New antithrombotics for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome

Improving Outcomes in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Review on Vorapaxar

Antiplatelet agents are the standard of practice in the management of atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In contrast to the available antiplatelet agents, vorapaxar represents a novel mechanism of action. It is an antagonist of the platelet protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) and inhibits thrombin-induced and thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP)- induced platelet aggregation. The TRA2○P-TIMI 50 trial led to the approval of vorapaxar by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or peripheral arterial disease. TRA2○P-TIMI 50 trial showed that the use of vorapaxar (2.5 mg once/daily) in addition to standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, was effective in the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombotic events among patients with previous atherothrombosis, particularly in patients with prior MI; at the expense of an increase in major bleeding. Another recently published VORA-PRATIC (Vorapaxar in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor) study showed that among post-MI patients treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor), vorapaxar reduced platelet-driven global thrombogenicity, an effect that persisted, albeit attenuated, in the absence of aspirin. The current review summarizes an up to date literature on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy of vorapaxar and proposes future directions of research.

Simultaneous determination of Rivaroxaban and TAK-438 in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS: application to pharmacokinetic interaction study

Aim: A sensitive and reliable LC-MS/MS method has been established and validated to the quantitation of rivaroxaban (RIV) and TAK-438 in rat plasma using carbamazepine as internal standard. Results: The procedure of method validation was conducted according to the guidelines of EMA and US FDA. At the same time, the method was applied to pharmacokinetic interactions study between RIV and TAK-438 for the first time. When RIV and TAK-438 co-administration to rats, main pharmacokinetic parameters of TAK-438 like AUC_(0-t), AUC_(0-∞) and C_max had statistically significant increase. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of RIV have no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) when co-administered except for t_1/2 (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The results indicated that drug-drug interactions occurred between RIV and TAK-438 when co-administered to rats.

Effects of Rivaroxaban on Platelet Aggregation

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anti-factor Xa anticoagulant. It has recently been suggested that rivaroxaban may affect platelet function in vitro; however, little is known about the clinical impact of this likely antiplatelet effect and whether this probable phenomenon is dose-dependent. Our aim was to determine whether rivaroxaban at 4 different doses inhibits direct platelet aggregation. We included adult patients of both sexes and who were allocated to one of the following groups depending on the prescribed daily dose of rivaroxaban: 5, 10, 15, and 20 mg. In 80 patients (20 patients/group), the percentage of platelet aggregation was determined by means of platelet aggregometry tests before and after rivaroxaban use. Basal samples were obtained before starting rivaroxaban and 1 month after treatment, both 2 and 24 hours after the last dose of the drug (12 hours after in the case of rivaroxaban 5 mg). We used 5 platelet agonists: adenosine diphosphate, epinephrine, arachidonic acid, collagen, and thrombin. There were no significant changes in the percentage of platelet aggregation before and after rivaroxaban use independently of the dose administered and the agonist used. Our results have clearly shown that rivaroxaban, even at a high dose, does not directly affect platelet aggregation.

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the most acute manifestation of coronary artery disease and is associated with great morbidity and mortality. A complete thrombotic occlusion developing from an atherosclerotic plaque in an epicardial coronary vessel is the cause of STEMI in the majority of cases. Early diagnosis and immediate reperfusion are the most effective ways to limit myocardial ischaemia and infarct size and thereby reduce the risk of post-STEMI complications and heart failure. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with STEMI; if PCI cannot be performed within 120 minutes of STEMI diagnosis, fibrinolysis therapy should be administered to dissolve the occluding thrombus. The initiation of networks to provide around-the-clock cardiac catheterization availability and the generation of standard operating procedures within hospital systems have helped to reduce the time to reperfusion therapy. Together with new advances in antithrombotic therapy and preventive measures, these developments have resulted in a decrease in mortality from STEMI. However, a substantial amount of patients still experience recurrent cardiovascular events after STEMI. New insights have been gained regarding the pathophysiology of STEMI and feed into the development of new treatment strategies.

