The long-term outcome of patients who suffered and survived an acute myocardial infarction in the midst of recurrent attacks of variant angina

Are patients with angiographically near-normal coronary arteries who present as acute myocardial infarction actually safe?

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data concerning the clinical outcome of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and near-normal coronary angiograms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and the prognosis of the patients with near-normal coronary angiograms who were registered in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR).

METHODS

The subjects were divided into three groups according to findings from coronary angiograms performed between September 2005 and November 2006. Among 8510 consecutive AMI patients, 372 patients (Group I) had near-normal coronary arteries, 6136 patients (Group II) had one- or two-vessel disease, and 2002 patients (Group III) had three-vessel or left main disease.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics, in-hospital mortality, and major cardiac adverse events (MACE) were analyzed. Group I was younger, had the lower prevalence of DM, and showed the higher percentage of previous angina history compared to the other two groups. Group III showed a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality, but there was no significant difference between Group I and Group II (2.6% in Group II and 2.2% in Group I, p=0.952). Furthermore, MACE at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months revealed no significant difference between Groups I and II (12 month MACE: 7.8% in Group I and 12.2% in Group II, p=0.359).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with near-normal coronary angiograms had similar clinical outcomes and prognosis compared with one- or two-vessel diseased patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction.

Effect of beta-blockers on the mortality of Japanese patients with myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

After a myocardial infarction, a higher prevalence of coronary vasospastic response has been reported in the Japanese population than in the Caucasian population. Beta-blockers may exacerbate coronary vasospasm. However, beta-blockers are given to Japanese patients after an acute myocardial infarction, though the mortality benefit is unknown. Thus, we investigated the mortality benefit of beta-blockers given to Japanese patients after an acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

We prospectively studied consecutive patients with a first myocardial infarction admitted to the coronary care unit of Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan from May 1994 through the end of 2001. Patients who died during hospitalization or who were referred for coronary artery bypass graft surgery were excluded. The association of beta-blocker use with mortality after discharge was assessed by a proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were 546 patients and 400 (73.3%) patients were treated with beta-blockers at the time of discharge from hospital. During a mean follow-up of 2 years, 46 (8.4%) patients died. Beta-blocker therapy was associated with a reduced mortality after adjustment for age, gender, Q wave myocardial infarction, reperfusion therapy during acute phase, Killip functional class, serum creatinine level, cardiovascular risk factors, and medications (hazard ratio=0.51, 95% confidence interval=0.27 to 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to the concern that beta-blocker therapy might induce coronary vasospasm and reduce survival, beta-blocker therapy improved survival after discharge in Japanese patients with a first myocardial infarction.

Myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries: the pathologic and clinical perspectives

Myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries is a syndrome resulting from numerous conditions but the exact cause in a majority of the patients remains unknown. Cigarette smokers and cocaine users are more prone to develop this condition. The possible mechanisms causing myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries are hypercoagulable states, coronary embolism, an imbalance between oxygen demand and supply, intense sympathetic stimulation, non-atherosclerotic coronary diseases, coronary trauma, coronary vasospasm, coronary thrombosis, and endothelial dysfunction. It primarily affects younger individuals, and the clinical presentation is similar to that of myocardial infarction with coronary atherosclerosis. Thrombolytics, aspirin, nitrates, and beta blockers should be instituted as a standard therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Once normal coronary arteries are identified on subsequent angiography, the calcium channel blockers could be added since coronary vasospasm appears to play a major role in the pathophysiology of this condition. The beta blockers should be avoided in cocaine-induced myocardial infarction because the coronary spasm may worsen. In myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries, complications such as malignant arrhythmia, heart failure, and hypotension are generally less common, and prognosis is usually good. Recurrent infarction, postinfarction angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death are rare. Stress electrocardiography and imaging studies are not useful prognostic tests and long-term survival mainly depends on the residual left ventricular function, which is usually good.

Occlusive vascular diseases in oral contraceptive users. Epidemiology, pathology and mechanisms

