Effect of intracoronary nicardipine on cardiac enzymes after elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Evaluating the effects of empagliflozin in preventing myocardial injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial

Introduction

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is a fundamental procedure for coronary artery disease management, yet the risk of adverse events such periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) persists. This double-blind, randomized clinical trial aims to assess the efficacy of empagliflozin in preventing myocardial injury during PCI procedure.

Methods

A total of 90 patients were randomly assigned to two groups A and B; Group A as the intervention group received empagliflozin 25 mg 24 hours before and empagliflozin 10 mg 1-2 hours before coronary intervention and group Bas the control group received placebo at similar intervals. The primary outcome involved comparing baseline, 8-hour, and 24-hour cTnI and baseline and 24-hour hs-CRP levels after PCI in both groups to measure the incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) and anti-inflammatory effects of empagliflozin.

Results

Baseline cTnI levels with P=0.955, 8 hours after PCI with P=0.469, and 24 hours after the intervention with P=0.980 were not statistically different in the two groups. Baseline levels of hs-CRP in both intervention and control groups were not statistically significantly different (P=0.982). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in hs-CRP levels 24 hours after PCI in two groups (P=0.198). Finally, the results showed that MACEs did not occur in any of the groups.

Conclusion

The results of this trial could not express the advantages of acute pretreatment with empagliflozin in preventing PCI-related myocardial injury.

Periprocedural Myocardial Injury: Pathophysiology, Prognosis, and Prevention

The definition and clinical implications of myocardial infarction occurring in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention have been the subject of unresolved controversy. The definitions of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) are many and have evolved over recent years. Additionally, the recent advancement of different imaging modalities has provided useful information on a patients' pre-procedural risk of myocardial infarction. Nonetheless, questions on the benefit of different approaches to prevent PMI and their practical implementation remain open. This review aims to address these questions and to provide a current and contemporary perspective.

Association of chronic kidney disease with periprocedural myocardial injury after elective stent implantation: A single center prospective cohort study

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with CKD who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may have more ischemic events than patients without CKD. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) after elective stent implantation in patients with CKD using the Third Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF PMI definition.In a single center prospective cohort study, we enrolled 344 consecutive patients who underwent elective PCI in a period of 39 months. Serum troponin I (cTnI) concentrations were measured at baseline and at 8 and 16 hours after PCI. Periprocedural increase of cTnI, according to the most recent PMI definition, was used to define both the presence and intensity of PMI. Patients were further stratified according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using 4 variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation: control group with eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m and the CKD group with eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m, with further subdivision according to the CKD stage.We found no significant difference in the incidence as well as intensity of the PMI in the control (>90 mL/min/1.73 m) and the CKD group (<90 mL/min/1.73 m) both 8 and 16 hours after PCI. When the CKD patients were further subdivided according to their CKD stage, there was again no difference in the intensity or incidence of PMI compared to the control group. Further analyses of our data showed angina pectoris CCS IV, bare metal stent (BMS) implantation, and treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) as independent predictors of PMI. Furthermore, the presence of hypertension was inversely related to the occurrence of PMI.Applying the new guidelines for PMI and using the eGFR equation most suitable for our patients, we found no association between PMI and CKD. Further analyses showed other factors that could potentially influence the occurrence of PMI.