1
|
Smithgall MC, Yemelyanova A, Solomon J, Chapman-Davis E, Schatz-Siemers N. High-grade Endometrial Carcinoma With Serous and Colorectal Carcinoma-like Components: Unique Morphology in Correlation With Immunohistochemical and Molecular Findings. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2024:00004347-990000000-00194. [PMID: 39230591 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000001067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma with intestinal differentiation/colorectal carcinoma-like (CRC-like) features is rare with few cases reported to date. Those described are mainly endometrioid carcinomas with intestinal differentiation. We report a case of high-grade endometrial carcinoma with serous and intestinal/CRC-like components. The gross, histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features are described for both components of the tumor in the initial diagnostic biopsy and subsequent resection specimen. The diagnosis of primary endometrial carcinoma with serous and CRC-like components is supported by immunohistochemical and molecular findings, as well as clinical workup. The rarity of this phenomenon poses diagnostic challenges. In addition, the literature is reviewed with specific emphasis on the molecular and pathologic features of mixed endometrial carcinomas, including those with intestinal/CRC-like features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie C Smithgall
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dyhdalo KS, Ababneh E, Lanigan C, Bowers K, Zhang S, McKenney JK, Joehlin-Price AS. Evaluation of Lineage/Site-specific Nuclear Immunohistochemical Markers SATB2, Cyclin D1, SALL4, and BCOR in High-grade Endometrial Carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2023; 42:443-450. [PMID: 36731037 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Poorly differentiated malignant neoplasms involving the gynecologic tract routinely include a poorly differentiated endometrial carcinoma (EC) in the differential diagnosis. Some nuclear lineage/site-specific immunohistochemical markers are utilized in this diagnostic setting including SATB2, cyclin D1, SALL4, and BCOR, but their specificity and use in small samples are not clear across the spectrum of ECs. Cases of undifferentiated/dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UEC/DDEC), clear cell carcinoma (CCC), uterine serous carcinoma (USC), FIGO grade 3 endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC), and uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) were identified and diagnoses confirmed. Whole-section immunohistochemical stains for SATB2, cyclin D1, SALL4, BCOR, and PAX8 were performed. A total of 113 cases were utilized: 15 CCC, 26 EEC, 19 UCS, 22 USC, and 31 UEC/DDEC. Cases were distributed across both low (49%) and high (51%) FIGO clinical stages. SATB2 was expressed by UCS (8/19, 42%), EEC (10/26, 38%), UEC/DDEC (11/30, 37%), and USC (6/22, 27%). Cyclin D1 was expressed by EEC (24/26, 92%), USC (17/22, 77%), UEC/DDEC (15/20 EEC component, 75%; 22/30 UEC, 73%), UCS (10/16 carcinoma, 63%; 11/19 sarcoma, 58%), and CCC (8/15, 53%). SALL4 was expressed most frequently by UEC/DDEC (12/30, 40%), but also USC (7/22, 32%), EEC (5/26, 19%), and UCS (4/16 carcinoma, 25%; 3/19 sarcoma, 16%). BCOR was expressed at low levels in 2 USC, 2 UEC/DDEC, and 2 UCS. PAX8 was generally positive but showed lower expression in UEC/DDEC (17/30, 57%) and in the sarcomatous portions of UCS (6/19, 32%). SATB2, cyclin D1, SALL4, and BCOR stain variable numbers of poorly-differentiated EC and must be carefully interpreted within morphologic and clinical context.
