Developing a rational management strategy for angina pectoris after coronary bypass surgery: a clinical decision analysis

Coronary angioplasty versus repeat coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with previous bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES

We attempted to determine the relative risks and benefits of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (re-CABG) in patients with previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG).

BACKGROUND

Due to an expanding population of patients with surgically treated coronary artery disease and the natural progression of atherosclerosis, an increasing number of patients with previous CABG require repeat revascularization procedures. Although there are randomized comparative data for CABG versus medical therapy and, more recently, versus PTCA, these studies have excluded patients with previous CABG.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 632 patients with previous CABG who required either elective re-CABG (n = 164) or PTCA (n = 468) at a single center during 1987 through 1988. The PTCA and re-CABG groups were similar with respect to gender (83% vs. 85% male), age > 70 years (21% vs. 23%), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (46% vs. 48%), presence of class III or IV angina (70% vs. 63%) and three-vessel coronary artery disease (77% vs. 74%).

RESULTS

Complete revascularization was achieved in 38% of patients with PTCA and 92% of those with re-CABG (p < 0.0001). The in-hospital complication rates were significantly lower in the PTCA group: death (0.3% vs. 7.3%, p < 0.0001) and Q wave myocardial infarction (MI) (0.9% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.0001). Actuarial survival was equivalent at 1 year (PTCA 95% vs. re-CABG 91%) and 6 years (PTCA 74% vs. re-CABG 73%) of follow-up (p = 0.32). Both procedures resulted in equivalent event-free survival (freedom from dealth or Q wave MI) and relief of angina; however, the need for repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization, or both, by 6 years was significantly higher in the PTCA group (PTCA 64% vs. re-CABG 8%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified age > 70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, unstable angina, number of diseased vessels and diabetes mellitus as independent correlates of mortality for the entire group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nonrandomized series of patients with previous CABG requiring revascularization, an initial stategy of either PTCA or re-CABG resulted in equivalent overall survival, event-free survival and relief of angina. PTCA offers lower procedural morbidity and mortality risks, although it is associated with less complete revascularization and a greater need for subsequent revascularization procedures.

Caring for patients after coronary bypass surgery. Follow-up tips for primary care physicians

Primary care physicians are often faced with follow-up care of patients who have had coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Familiarity with possible cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, and infectious complications is important, and an open line of communication with the consulting cardiologist and the cardiac surgeon is essential. Modification of coronary risk factors is one of the greatest challenges after bypass surgery. The primary care physician plays the major role in directing and monitoring life-style changes that reduce the risk of progressive coronary atherosclerosis. Recurrent myocardial ischemia after bypass surgery should be evaluated fully and is often responsive to nonsurgical therapies, including percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.