Overview of causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury

Acute liver injury in pregnancy

A woman in her fifth month of pregnancy presented to the outpatient department with vomiting, generalised itching and yellowish discolouration of the skin for 1 week. No history of rashes, fever, pain abdomen or altered stools. In view of four pregnancy losses previously, she was evaluated to have antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and was advised low molecular weight heparin. She was a known type-II diabetic on insulin. Prophylactic oral dydrogesterone and natural micronised progesterone were started at a local hospital 2 months prior, in view of threatened abortion. Investigations revealed grossly elevated serum bilirubin and liver enzymes. Other blood investigations were unremarkable and abdominal ultrasonography was normal. The most likely diagnosis in this case, is drug-induced liver injury due to oral progestin consumption. Causality assessment by Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Model was used to establish the diagnosis. High doses of progestin over a prolonged period resulted in acute hepatic toxicity causing itching, jaundice and transaminitis. Cautious use of progestins in appropriate dosage is recommended during pregnancy.

When Is Suspected Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Not DILI? An Analysis of Unlikely Cases From the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is difficult. We reviewed cases in the DILI Network prospective study that were adjudicated to have liver injury due to other causes to discover pearls for improved diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Cases were adjudicated by expert opinion and scored from 1 (definite DILI) to 5 (unlikely DILI). Confirmed cases (1-3) were compared with unlikely cases (5).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four of the 1,916 cases (7%) were unlikely DILI. Alternative diagnoses were autoimmune hepatitis (20%), hepatitis C (20%), bile duct pathology (13%), and hepatitis E (8%).

DISCUSSION

Thorough evaluation, including follow-up, is essential to minimize incorrect diagnosis of idiosyncratic DILI.

Ashwagandha-induced liver injury-A case series from India and literature review

BACKGROUND

Ashwagandha herb is commonly used in Ayurveda and a "fad" dietary supplement for a host of indications based on low levels of evidence. Recently, ashwagandha was implicated in multiple reports of herb-induced liver injury (HILI), mainly from the United States. We present the first, and currently largest, series of ashwagandha-HILI from multiple centers in India.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the respective institutional electronic medical records for ashwagandha-HILI. Patients consuming ashwagandha as part of multiherbal formulations or along with other known hepatotoxic supplements or medicines were excluded. All patients underwent a detailed diagnostic workup to exclude competing causes reasonably. Where possible, the implicated herbal formulation was retrieved and subjected to chemical analysis.

RESULTS

Out of 23 patients with liver injury from ashwagandha (January 2019 to December 2022), we report 8 patients with single-ingredient formulation-related HILI. Study cohort was male predominant, and cholestatic hepatitis was the commonest presentation. Five patients had underlying chronic liver disease; 3 presented with acute-on-chronic liver failure, and all 3 died on follow-up. In others, the liver injury was prolonged, nonetheless self-limiting. Liver biopsy revealed cholestatic features predominantly with hepatocellular necrosis and lymphocyte/eosinophil predominant portal-based inflammation. One patient progressed to chronic HILI. Chemical analysis revealed only natural phytochemicals without adulteration or contamination.

CONCLUSIONS

Ashwagandha-HILI presents with cholestatic hepatitis and can lead to the syndrome of acute-on-chronic liver failure with high mortality in those with pre-existing liver disease. Educating the public on avoiding the use of potentially toxic and unrecommended herbal supplements can help mitigate the avoidable liver disease burden in the community.

Tinospora cordifolia (Guduchi/Giloy)-Induced Liver Injury: A Case Review

Tinospora cordifolia (Guduchi/Giloy) is a relatively common herbal supplement whose use has recently become prominent in Southeast Asia. It was promoted to the public in India as an immunity booster, especially against the novel COVID-19. There have been reports, mostly from India, of an association between Guduchi/Giloy and liver injury. We present a 50-year-old female with a history of Hashimoto thyroiditis, who presented with abdominal discomfort and nausea of two weeks duration, which coincided with starting HistaEze^TM supplement containing Tinospora cordifolia. The vital signs upon presentation showed no significant abnormalities. Labs were significant for severely elevated transaminases; however, viral panels, autoimmune serologies, and imaging studies were unremarkable. Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method (RUCAM) score was at 6, which was indicative of probable drug/herb-induced liver injury. HistaEze^TM was discontinued, and the patient took a three-day course of oral steroids with significant interval improvement in clinical status, as evidenced by progressive normalization of the transaminases level. The transaminases decreased by greater than 50% within two weeks of discontinuation and trended back to baseline within three months. This case highlights the worldwide availability and use of Tinospora cordifolia, which can cause liver injury that appears to be idiosyncratic and possibly immune-mediated. Further research on the precise mechanism of its hepatotoxicity is warranted.