Collapse
|
3
|
Talia KL, McCluggage WG. The diverse morphology and immunophenotype of ovarian endometrioid carcinomas. Pathology 2023; 55:269-286. [PMID: 36759286 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Endometrioid carcinoma (EC) accounts for approximately 10-12% of ovarian epithelial malignancies but compared to its relative frequency, results in a disproportionate number of diagnostically difficult cases with potential for misdiagnosis. In this review the protean and diverse morphologies of ovarian EC are discussed, including 'metaplastic' changes, EC with spindle cell differentiation/corded and hyalinised features and EC with sex cord-like formations. The propensity for 'transdifferentiation' in ovarian ECs is also discussed, one example being the association with a somatically derived yolk sac tumour. Although immunohistochemistry may be extremely useful in diagnosing EC and in distinguishing between EC and other ovarian epithelial malignancies, metastatic neoplasms and sex cord-stromal tumours, this review also discusses the propensity for ovarian EC to exhibit an aberrant immunophenotype which may compound diagnostic uncertainty. The genomic characteristics of these tumours and the recent 'incorporation' of seromucinous carcinoma into the EC category are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen L Talia
- Royal Children's Hospital, Royal Women's Hospital and Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rajendran S, McCluggage WG. WT1 Positive Ovarian Endometrioid Tumors: Observations From Consult Cases and Strategies for Distinguishing From Serous Neoplasms. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:191-202. [PMID: 33782345 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma, more than any other type of ovarian epithelial malignancy, demonstrates a varied morphology which can cause problems in diagnosis. In tubo-ovarian tumor pathology, WT1 is a commonly used marker as it is consistently expressed in low-grade and high-grade serous carcinomas and is often considered a specific marker of a serous phenotype. However, ovarian endometrioid neoplasms may also express WT1 which may contribute to misdiagnosis. We report our experience with 23 ovarian endometrioid neoplasms (4 borderline tumors, 19 carcinomas), mainly received in consultation, which were WT1 positive (diffuse in 11 cases) which often contributed to misdiagnosis. Endometriosis was identified in the same ovary in 6 cases and squamous elements in 7. We describe strategies for distinguishing such neoplasms, which may exhibit morphologic overlap with serous tumors, from low-grade and high-grade serous carcinomas and stress that a diagnosis of HGSC is unlikely with two grossly and histologically normal fallopian tubes. We also stress that a panel of markers should always be used rather than relying on a single marker and that when the morphology is classical of an endometrioid carcinoma, diagnostic immunohistochemistry is not needed given the potential for confusion in cases showing "aberrant" staining. We also discuss the phenomenon of "aberrant" immunohistochemical staining in endometrioid carcinomas which appears more common than in other ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Rajendran
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK (S.R., W.G.M.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang B, Tian L, Chen Z, Zhang L, Su W, Lu T, Yang Y, Hui R, Wang X, Fan X. Angiopoietin 2 as a Novel Potential Biomarker for Acute Aortic Dissection. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 8:743519. [PMID: 35004874 PMCID: PMC8733161 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.743519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Biomarker-assisted diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (AAD) is important for initiation of treatment and improved survival. However, identification of biomarkers for AAD in blood is a challenging task. The present study aims to find the potential AAD biomarkers using a transcriptomic strategy. Arrays based genome-wide gene expression profiling were performed using ascending aortic tissues which were collected from AAD patients and healthy donors. The differentially expressed genes were validated using quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blot. The plasma levels of a potential biomarker, angiopoietin 2 (ANGPT2) were determined in case-control cohort (77 AAD patients and 82 healthy controls) by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic power of ANGPT2 for AAD. Transcriptome data demonstrated that a total of 18 genes were significantly up-regulated and 28 genes were significantly down-regulated among AAD tissues (foldchange>3.0, p < 0.01). By bioinformatic analysis, we identified ANGPT2 as a candidate biomarker for blood-based detection of AAD. The qRT-PCR and protein expression demonstrated that ANGPT2 increased 2.4- and 4.2 folds, respectively in aortic tissue of AAD patients. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that ANGPT2 was markedly increased in intima of the aortic wall in AAD. Furthermore, ANGPT2 was significantly elevated in AAD patients as compared with controls (median 1625 vs. 383 pg/ml, p < 1E-6). ROC curve analysis showed that ANGPT2 was highly predictive of a diagnosis of type A AAD (area under curve 0.93, p < 1E-6). Sensitivity and specificity were 81 and 90%, respectively at the cutoff value of 833 pg/ml. In conclusion, ANGPT2 could be a promising biomarker for diagnosis of AAD; however, more studies are still needed to verify its specificity in diagnosing of AAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bi Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.,Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Tian
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.,Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Zhaoran Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.,Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Liang Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjun Su
