Shortness of Breath During Pregnancy: Could a Cardiac Factor Be Involved?

Cardiac evaluation in pregnant patients with dyspnea and palpitations

BACKGROUND

Symptoms of underlying cardiac disease in pregnancy can often be mistaken for common complaints because of normal physiological changes in pregnancy. Echocardiographic evaluation of patients with symptoms of palpitations and dyspnea can detect structural changes and identify high-risk features.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine transthoracic echocardiograms of perinatal individuals completed for palpitations or dyspnea to determine the frequency of identifying structural changes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all perinatal individuals with a transthoracic echocardiogram at a single academic center between October 1, 2017, and May 1, 2022. The indication for the echocardiogram, demographics, and clinical characteristics were recorded. Transthoracic echocardiograms with any abnormal findings noted in the transthoracic echocardiogram report were reviewed and categorized into findings of congenital heart disease, valvular disease, pericardial effusion, evidence of ischemia or wall motion abnormalities, abnormal diastolic or systolic function, and other.

RESULTS

Of 539 transthoracic echocardiograms completed on 478 individuals who were pregnant or in the 12-week postpartum period, 96 (17.8%) had an indication of palpitations, and 32 (5.9%) had an indication of dyspnea. Abnormal findings were seen in 21.9% of patients with palpitations and in 34.4% of patients with dyspnea. In patients with palpitations who had abnormal findings, 33.3% had congenital heart disease; 33.3% had mild valvular disease, including mitral valve prolapse; 19.0% had a pericardial effusion; and 14.3% had evidence of ischemia or wall motion defects. Abnormal transthoracic echocardiogram findings in the dyspnea cohort included ischemia or wall motion defects (27.3%), mild valvular disease or mitral valve prolapse (36.4%), and abnormal systolic or diastolic function (36.4%).

CONCLUSION

Many of the transthoracic echocardiograms completed for patients with dyspnea or palpitations identified no structural abnormality; however, in 1 of 3 to 1 of 4 patients, underlying structural heart disease was identified. Although some of these abnormalities were unlikely to change delivery plans, such as mild valvular disease or small effusions, other abnormalities, such as ischemia, congenital abnormalities, and abnormal systolic or diastolic function, were likely to have implications for pregnancy and postpartum management.

Dyspnea in pregnancy might be related to the incomplete physiological adaptation of the heart

Introduction: Dyspnea is a common complaint in pregnant women with no cardiac and pulmonary diseases. We aimed to assess whether physiological dyspnea of pregnancy was correlated with subtle changes in ventricular systolic and diastolic function. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 40 healthy pregnant women in their second and third trimesters with no complaints of dyspnea and 40 healthy pregnant women in the same trimesters with a complaint of dyspnea. Parameters of echocardiography were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Global left ventricular ejection fraction (59.65±6.44 and 58.49±4.95 P=0.418 in patients without and with dyspnea respectively), and global longitudinal strain were not significantly different (18.72±2.90 and 18.94±3.07, P=0.57 in the same order). Global circumferential strain (GCS) was lower in patients with dyspnea. (20.19±4.86 vs 22.61±4.69, P=0.03). Systolic volume (33.17±8.94 vs 32.63±8.09) and diastolic volume (80.75±18.73 vs 78.37±16.63) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (47.5±4.24 vs 46.23±3.21) were not different (P=0.784, 0.560 and 0.146 respectively). Left ventricular end-systolic diameter was significantly lower in the case group (32.52±4.66 vs 29.92±4.05, P=0.011). Left atrial area index in the patients with dyspnea was lower(8.13±1.42 vs 8.94±1.4, P=0.014). Other findings were a high E/E' and high pulmonary artery pressure in the patients with dyspnea. Conclusion: Dyspnea in pregnant women can be a consequence of incomplete physiological adaptation to volume overload in pregnancy. Lower systolic and diastolic diameters of the left ventricle, left atrial area, and left atrial index may lead to increased filling pressure, manifested by a higher E/E' ratio and pulmonary artery pressure.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 212: Pregnancy and Heart Disease

Maternal heart disease has emerged as a major threat to safe motherhood and women's long-term cardiovascular health. In the United States, disease and dysfunction of the heart and vascular system as "cardiovascular disease" is now the leading cause of death in pregnant women and women in the postpartum period () accounting for 4.23 deaths per 100,000 live births, a rate almost twice that of the United Kingdom (). The most recent data indicate that cardiovascular diseases constitute 26.5% of U.S. pregnancy-related deaths (). Of further concern are the disparities in cardiovascular disease outcomes, with higher rates of morbidity and mortality among nonwhite and lower-income women. Contributing factors include barriers to prepregnancy cardiovascular disease assessment, missed opportunities to identify cardiovascular disease risk factors during prenatal care, gaps in high-risk intrapartum care, and delays in recognition of cardiovascular disease symptoms during the puerperium. The purpose of this document is to 1) describe the prevalence and effect of heart disease among pregnant and postpartum women; 2) provide guidance for early antepartum and postpartum risk factor identification and modification; 3) outline common cardiovascular disorders that cause morbidity and mortality during pregnancy and the puerperium; 4) describe recommendations for care for pregnant and postpartum women with preexisting or new-onset acquired heart disease; and 5) present a comprehensive interpregnancy care plan for women with heart disease.