Significance of tumour regression in lymph node metastases of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinomas

Histopathologic response in patients with curative resection with D2 dissection following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

AIM

This study evaluated pathologic response rate, overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications in locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative gastric resection D2 lymph node dissection with neoadjuvant treatment.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 122 patients with locally advanced GC and EGJ adenocarcinoma who had neoadjuvant treatment and curative resection with D2 dissection between January 2014 and December 2022. Patients were divided into responders and nonresponders. Grades 1a-1b were responders, while 2-3 were non-responders. Patients' clinicopathological features, pathologic response rate, survival, and postoperative complications were evaluated. We assessed complications using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. Total survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier model. Overall survival was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study participants was 61 (N = 89 males; N = 33 females). There were 79 GC and 43 EGJ adenocarcinomas. Overall postoperative complications (CD ≥ II) were 27 %. Postoperative complications were similar in responders and non-responders (p = 0.316). YpT0N0 had a 2.5 % pathological complete response rate. Responders had better overall survival, but there was no statistical difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Both responder and non-responder groups have similar postoperative complications. A complete pathologic response is discouraging for assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer, but a positive treatment response is acceptable. Pathologic response rate helps stage and predict gastric cancer prognosis. Responder groups survive slightly better.

Challenging the Dogma: Stage migration or negative lymph nodes, which of them is the main player on gastric cancer prognosis?

Expanding loco-regional nodes harvesting is expected to increase survival. This improvement may be associated to stage migration (SM). However, the great bulk of harvested lymph nodes observed in large dissections is negative. M&M: 830 patients who received R0 gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma were included. pN+ patients with <26 nodes (n = 209) were included for a simulation to "offer 26 nodes" - SM (proportional and exponential based) was simulated and analysed through machine learning algorithms. Overall Survival (OS), in native and simulated stages, were compared. OS of extended lymphadenectomies (pN+, D ≥ 26, n = 273) was compared with the simulated curves. OS of patients in the following dissection intervals of negative nodes were compared: <16 (n = 233), 16-25 (n = 258), ≥26 (n = 339). RESULTS: After simulation to 26 nodes (pN+, D < 26 patients, n = 209), staging was recomputed. OS of native vs simulated early-stages (I-II) and advanced stages (III) were not different (p > 0.05). OS of patients with lymphadenectomy (≥26) was better than simulated for early and advanced stages (p = 0.008; p = 0.005). OS of patients included in distinct intervals of negative lymph nodes were different (p < 0.001). These intervals were an independent prognostic factor (multivariate analysis). CONCLUSIONS: The influence of Stage Migration was null in this set of simulations and Will Rogers phenomenon was not observed. Extended dissection performed better in OS. But the influence of the number of negative nodes, even in large dissections, was highlighted. By emphasizing the role of negative nodes, we aim to facilitate more informed decision-making in management of gastric cancer patients, ultimately leading to improved treatment outcomes and patient care.

Role of pathological tumor regression grade of lymph node metastasis following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer

AIMS

To confirm whether the pathological response of lymph node metastasis (LNM) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) can predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

A total of 979 patients with locally advanced GC were included. χ2 test was used to analyze the relationship between LNM TRG and clinicopathological factors. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the relationship between LNM TRG, clinicopathological factors, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 21,162 lymph nodes were evaluated, with 237 patients (35.4%) in the response group and 433 patients (64.6%) in the non-response group. The non-responsive group was strongly associated with higher ypT, ypN, ypTNM, primary tumor (PT) TRG (all p < 0.001), positive cancer nodules (p = 0.001), and more distant LNM location (p < 0.001). Patients with the same PT TRG but different LNM TRG had different prognosis. There was no difference in OS between the responding and non-responding groups of LNM at location 2, 3, and M. YpN, tumor location, and LNM location were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of LNM TRG and PT TRG could better predict patient prognosis. Lymph node dissection should be routinely performed after NCT to provide the reference of radical resection.