Despite being an unprecedented departure from normal physiology, the combined oral contraceptive is not only highly effective, but it also has a remarkably good safety record. Concerns over safety persist, though, particularly with regard to venous thromboembolism (VTE), stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). Epidemiological studies consistently show an increase in risk of VTE, but the results are more contentious with regard to arterial diseases. Despite 40 years of research, the mechanisms behind these adverse effects are not understood. In this review, we integrate information from published studies of the epidemiology and pathology of the occlusive vascular diseases and their risk factors to identify likely explanations for pathogenesis in oral contraceptive users. Oral contraceptives induce both prothrombotic and fibrinolytic changes in haemostatic factors and an imbalance in haemostasis is likely to be important in oral contraceptive-induced VTE. The complexity of the changes involved and the difficulty of ascribing clinical significance has meant that uncertainty persists. A seriously under-researched area concerns vascular changes in oral contraceptive users. Histologically, endothelial and intimal proliferation have been identified in women exposed to high plasma estrogen concentrations and these lesions are associated with thrombotic occlusion. Other structural changes may result in increased vascular permeability, loss of vascular tone and venous stasis. With regard to arterial disease risk, epidemiological information relating to dose effects and joint effects with other risk factors, and studies of pathology and changes in risk factors, suggests that oral contraceptive use per se does not cause arterial disease. It can, nevertheless, synergise very powerfully with subclinical endothelial damage to promote arterial occlusion. Accordingly, the prothrombotic effects of the oral contraceptive estrogen intervene in a cycle of endothelial damage and repair which would otherwise remain clinically silent or would ultimately progress - in, for example, the presence of cigarette smoking or hypertension - to atherosclerosis. Future work in this area should focus on modification of the effects of established risk factors by oral contraceptive use rather than modification of the supposed risk of oral contraceptive use by established risk factors. Attempts to understand vascular occlusion in oral contraceptive users in terms of the general features of VTE or with reference to atherosclerosis may be limiting, and future work needs to acknowledge that such occlusions may have unique features. Unequivocal identification of the mechanisms involved would contribute considerably to the alleviation of fears over vascular disease and to the development of even safer formulations.

Early evolution of symptoms and long-term prognosis in variant angina: importance of the functional component of coronary arterial disease

PURPOSE

Most investigations describing the long-term outcome of large groups of patients with variant angina pectoris have focused on such endpoints as myocardial infarction, coronary artery surgery, and death, and have asked how the risk of these events is related to the severity of existing organic coronary disease. It is also possible to ask what is the relative importance of organic and functional components in causation of symptoms and outcomes, as was done in this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The early and long-term clinical course was observed in a group of 80 patients with variant angina and a low prevalence of severe organic coronary disease (diameter stenosis greater than 70 percent of one vessel in 28.3 percent, of two or more vessels in 2.7 percent). Patients were seen at the UCLA Medical Center between July 1963 and June 1985.

RESULTS

The following observations were made: Compared with those experiencing a first episode of angina at rest, subjects whose first episode of vasospastic angina occurred during strenuous effort were more likely subsequently to have a positive exercise test result and a more stable but long-term anginal course. A good initial response to vasodilator therapy indicated a likelihood of being alive and symptom-free without an intervening myocardial infarction by five years after diagnosis, which was twice the rate as if initial response to such treatment was poor. The presence or absence of severe coronary artery obstruction as detected by angiography could not be predicted from the nature or severity of angina, the historical presence of effort angina, or the occurrence of a positive result on an exercise test. The existence of severe coronary stenosis in at least one vessel was not associated with an increased incidence of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, or death in the first nine years after diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that manifestations of ischemic heart disease in these patients were more directly caused by coronary vasospasm than by the degree of organic coronary obstruction seen by coronary arteriography. In addition, the presence of severe organic stenosis in one coronary artery did not appear to be associated with measurably increased adverse effects on clinical course or survival over the first nine years after diagnosis.

Myocardial infarction and normal coronary arteriography: a 10 year clinical and risk analysis of 74 patients

Myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries was identified in 74 patients with a mean age of 43 years (range 19 to 66). A mean follow-up period of 10.5 years after documented myocardial infarction and 8.6 years after cardiac catheterization was obtained. The survival rate was 85% (n = 63). There were no statistical differences in age or clinical risk factor prevalence between survivors and nonsurvivors. Moderate (55%) to severe (27%) left ventricular impairment was more common in nonsurvivors. Nine of 11 deaths were cardiovascular, 6 were sudden and 8 occurred in patients with moderate to severe global left ventricular impairment. Seventy-six percent of survivors were asymptomatic and 86% were fully active at follow-up. Two survivors and three nonsurvivors experienced a second myocardial infarction. The clinical risk factors of the study group (Group I) were compared by age, sex and year of catheterization with risk factors in two matched groups. Group II consisted of 74 patients with coronary occlusive disease and myocardial infarction and Group III consisted of 148 patients with normal arteriograms. Group I differed from Group II in having fewer clinical risk factors (p = 0.01 to less than 0.0001). Cigarette smoking did not differ significantly between Group I (72%) and Group II (69%) but was less common in Group III (45%) (p less than 0.001). Hormone therapy or the peripartum state was more common in women in Group I (34%) than in women in Group III (14%) (p = 0.03).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)