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tianyi Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yanmin Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Rutai Hui
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaojian Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohan Fan
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Le Page C, Almadani N, Turashvili G, Bataillon G, Portelance L, Provencher D, Mes-Masson AM, Gilks B, Hoang L, Rahimi K. SATB2 Expression in Uterine Sarcoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2021; 40:487-494. [PMID: 33720083 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Uterine sarcomas represent a clinical challenge because of their difficult diagnosis and the poor prognosis of certain subtypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of the special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) in endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) and other types of uterine sarcoma by immunohistochemistry. We studied the expression of SATB2 on 71 full tissue sections of endometrial stromal nodule, low-grade ESS, uterine leiomyomas and leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, adenosarcoma, and carcinosarcoma samples. Nuclear SATB2 expression was then evaluated in an extended sample set using a tissue microarray, including 78 additional uterine tumor samples. Overall, with a cut-off of ≥10% of tumor cell staining as positive, the nuclear SATB2 score was negative in all endometrial stromal nodule samples (n=10) and positive in 83% of low-grade ESS samples (n=29/35), 40% of undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (n=4/10), 13% of leiomyosarcoma (n=2/16), 14% of adenosarcoma (n=3/22), and 8% carcinosarcoma (n=2/25) samples. Furthermore, in ESS patients, direct comparison of nuclear SATB2 scores with clinicopathologic parameters and other reported biomarkers such as progesterone receptor and estrogen receptor showed that nuclear SATB2 was associated with PR expression and a decreased risk of disease-specific death (odds ratio=0.06, 95% confidence interval=0.04-0.81, P=0.04). Our data suggest that SATB2 could be a marker with relative sensitivity (83%) for distinguishing between endometrial stromal nodule and ESS with potential prognostic value.
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen S, Li Y, Qian L, Deng S, Liu L, Xiao W, Zhou Y. A Review of the Clinical Characteristics and Novel Molecular Subtypes of Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:668151. [PMID: 34150634 PMCID: PMC8210668 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.668151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers that has the highest mortality rate. Endometrioid ovarian cancer, a distinct subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, is associated with endometriosis and Lynch syndrome, and is often accompanied by synchronous endometrial carcinoma. In recent years, dysbiosis of the microbiota within the female reproductive tract has been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer, with some specific pathogens exhibiting oncogenic having been found to contribute to cancer development. It has been shown that dysregulation of the microenvironment and accumulation of mutations are stimulatory factors in the progression of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. This would be a potential therapeutic target in the future. Simultaneously, multiple studies have demonstrated the role of four molecular subtypes of endometrioid ovarian cancer, which are of particular importance in the prediction of prognosis. This literature review aims to compile the potential mechanisms of endometrioid ovarian cancer, molecular characteristics, and molecular pathological types that could potentially play a role in the prediction of prognosis, and the novel therapeutic strategies, providing some guidance for the stratified management of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuangfeng Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yuebo Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Lili Qian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Sisi Deng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Luwen Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Weihua Xiao
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, The CAS Key Laboratory of Innate Immunity and Chronic Disease, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.,Institute of Immunology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Ying Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zyla RE, Olkhov-Mitsel E, Amemiya Y, Bassiouny D, Seth A, Djordjevic B, Nofech-Mozes S, Parra-Herran C. CTNNB1 Mutations and Aberrant β-Catenin Expression in Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma: Correlation With Patient Outcome. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:68-76. [PMID: 32769429 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CTNNB1 mutations and aberrant β-catenin expression have adverse prognosis in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, and recent evidence suggests a prognostic role of β-catenin in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma. Thus, we aimed to determine the prognostic value of the CTNNB1 mutational status, and its correlation with β-catenin expression, in a well-annotated cohort of 51 ovarian endometrioid carcinomas. We performed immunohistochemistry for β-catenin and developed an 11-gene next-generation sequencing panel that included whole exome sequencing of CTNNB1 and TP53. Results were correlated with clinicopathologic variables including disease-free and disease-specific survival. Tumor recurrence was documented in 14 patients (27%), and cancer-related death in 8 patients (16%). CTNNB1 mutations were found in 22 cases (43%), and nuclear β-catenin in 26 cases (51%). CTNNB1 mutation highly correlated with nuclear β-catenin (P<0.05). Mutated CTNNB1 status was statistically associated with better disease-free survival (P=0.04, log-rank test) and approached significance for better disease-specific survival (P=0.07). It also correlated with earlier International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (P<0.05). Nuclear β-catenin, TP53 mutations, age, ProMisE group, surface involvement, tumor grade and stage also correlated with disease-free survival. There was no association between membranous β-catenin expression and disease-free or disease-specific survival. CTNNB1 mutations and nuclear β-catenin expression are associated with better progression-free survival in patients with OEC. This relationship may be in part due to a trend of CTNNB1-mutated tumors to present at early stage. β-catenin immunohistochemistry may serve as a prognostic biomarker and a surrogate for CTNN1B mutations in the evaluation of patients with ovarian endometrioid neoplasia, particularly those in reproductive-age or found incidentally without upfront staging surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman E Zyla
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| | - Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| | - Yutaka Amemiya
- Genomics Core Facility, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dina Bassiouny
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.,Department of Pathology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Arun Seth
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.,Genomics Core Facility, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bojana Djordjevic
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| | - Carlos Parra-Herran
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huang X, Chen Q, Luo W, Pakvasa M, Zhang Y, Zheng L, Li S, Yang Z, Zeng H, Liang F, Zhang F, Hu DA, Qin KH, Wang EJ, Qin DS, Reid RR, He TC, Athiviraham A, El Dafrawy M, Zhang H. SATB2: A versatile transcriptional regulator of craniofacial and skeleton development, neurogenesis and tumorigenesis, and its applications in regenerative medicine. Genes Dis 2020; 9:95-107. [PMID: 35005110 PMCID: PMC8720659 DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
SATB2 (special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2) is a member of the special AT-rich binding protein family. As a transcription regulator, SATB2 mainly integrates higher-order chromatin organization. SATB2 expression appears to be tissue- and stage-specific, and is governed by several cellular signaling molecules and mediators. Expressed in branchial arches and osteoblast-lineage cells, SATB2 plays a significant role in craniofacial pattern and skeleton development. In addition to regulating osteogenic differentiation, SATB2 also displays versatile functions in neural development and cancer progression. As an osteoinductive factor, SATB2 holds great promise in improving bone regeneration toward bone defect repair. In this review, we have summarized our current understanding of the physiological and pathological functions of SATB2 in craniofacial and skeleton development, neurogenesis, tumorigenesis and regenerative medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Huang
- Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing 401147, PR China
| | - Qiuman Chen
- Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing 401147, PR China
| | - Wenping Luo
- Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Mikhail Pakvasa
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.,The Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.,Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Yuxin Zhang
- Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing 401147, PR China
| | - Liwen Zheng
- Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing 401147, PR China
| | - Shuang Li
- Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing 401147, PR China
| | - Zhuohui Yang
- Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing 401147, PR China
| | - Huan Zeng
- Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing 401147, PR China
| | - Fang Liang
- Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing 401147, PR China
| | - Fugui Zhang
- Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Daniel A Hu
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Kevin H Qin
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Eric J Wang
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - David S Qin
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Russell R Reid
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.,Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Tong-Chuan He
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.,Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Aravind Athiviraham
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Mostafa El Dafrawy
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, PR China.,Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.,Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education, Chongqing 401147, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McCluggage WG. Endometriosis-related pathology: a discussion of selected uncommon benign, premalignant and malignant lesions. Histopathology 2020; 76:76-92. [PMID: 31846535 DOI: 10.1111/his.13970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Endometriosis is an extremely common condition and, in most cases, establishing a histological diagnosis is straightforward, although a variety of benign alterations may result in problems with interpretation. In this review, I discuss selected uncommon variants of endometriosis or benign alterations that may result in diagnostic problems. The topics covered include the contentious issue of so-called atypical endometriosis, stromal endometriosis, polypoid endometriosis, and the association of endometriosis with florid mesothelial hyperplasia. The propensity of