Interleukin-6 as a Predictive Factor of Pathological Response to FLOT Regimen Systemic Treatment in Locally Advanced Gastroesophageal Junction or Gastric Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Perioperative treatment is a gold standard in locally advanced gastric cancer or GEJ cancer in the Western population. Unfortunately, the response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains limited. Moreover, there are currently no biomarkers enabling an individual prediction of therapeutic efficacy. The aim of this study was the identification of serum biomarkers of early response to NAC.

METHODS

We conducted this prospective study in the MSCNRIO in Warsaw, Poland. A total of 71 patients and 15 healthy volunteers gave informed consent. Complete blood count, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carcinoma antigen 125 (CA125), carcinoma antigen 19.9 (CA19.9), and fibrinogen (F) were measured at baseline and before every cycle. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were measured in a pilot group of 40 patients at baseline and before cycle two (C2) and cycle three (C3).

RESULTS

Of all the measured parameters, only the IL-6 serum level was statistically significant. The IL-6 level before C2 of chemotherapy was significantly decreased in the complete pathological response (pCR) vs. the non-pCR group (3.71 pg/mL vs. 7.63 pg/mL, p = 0.004). In all patients with an IL-6 level below 5.0 pg/mL in C2, tumour regression TRG1a/1b according to the Becker classification and ypN0 were detected in postoperative histopathological specimens. The IL-6 level before C1 of chemotherapy was significantly elevated in ypN+ vs. ypN0 (7.69 pg/mL vs. 2.89 pg/mL, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The trial showed that an elevated level of IL-6 prior to treatment and C2 might be a predictor of pathological response to NAC.

Imaging lymph node regression can predict the pathological tumor regression grade in gastric cancer after neoadjuvant treatment

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. The tumor regression grade system is an effective and widely used tool for the evaluation of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, whether tumor regression grade could be predicted using clinical characteristics is uncertain.

METHODS

A total of 287 locally advanced gastric cancer patients from 2014 to 2021 were retrospectively included. According to the College of American Pathologists' tumor regression grade system, patients were classified into response group (tumor regression grade 0-1) and non-response group (tumor regression grade 2-3). Associations between clinical characteristics and neoadjuvant chemotherapy response were performed by the logistic regression model. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival. A prediction scoring system was constructed based on the β coefficients of multivariate analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the performance of the predictive scoring system.

RESULTS

Survival analysis showed that patients with tumor regression grades 0 to 1 had significantly better disease-free survival and overall survival than the tumor regression grades 2 to 3. Tumor differentiation, ycT stage, immunotherapy, and lymph node regression were independent predictors of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We further developed a scoring system to predict the tumor regression grade. The receiver operating characteristic and decision curve analysis showed good predictive performance of the scoring system.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node regression could be used as a predictor for pathological response. We developed a scoring system to predict the treatment response of patients with gastric cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The scoring system based on the predictors could provide guidance for making clinical decisions.

Interpretation of Tumor Response Grade following Preoperative Therapy for Gastric Cancer: An Overview

Gastric cancer is among the top five causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Preoperative chemotherapy has been established as an option in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. However, chemotherapy yields variable results, owing to the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of this disease. Identifying patients who did or did not respond to preoperative therapy can allow clinicians to alter treatment modalities and provide important information related to prognostication. A pathologic response to preoperative therapies, called the Tumor Response Grade (TRG), has been evaluated to quantify treatment response. Multiple systems for TRG have been established. However, the literature has demonstrated inconsistent results for TRG systems and prognosis, possibly due to variability in interpretation of tumor response between systems and interobserver variability. Radiographic responses to preoperative therapies using RECIST 1.1 criteria and endoscopically assessed tumor response have demonstrated association with survival; however, their use in gastric cancer remains challenging given the inability to accurately and consistently identify and measure the tumor, especially in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy, where treatment-related changes can obscure the gastric wall layers. While the response to preoperative therapies with positron emission tomography (PET) has shown promising results in esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) malignancies, its role in gastric cancer is still under investigation. This review is focused on summarizing the available literature related to evaluating TRG in gastric cancer, as well as providing a brief overview of the use of radiographic and endoscopic methods to assess response to preoperative therapies. Lastly, we outline future directions regarding the use of a universal TRG system to guide care and assist with prognosis.

