Operations for atrial fibrillation

Mid-term success rate of single stage hybrid ablation of persistent and long-term persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Single stage thoracoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a treatment method for persistent and long-term persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) offering the possibility for patients otherwise inconsolable by conventional catheter RFA. We present a pilot group of patients after the introduction of the new method at our clinical center. Patients group: A total of 52 patients aged 61.82 ± 9.7 years underwent single stage hybrid ablation (thoracoscopic isolation of pulmonary veins and box lesion followed by catheter verification of the surgical procedure effectivness) for symptomatic persistent and long-term persistent AF with significantly dilated left atrium 57.9 ± 11.0mm in the period September 2016-March 2019.

RESULTS

The median duration of the procedure was 232 minutes and the median duration of hospitalization was 10 days. At discharge, 52 patients (100%) had sinus rhythm. 48 of 52 patients (92.3%) had a 6-month follow-up. 41 of 48 (85.4%) and 38 of 44 (86.4%) of patients were AF free at 3-month and 6-month follow-up, respectively. Acute complications were: one left atrial perforation resolved successfully by suture and one transient ischaemic attack without permanent sequelae. Late complications involved one massive pulmonary embolization and an atrioesophageal fistula. There was no periprocedural myocardial infarction or stroke with permanent sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid thoracoscopic-catheter ablation performed during one procedure is an effective and relatively safe mini-invasive method of treatment for long-term persistent atrial fibrillation.

Left atrial appendage resection versus preservation during the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage (LAA) resection during the Maze procedure may decrease thromboembolic risks, but its preservation may improve left atrial contractile function. This study compared the clinical effects of LAA resection and preservation after the Maze procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective review was made of 379 patients (mean age 53.3 ± 12.6 years, 244 females) who underwent the cryo-Maze procedure in conjunction with mitral surgery from 1999 to 2011. The LAA was resected in 187 patients (resection group) but preserved in 192 patients (preservation group). Outcomes were compared using a propensity score study design based on 20 baseline characteristics to obtain well-matched patient pairs.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching yielded 119 pairs of patients in whom there were no significant differences in baseline profiles between the two groups. During a mean follow-up of 3.1 ± 2.8 years, there were 16 deaths, 6 cases of stroke, and 39 cases of atrial fibrillation recurrence. There were no significant differences in stroke-free survival (p = 0.88) and freedom from AF while off antiarrhythmic drugs (p = 0.46) between the two groups. On serial echocardiographic assessments, patients in the preservation group showed a higher transmitral A-wave velocity (peak atrial contraction wave velocity; p = 0.47, 0.020, and 0.001 at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively) and lower E/A ratio (peak early filling wave [E-wave] velocity / A-wave velocity; p = 0.34, 0.065, and 0.001 at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively) at each timepoint compared with the resection group.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of the LAA during the Maze procedure resulted in similar clinical and rhythm outcomes, but LA contractile function superior to that of LAA resection.

Surgical Maze procedure as a treatment for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Surgical or modified Maze procedures have been promoted to treat atrial fibrillation (AF); however, few randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) examine their outcomes. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of surgical Maze procedures performed concomitantly with referral cardiac surgery versus pharmacologic therapy for the treatment of AF. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane database, FDA web-portal, and clinicaltrials.gov for all RCTs comparing surgical Maze procedures with medical therapy for sinus rhythm maintenance. Primary outcomes were either freedom from AF within 12 months postprocedure off antiarrhythmic drug (AAD), or freedom from AF while taking an AAD. Secondary outcomes included operative mortality, all-cause mortality, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications. Both fixed- and random-effects models were used for a meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials (n = 472, of which 249 underwent a Maze procedure and 213 underwent referral surgery alone). The surgical Maze procedure significantly increased the odds of freedom from AF within 12 months compared with cardiac surgery alone (OR 5.22, 95% CI 1.71-15.88). There was significant heterogeneity among the trials for freedom from AF (chi-square = 15.98 for 4 degrees of freedom, P= 0.003). Among the two studies that fully reported AAD use, there was no evidence of improved survival free from AF and AAD therapy (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.73-4.34). Among patients with valvular AF, surgical Maze procedures are associated with a decrease in AF one year postprocedure without significant increase in mean length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, operative, or all-cause mortality. Large RCTs defining rates of freedom from AF without AADs postprocedure, are still needed to evaluate outcomes and determine the appropriate role for surgical Maze procedures in the management of AF.

