High incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with left ventricular enlargement and moderate left ventricular dysfunction

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Arrhythmogenic Substrates in Patients with Systemic Autoimmunity: An Update

Patients with systemic autoimmunity due to autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) or sarcoidosis frequently present with systemic manifestations including cardiac involvement. Cardiac rhythm disturbances and specifically ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) may affect the prognosis of these patients. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a non-invasive imaging modality that can provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with ARDs or systemic autoimmunity in general. In this narrative review, we briefly present the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms contributing to arrhythmogenicity in patients with systemic autoimmunity. Furthermore, we discuss recent advances underlying the role and value of CMR for use in the detection and risk stratification of arrhythmogenic substrates in patients with systemic autoimmunity and VAs.

Differential relationship between decreased muscle oxygenation and blood pressure recovery during supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia

Vasoconstriction during tachyarrhythmia contributes to maintenance of arterial pressure (AP) by decreasing peripheral blood flow. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to ascertain whether the relationship between peripheral blood flow and AP recovery occurs during both paroxysmal supraventricular (PSVT, n = 19) and ventricular tachycardias (VT, n = 17). Peripheral blood flow was evaluated using forearm tissue oxygen index (TOI), and mean AP (MAP) was measured using a catheter inserted in the brachial or femoral artery during an electrophysiological study. PSVT and VT rapidly decreased MAP with a comparable heart rate (P = 0.194). MAP recovered to the baseline level at 40 s from PSVT onset, but not VT. The forearm TOI decreased during both tachyarrhythmias (P ≤ 0.029). The TOI response was correlated with MAPrecovery (i.e., MAP recovery from the initial rapid decrease) at 20-60 s from PSVT onset (r = -- 0.652 to - 0.814, P ≤ 0.0298); however, this association was not observed during VT. These findings persisted even after excluding patients who had taken vasoactive drugs. Thus, restricting peripheral blood flow was associated with MAP recovery during PSVT, but not VT. This indicates that AP recovery depends on the type of tachyarrhythmia: different cardiac output and/or vasoconstriction ability during tachyarrhythmia.

Prognostic Implications of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with ICD

Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a suboptimal indicator of risk stratification for patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Studies have shown that left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) was associated with all-cause mortality and ventricular arrhythmias. We examined the quantified prognostic value of LVEF and LVEDD for clinical outcomes, respectively. Method: This study retrospectively enrolled patients with ICD implantation in a single center. The associations between LVEF or LVEDD and all-cause mortality and appropriate shocks were analyzed using Cox regression and Fine-gray competing risk regression, respectively. Result: During a median follow up of 59.6 months, 168/630 (26.7%) patients died. LVEF and LVEDD were strongly associated with all-cause mortality (LVEF per 10%: HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.64−0.93, p = 0.006; LVEDD per 10 mm: HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.27−1.85, p < 0.001). After a median interrogation time of 37.1 months, 156 (24.8%) patients received at least one shock. LVEF was not associated with appropriate shock, whereas larger LVEDD (per 10 mm) was significantly associated with a higher risk of shock (HR: 1.27, 95%CI 1.06−1.52, p = 0.008). The addition of LVEF or LVEDD to clinical factors provided incremental prognostic value and discrimination improvement for all-cause mortality, while only the addition of LVEDD to clinical factors improved prognostic value for shock intervention. Conclusions: Baseline LVEF and LVEDD show a linear relationship with all-cause mortality in patients with ICD. However, whereas LVEF is not associated with shock, a linear relationship exists between LVEDD and appropriate shock. LVEDD adds more predictive value in relation to all-cause mortality and appropriate shocks than LVEF.

Value of CMR and PET in Predicting Ventricular Arrhythmias in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients Eligible for ICD

OBJECTIVES

This study presents a head-to-head comparison of the value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived left-ventricular (LV) function and scar burden and positron emission tomography (PET)-derived perfusion and innervation in predicting ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).