Pathological regression of primary tumour and metastatic lymph nodes following chemotherapy in resectable OG cancer: pooled analysis of two trials

BACKGROUND

No definitive largescale data exist evaluating the role of pathologically defined regression changes within the primary tumour and lymph nodes (LN) of resected oesophagogastric (OG) adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the impact on survival.

METHODS

Data and samples from two large prospective randomised trials (UK MRC OE05 and ST03) were pooled. Stained slides were available for central pathology review from 1619 patients. Mandard tumour regression grade (TRG) and regression of tumour within LNs (LNR: scored as present/absent) were assessed and correlated with overall survival (OS) using a Cox regression model. An exploratory analysis to define subgroups with distinct prognoses was conducted using a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.

RESULTS

Neither trial demonstrated a relationship between TRG score and the presence or absence of LNR. In univariable analysis, lower TRG, lower ypN stage, lower ypT stage, presence of LNR, presence of well/moderate tumour differentiation, and absence of tumour at resection margin were all associated with better OS. However, the multivariable analysis demonstrated that only ypN, ypT, grade of differentiation and resection margin (R0) were independent indicators of prognosis. Exploratory CART analysis identified six subgroups with 3-year OS ranging from 83% to 22%; with ypN stage being the most important single prognostic variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological LN stage within the resection specimen was the single most important determiner of survival. Our results suggest that the assessment of regression changes within the primary tumour or LNs may not be necessary to define the prognosis further.

Perioperative Tailored Treatments for Gastric Cancer: Times Are Changing

Resectable gastric or gastroesophageal (G/GEJ) cancer is a heterogeneous disease with no defined molecularly based treatment strategy. Unfortunately, nearly half of patients experience disease recurrence despite standard treatments (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy and surgery). In this review, we summarize the evidence of potential tailored approaches in perioperative treatment of G/GEJ cancer, with a special focus on patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2)-positive and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. In patients with resectable MSI-H G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, the ongoing INFINITY trial introduces the concept of non-operative management for patients with complete clinical-pathological-molecular response, and this could be a novel and potential practice changing strategy. Other pathways involving vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), claudin18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2), and DNA damage repair proteins are also described, with limited evidence until now. Although tailored therapy appears to be a promising strategy for resectable G/GEJ cancer, there are several methodological issues to address: inadequate sample size for pivotal trials, underestimation of subgroup effects, and choice of primary endpoint (tumor-centered vs. patient-centered endpoints). A better optimization of G/GEJ cancer treatment allows maximizing patient outcomes. In the perioperative phase, although caution is mandatory, times are changing and tailored strategies could introduce new treatment concepts. Overall, MSI-H G/GEJ cancer patients possess the characteristics to be the subgroup that could receive the most benefit from a tailored approach.

A Standardized Pathology Report for Gastric Cancer: 2nd Edition

The first edition of 'A Standardized Pathology Report for Gastric Cancer' was initiated by the Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists and published 17 years ago. Since then, significant advances have been made in the pathologic diagnosis, molecular genetics, and management of gastric cancer (GC). To reflect those changes, a committee for publishing a second edition of the report was formed within the Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists. This second edition consists of two parts: standard data elements and conditional data elements. The standard data elements contain the basic pathologic findings and items necessary to predict the prognosis of GC patients, and they are adequate for routine surgical pathology service. Other diagnostic and prognostic factors relevant to adjuvant therapy, including molecular biomarkers, are classified as conditional data elements to allow each pathologist to selectively choose items appropriate to the environment in their institution. We trust that the standardized pathology report will be helpful for GC diagnosis and facilitate large-scale multidisciplinary collaborative studies.