An Update on the Energy Sources and Catheter Technology for the Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

The ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an area of intense research in cardiac electrophysiology. In this review, we discuss the development of catheter-based interventions for AF ablation. We outline the pathophysiologic and anatomic bases for ablative lesion sets and the evolution of various catheter designs for the delivery of radiofrequency (RF), cryothermal, and other ablative energy sources. The strengths and weaknesses of various specialized RF catheters and alternative energy systems are delineated, with respect to efficacy and patient safety.

Role of catheter and surgical ablation in congenital heart disease

The role of surgery and radiofrequency current ablation for the treatment of tachycardias in patients with congenital heart disease The use of radiofrequency current application as a treatment strategy has stimulated a revolution in our understanding of tachycardia mechanisms. The extension of its use to patients with congenital heart defects and tachyarrhythmias has opened the door to new treatments with known success rates and known risks for mortality and morbidity. Antiarrhythmic surgery aims to dissect or excavate a responsible substrate and is especially worth considering if cardiac surgery is being undertaken for other reasons. With suitable surgical skill and interest, and with strong electrophysiologic support, high success rates have been documented. Antiarrhythmic surgical incisions have the advantage of being visually controllable regarding the extent and location of damage to myocardial tissue. In other situations, radiofrequency current ablation is preferred because of its less-invasive character, its use of local anesthesia, and the avoidance of surgical trauma. Both surgery and catheter ablation require precise clarification of the tachycardia mechanism and precise localization of the underlying substrate. The importation of such techniques into the realm of open chest surgery would be difficult in light of the need for multiple intracardiac catheters and repeated fluoroscopically guided catheter positioning. Electrophysiologic studies performed during the antiarrhythmic surgical procedure cannot provide complete information, and their use is thus restricted to the arrhythmogenic myocardial target only [32,45]. In contrast, catheter-mediated electrophysiologic studies offer the option of exact diagnosis, precise substrate localization, and interventional treatment in a single session. Moreover, validation of the linear lesion's completeness has become a reliable predictor for mid- and long-term success in avoiding recurrences. As a result, the application of catheter-mediated ablation has exploded within the past 15 years. Antiarrhythmic surgery has survived as a discipline in a decreasing number of experienced hands [43,44]. As a result of recent experiences and modern technology, success rates above 90% [74-76, 81,88] for the interventional treatment of congenital tachycardias have become comparable to those reported in patients with "normal" hearts. For acquired tachycardias, acute success rates today range about 80% at the atrial level. The rate of recurrence is still relatively high at about 10-25% [73,76,77,79,91,96,102]. Further improvements are being pursued. Data on the treatment of acquired tachycardias at the ventricular level is largely anecdotal. Good early success rates are combined with a tendency to recurrence in longer-term follow-up [50,76,103-108]. Some of the late VT ablation recurrences may be explained by the fact that fibrotic, scarred, and hypertrophic myocardial tissue at the targeted site often prevents effective radiofrequency current application and lesion generation. In order to improve RF lesion depth and continuity, newly designed technologies for radiofrequency current ("cooled tip electrode", Cordis Webster, Baldwin Park, CA), and alternative energy sources (cryo-ablation, micro-wave, or ultrasound) are being readied for introduction in the very near future. For patients suffering from recurrent tachycardias and having other reasons for open-heart surgery, a hybrid concept can be created, utilizing modern 3-D electro-anatomical reconstruction as a basis for an electrophysiologically informed surgical procedure. Following such a concept, a hemodynamic catheterization can be combined with an electrophysiologic study to define critical myocardial zones for induced macro-re-entry tachycardias, or of those zones expected to play an arrhythmogenic role in the future. With such information, surgical incisions for cardiac access and repair can be planned and performed. The role of surgery in antiarrhythmic treatment can become preventive. Myocardial tissue is incised for cannulation and repair in a way that can reduce the chance of later scar-associated tachycardias [109]. The extension of surgical cuts to physiologic barriers of electrical conduction is a major strategy for the primary prevention of postsurgical or incisional arrhythmias. In addition, the simultaneous treatment at heart surgery of already existing tachycardias can be offered within the same session as a secondary preventive concept. Despite the immense growth of knowledge and experience in recent years, there is still a need for more knowledge about the factors causing arrhythmogenesis and their interactions. Prospective and randomized studies are needed to show the most effective strategies to prevent arrhythmia-mediated death. The future of antiarrhythmic treatment will less be directed by the limitations of current interventional tools, which will be improved, and more by an evolutionary process in philosophy regarding the understanding of arrhythmogenesis in these patients as the basis for new concepts of arrhythmia prevention and treatment.