endometriosis to undergo neoplastic transformation (especially to endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma) is well known. Selected issues relating to the various neoplasms that can arise in endometriosis are discussed, with a particular concentration on unusual variants of endometrioid carcinoma that result in a disproportionately high number of issues in referral practice. The propensity of ovarian endometrioid carcinomas to show an unexpected ('aberrant') immunophenotype with positive staining with 'intestinal' markers and negative staining with Mullerian markers is also discussed. Uncommon tumour types that may arise in endometriosis, namely seromucinous neoplasms, mesonephric-like carcinomas, and somatically derived yolk sac tumours, are also covered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Endometrial Gastric (Gastrointestinal)-type Mucinous Lesions: Report of a Series Illustrating the Spectrum of Benign and Malignant Lesions. Am J Surg Pathol 2020; 44:406-419. [PMID: 31567280 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
With the recent elucidation of gastric-type lesions in the female genital tract (especially in the cervix), occasional cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma displaying gastric (gastrointestinal) differentiation have been reported, but they are currently not recognized as a distinct pathologic entity. We report 9 cases of endometrial mucinous lesions which exhibit gastric (gastrointestinal)-type features by morphology and immunohistochemistry, including 4 adenocarcinomas and 5 benign mucinous lesions, in patients aged 32 to 85. The adenocarcinomas showed gastric-type morphology in all 4 cases and goblet cells in 1, with a component of benign gastric-type mucinous glands in 1 case. Immunohistochemically, the adenocarcinomas were positive for CK7 (4/4), CEA (4/4), MUC6 (3/3), PAX8 (3/4), CK20 (2/4), CDX2 (2/4), and estrogen receptor (1/4). They were negative for Napsin A (0/3), with mutation-type p53 staining in 2/4 cases, block-type p16 positivity in 1/4, and scattered chromogranin-positive cells in 1/2. Targeted next-generation sequencing revealed nonsense mutation in RB1 gene for the case with block-positive p16. Follow-up was available in all adenocarcinoma cases and indicated aggressive behavior; 2 patients were dead of disease at follow-up of 7 months to 3 years, 1 was alive with progression at 9 months, and 1 was alive without disease at 7 months. The benign mucinous lesions (including the benign component in 1 adenocarcinoma) exhibited gastric-type morphologic features in 5/6 cases, goblet cells in 5/6, and Paneth-like neuroendocrine cells in 1/6. These benign mucinous lesions were associated with an endometrial polyp in 5/6 cases. Cytologic atypia was present in 2/6 cases and a lobular architecture resembling cervical lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia in 4/6. Immunohistochemically, the benign mucinous lesions were positive for CK7 (5/5), CDX2 (5/6), estrogen receptor (4/5), MUC6 (4/5), CK20 (3/5), PAX8 (3/5), and CEA (2/4), with scattered chromogranin-positive cells in 4/4 cases; in all cases tested Napsin A was negative, p53 was wild-type and p16 was negative. We propose the term "endometrial gastric (gastrointestinal)-type adenocarcinoma" for this distinctive group of rare aggressive endometrial carcinomas. We believe that benign or atypical gastric (gastrointestinal)-type mucinous lesions are putative precursors for these adenocarcinomas, comparable to recognized premalignant gastric-type lesions in the cervix and the vagina. Future recognition and reporting of these gastric-type endometrial mucinous lesions will help delineate their pathogenesis and clinical significance.
Collapse
|
12
|
Meagher NS, Wang L, Rambau PF, Intermaggio MP, Huntsman DG, Wilkens LR, El-Bahrawy MA, Ness RB, Odunsi K, Steed H, Herpel E, Anglesio MS, Zhang B, Lambie N, Swerdlow AJ, Lubiński J, Vierkant RA, Goode EL, Menon U, Toloczko-Grabarek A, Oszurek O, Bilic S, Talhouk A, García-Closas M, Wang Q, Tan A, Farrell R, Kennedy CJ, Jimenez-Linan M, Sundfeldt K, Etter JL, Menkiszak J, Goodman MT, Klonowski P, Leung Y, Winham SJ, Moysich KB, Behrens S, Kluz T, Edwards RP, Gronwald J, Modugno F, Hernandez BY, Chow C, Kelemen LE, Keeney GL, Carney ME, Natanzon Y, Robertson G, Sharma R, Gayther SA, Alsop J, Luk H, Karpinskyj C, Campbell I, Sinn P, Gentry-Maharaj A, Coulson P, Chang-Claude J, Shah M, Widschwendter M, Tang K, Schoemaker MJ, Koziak JM, Cook LS, Brenton JD, Daley F, Kristjansdottir B, Mateoiu C, Larson MC, Harnett PR, Jung A, deFazio A, Gorringe KL, Pharoah PDP, Minoo P, Stewart C, Bathe OF, Gui X, Cohen P, Ramus SJ, Köbel M. A combination of the immunohistochemical markers CK7 and SATB2 is highly sensitive and specific for distinguishing primary ovarian mucinous tumors from colorectal and appendiceal metastases. Mod Pathol 2019; 32:1834-1846. [PMID: 31239549 PMCID: PMC8207534 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0302-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Primary ovarian mucinous tumors can be difficult to distinguish from metastatic gastrointestinal neoplasms by histology alone. The expected immunoprofile of a suspected metastatic lower gastrointestinal tumor is CK7-/CK20+/CDX2+/PAX8-. This study assesses the addition of a novel marker SATB2, to improve the diagnostic algorithm. A test cohort included 155 ovarian mucinous tumors (105 carcinomas and 50 borderline tumors) and 230 primary lower gastrointestinal neoplasms (123 colorectal adenocarcinomas and 107 appendiceal neoplasms). All cases were assessed for SATB2, PAX8 CK7, CK20, and CDX2 expression on tissue microarrays. Expression was scored in a 3-tier system as absent, focal (1-50% of tumor cells) and diffuse ( >50% of tumor cells) and then categorized into either absent/present or nondiffuse/diffuse. SATB2 and PAX8 expression was further evaluated in ovarian tumors from an international cohort of 2876 