Distribution of residual tumors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy

Aims

The distribution of residual esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the esophageal wall and resected lymph nodes was evaluated after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nICT).

Methods and results

Clinical data were collected from 137 ESCC patients who underwent anti-programmed death 1 therapy and esophagectomy. Ninety (65.7%) achieved an major pathological response (MPR) in the esophageal wall, and 27 (19.7%) achieved an MPR in the lymph nodes. Pathologically complete response (pCR, ypT0N0) was observed in 26 patients (19%). Residual tumors located in the mucosa and/or submucosa were found in 94.6% of nonpCR patients. In the minor responders, 97.8% had residual tumor >10% in the mucosa or submucosa. A preferential regression direction toward the lumen was found in 76.4% of prepT2 nonpCR patients, or 60.7% of prepT3-4a nonpCR patients. The correlation between pCR in the esophageal wall and in lymph nodes was not significant (P=0.143). Among 19 patients with pCR in resected recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph nodes, 31.6% had residual tumor cells in other resected lymph nodes. A significant correlation was found between ypT/ypN downstaging and tumor regression grade (P<0.05).

Conclusions

After nICT for ESCC, residual tumors were frequently found in the mucosa or submucosa, with relatively high responsiveness of the invasive front and a significant correlation with downstaging, which may help clinicians make appropriate decisions about postoperative treatment and surveillance. The differences in pCR status in primary tumors, resected lymph nodes, and RLN lymph nodes indicated the importance of assessing regression changes in all resected lymph nodes during clinical practice.

A standardized pathology report for gastric cancer: 2nd edition

The first edition of 'A Standardized Pathology Report for Gastric Cancer' was initiated by the Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists and published 17 years ago. Since then, significant advances have been made in the pathologic diagnosis, molecular genetics, and management of gastric cancer (GC). To reflect those changes, a committee for publishing a second edition of the report was formed within the Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists. This second edition consists of two parts: standard data elements and conditional data elements. The standard data elements contain the basic pathologic findings and items necessary to predict the prognosis of GC patients, and they are adequate for routine surgical pathology service. Other diagnostic and prognostic factors relevant to adjuvant therapy, including molecular biomarkers, are classified as conditional data elements to allow each pathologist to selectively choose items appropriate to the environment in their institution. We trust that the standardized pathology report will be helpful for GC diagnosis and facilitate large-scale multidisciplinary collaborative studies.

Pathological complete response in multimodal treatment of esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

To evaluate pathological complete response (pCR, ypT0ypN0) after neoadjuvant treatment compared with non-complete response (non-CR) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC), and 393 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Survival probability was analyzed in patients with: (i) pCR vs non-CR; (ii) complete response of the primary tumor but persisting lymphatic metastases (non-CR-T0N+) and (iii) pCR and tumor-free lymphnodes exhibiting signs of postneoadjuvant regression vs. no signs of regression. (i) Median overall survival (mOS) was favorable in patients with pCR (pCR: mOS not reached vs. non-CR: 41 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that grade of regression was not an independent predictor for prolonged survival. Instead, the achieved postneoadjuvant TNM-stage (T-stage: Hazard ratio [HR] ypT3-T4 vs. ypT0-T2: 1.837; N-stage: HR ypN1-N3 vs. ypN0: 2.046; Postneoadjuvant M-stage: HR ypM1 vs. ycM0: 2.709), the residual tumor (R)-classification (HR R1 vs. R0: 4.195) and the histologic subtype of EC (HR ESCC vs. EAC: 1.688) were prognostic factors. Patients with non-CR-T0N+ have a devastating prognosis, similar to those with local non-CR and lymphatic metastases (non-CR-T + N+) (non-CR-T0N+: 22.0 months, non-CR-T + N-: mOS not reached, non-CR-T + N+: 23.0 months; P-values: non-CR-T0N+ vs. non-CR-T + N-: 0.016; non-CR-T0N+ vs. non-CR-T + N+: 0.956; non-CR-T + N- vs. non-CR-T + N+: <0.001). Regressive changes in lymphnodes after neoadjuvant treatment did not influence survival-probability in patients with pCR (mOS not reached in each group; EAC-patients: P = 0.0919; ESCC-patients: P = 0.828). Particularly, the achieved postneoadjuvant ypTNM-stage influences the survival probability of patients with EC. Patients with non-CR-T0N+ have a dismal prognosis, and only true pathological complete response with ypT0ypN0 offers superior survival probabilities.