Influence of the maze procedure on the treatment of rheumatic atrial fibrillation - evaluation of rhythm control and clinical outcome in a comparative study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the maze procedure on the treatment of rheumatic atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients (mean age 51 years; 47 females) with rheumatic mitral valve disease and associated atrial fibrillation in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, preoperatively, were operated upon. Thirty-five had double dysfunction, 19 had stenosis, and one had mitral regurgitation. None had other associated heart diseases or previous operations. The patients were divided into two groups: GI, 20 patients were treated for mitral valve disease with associated maze procedure; GII, 35 patients were treated for mitral valve disease without the maze procedure. The preoperative echocardiogram showed a left atrial diameter in GI of 5.35 mm and in GII of 5.57 mm (P=0.779). The groups were considered clinically similar (P=0.759). Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in all patients. The mitral valve was replaced with a biological prosthesis in 24 patients and repaired in 31 patients.

RESULTS

Three hospital deaths occurred, one in GI, two in GII. After cardiopulmonary bypass, 37.1% of patients in GII remained in atrial fibrillation. All patients in GI recovered regular rhythm (P<0.0001). In the ICU, atrial fibrillation was detected in 80% of patients in GII and maintained in 76.4% in a mean follow-up period of 38.5 months. In GI, atrial fibrillation occurred in 20% of patients in the ICU and maintained in 5.3% in 41 months of mean follow-up (P=0.0001). None of the patients in GI and 20.6% of patients in GII had a thromboembolic episode 1-63 months after the operation (P=0.041). Four late deaths occurred (two in each group), two being due to progression of valvular disease, one after an episode of pulmonary infection and one with no cardiac cause.

CONCLUSION

The maze procedure is effective in treating atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease. The results are sustained in the mid-term follow-up period, preventing postoperative thromboembolic episodes, and with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Current status of the Maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Since the first patient underwent the Maze procedure on September 25, 1987, 346 patients have undergone this operation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. The procedure was designed as an open-heart operation performed through a median sternotomy. It underwent 2 major modifications relatively early in the series, evolving into the so-called Maze-III procedure, which has been used exclusively since April 16, 1992. Since that time, the Maze-III procedure has been adapted to allow it to be done by minimally invasive techniques. In addition, we recently performed the entire procedure in 2 patients without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. The operative mortality rate has remained at 2% to 3%. This includes patients undergoing concomitant high-risk cardiac surgical procedures and all re-do cases. The overall success rate in curing atrial fibrillation has been 99%. The procedure itself has been shown to cause no permanent damage to the sinus node. The left atrium has been documented to function long-term postoperatively in 93% of patients and the right atrium functions in 99% of patients. The Maze-III procedure remains the surgical procedure of choice for the treatment of medically refractory atrial fibrillation.

Comparative efficacy of the maze procedure for restoration of atrial contraction in patients with and without giant left atrium associated with mitral valve disease

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the effectiveness of the maze procedure for restoring atrial contraction in patients with and without giant left atrium (GLA).

BACKGROUND

Although the maze procedure has been reported to be effective for refractory atrial fibrillation, it is unknown whether this procedure can restore effective atrial contraction in patients with GLA.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with and 32 patients without GLA were studied with Doppler echocardiography before and after the maze procedure. Peak velocity and the time-velocity integral of the left ventricular diastolic filling wave during atrial contraction (A wave) and the atrial filling fraction calculated as the ratio of the time-velocity integral of the A wave to that of total diastolic filling were compared between patients with and without GLA. A peak A wave velocity > or =10 cm/s was considered to indicate echocardiographic evidence of effective atrial contraction.

