Psychiatric Disorders and Their Treatment: Impact of Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

Association of psychosocial risk factors and liver transplant evaluation outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) is a standardized psychosocial assessment tool used in liver transplantation (LT) evaluation and has been primarily studied in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between SIPAT score and metabolic syndrome severity and LT waitlist outcomes in a large cohort of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with MASLD evaluated for LT from 2014 to 2021. The utility of the previously defined total SIPAT cutoff (<21 [excellent/good candidates] vs. ≥21 [minimally acceptable/high-risk candidates]) was studied. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between continuous SIPAT scores and LT waitlisting outcomes. The Youden J statistic was used to identify the optimal SIPAT cutoff for patients with MASLD. A total of 480 patients evaluated for transplant with MASLD were included. Only 9.4% of patients had a SIPAT score ≥21. Patients with SIPAT score ≥21 had higher hemoglobin A1c compared to patients with lower psychosocial risk (median [IQR]: 7.8 [6.0-9.7] vs. 6.6 [5.8-7.9]; p = 0.04). There were no other differences in metabolic comorbidities between SIPAT groups. Increasing SIPAT score was associated with decreased odds of listing (OR: 0.82 per 5-point increase; p = 0.003) in multivariable models. A SIPAT of ≥12 was identified as the optimal cutoff in this population, resulting in an adjusted OR for a listing of 0.53 versus SIPAT <12 ( p = 0.001). In this large cohort of patients with MASLD evaluated for LT, few patients met the previously defined high SIPAT cutoff for transplant suitability. Nevertheless, increasing the SIPAT score was associated with waitlist outcomes. Our suggested SIPAT cutoff of ≥12 for patients with MASLD warrants further external validation using data from other centers.

Commonly encountered symptoms and their management in patients with cirrhosis

This exhaustive review, explored the multifaceted symptoms and their management in patients with cirrhosis. Patients frequently endure pain, muscle cramps, sleep disturbances, psychological distress, and gastrointestinal issues, significantly impairing their quality of life. Pain is prevalent, often requiring analgesics, while muscle cramps affect up to 68% of patients, treated with supplements like zinc and taurine despite limited evidence. Sleep disturbances, including insomnia and excessive daytime sleepiness, afflict up to 80% of patients, managed through lactulose, melatonin, and cognitive behavioral therapies. Gastrointestinal symptoms, affecting 80%, include abdominal pain and bloating, necessitating lifestyle and dietary adjustments. Mental health disorders, such as depression and anxiety, are common, managed with a combination of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. Sexual dysfunction, often overlooked, profoundly impacts both men and women, requiring holistic treatment approaches. Pruritus, another distressing symptom, is managed with moisturizers and antihistamines, though many treatments show limited success. Hair loss and skin changes add to the psychological burden, highlighting the need for a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach. The review underscores the imperative for tailored, compassionate care to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life in cirrhosis.

Factors Associated With Motivation to Reduce Alcohol Use Among Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Alcohol use is prevalent among hepatology clinic patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). We explored factors associated with the importance and confidence dimensions of motivation to reduce drinking.

METHODS

Participants (N = 121) with unhealthy alcohol use (i.e., over NIH guidelines) receiving care in hepatology clinics from a safety-net hospital (SN, N = 54) and two Veterans Affairs Healthcare Systems (VA, N = 67) were enrolled in an alcohol intervention trial from March 2022 through October 2023. Baseline assessments included Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), COVID-19 stress; and measures of importance and confidence to decrease alcohol use (readiness rulers, scales of 1-10). Liver disease aetiology and severity were extracted from electronic health records. We performed multivariable linear regression models with forward selection to assess pre-specified variables' associations with importance and confidence.

RESULTS

The sample was 84% male, 40% Latino, 31% White, 18% Black and 11% other races; median age was 61 years. Median (Q1-Q3) AUDIT score was 16 (12-24), importance was 9 (6-10) and confidence was 8 (5-9). On multivariable analysis, VA site (vs. SN) participants had a 0.97-point lower importance score (p = 0.02); higher symptoms of depression (PHQ-8 score ≥ 10 vs. < 10) and AUDIT scores (for each point increase) were associated with higher importance score (estimates 1.2 and 0.08, p < 0.05, respectively). Liver disease aetiology and severity were not significantly associated with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression, alcohol problem severity and treatment site may influence motivation to reduce alcohol use and could inform future hepatology-based interventions.

