Management of intracoronary thrombosis complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Pharmacological postconditioning with atorvastatin calcium attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in diabetic rats by phosphorylating GSK3β

Diabetes is an independent risk factor for myocardial ischemia, and many epidemiological data and laboratory studies have revealed that diabetes significantly exacerbated myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury and ameliorated protective effects. The present study aimed to determine whether pharmacological postconditioning with atorvastatin calcium lessened diabetic myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, and investigated the role of glycogen synthase kinase (GSK3β) in this. A total of 72 streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats were randomly divided into six groups, and 24 age-matched male non-diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups. Rats all received 40 min myocardial ischemia followed by 180 min reperfusion, except sham-operated groups. Compared with the non-diabetic ischemia/reperfusion model group, the diabetic ischemia/reperfusion group had a comparable myocardial infarct size, but a higher level of serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and morphological alterations to their myocardial cells. Compared with the diabetic ischemia/reperfusion group, the group that received pharmacological postconditioning with atorvastatin calcium had smaller myocardial infarct sizes, lower levels of cTnI, reduced morphological alterations to myocardial cells, higher levels of p-GSK3β, heat shock factor (HSF)-1 and heat shock protein (HSP)70. The cardioprotective effect conferred by atorvastatin calcium did not attenuate myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury following application of TDZD-8, which phosphorylates and inactivates GSK3β. Pharmacological postconditioning with atorvastatin calcium may attenuate diabetic heart ischemia/reperfusion injury in the current context. The phosphorylation of GSK3β serves a critical role during the cardioprotection in diabetic rats, and p-GSK3β may accelerate HSP70 production partially by activating HSF-1 during myocardial ischemic/reperfusion injury.

Intracoronary Macrothrombus Formation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Despite Optimal Activated Clotting Time Using Bivalirudin

The occurrence of intracoronary thrombus during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a well-known complication. It has been estimated that it complicates approximately 6% of all coronary procedures. Patients at highest risk for this complication include those with acute ischemic syndromes or with angiographically apparent thrombus. Since the development of PCI, intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) has remained the primary antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of periprocedural ischemic complications. The availability of a rapid “point of care” test for dose individualization (the activated clotting time [ACT]) has facilitated this process. Other forms of antithrombotic therapies such as direct thrombin inhibitors or low-molecular-weight heparin have been proposed as more effective anticoagulants during PCI. Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor proven to decrease post-PCI ischemic complication rate compared with UFH and have a lower vascular complication rate compared with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists. We herein report a case of acute macrothrombus formation during PCI despite adequate ACT achieved with bivalirudin.

Active site-inactivated factor VIIa prevents thrombosis without increased surgical bleeding: topical and intravenous administration in a rat model of deep arterial injury

PURPOSE

The primary event in the procoagulant response after vascular interventions is the tissue factor (TF)-factor VIIa complex formation, which occurs when TF is exposed to the circulating blood by the inflicted trauma. Human recombinant active site-inhibited coagulation factor VIIa (FFR-rFVIIa) binds well to TF but cannot initiate blood coagulation, and should thereby block thrombus formation. This hypothesis was tested with a rat model of arterial thrombosis.

METHODS

In a blinded randomized study, the antithrombotic and antihemostatic effects of FFR-rFVIIa and heparin were evaluated in a rat model of mechanical deep arterial injury. In one arm of the study, FFR-rFVIIa (0.2 mg in 150 microL) or vehicle alone was applied topically at the site of vascular injury. In the other arm, FFR-rFVIIa (4 mg/kg), heparin (1 mg/kg), or vehicle alone was injected intravenously.

RESULTS

FFR-rFVIIa produced a powerful antithrombotic effect after both topical and intravenous administrations (P =.02 and P =.005, respectively) without increasing the surgical bleeding. Heparin prevented thrombosis equally well as FFR-rFVIIa (P =.0007), but doubled the surgical bleeding compared with FFR-rFVIIa (P =.03) and controls (P =.008). In the topical study, the antithrombotic effect was achieved without altering parameters of plasma anticoagulation (prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time) or producing detectable levels of FFR-rFVIIa in plasma.

CONCLUSION

In this model FFR-rFVIIa effectively inhibits thrombus formation without the expense of increased surgical bleeding, which indicates the potential of FFR-rFVIIa as an effective and safe strategy for prevention of thrombosis in reconstructive vascular surgery and various forms of percutaneous revascularization.

Analysis of number needed to treat and cost of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in percutaneous coronary interventions and acute coronary syndromes

This retrospective review and analysis of pivotal clinical trials compared acquisition costs and outcomes of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Absolute reduction in the number of deaths and nonfatal myocardial infarctions at 30 days, number of patients that need to be treated to prevent one event, and drug costs expended to prevent one event were assessed. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), abciximab is the better value, especially in high-risk patients. In those with unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction, costs of eptifibatide and tirofiban were not significantly different, but the cost of tirofiban was more variable. These agents have the potential to be cost-effective if administered to populations at high risk for adverse outcomes of acute coronary syndromes or PCI. Prospective methods to identify these high-risk patients are being developed.