Nodal downstaging to ypN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy positively impacts on survival of cT4N+ GC/GEJ patients

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of histomorphologic regression in primary gastric and gastroesophageal cancers (GC/GEJ) has been previously established, however, the impact of lymph node (LN) regression on survival still remains unclear.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was reviewed to identify cT4N+ gastric and gastroesophageal cancers (GC/GEJ) after NAC (neoadjuvant chemotherapy). Patients were categorized into two groups based on LN status: cN+/ypN0 (downstaged N0) and cN+/ypN+ (persistent N+), long-term survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.

RESULTS

In total, 125 patients with cT4N+ GC/GEJ underwent NAC followed by surgery were enrolled. A total of 39 patients (31.2%) had cN+/ypN0 (ypN0) disease, 86 patients (68.8%) had cN+/ypN+ (ypN+) disease. Prognosis in ypN+ patients was significantly worse than those in ypN0 group for 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) (p < 0.05). The 3-year OS was 83%, 44% in ypN0 and ypN+ group, respectively. The 5-year OS was 75%, 35% in ypN0 and ypN+ group, respectively. Multivariable analysis suggested that multivisceral resection (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14-0.76, p = 0.009), and ypN+ (HR = 3.42, 95% CI: 1.15-10.13, p =0.027) were independent prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

Nodal downstaging is an important hallmark representing the effectiveness of NAC for GC/GEJ, and it positively impacts on survival of these patients.

Grading der Tumorregression gastrointestinaler Karzinome nach neoadjuvanter Therapie

Prä- oder perioperative Chemo- oder Radiochemotherapie und anschließende Resektion ist die Standardtherapie von lokal fortgeschrittenem Ösophagus‑, Magen- und Rektumkarzinom. Eine Tumorregressionsgraduierung (TRG, auch Tumorregressionsgrad) kategorisiert das Ausmaß der regressiven Veränderungen nach neoadjuvanter Behandlung. Für gastrointestinale Karzinome existieren mehrere TRG-Systeme, die sich entweder auf das Ausmaß der therapieinduzierten Fibrose im Verhältnis zum Resttumor oder den geschätzten Anteil des Resttumors im Bereich des ehemaligen Tumorareals beziehen. Ein ideales TRG-System zeigt eine signifikante Interobserverübereinstimmung und bietet relevante prognostische Informationen – in den meisten Fällen ist eine vollständige oder nahezu vollständige Regression nach neoadjuvanter Therapie mit verbesserter Prognose verbunden. In diesem Review werden die am häufigsten verwendeten TRG-Systeme für gastrointestinale Karzinome vorgestellt und diskutiert. Zudem werden aktuelle Punkte wie die Standardisierung der Angabe von TRGs und die Thematik der Regression bei Lymphknotenmetastasen im Kontext eines TRG-Systems behandelt.

Consensus recommendations for the standardized histopathological evaluation and reporting after radical oesophago-gastrectomy (HERO consensus)

BACKGROUND

Variation in the approach, radicality, and quality of gastroesophageal surgery impacts patient outcomes. Pathological outcomes such as lymph node yield are routinely used as surrogate markers of surgical quality, but are subject to significant variations in histopathological evaluation and reporting. A multi-society consensus group was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations for the standardized assessment of gastroesophageal cancer specimens.

