Risk stratification in patients undergoing interventional left atrial appendage occlusion-Prognostic impact of EuroSCORE II

Long-term outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and end stage renal disease

OBJECTIVE

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), oral anticoagulants are contraindicated, and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative treatment. However, the efficacy of thromboembolic prevention using LAAO in these patients has rarely been reported in Asian populations. To our knowledge, this is the first long-term LAAO study in patients with AF undergoing dialysis in Asia.

METHODS

In this study, 310 patients (179 men) with a mean age of 71.3 ± 9.6 years and mean CHA2DS2-VASc 4.2 ± 1.8 were consecutively enrolled at multiple centers in Taiwan. The outcomes of 29 patients with AF and ESRD undergoing dialysis who underwent LAAO were compared to those without ESRD. The primary composite outcomes were stroke, systemic embolization, or death.

RESULTS

No difference in mean CHADS-VASc score was noted between patients with versus without ESRD (4.1 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 1.9, p = 0.453). After a mean follow-up of 38 ± 16 months, the composite endpoint was significantly higher in patients with ESRD (hazard ratio, 5.12 [1.4-18.6]; p = 0.013) than in those without ESRD after LAAO therapy. Mortality was also higher in patients with ESRD (hazard ratio, 6.6 [1.1-39.7]; p = 0.038). The stroke rate was numerically higher in patients with versus without ESRD, but the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 3.2 [0.6-17.7]; p = 0.183). Additionally, ESRD was associated with device-related thrombosis (odds ratio, 6.15; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes of LAAO therapy may be less favorable in patients with AF undergoing dialysis, possibly because of the poor condition of patients with ESRD.

Initial report of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and high risk of bleeding in Japan

In the countries like Japan where anticoagulation is not recommended in hemodialysis patients, the feasibility of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in hemodialysis patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) accompanying high risks of thromboembolic stroke and bleeding remains unknown. Peri-procedural and 45-day clinical outcomes following LAAC using WATCHMAN system, which were performed in our institute between Jun 2020 and April 2022 according to the Japanese Circulation Society guidelines, were retrospectively compared between those with and without hemodialysis. 118 patients (median 79 years, 81 men) consisting of 25 hemodialysis patients and 93 non-hemodialysis patients were included. CHADS score was 3 (2, 4) in the hemodialysis patients and 3 (2, 4) in the non-hemodialysis patients (p = 0.98). HAS-BREAD score was 4 (3, 5) in the hemodialysis patients and 3 (2, 3) in the non-hemodialysis patients (p < 0.001). All procedures were successful, except for a non-hemodialysis patient with a larger left atrial appendage. There were no major complications during index hospitalization and 45-day observational period, except for a hemodialysis patient with suspected bleeding and a non-hemodialysis patient who died due to cardiac amyloidosis. LAAC seems to be feasible in hemodialysis patients with high risks of thromboembolic events and bleedings.

Outcomes on safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion in end stage renal disease patients undergoing dialysis

BACKGROUND

In patients with end stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation (AF), undergoing chronic dialysis, direct oral agents are contraindicated and warfarin does not fully prevent embolic events while increasing the bleeding risk. The high hemorrhagic risk represents the main problem in this population. Aim of the study was to estimate the safety and efficacy for thromboembolic prevention of left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in a cohort of dialysis patients with AF and high hemorrhagic risk.

METHODS

Ninety-two dialysis patients with AF who underwent LAA occlusion were recruited. For comparative purposes, two cohorts of dialysis patients with AF, one taking warfarin (oral anticoagulant therapy, OAT cohort, n = 114) and the other not taking any OAT (no-therapy cohort, n = 148) were included in the study. Primary endpoints were (1) incidence of peri-procedural complications, (2) incidence of 2-year thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events, (3) mortality at 2 years. In order to evaluate the effect of the LAA occlusion on the endpoints with respect to the OAT and No-therapy cohorts, a multivariable Cox regression model was applied adjusted for possible confounding factors.

RESULTS

The device was successfully implanted in 100% of cases. Two major peri-procedural complications were reported. No thromboembolic events occurred at 2-year follow-up. The adjusted multivariable Cox regression model showed no difference in bleeding risk in the OAT compared to the LAA occlusion cohort in the first 3 months of follow-up [HR 1.65 (95% CI 0.43-6.33)], when most of patients were taking two antiplatelet drugs. In the following 21 months the bleeding incidence became higher in OAT patients [HR 6.48 (95% CI 1.32-31.72)]. Overall mortality was greater in both the OAT [HR 2.76 (95% CI 1.31-5.86)] and No-Therapy [HR 3.09 (95% CI 1.59-5.98)] cohorts compared to LAA occlusion patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The study could open the way to a non-pharmacological option for thromboembolic protection in dialysis patients with AF and high bleeding risk.

Risk stratification in patients undergoing interventional left atrial appendage occlusion-Prognostic impact of EuroSCORE II

Background

Interventional closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is an alternative option to stroke prophylaxis, particularly in multimorbid patients with a high risk of bleeding under oral anticoagulation. Due to the multiple comorbidities, the prognosis of patients is reduced, and the clinical benefit of the procedure is therefore questionable in the individual patient.

Hypothesis

The present study aims to identify independent preprocedural risk factors to improve risk stratification in these highly selected patients.

Methods

This study consecutively included 128 patients who received an interventional LAA occlusion with Amplatzer device (St Jude Medical, St Paul, Minnesota). The preinterventional risk assessment was performed with the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II. The primary endpoint was all‐cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were thromboembolic events and severe bleeding.

Results

During a follow‐up of 781 ± 498 days the primary endpoint (all‐cause mortality) was reached in 35 patients (27%). The only independent predictor of mid‐term mortality was a logistic EuroSCORE II > 2% (Hazard risk [HR] 4.55, confidence interval [CI] 1.599‐12.966, P = .005). In our study, 33 patients (26%) suffered from end‐stage renal disease which was not associated with increased mortality (P = .371), increased thromboembolic events (P = .475), or severe bleeding (P = .613).

Conclusions

In patients undergoing interventional LAA occlusion, preprocedural assessment of logistic EuroSCORE II provide independent prognostic information. This parameter might help to improve risk stratification in these highly selected patients. In contrast, terminal renal failure was not associated with a significantly worse outcome.