Dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease

Validated risk stratification model accurately predicts low risk in patients with unstable angina

BACKGROUND

In the mid 1990s, two unstable angina risk prediction models were proposed but neither has been validated on separate population or compared.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcome among high, medium and low risk unstable angina patients defined by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) guideline to similar risk groups defined by a validated model from our institution (RUSH).

METHODS

Four hundred sixteen patients consecutively admitted to the hospital with unstable angina between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1997, were prospectively evaluated for risk factors. The presence of major adverse events such as myocardial infarction (MI), death and heart failure was assessed for each patient by chart review.

RESULTS

The composite end point of heart failure, MI or death occurred in 3% and 5% of the RUSH and AHCPR low risk categories, respectively, and in 8% and 10% of AHCPR and RUSH high risk categories, respectively. Recurrent ischemic events were best predicted by the RUSH model (high: 24% vs. medium: 12% and low: 10%, p = 0.029), but not by the AHCPR model (high: 14% vs. medium: 13% and low: 9%, p = 0.876). The RUSH model identified five times more low risk patients than the AHCPR model.

CONCLUSIONS

Both models identify patients with low and high event rates of MI, death or heart failure. However, the RUSH model allowed for five times more patients to be candidates for outpatient evaluation (low risk) with a similar observed event rate to the AHCPR model; also, the RUSH model more successfully predicted ischemic complications. We conclude that the RUSH model can be used clinically to identify patients for early noninvasive evaluation, thereby improving cost effectiveness of care.

Effect of gender and left ventricular dysfunction on the incidence of hypotension induced by dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Of patients who undergo dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), 14% to 38% experience hypotension that sometimes requires termination of the test before an adequate cardiac work-load is reached. The mechanisms of hypotension reportedly are related to peripheral vasodilation, a decrease in cardiac output, and left ventricular (LV) cavity obliteration. DSE is performed increasingly in women and in patients with LV dysfunction. However, the impact of gender and LV dysfunction on DSE-induced hypotension has not been elucidated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical, hemodynamic, and echocardiographic characteristics were studied in 412 patients undergoing DSE, 82 patients with an LV ejection fraction of 40% or less, and 147 women. Hypotension, defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure of at least 20 mm Hg, occurred in 117 (28%) patients. Hypotension was more common in women than men (36% vs 24%, P = .01). Hypotension was also more common in older adults (P = .004), persons taking diuretics (P = .025) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (P = .01), and persons with higher baseline blood pressures (P < .0001). Hypotension was not related to the use of beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, nitrates, LV dimensions, or ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of DSE-induced hypotension is related to gender but not to the level of LV systolic function. It also is associated significantly with higher age, and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or diuretics.

Functional evaluation of the bileaflet mechanical valve in the aortic position using dobutamine-stress echocardiography: is a 23-mm prosthetic valve adequately large enough?

The issue of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch in small annular patients is still controversial. The hemodynamic function of bileaflet mechanical valves in the aortic position was examined using dobutamine-stress echocardiography. Forty-four patients were enrolled in the study and divided into 5 groups, according to prosthesis size, from 21 mm to 29 mm. The aortic peak pressure gradient (APG) increased significantly in all groups with dobutamine-stress and exceeded 50 mmHg in 83% of the 21-mm group, in 64% of the 23-mm group, and in 33% of the 25-mm group. The APG even exceeded 80 mmHg in 22% and 18% of the 21-mm and 23-mm groups, respectively. In these cases, the potential of 'valve prosthesis-patient mismatch' was considered. From the relationship between the APG and the prosthesis valve area index (VAI), 'critical VAIs' were found where patients were likely to enter the 'mismatch' status; that is, 1.22 and 1.77 cm2/m2, respectively, for the 5 and 10 microg/kg per min stages of dobutamine stress. This critical VAI range is useful in predicting the 'mismatch' patients preoperatively. Alternative procedures or prostheses should then be selected for them.

Left ventricular cavity obliteration during dobutamine stress echocardiography is associated with female sex and left ventricular size and function

We investigated 568 consecutive patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography to elucidate the mechanism of left ventricular (LV) obliteration. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic variables were related to dobutamine-induced LV cavity obliteration defined as approximation of LV endocardium associated with an intracavitary flow acceleration of at least 2 m/s in the absence of a distal residual cavity. The LV cavity obliteration was observed in 89 (16%) of the 568 patients and was more frequent in women and those with smaller LV dimensions, increased LV wall thickness, and higher resting ejection fractions. Despite similar peak stress levels, the cavity obliterators were less likely to have chest pain and detectable stress-induced wall motion abnormalities. We conclude that LV cavity obliteration during dobutamine stress is common and is associated with female sex, smaller LV size, presence of LV hypertrophy, and higher LV ejection fraction. Despite similar stress levels, chest pain and reversible wall motion abnormalities are observed less frequently in patients with cavity obliteration, raising the possibility of lower prevalence of coronary artery disease or masking of ischemia in this patient population.