METHODS

A consensus group comprised of surgeons, pathologists, and oncologists was convened on behalf of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain & Ireland. Literature was reviewed for 17 key questions. Draft recommendations were voted upon via an anonymous Delphi process. Consensus was considered achieved where >70% of participants were in agreement.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved on 18 statements for all 17 questions. Twelve strong recommendations regarding preparation and assessment of lymph nodes, margins, and reporting methods were made. Importantly, there was 100% agreement that the all specimens should be reported using the Royal College of Pathologists Guidelines as the minimum acceptable dataset. In addition, two weak recommendations regarding method and duration of specimen fixation were made. Four topics lacked sufficient evidence and no recommendation was made.

CONCLUSIONS

These consensus recommendations provide explicit guidance for gastroesophageal cancer specimen preparation and assessment, to provide maximum benefit for patient care and standardize reporting to allow benchmarking and improvement of surgical quality.

Interobserver agreement of a gastric adenocarcinoma tumor regression grading system that incorporates assessment of lymph nodes

Perioperative chemotherapy is increasingly used in combination with surgery for the treatment of patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric cancer. Histologic tumor regression grade (TRG) has emerged as an important prognostic factor; however, a common standard for its evaluation is lacking. Moreover, the clinical significance of regressive changes in metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) remains unclear. We conducted an international study to examine the interobserver agreement of a TRG system that is based on the Becker system for the primary tumors and additionally incorporates regression grading in LNs. Twenty observers at different levels of experience evaluated the TRG in 60 histologic slides (30 primary tumors and 30 LNs) based on the following criteria: for primary tumors, grade 1 represented complete response (no residual tumor), grade 2 represented <10%, grade 3 represented 10-50%, and grade 4 represented >50% residual tumor, as described by Becker et al. For LNs, grade "a" represented complete, grade "b" represented partial, and grade "c" represented no regression. The interobserver agreement was estimated using the Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W). Regarding primary tumors, agreement was good irrespective of the level of experience, reaching a W-value of 0.70 overall, 0.71 among subspecialized, and 0.71 among nonsubspecialized observers. Regarding LNs, interobserver agreement was moderate to good, with W-values of 0.52 overall, 0.64 among subspecialized, and 0.45 among nonsubspecialized observers. These findings indicate that the combination of the Becker TRG system with a three-tiered grading of regression in LNs generates a system that is reproducible. Future studies should investigate whether the additional information of TRG in LNs adds to the prognostic value of histologic regression grading in gastric cancer specimens.

Clinical assessment of tumor regression grade systems in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for gastroesophageal cancer is neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surgery, which has been shown to increase survival compared with surgery alone. Evidence is mounting that characterization of the oncologically induced tumor regression is of prognostic importance. However, no consensus regarding the optimal system for describing tumor regression exists. Thus, this study aims to explore three validated/promising tumor regression systems with a focus on their interobserver reliability and usability.

METHODS

We included 100 consecutive patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who had undergone neoadjuvant oncological treatment followed by surgery. The tumors underwent tumor regression grade (TRG) assessment according to the Standard Mandard-, Modified Mandard-, and Becker systems to assess the interobserver reliability between two consultant pathologists. The interobserver reliability was determined by both Fleiss kappa and weighted kappa metrics. Besides, a semi-quantitative usability questionary was completed and it was expanded with usability comments.

RESULTS

The Fleiss kappa interobserver agreement was 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55-0.79], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.73-1.00], and 0.88 [95% CI, 0.73-1.00] for Standard Mandard-, Modified Mandard-, and the Becker systems, respectively. The weighted kappa (linear) was 0.80 [95% CI, 0.72-0.89], 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84-0.98], and 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84-0.98] for the Standard Mandard-, Modified Mandard-, and the Becker systems, respectively. The usability was scored on a scale of 8-24 by both raters. The systems were scored accordingly: 47 (Modified Mandard system), 43 (Becker system), and 37 (Standard Mandard system).