Proteinases and their receptors in inflammatory arthritis: an overview

Proteinases are enzymes with established roles in physiological and pathological processes such as digestion and the homeostasis, destruction and repair of tissues. Over the past few years, the hormone-like properties of circulating proteinases have become increasingly appreciated. Some proteolytic enzymes trigger cell signalling via proteinase-activated receptors, a family of G protein-coupled receptors that have been implicated in inflammation and pain in inflammatory arthritis. Proteinases can also regulate ion flux owing to the cross-sensitization of transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V members 1 and 4, which are associated with mechanosensing and pain. In this Review, the idea that proteinases have the potential to orchestrate inflammatory signals by interacting with receptors on cells within the synovial microenvironment of an inflamed joint is revisited in three arthritic diseases: osteoarthritis, spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Unanswered questions are highlighted and the therapeutic potential of modulating this proteinase-receptor axis for the management of disease in patients with these types of arthritis is also discussed.

Effect of high-dose rosuvastatin loading before percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is an important disease threatening human life and health. Many studies have shown that the loading dose of atorvastatin can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with ACS, and reduce the mortality. However, this conclusion is not consistent. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of high-dose rosuvastatin loading before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Chinese patients with ACS using a meta-analysis based on a systematic review of published articles.

Methods

We systematically reviewed published studies, evaluating the effect of high-dose rosuvastatin loading before percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with ACS. The retrieval time is limited from inception to 2 November 2016, and the retrieved databases included PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, the VIP database and the Wang Fang database. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of the included studies and then extracted the data. Stata 11.0 was used for data analysis.

Results

In total, 11 articles, which included 802 patients, were included in our meta-analysis. Among these patients, 398 patients were in the high-dose group (20 mg/day) and 404 patients were in the conventional dose group (10 mg/day). Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the conventional dose group: 1) The loading dose of rosuvastatin can significantly reduce the hs-CRP level after PCI, including at 24 hours (SMD = -0.65, 95%CI -0.84 ~ -0.47, P = 0.000), 48 hours (SMD = -0.40, 95%CI -0.68 ~ -0.11, P = 0.006), and four weeks (SMD = -1.64, 95%CI -2.01 ~ -1.26, P = 0.000). 2) The loading dose of rosuvastatin can significantly reduce the levels of LDL-C and cTnT, including the level of LDL-C at 30 d after PCI (SMD = -0.89, 95%CI -1.10 ~ -0.69, P = 0.000), and the level of cTnT at 24 h after PCI (SMD = -1.93, 95%CI -2.28 ~ -1.59, P = 0.000), and increase the level of HDL-C at 48 h after PCI (SMD = 0.61, 95%CI 0.34 ~ 0.88, P = 0.000). 3) The loading dose of rosuvastatin can significantly reduce the levels of TG and TC, including the level of TG at 30 d after PCI (SMD = -0.94, 95%CI -1.17 ~ -0.71, P = 0.000), the level of TC at 48 h after PCI (SMD = -0.35, 95%CI -0.68 ~ -0.01, P = 0.043), and the level of TC at 30 d after PCI (SMD = -0.77, 95%CI -0.98 ~ -0.56, P = 0.000).

Conclusions

Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that, compared with the conventional dose, the loading dose of rosuvastatin was more beneficial to patients with ACS in China and is suitable for clinical application. Due to the limitations of the quality and quantity of included articles, this conclusion still needs to be confirmed by multicenter clinical trials.

Proteinases, Their Extracellular Targets, and Inflammatory Signaling

Given that over 2% of the human genome codes for proteolytic enzymes and their inhibitors, it is not surprising that proteinases serve many physiologic-pathophysiological roles. In this context, we provide an overview of proteolytic mechanisms regulating inflammation, with a focus on cell signaling stimulated by the generation of inflammatory peptides; activation of the proteinase-activated receptor (PAR) family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), with a mechanism in common with adhesion-triggered GPCRs (ADGRs); and by proteolytic ion channel regulation. These mechanisms are considered in the much wider context that proteolytic mechanisms serve, including the processing of growth factors and their receptors, the regulation of matrix-integrin signaling, and the generation and release of membrane-tethered receptor ligands. These signaling mechanisms are relevant for inflammatory, neurodegenerative, and cardiovascular diseases as well as for cancer. We propose that the inflammation-triggering proteinases and their proteolytically generated substrates represent attractive therapeutic targets and we discuss appropriate targeting strategies.