Effect of dobutamine stress on left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions in patients with moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is increasingly used in patients with moderate and severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. However, its effect on central and peripheral hemodynamics and LV function in this patient population is not known. This study investigates the effect of dobutamine stress on LV systolic and diastolic performance and peripheral hemodynamics in 177 consecutive patients undergoing DSE. Sixty-five patients with an LV ejection fraction (EF) of < or =40% were compared with 112 patients with an EF of >40%. Compared with those with EF > 40%, patients with EF < or =40% had a faster heart rate(76 +/- 13 vs 70 +/- 13 bpm, p < 0.001), lower systolic blood pressure (127 +/- 18 vs 133 +/- 20 mm Hg, p < 0.05), lower stroke volume (60 +/- 20 vs 74 +/- 36, p = 0.01), longer LV isovolumic relaxation time (118 +/- 37 vs 108 +/- 25 msec, p < 0.05) and larger LV end-diastolic (57 +/- 9.6 vs 49 +/- 7 mm, p < 0.0001) and end-systolic (46 +/- 10 vs 32 +/- 7.9 mm, p < 0.0001) diameters. They also had a lesser increment in cardiac output (1.5 +/- 1.6 vs 3.2 +/- 4.8 L/min, p = 0.02), a smaller reduction of systolic LV size (-5.3 +/- 4.1 vs -7.0 +/- 4.3 mm, p < 0.05) and a lower propensity to LV cavity obliteration with dobutamine infusion. In conclusion, patients with an EF < or =40% have lower baseline stroke volume, systolic blood pressure, higher heart rate, and longer LV isovolumic relaxation time. They also have a smaller increase in cardiac output, a smaller reduction of LV size, and a lower propensity to LV cavity obliteration with dobutamine stress.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography for preoperative cardiac risk stratification in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation

This study attempts to evaluate the efficacy of dobutamine stress echocardiography for preoperative cardiac risk stratification in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. Two hundred twenty consecutively submitted patients were evaluated in preparation for orthotopic liver transplantation. Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed in 80 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Follow-up information was available in 40 patients in the form of cardiac catheterization and/or outcome from liver transplantation to validate the dobutamine stress echo findings. The prevalence of coronary artery disease in this cohort was 5% and was closely associated with the presence of diabetes mellitus. Dobutamine stress echocardiography, when interpreted as abnormal in the presence of wall motion abnormalities only, is associated with a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of 100%. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is highly efficacious and should be the screening study of choice to detect coronary artery disease in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.

Targeting of dobutamine to ischemic myocardium without systemic effects by selective suction and pressure-regulated retroinfusion

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of low-dose dobutamine and/or glyceryl trinitrate in addition to selective suction and pressure-regulated retroinfusion with arterial blood on regional myocardial function of the ischemic myocardium and systemic hemodynamics.

METHODS

Using a pig model of repeated brief (90 s) occlusions of the left anterior descending artery, selective suction and pressure-regulated retroinfusion was carried out either with arterial blood alone (SSRalone) or with arterial blood and simultaneous application of low-dose dobutamine (0.1 microgram/kg/min (SSRDOB), glyceryl trinitrate (0.03 mg/kg/min) (SSRNIT) or the combination of both drugs (SSRDOB + NIT). Regional myocardial function of the ischemic and non-ischemic myocardium was determined by sonomicrometry (segment shortening).

RESULTS

Segment shortening in the ischemic area after 90 s of ischemia was preserved at 57.5 +/- 9.2% with SSRalone but at 78.0 +/- 22.3% of baseline with SSRDOB (P < 0.05). The addition of glyceryl trinitrate did not improve regional myocardial function further. No effects of locally applied dobutamine were observed with regard to non-ischemic myocardium or heart rate. Cardiac output and mean arterial blood pressures tended to be further stabilized with SSRDOB.

CONCLUSIONS

Local application of low-dose dobutamine together with arterial blood by selective suction and pressure-regulated retroinfusion during brief myocardial ischemia resulted in improved regional myocardial function without undesired effects on non-ischemic myocardium or systemic hemodynamics.