CONCLUSION

The Modified Mandard- and Becker systems had excellent interobserver reliability and usability. However, the systems could be improved by a better characterization of the different tiers and tumor morphology.

Lymph Node Involvement in Advanced Gastric Cancer in the Era of Multimodal Treatment-Oncological and Surgical Perspective

Simple Summary

Gastric cancer (GC) continues to be one of the major oncological challenges on a global scale. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in GC is to downstage primary tumour, eliminate potential micrometastases, and increase the chance for radical resection. Although systemic treatment prolongs the survival in advanced GC, persistent lymph node (LN) metastases indicate poor prognosis. Therefore, further identification of prognostic factors after NAC is urgent and could positively influence clinical outcomes. This article aimed to review the actual trends and future perspectives in multimodal therapy of advanced GC, with a particular interest in the post-neoadjuvant pathological nodal stage. Since downstaged and primarily node-negative patients show a similar prognosis, the main target for NAC in advanced GC should be nodal clearance. Adequate staging and personalised perioperative therapy seem to be of great importance in the multimodal treatment of GC.

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) continues to be one of the major oncological challenges on a global scale. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in GC is to downstage primary tumour, eliminate potential micrometastases, and increase the chance for radical resection. Although systemic treatment prolongs the survival in advanced GC, persistent lymph node (LN) metastases indicate poor prognosis. Further identification of prognostic factors after NAC is urgent and could positively influence clinical outcomes. This article aimed to review the actual trends and future perspectives in multimodal therapy of advanced GC, with a particular interest in the post-neoadjuvant pathological nodal stage. A favourable prognostic impact for ypN0 patients is observed, either due to truly negative LN before the start of therapy or because preoperative therapy achieved a pathologically complete nodal response. Ongoing trials investigating the extent of lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant therapy will standardise the LN dissection from the multimodal therapy perspective. Since downstaged and primarily node-negative patients show a similar prognosis, the main target for NAC in advanced GC should be nodal clearance. Adequate staging and personalised perioperative therapy seem to be of great importance in the multimodal treatment of GC.

Tumor Regression in Lymph Node Metastases of Esophageal Adenocarcinomas after Neoadjuvant Therapy

Tumor regression following neoadjuvant treatment can be observed in lymph node (LN) metastases similar to the primary tumor in esophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC). We evaluated the prognostic significance of tumor regression in LN metastases of locally advanced EAC of 239 patients treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCTX) or chemotherapy (CTX) followed by esophagectomy. We examined retrospectively the LN for histopathologic signs of regression, i.e., nodular fibrosis and acellular mucin. LN classification was performed according to two parameters: presence (−) or absence (+) of residual tumor and regression characteristics in the LN, resulting in four categories: LN−/REG−, LN−/REG+, LN+/REG+, LN+/REG−. In total, LN metastases with residual tumor were detectable in 117/239 (49%) cases. Regression in LN were observed in 85/239 cases (35.5%). The distribution of the LN/REG categories were as follows: 97 patients (40.6%) were LN−/REG−. A total of 25 patients (10.5%) were LN−/REG+. A total of 60 (25.1%) were LN+/REG+ and 57 (23.8%) LN+/REG−. The LN/Reg categorization had a significant prognostic value in univariate analysis (p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR = 1.326; p = 0.002) with similar results for the subgroups of patients treated with RCTX or CTX. The prognosis of LN−/REG+ was worse than LN−/REG− but better than both LN+ categories, which was demonstrated in the Kaplan–Meier curves but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.104 and p = 0.090, respectively). In contrast, there was no difference between LN+/REG+ and LN+/REG− (p = 0.802). In summary, regression in LN metastases of EAC can be observed in a significant number of patients after neoadjuvant therapy. Complete regression of former LN metastases in comparison to “true” negative LN seems to be of prognostic relevance but additional studies are needed to confirm this trend seen in our study.