patients (expansion cohort, including 159 mucinous carcinomas and 46 borderline mucinous tumors). The highest accuracy of an individual marker in distinguishing lower gastrointestinal from ovarian mucinous tumors was CK7 (91.7%, nondiffuse/diffuse cut-off) followed by SATB2 (88.8%, present/absent cut-off). The most effective combination was CK7 and SATB2 with accuracy of 95.3% using the 3-tier interpretation, absent/focal/diffuse. This combination outperformed the standard clinical set of CK7, CK20 and CDX2 (87.5%). Re-evaluation of outlier cases confirmed ovarian origin for all but one case. The accuracy of SATB2 was confirmed in the expansion cohort (91.5%). SATB2 expression was also detected in 15% of ovarian endometrioid carcinoma but less than 5% of other ovarian histotypes. A simple two marker combination of CK7 and SATB2 can distinguish lower gastrointestinal from ovarian primary mucinous tumors with greater than 95% accuracy. PAX8 and CDX2 have value as second-line markers. The utility of CK20 in this setting is low and this warrants replacement of this marker with SATB2 in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola S Meagher
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School. UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program. Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Linyuan Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Pathology Department, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences-Bugando, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Maria P Intermaggio
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program. Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - David G Huntsman
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, Vancouver General Hospital, BC Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Agency Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Mona A El-Bahrawy
- Department of Histopathology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Roberta B Ness
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kunle Odunsi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology. Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Esther Herpel
- Tissue Bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bonnie Zhang
- Bendat Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Neil Lambie
- NSW Health Pathology. Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Robert A Vierkant
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Oleg Oszurek
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Sanela Bilic
- Bendat Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Aline Talhouk
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, Vancouver General Hospital, BC Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adeline Tan
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Western Women's Pathology, Western Diagnostic Pathology, Wembley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Rhonda Farrell
- Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Inst Clinical Scienses, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - John L Etter
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Janusz Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Community and Population Health Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul Klonowski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Yee Leung
- Histopathology Department, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Sabine Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fryderyk Chopin University Hospital No 1, Faculty of Medicine, Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Robert P Edwards
- Ovarian Cancer Center of Excellence, Womens Cancer Research Program, Magee-Womens Research Institute and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Womens Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Christine Chow
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Gary L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael E Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Yanina Natanzon
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gregory Robertson
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St George Private Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Pathology West ICPMR Westmead, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Western Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Translational Genomics, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hugh Luk
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Chloe Karpinskyj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH). University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Katrina Tang
- NSW Health Pathology. Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Linda S Cook
- University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Frances Daley
- Division of Breast Cancer Research. Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Bioscience, Brunel University, London, UK
| | - Björg Kristjansdottir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Inst Clinical Scienses, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Constantina Mateoiu
- Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Melissa C Larson
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Paul R Harnett
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network. Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Audrey Jung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna deFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Parham Minoo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Colin Stewart
- Histopathology Department, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Oliver F Bathe
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Xianyong Gui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Paul Cohen
- Bendat Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program. Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|