RESULTS

Regular rhythm with P waves was restored in 10 patients (53%) with and 26 (81%, p < 0.05) without GLA. Four patients (21%) with and 21 patients (66%, p < 0.01) without GLA showed effective atrial contraction by echocardiography. Once atrial contraction was resumed, the degree of atrial contraction was comparable between patients with and without GLA (17+/-5% vs. 17+/-4% for atrial filling fraction at 12 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most patients without GLA had restored atrial contraction by the maze procedure, it was resumed in fewer patients with GLA. However, once atrial contraction was resumed, the degree of atrial contraction was comparable between patients with and without GLA. Therefore, the maze procedure may be an option in selected patients with GLA.

Left and right atrial transport function after the Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation: an echocardiographic Doppler follow-up study

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated atrial transport function after the Maze procedure in long-term follow-up and compared left and right atrial function in Maze patients with that of healthy age-matched controls using echo Doppler techniques.

BACKGROUND

The Maze procedure is designed to eliminate atrial fibrillation, restore normal sinus rhythm, and preserve atrial contraction. Initial data indicate that atrial transport function is restored in most patients undergoing the Maze procedure. The long-term echo Doppler evaluation of patients after the Maze procedure has not been well described.

METHODS

We performed pulsed-wave Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiographic studies on 31 patients (24 men, mean age 53.8 years) who underwent the Maze procedure and who had a follow-up study greater than 3 months (mean 16.5 months) after the procedure. Measurements included peak left ventricular and right ventricular inflow A-wave velocity, maximum and minimum left atrial and right atrial areas, and fractional area change of the left and right atria. Results were compared with those obtained from 15 age-matched control subjects (11 men, mean age 53.8 years).

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (71%) had left atrial function shown by the presence of left ventricular inflow A-wave, and 25 patients (81%) had right atrial function shown by the presence of right ventricular inflow A-wave on Doppler echocardiography. The left ventricular inflow A-wave velocity was significantly lower than that of age-matched controls (37.5 +/- 15.5 versus 61.0 +/- 13.9 cm/sec; p < 0.001), whereas the right ventricular inflow A-wave velocity did not significantly differ between patients and control subjects (35.4 +/- 9.9 versus 35.3 +/- 4.9 cm/sec; p = Not significant). Although left and right atrial areas decreased significantly after the procedure, there was no significant change in the fractional area change which was smaller in Maze patients than control individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) In long-term follow-up of 16.5 months after the Maze procedure, left atrial systolic function was preserved in 71% of our patients and right atrial systolic function was preserved in 81%; (2) the left ventricular inflow peak A-wave velocity after Maze is considerably less than that in age-matched controls; and (3) left and right atrial sizes decreased after the procedure with no change in the fractional area change. These findings suggest that the Maze procedure is effective in restoring atrial function in the majority of patients; however, restored function is less than in control individuals.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Until recently, catheter-based radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation was limited to palliative approaches of either atrioventricular node ablation or modification. It is now recognized that at least a proportion of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation may be suitable for curative ablation of an underlying single arrhythmogenic focus. With the intense interest in this area, a catheter-based cure involving endocardial linear lesion creation for patients with chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation may not be far in the future.

Use of intracardiac echocardiography in interventional electrophysiology

Intracardiac echocardiography is emerging as a potentially useful tool during RF ablation procedures. There are a number of potential benefits of direct endocardial visualization during RF ablation including: (1) precise anatomical localization of the ablation catheter tip in relation to important endocardial structures, which cannot be visualized with fluoroscopy; (2) reduction in fluoroscopy time; (3) evaluation of catheter tip tissue contact; (4) confirmation of lesion formation and identification of lesion size and continuity; (5) immediate identification of complications; and (6) as a research tool to help in understanding the critical role played by specific endocardial structures in arrhythmogenesis. This article will review existing data and speculate as to possible future roles for intracardiac echocardiography in interventional electrophysiology.

