Effectiveness and safety of single transseptal ablation for atrial fibrillation in real-word practice

Silent cerebral lesions following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a state-of-the-art review

Atrial fibrillation is associated with neurocognitive comorbidities such as stroke and dementia. Evidence suggests that rhythm control-especially if implemented early-may reduce the risk of cognitive decline. Catheter ablation is highly efficacious for restoring sinus rhythm in the setting of atrial fibrillation; however, ablation within the left atrium has been shown to result in MRI-detected silent cerebral lesions. In this state-of-the-art review article, we discuss the balance of risk between left atrial ablation and rhythm control. We highlight suggestions to lower the risk, as well as the evidence behind newer forms of ablation such as very high power short duration radiofrequency ablation and pulsed field ablation.

Effectiveness and safety of single transseptal ablation for atrial fibrillation in real-word practice

Background

We have previously reported that unilateral groin‐single transseptal (ST) ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) was safe and significantly reduced patient discomfort compared with bilateral groin‐double transseptal (DT) ablation.

Hypothesis

In the present study, we hypothesized that ST ablation would be as effective and safe as DT ablation in real‐world practice like previous study. Among the 1765 consecutive patients in the Yonsei AF ablation cohort from October 2015 to January 2020, 1144 patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation were included for the analysis. Among them, 450 underwent ST ablation and 694 underwent DT ablation.

Results

The total procedure time, ablation time, and fluoroscopy time were longer in the ST group than in the DT group (p < .05 for all). The hospital stay after catheter ablation was 1.3 ± 1.1 days which was longer in DT group than ST group (p = .001). No significant difference was observed in the complication rate (p = .263) and AF‐free survival rate (log‐rank p = .19) between the groups. However, after excluding patients who used antiarrhythmic drugs when AF recurred, the AF‐free survival rates were lower in the DT group than in the ST group before and after propensity score matching (log‐rank p = .026 and .047, respectively).

Conclusion

Although the ST approach increases the procedure time compared with the DT approach owing to the need for more frequent catheter exchanges, the ST approach is a feasible and safe strategy for AF ablation in terms of rhythm outcomes and risk of complications.