A Case Report of Acute Hepatitis Involving the Medicinal Herb Tinospora cordifolia Along with Other Variables

This is a 54-year-old woman from Germany of central European origin who developed an acute hepatitis while orally taking Ayurvedic herbal remedies, among those was the medicinal herb Tinospora cordifolia. She took the plant powders from July 1, 2021, to October 1, 2021, with the intention of relieving the symptoms of her subjectively irritated gastrointestinal tract. The patient's main symptoms of acute hepatitis were progressively increasing general fatigue, nausea, and exhaustion. During an inpatient hospital admission from November 4, 2021, to November 9, 2021, she was under clinical observation, but no specific therapeutic measures were deemed necessary; however, blood chemistry showed an acute toxic hepatitis. There was no clinical or laboratory evidence of acute liver failure. Aminotransferase values decreased to normal values on December 14, 2021, by themselves. This case report contributes to the ongoing discussion about the potential risks of triggering an acute hepatitis due to the intake of herbal remedies from the Tinospora genus in rare cases, differentiating other involved risk factors. The case also shows that causality assignments are not trivial in the context of multivariate clinical scenarios. In the case of known hepatic metabolism-associated risk factors, T. cordifolia should be used with more caution based on available case reports. At the same time, no hasty and exaggerated prejudgments should be made about this medicinal herb, which has been very successfully used in traditional South Asian systems of medicine for many centuries.

Tinospora Cordifolia (Giloy)-Induced Liver Injury During the COVID-19 Pandemic-Multicenter Nationwide Study From India

Tinospora cordifolia (Giloy) is an herbal supplement commonly used in the Indian alternative medicine system Ayurveda. This herb has been promoted to the public in India as an immune booster to prevent novel coronavirus disease 2019. However, small reports have recently shown an association between Giloy use and the development of herb-induced liver injury (HILI) with autoimmune features in some patients. This large retrospective Indian multicenter study spanning 13 centers at nine locations was designed to identify features and outcomes of HILI temporally associated with Giloy use. Chemical and toxicological analyses of retrieved Giloy samples using state-of-the-art methods were also performed. We report 43 patients, of whom more than half were female, with a median time from initial Giloy consumption to symptom onset of 46 days. Patients presented with acute hepatitis, acute worsening of chronic liver disease (CLD, the most common clinical presentation), or acute liver failure. Causality assessment revealed probable liver injury in 67.4%. The most common autoantibody detected was anti-nuclear antibody. Liver biopsy in a subset revealed HILI associated with autoimmune features and hepatocyte and canalicular cholestasis and neutrophilic and eosinophilic infiltration. Conclusion: Giloy is associated with acute hepatitis with autoimmune features and can unmask autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in people with silent AIH-related CLD. Further studies on the safety (and efficacy) of untested but heavily promoted herbals in alternative systems of medicine are an unmet need in the interests of public health and are especially important during this global health emergency.

Assessing Toxicity in Drug Trials in Liver Disease

Since the early trials in viral hepatitis, more and more new drugs are being tested for use in various liver diseases. Since drug hepatotoxicity is a major cause of drugs under investigation not making it to market, the assessment of drug-induced liver injury in clinical trials of new drugs is crucial. This review will focus on the systems that are used to assess drug-induced liver injury in clinical trials and will discuss how some of these criteria are inappropriate or inaccurate in this function together with suggestions for improvement.

Is There an Increased Risk of Hepatotoxicity with Metamizole? A Comparative Cohort Study in Incident Users

INTRODUCTION

The analgesic metamizole, which has been withdrawn from the market in several countries due to the risk of agranulocytosis but is still available on the market in Germany and some other countries, has been associated with liver injury in published case reports; however, epidemiological studies on the risk of liver injury are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of liver injury up to 270 days after the first start of treatment with metamizole with the corresponding risk in patients starting treatment with paracetamol, using a retrospective cohort incident user design.