Atrial fibrillation in the elderly

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation is 11% in persons older than 70 years and rises to 17% in those aged 84 years or more. One-year mortality ranges from 0.2 to 16%, being highest in elderly patients, and is associated with a 4.8-fold increased risk of stroke. Atrial fibrillation can be cardioverted to normal sinus rhythm electrically or pharmacologically and rapid ventricular rate can be controlled with drugs. While anti-coagulation prevents embolic events in those with atrial fibrillation, the decision to anticoagulate should be based on an assessment of the risk/benefit ratio.

Electrophysiological mechanisms in successful radiofrequency catheter modification of atrioventricular junction for patients with medically refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Mechanisms and changes of electrophysiological (EP) characteristics in successful radiofrequency (RF) modification of right midseptal and posteroseptal areas for controlling rapid ventricular response to atrial fibrillation (Af) are not clear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 50 patients with medically refractory paroxysmal Af. Group 1 consisted of 40 patients without dual atrioventricular (AV) node physiology with modification sites located in the mid/posteroseptal area. Of the 40 patients, 36 had successful modification (follow-up of 14 +/- 8 months), and 3 had AV block. Late follow-up electrophysiological study (98 +/- 10 days) showed pattern 1 (67%) with prolongation of AV node effective refractory period (ERP, > or =40 milliseconds) and Wenckebach block cycle length (WBCL, > or =40 milliseconds); pattern 2 (22%) with prolongation of AH interval (> or =20 milliseconds), ERP, and WBCL; and pattern 3 (11%) without any change in AV node conduction parameter. Change in ventricular rate negatively correlated with change of WBCL in patterns 1 (r=-.691, P=.019) and 2 (r=-.90, P=.01). Group 2 consisted of 10 patients with dual AV node pathway; elimination of slow pathway property was performed. Late follow-up electrophysiological study (92+/-7 days) showed that change in ventricular rate negatively correlated with change in AV node ERP (r=-.926, P=.0001) and WBCL (r=-.969, P=.0001). Four patients without significant modification effect had success after RF energy was delivered to higher levels (follow-up, 15+/-7 months).

CONCLUSIONS

RF modification of right mid/posteroseptal area is feasible in 92% of patients with paroxysmal Af. Mechanisms of successful modification might be elimination of posterior input and/or partial injury of the compact node. Furthermore, simple elimination of slow pathway might be inadequate for control of ventricular rate in patients with little difference in conduction properties between fast and slow pathways.

Echocardiographic automatic boundary detection to measure left atrial function after the maze procedure

Automatic boundary detection (ABD) is a new echocardiographic modality providing continuous on-line measurements of cavitary area throughout the cardiac cycle. The maze procedure is a new surgical intervention designed to restore sinus rhythm and mechanical atrial contraction as a definitive treatment for patients with atrial fibrillations for whom medical therapy has failed. To evaluate whether ABD may define left atrial function in patients after the maze procedure, we obtained pulsed Doppler recordings of mitral inflow velocity and echocardiographic ABD in 25 patients, 6 +/- 2 months after the maze procedure. We measured the left atrial end-systolic cavitary area, mid-diastolic area before atrial contraction, and end-diastolic area (in square centimeters). Left atrial contraction by Doppler was compared with that derived by ABD in patients who underwent the maze procedure and control subjects (n = 13), both qualitatively and quantitatively (atrial filling fraction vs active atrial contraction [ABD] where atrial contraction (in percent) = (mid-diastolic area - end-diastolic area) x 100/(end-systolic area - end-diastolic area in percent]). Restoration of atrial contraction after the maze procedure was detected by Doppler in 19 patients (76%) and by ABD in 21 patients (84%). The atrial filling fraction was 19 +/- 4% in patients compared with values of 34% +/- 8% in control subjects (p < 0.001). By ABD atrial contraction was 20% +/- 6% in patients whereas control subjects exhibited values of 41% +/- 14% p < 0.001). The Doppler-derived atrial filling fraction and ABD-derived atrial contraction were closely correlated (r = 0.91; p < 0.001; y = 0.59x + 8.6). Thus Doppler techniques complemented by ABD provide direct quantitative indexes of left atrial function throughout the cardiac cycle. Although left atrial contraction and filling are reduced after the maze procedure, left atrial function is restored in most patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, and echocardiographic ABD is a sensitive technique for its detection.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation versus modification of the AV node for control of rapid ventricular response in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia, which is frequently difficult to control. Symptoms and ventricular dysfunction may be caused by a rapid ventricular response to atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency catheter ablation techniques for ventricular rate control have been developed, including AV node modification and AV node ablation with pacemaker implantation. For both AV node modification and ablation, radiofrequency energy is applied via a 4-mm tipped electrode catheter. For AV node ablation radiofrequency energy is applied near the compact AV node or His bundle via the right atrium, or occasionally at the His bundle via the left ventricle. For AV node modification radiofrequency energy is applied in the low middle or posterior septal right atrium near the tricuspid valve annulus. Both techniques can effectively control ventricular response to atrial fibrillation and the associated symptoms, although AV node modification is effective in only about 70% of patients compared to AV node ablation, which is effective in nearly 100%. In patients responding to AV node modification, maximal and mean ventricular response to atrial fibrillation is reduced by 25% to 35% chronically. Inadvertent AV block may occur during attempted AV node modification. It seems appropriate to attempt AV node modification prior to AV node ablation in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation and rapid ventricular response, in order to avoid the need for permanent pacemaker implantation. Although unproven, studies suggest that the mechanism by which AV node modification achieves ventricular rate control may be slow-pathway ablation in the low posterior septal right atrium.

