at a tertiary referral center was to investigate the outcome of cochlear implantation (CI) in children with sensorineural hearing loss due to meningitis compared to CI in children with deafness due to other reasons. METHODS This post-meningial group (PMG) consisted of 22 children undergoing CI due to deafness induced by meningitis, between December 1996 and January 2012. Five children had bilateral simultaneous implantation. None was excluded and the children were followed for at least 3 years. Operations were carried out by one of two surgeons using similar techniques in all cases. Each patient from the PMG was matched 2:1 with children having implantation for other reasons according to age and follow up (control group). RESULTS Overall, the median category of auditory performance (CAP) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) score were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. The presence of additional central nervous system (CNS) disorders (post-meningeal sequelae), however, correlated significantly with poorer outcome CONCLUSIONS CI was a safe procedure without surgical complications in the present study. It is possible to restore auditory capacity and speech performance to a degree comparable to children undergoing implantation for other reasons. A statistically important variable is secondary CNS involvement. The rehabilitation program after CI should be adjusted according to these additional handicaps. It is recommended to screen meningitis patients as fast as possible to identify those with hearing loss and initiate treatment with hearing aids or CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesper Bille
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Couto MIV, Carvalho ACM. Factors that influence the participation of parents in the oral rehabilitation process of children with cochlear implants: a systematic review. Codas 2014; 25:84-91. [PMID: 24408176 DOI: 10.1590/s2317-17822013000100015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2012] [Accepted: 08/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify and analyze factors that influence the participation of parents in the rehabilitation process of children with cochlear implants (CI). RESEARCH STRATEGY Question formulation and articles selection in three databases using the following keywords: cochlear implant (implante coclear) and parents (pais). SELECTION CRITERIA Complete original articles published in Brazilian Portuguese or English, with direct participation of parents of children with CI. DATA ANALYSIS Articles were fully read. Data regarding characterization of the centers, research methodology and content were analyzed. RESULTS Thirteen articles were selected based on the established criteria. The types of studies were cross-sectional and case-control (interview technique). The following influential factors were identified: pre-CI surgery factors (knowledge about CI, quality and quantity of information, specialist's advices, ethical and biomedical aspects, rehabilitation engagement, contact with experienced families, social service support and overall costs); rehabilitation aspects (CI use, oral communication modality, regular school, other disabilities, social and demographic aspects and rehabilitation program's effectiveness); other important influential processes (communication modality, auditory and language development, second oral language learning, as well as parent's behavior and satisfaction). CONCLUSION The engagement of parents in the rehabilitation process of children with CI depends on several distinct influential factors which audiologists should understand and consider when elaborating a rehabilitation program.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bille J, Fink-Jensen V, Ovesen T. Outcome of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear malformations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 272:583-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-2883-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2013] [Accepted: 01/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|