METHODS

The first prescription for either metamizole or paracetamol in the Intercontinental Medical Statistics (IMS)^® Disease Analyzer Germany database during the study period (2009-2018) was identified in patients with at least 365 days of observation and no prior diagnosis of liver events, cancer or HIV, or treatment within the last 6 months with hepatotoxic drugs typically administered for chronic conditions. Each patient was followed for specific liver events for 90 days after the prescription. In case of a new prescription within 90 days, a new 90-day observation period started, up to a maximum of 270 days. Cox regression was used to compare the risk of liver injury in the two groups.

RESULTS

Metamizole was associated with a higher risk of liver injury compared with paracetamol (adjusted hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.46-1.97). Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of these findings. In all the sensitivity analyses, metamizole was still associated with a higher risk of liver injury, including an analysis where naproxen was used as a comparator instead of paracetamol.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study support previous studies suggesting that metamizole is associated with a significant risk of liver injury. Nevertheless, a possible impact of residual confounding cannot be excluded.

Overview of Causality Assessment for Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) in Clinical Trials

Causality assessment for suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) during drug development and following approval is challenging. The IQ DILI Causality Working Group (CWG), in collaboration with academic and regulatory subject matter experts (SMEs), developed this manuscript with the following objectives: (1) understand and describe current practices; (2) evaluate the utility of new tools/methods/practice guidelines; (3) propose a minimal data set needed to assess causality; (4) define best practices; and (5) promote a more structured and universal approach to DILI causality assessment for clinical development. To better understand current practices, the CWG performed a literature review, took a survey of member companies, and collaborated with SMEs. Areas of focus included best practices for causality assessment during clinical development, utility of adjudication committees, and proposals for potential new avenues to improve causality assessment. The survey and literature review provided renewed understanding of the complexity and challenges of DILI causality assessment as well as the use of non-standardized approaches. Potential areas identified for consistency and standardization included role and membership of adjudication committees, standardized minimum dataset, updated assessment tools, and best practices for liver biopsy and rechallenge in the setting of DILI. Adjudication committees comprised of SMEs (i.e., utilizing expert opinion) remain the standard for DILI causality assessment. A variety of working groups continue to make progress in pursuing new tools to assist with DILI causality assessment. The minimum dataset deemed adequate for causality assessment provides a path forward for standardization of data collection in the setting of DILI. Continued progress is necessary to optimize and advance innovative tools necessary for the scientific, pharmaceutical, and regulatory community.

A Rare Cause of Acute Liver Failure: Diffuse Liver Metastization of Merkel Cell Carcinoma

The authors describe a case of a 76-year-old male with a medical history of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) of the right lower eyelid. He was admitted to the emergency department due to abdominal pain in the right hypochondrium, nauseas, asthenia, and choluria with 3 days of evolution. Biochemical liver workup revealed a cytocholestase pattern as well as a prolonged prothrombin time. After admission, the patient developed hepatic encephalopathy, and a clinical and analytical worsening was observed. Abdominal ultrasound showed a reduction in the caliber of the hepatic veins, in apparent relation to a parenchymal compression. Liver biopsy was performed and showed an extensive infiltration of the hepatic parenchyma by a solid neoplasm, which, upon immunohistochemical study, was compatible with a diffuse metastization of a MCC. We report this clinical case due to its rarity of presentation and to show the important role of liver biopsy in cases of acute hepatitis.

Drug-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), including herbal and dietary supplement hepatotoxicity, is often passed lightly; however, it can lead to the requirement of a liver transplant or may even cause death because of liver failure. Recently, the American College of Gastroenterology, Chinese Society of Hepatology and European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of DILI have been established, and they will be helpful for guiding clinical treatment decisions. Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method scoring is the most commonly used method to diagnose DILI; however, it has some limitations, such as poor validity and reproducibility. Recently, studies on new biomarkers have been actively carried out, which will help diagnose DILI and predict the prognosis of DILI. It is expected that the development of new therapies such as autophagy inducers and various other technologies of the fourth industrial revolution will be applicable to DILI research.