BACKGROUND

Improved risk stratification of VA is important to identify patients who should benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Perfusion abnormalities, sympathetic denervation, and scar burden have all been linked to VA, although comparative studies are lacking.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, referred for primary prevention ICD placement were enrolled prospectively. Late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) CMR was performed to assess LV function and scar characteristics. [¹⁵O]H₂O and [¹¹C]hydroxyephedrine positron emission tomography (PET) were performed to quantify resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and sympathetic innervation. During follow-up of 5.4 ± 1.9 years, the occurrence of sustained VA, appropriate ICD therapy, and mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 20 (26%) patients experienced VA. CMR and PET parameters showed considerable overlap between patients with VA and patients without VA, caused by substantial heterogeneity within groups. Univariable analyses showed that lower LVEF (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.92; p = 0.03), higher left-ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) (HR 1.02; p < 0.01), and larger scar border zone (HR 1.11; p = 0.03) were related to VA. Scar core size, resting MBF, hyperemic MBF, perfusion defect size, innervation defect size, and the innervation-perfusion mismatch were not found to be associated with VA.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, lower LVEF, higher LVEDVi, and larger scar border zone were related to VA. PET-derived perfusion and sympathetic innervation, as well as CMR-derived scar core size were not associated with VA. These results suggest that improved prediction of VA by advanced imaging remains challenging for the individual patient.

Clinical and Echocardiographic Predictors of Arrhythmias Detected With 24-Hour Holter Electrocardiography Among Hypertensive Heart Failure Patients in Nigeria

Background

Hypertensive heart failure (HHF) is the commonest form of heart failure in Nigeria. There is paucity of data in Nigeria on 24-hour Holter electrocardiography (24-HHECG) and important predictors of arrhythmias among HHF patients.

Objectives

To determine the 24-HHECG characteristics among HHF patients. To determine the clinical and echocardiographic predictors of arrhythmias detected using 24-HHECG among HHF patients.

Methods

A total of 100 HHF patients as well as 50 age-matched and sex-matched apparently healthy controls were prospectively recruited over a period of 1 year. They all had baseline laboratory tests, echocardiography, and 24-HHECG.

Results

Hypertensive heart failure patients had significantly higher counts of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) than the controls (P ≤ .001). Ventricular tachycardia (VT) was recorded in 29% of HHF patients as compared with controls who had no VT on 24-HHECG. The standard deviation of all normal to normal sinus RR intervals over 24 hours (SDNN) was abnormally reduced among HHF patients when compared with controls (P = .046). There was positive correlation between atrial fibrillation (AF) and the following parameters: PVCs (r = .229, P = .015), New York Heart Association (NYHA) (r = .196, P = .033), and VT (r = .223, P = .018). Following multiple linear regression, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P ≤ .001) and serum urea (P = .037) were predictors of PVCs among HHF patients. Serum creatinine (P ≤ .001), elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) (P = .005), and PVCs (P ≤ .001) were important predictors of VT among HHF patients.

Conclusions

Renal dysfunction and reduced LVEF were important predictors of ventricular arrhythmias. High counts of PVCs and elevated SBP were predictive of the occurrence of VT among HHF patients. The NYHA class and ventricular arrhythmias have a significant positive correlation with AF. The SDNN is reduced in HHF patients.

High incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with left ventricular enlargement and moderate left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% is the cutoff value used to identify patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death. However, whether patients who have moderate left ventricular dysfunction and left ventricular enlargement (LVE) have a high risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and cardiac death is unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction and LVE may have a high risk of VAs.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 853 patients who have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy cardioverter-defibrillator equipped with home monitoring. The patients were divided into 4 groups: group A, 35% < LVEF ≤ 45% and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) ≥60 mm; group B, LVEF ≤35% and LVEDD <60 mm; group C, 35% < LVEF ≤ 45% and LVEDD <60 mm; and group D, LVEF ≤35% and LVEDD ≥60 mm.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up period of 30 ± 13 months, 324 patients (38%) experienced VAs and 125 patients (14.7%) experienced cardiac death. Based on multivariate Cox regression modeling, group A had an increased risk of VAs (A vs B, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.563, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.029-2.375, P = 0.036; A vs C, HR: 1.661, 95% CI: 1.204-2.294, P = 0.002) and cardiac death (A vs B, HR: 1.845, 95% CI: 1.013-3.356; A vs C, HR: 2.041, 95% CI: 1.136-3.731, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction and LVE have a high risk of VAs and cardiac death.