Antidepressants in People With Chronic Liver Disease and Depression: When Are They Warranted and How to Choose the Suitable One?

Most chronic medical illnesses are associated with significant psychiatric comorbidity, especially in the form of depression, anxiety, and suicidality. Chronic liver disease (CLD) is no exception to this and rather is placed uniquely as compared to other diseases because of its intersection with alcohol use disorder and other substance use, which in itself is a mental illness. Patients with CLD may have comorbid psychiatric illnesses; the pharmacokinetic concerns arising out of hepatic dysfunction which affects pharmacotherapy for depression and vice versa. The high prevalence of medical comorbidities with CLD may further complicate the course and outcome of depression in such patients, and diagnostic and management issues arise from special situations like transplant evaluation, alcohol use disorder, and hepatic encephalopathy or multifactorial encephalopathy seen in a disoriented or agitated patient with CLD. For this narrative review, we carried out a literature search in PubMed/PubMed Central and in Google Scholar (1980-2023) with the keywords "depression in cirrhosis", "antidepressants in liver disease", "anxiety in liver disease", "depression in liver transplantation", and "drug interactions with antidepressants". This review presents a comprehensive view of the available research on the use of antidepressants in patients with CLD, including deciding to use them, choosing the right antidepressant, risks, drug interactions, and adverse reactions to expect, and managing the same. In addition, liver transplant fitness and the overlap of hepatic encephalopathy with neuropsychiatric illness will be discussed.

Closing the Care Gap: Management of Alcohol Use Disorder in Patients with Alcohol-associated Liver Disease

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD)-related morbidity and mortality are rising in the United States. Although effective medications and behavioral interventions are available for the treatment of patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD), patients with ALD are profoundly undertreated for AUD. This article reviews the management of AUD in patients with ALD, with a focus on appropriate screening and diagnosis, management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome, pharmacotherapy for AUD, alcohol biomarkers, and behavioral interventions. Expanding access to AUD treatment is imperative for improving health outcomes in patients with ALD.

Advanced Biomarkers of Hepatotoxicity in Psychiatry: A Narrative Review and Recommendations for New Psychoactive Substances

One of the factors that increase the effectiveness of the pharmacotherapy used in patients abusing various types of new psychoactive substances (NPSs) is the proper functioning of the liver. However, the articles published to date on NPS hepatotoxicity only address non-specific hepatic parameters. The aim of this manuscript was to review three advanced markers of hepatotoxicity in psychiatry, namely, osteopontin (OPN), high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) and glutathione dehydrogenase (GDH, GLDH), and, on this basis, to identify recommendations that should be included in future studies in patients abusing NPSs. This will make it possible to determine whether NPSs do indeed have a hepatotoxic effect or whether other factors, such as additional substances taken or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, are responsible. NPS abusers are at particular risk of HCV infection, and for this reason, it is all the more important to determine what factors actually show a hepatotoxic effect in them.

Mental Health, Quality of Life, and Stigmatization in Danish Patients with Liver Disease

The mental health of patients with liver diseases is often overlooked when assessing their overall health and planning care and treatment. The aim of this study was to assess anxiety, depression, hopelessness, quality of life, and the perception of stigmatization in a large cohort of patients with chronic liver disease of different aetiology and severity, as well as to identify predictors associated with mental health disorders. A total of 340 patients completed a survey assessing mental health using the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, and the Major Depression Inventory. Quality of life was measured with the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire and the European Quality-of-Life visual analogue scale. To assess stigmatization, validated questions from the Danish Nationwide Survey of Patient Experiences were used. Predictors associated with anxiety, hopelessness, and depression were analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Overall, 15% of the patients had moderate or severe anxiety, 3% had moderate or pronounced hopelessness, and 8% had moderate or severe depression. The prevalence of all three was highest in patients with cirrhosis and was associated with a low quality of life. More patients with cirrhosis had perceived stigmatization compared to patients with liver disease without cirrhosis, which affected their self-perception, and more than one-third of the patients refrained from telling others about their liver disease. The results emphasize the need for increased focus on mental health problems and awareness on preventing the discrimination of patients with liver disease.