Six-month angiographic and clinical follow-up of patients prospectively randomized to receive either tirofiban or placebo during angioplasty in the RESTORE trial. Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and Restenosis

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the effects of tirofiban versus placebo on the incidence of adverse cardiac outcomes and coronary artery restenosis at 6 months.

BACKGROUND

Tirofiban is a highly selective, short-acting inhibitor of fibrinogen binding to platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa. In a recent clinical study, tirofiban reduced the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events at both 2 and 7 days after coronary angioplasty or directional coronary atherectomy. This reduction persisted but was no longer statistically significant at 30 days.

METHODS

The Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and Restenosis (RESTORE) trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tirofiban in patients undergoing balloon angioplasty or directional atherectomy within 72 h of presentation with either unstable angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction. All patients received an initial bolus (10 microg/kg body weight over 3 min), followed by a 36-h infusion (0.15 microg/kg per min) of either tirofiban or placebo.

RESULTS

At 6 months the composite end point (either death from any cause, new myocardial infarction, bypass surgery for angioplasty failure or recurrent ischemia, repeat target vessel angioplasty or stent insertion for actual or threatened abrupt closure) occurred in 1,070 placebo group patients (27.1%) and 1,071 tirofiban group patients (24.1%, p = 0.11). Analysis of 6-month coronary arteriograms by means of quantitative coronary arteriography showed no significant difference between placebo- and tirofiban-treated patients in either the incidence of a > or =50% diameter stenosis (57% vs. 51%, p = NS), a loss of > or =50% of lumen diameter gained (50% vs. 50%, p = NS) or a loss of > or =0.72 mm of lumen diameter (44% vs. 42%, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3% absolute reduction in the incidence of the composite end point at 6 months (27.1% placebo vs. 24.1% tirofiban) was similar to that previously reported at 2 days (8.7% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.005), and there does not appear to be any late effect of tirofiban on clinical end points between day 2 and 6 months. Tirofiban did not reduce the incidence of restenosis at 6 months when defined in a number of ways.

Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. The RESTORE Investigators. Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and REstenosis

BACKGROUND

Adverse cardiovascular events associated with thrombotic occlusion occur in 4% to 12.8% of patients after coronary angioplasty. Recently, potent antiplatelet agents have been used to reduce those thrombotic complications. Tirofiban is a highly selective, short-acting inhibitor of fibrinogen binding to platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa that inhibits ex vivo platelet aggregation in response to a variety of agonists.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The RESTORE trial (Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and REstenosis) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tirofiban in patients undergoing coronary interventions (balloon angioplasty or directional atherectomy) within 72 hours of presentation with an acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina pcctoris or acute myocardial infarction). The end points of the study were death from any cause, myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery due to angioplasty failure or recurrent ischemia, repeat target-vessel angioplasty for recurrent ischemia, and insertion of a stent due to actual or threatened abrupt closure of the dilated artery, and the primary end point was a composite representing the occurrence of any of these events. The prespecified primary hypothesis of the study was that tirofiban, administered as a bolus of 10 microg/kg over a 3-minute period and followed by a 36-hour infusion of 0.15 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), would result in a reduction in the 30-day composite end point compared with placebo. Patients (n=2139) who were already receiving treatment with aspirin and heparin were randomized to receive tirofiban or placebo. The primary composite end point at 30 days was reduced from 12.2% in the placebo group to 10.3% in the tirofiban group, a 16% relative reduction (P=.160). However, 2 days after angioplasty, the tirofiban group had a 38% relative reduction in the composite end point (P< or =.005), and at 7 days there was a 27% relative reduction (P=.022), largely because of a reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction and the need for repeat angioplasty. When repeat angioplasty or coronary artery bypass surgery procedures were included in the composite only if performed on an urgent or emergency basis, the composite 30-day event rates were 10.5% for the placebo group and 8.0% for the tirofiban group, a relative reduction of 24% (P=.052). Major bleeding, including transfusion, was not significantly different between the two groups (3.7% in the placebo group and 5.3% in the tirofiban group; P=.096). When the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria for major bleeding were used, the incidence was 2.1% in the placebo group compared with 2.4% in the tirofiban group (P=.662). Thrombocytopenia was similar in the placebo and tirofiban groups (0.9% for the placebo group versus 1.1% for the tirofiban group; P=.709).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing coronary angioplasty for acute coronary syndromes, tirofiban protects against early adverse cardiac events related to thrombotic closure. At 30 days, however, the reduction in adverse cardiac events was no longer statistically significant. The bleeding observed with tirofiban was not statistically different from that observed with placebo.