Vorapaxar: A Protease-Activated Receptor Antagonist for the Prevention of Thrombotic Events

Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risks for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with atherosclerotic disease, and it is also beneficial in managing peripheral arterial disease (PAD). These agents work through various therapeutic pathways to achieve antithrombotic effects. Although single- or two-drug regimens have been deployed to prevent vascular events, approximately 10% of the patients with acute coronary syndrome remain at risk for recurrent thrombotic events and may need a more aggressive preventative strategy. Vorapaxar offers a unique mechanism for platelet inhibition via the antagonism of protease-activated receptor-1. It is approved for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or PAD. This new drug approval was mainly based on the results from subgroup analyses from a large landmark trial (Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 50), which found that vorapaxar reduces the rate of the combined end point of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, and urgent coronary revascularization when used in addition to aspirin and/or clopidogrel in patients without a history of stroke. In this study, vorapaxar was discontinued in patients with a history of stroke due to excessive risk for intracranial hemorrhage after 2 years of therapy. As an adjunctive therapy to standard regimens, vorapaxar provides a greater net clinical benefit in MI patients who are at a lower risk for bleeding. In patients with PAD, it reduces the rates of recurrent acute limb ischemia with rehospitalization or peripheral revascularization. The most concerning adverse effect is bleeding. Vorapaxar should not be used in patients with a history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, intracranial hemorrhage, or active pathological bleeding. The risks and benefits of adding vorapaxar to intensify antiplatelet regimens should be assessed in individual patients to aim for additional therapeutic outcomes with minimal bleeding risks.

Efficacy and safety of vorapaxar for the prevention of adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Vorapaxar, a protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) antagonist, is a novel antiplatelet agent that may provide us a new way in antithrombotic therapy. Several studies had been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of vorapaxar in the treatment of CAD, but the results were inconsistent. Here a meta-analysis was made to assess the efficacy and safety of vorapaxar in reducing adverse cardiac events in patients with CAD.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted. The primary efficacy endpoint was the major adverse cardiac events, which was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, urgent coronary revascularization, or recurrent ischemia with rehospitalization. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of major or minor bleeding events. Pooled effects were measured by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effect or fixed model was used in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Totally, 31,388 patients from four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis. Patients who took vorapaxar combined with standard dual anti-platelet therapy (aspirin and thienopyridine) showed a lower incidence in major adverse cardiac events (OR, 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.99, P=0.03), MI (OR, 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.95, P=0.01) and ischemic stroke (OR, 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.89, P=0.003) than those who only took placebo instead. But there was no significant reduction in cardiovascular death (OR, 0.95, 95% CI: 0.82-1.09, P=0.45). Nevertheless, the vorapaxar group were associated with a higher risk of bleeding events (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The result of this meta-analysis indicated that adding vorapaxar to the standard dual anti-platelet therapy may be efficient in reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at the cost of increasing risk of bleeding events.

Platelet transfusion reverses bleeding evoked by triple anti-platelet therapy including vorapaxar, a novel platelet thrombin receptor antagonist

Vorapaxar is a novel protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) antagonist recently approved for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction or with peripheral arterial disease. Patients who received vorapaxar in addition to standard of care antiplatelet therapy had an increased incidence of major bleeding events compared with placebo. To assess whether platelet transfusion can restore hemostasis in primates on triple antiplatelet therapy, template bleeding times were assessed concurrently in the buccal mucosa, finger pad, and distolateral tail of anesthetized cynomolgus macaques to evaluate bleeding with vorapaxar as either monotherapy or in combination with aspirin or aspirin and clopidogrel. Aspirin (5mg/kg, IV) or vorapaxar (1mg/kg, PO) alone had no significant effect on bleeding times in the three vascular beds examined. A modest (<2-fold) increase in bleeding time was achieved in the three beds with the dual combination of aspirin and vorapaxar. Major increases in bleeding time were achieved in the three beds with the triple combination of aspirin (5mg/kg, IV), vorapaxar (1mg/kg, PO), and clopidogrel (1mg/kg, PO). Transfusion of fresh human platelet rich plasma, but not platelet poor plasma, reversed the increase in bleeding time in the triple therapy group. Transfusion of human platelets may be a viable approach in situations requiring a rapid reversal of platelet function in individuals treated with triple anti-platelet therapy that includes vorapaxar.