Late occurrence of incessant atrial tachycardia following the maze procedure

We report a patient with incessant atrial tachycardia and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia tachycardia and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia beginning almost 18 months following a successful maze procedure. Both tachycardias were cured by radiofrequency ablation. We speculate that the right atrial tachycardia may have been related to the maze procedure. Finally, we believe this report should emphasize the importance of careful and long-term follow-up of all patients undergoing the maze procedure. Proper evaluation of the place of this therapy greatly depends on reporting of all short- and long-term complications of this new procedure.

Control of rapid ventricular response by radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node in patients with medically refractory atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological control of rapid ventricular response to atrial fibrillation may be difficult in some patients. Alternative treatments, including curative surgery or atrioventricular (AV) node ablation with pacemaker implantation, have significant potential morbidity. In view of evidence that dual AV nodal physiology may exist in a significant percentage of the population, even in those without AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, we postulated that control of ventricular response might be achieved by radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation in the region of the AV nodal slow pathway with its short refractory period.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ten patients underwent attempted AV node modification using a 4-mm-tipped electrode catheter positioned in the middle or posterior septum, between the His bundle and coronary sinus ostium on the tricuspid valve annulus. RF energy was applied at 16 to 30 W for up to 60 seconds, until average ventricular response fell below 100 beats per minute. Reduction of maximal ventricular response below 120 beats per minute was confirmed with atropine 1 mg IV. If required, additional ablations were performed progressively more posteriorly up to the coronary sinus ostium. Patients with successful AV node modification were discharged off AV node-blocking drugs and followed in the clinic at regular intervals. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory ECG recordings and/or treadmill stress tests were obtained before and after ablation for statistical comparison of maximum ventricular rate. Resting average ventricular rate was determined during electrophysiology study before and after ablation. In 7 of 10 patients (70%), maximum ventricular rate was reduced from a mean of 164 +/- 12 to 123 +/- 16 beats per minute (P < .01) and average ventricular rate from a mean of 128 +/- 11 to 83 +/- 10 beats per minute after ablation. Mean minimum ventricular rate was 54 +/- 11 beats per minute after ablation. These 7 patients have remained symptom free from rapid ventricular response for a mean of 14 +/- 8 months (range, 1 to 22). Three remain off all AV node-blocking drugs, 3 remain on digoxin alone, which was previously ineffective, and 1 remains on a beta-blocker for angina. In the 3 patients who did not respond to AV node modification, complete AV node ablation and permanent pacemaker implantation was performed in 2 and DC cardioversion after amiodarone loading was performed in 1.

CONCLUSIONS

RF catheter modification of AV node conduction is effective in controlling rapid ventricular response to atrial fibrillation in a significant percentage of medically refractory patients. A possible mechanism of RF modification of AV node conduction is AV nodal slow pathway ablation. Large-scale clinical trials will be needed to determine the overall efficacy and safety of this technique.