Long-term safety and effectiveness of berotralstat for hereditary angioedema: The open-label APeX-S study

Hereditary angioedema: current therapeutic management and future approaches

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an account of the focus of therapeutic strategies for hereditary angioedema (HAE), give a brief overview of those used in the past and set aside and toughly discuss those currently available as first line. Further research is ongoing and the future therapeutic approaches that are still in different phases of study will be reviewed as well.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last two decades, major research advancements on HAE pathophysiology and management were made and numerous novel therapeutic options are now available. Compared to the past, drugs available nowadays are more effective, well tolerated, and possibly have a more convenient administration route. Moreover, numerous other drugs with innovative mechanisms of action are under development.

SUMMARY

HAE is a rare genetic disease that if not promptly treated, it can lead to death from asphyxiation. Furthermore, due to its disfiguring and painful manifestations, HAE implies an important burden on the quality of life. Recently, following great research progresses on HAE therapy, evidence-based guidelines on HAE management were released. The therapeutic landscape of HAE is still under florid development, and it is possible novel treatments will remarkably revolutionize HAE management in the future.

Androgen transition and management of hereditary angioedema long-term prophylaxis in real life: a single-center case series

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare and potentially life-threatening disease that manifests clinically as recurrent episodes of swelling affecting multiple anatomical locations. Long-term prophylaxis (LTP) aims to control the disease by preventing HAE attacks. Previously, treatments such as attenuated androgens have been used for LTP, but they have an unfavorable adverse effect profile. Today, these limitations may be overcome by patients transitioning to newer, targeted therapies including oral berotralstat and subcutaneous lanadelumab. This case series reports the transition process between different prophylactic therapies in a family with HAE in a real-world setting.

RESULTS

Four adult patient cases from the same family who underwent transitions in HAE prophylaxis are presented. Three were female and one male. Two patients who transitioned to berotralstat were initially prescribed attenuated androgens. Two patients were not taking LTP at the time of initiating targeted treatment but had previously been prescribed tranexamic acid. The length of transition varied between the patients, with the longest time taken to stabilize on new therapy being 26 months. All patients received regular follow-up in person or by telephone and all four required an adjustment from their initial treatment plan.

CONCLUSIONS

Transitioning between LTP in HAE may help improve control of attacks, avoid unwanted adverse effects, or better cater to individual patient preferences. Newer targeted therapies have been shown to be effective and should be discussed with patients. Shared decision-making is a tool that can aid these discussions. The transition journey between LTP therapies in HAE may not be straightforward and is specific to each patient. Physicians should consider complicating factors such as patient anxieties around changing treatment, adverse effects, preferred routes of administration, and speed of transition. Following patients closely during the transition period helps identify any issues, including difficulties with treatment adherence, and may allow the transition plan to be adapted when necessary.

The real life experience goes on: update after 4 years on the first cohort treated with lanadelumab at our center

Introduction

Lanadelumab is a first-line long-term prophylaxis (LTP) in hereditary angioedema (HAE). Real-life data on its long-term efficacy and safety are limited. It is unknown whether patients using lanadelumab need short-term prophylaxis (STP).

Objectives

To provide 4-year follow-up data for our first 34 patients treating with lanadelumab.

Methods

Patients were assessed for their current injection interval, attacks, treatment satisfaction, disease control (AECT), quality of life impairment (AE-QoL), events that can induce attacks, and the use of STP since the start of their treatment with lanadelumab.

Results

Of 34 patients who started lanadelumab treatment, 32 were still using it after 4 years, with a median injection interval of 33 (range 14-90) days. HAE patients (n=28) reported longer intervals, i.e. 35 (14-90) days, than patients with angioedema due to acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency (n=4, 23 (14-31) days). With their current injection intervals, used for a mean duration of 29 ± 17 months, patients reported a yearly attack rate of 0.3 ± 0.1. More than 70% of patients were attack-free since starting their current injection interval. All patients reported well-controlled disease, i.e. ≥10 points in the AECT; 21 patients had complete control (16 points). AE-QoL scores improved further compared to our initial report, most prominently in the fears/shame domain (-6 points). Treatment satisfaction was very high. No angioedema occurred after 146 of 147 potentially attack-inducing medical procedures without STP.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of lanadelumab in real-life and question the need for STP in patients who use effective LTP.

Hereditary angioedema outcomes in US patients switched from injectable long-term prophylactic medication to oral berotralstat

BACKGROUND

Berotralstat, a first-line, once-daily, oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor for long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE), is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the safety, effectiveness, and impact on treatment satisfaction in patients who switched from injectable long-term prophylactics to oral berotralstat monotherapy (150 mg daily) at US sites in the international open-label APeX-S study.

METHODS

APeX-S was an open-label, Phase II study of berotralstat conducted in 22 countries. Here, we focus on APeX-S patients enrolled at US sites who switched from injectable long-term prophylactics to berotralstat 150 mg once-daily monotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients discontinued lanadelumab (n = 21), subcutaneous C1 esterase inhibitor (n = 11), or intravenous C1 esterase inhibitor (n = 2) and switched to berotralstat 150 mg monotherapy. Vomiting, diarrhea, and upper respiratory tract infection were the most common adverse events (each 11.8%). Mean monthly attack rates were consistently low after the switch to berotralstat. The mean (SEM) monthly attack rate was 0.29 (0.11) at Month 1, 0.48 (0.15) at Month 6, and 0.58 (0.23) at Month 12. The median attack rate was 0 attack/mo throughout 12 months of treatment. Improvements were observed in the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication from baseline to Month 12 after the switch to berotralstat monotherapy, with the greatest improvements in convenience.

CONCLUSION

The transition from injectable prophylactic medication to berotralstat was generally well tolerated. Patients switching to berotralstat monotherapy maintained good control of their HAE symptoms and reported improved treatment satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03472040.

Summary and future of medicine for hereditary angioedema

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal genetic disease for which there are currently nine FDA-approved drugs. This review summarizes drug treatments for HAE based on four therapeutic pathways: inhibiting the contact system, inhibiting bradykinin binding to B2 receptors, supplying missing C1 inhibitors, and inhibiting plasminogen conversion. The review generalizes the clinical use, pharmacological effects and mechanisms of HAE drugs, and it also discusses possible development directions and targets to enhance understanding of HAE and help researchers.

Kallikrein inhibitors for angioedema: the progress of preclinical and early phase studies

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by recurrent edema and predominantly caused by the dysregulation of the kinin-kallikrein system.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript presents the results of preclinical and early clinical trials of newer drugs targeting the dysregulated kinin-kallikrein system. ATN-249 is an oral drug that has shown promising results in preclinical and Phase I studies, and good tolerability in the prophylactic treatment of attacks. KVD900 is also an oral agent developed for the on-demand treatment of HAE attacks. It has shown positive results in Phase I/II studies, with rapid absorption. The third drug, IONIS-PKKRx, is an antisense oligonucleotide targeting plasma prekallikrein mRNA. It has shown a dose-dependent reduction of plasma prekallikrein levels and proenzyme activation in Phase I/II studies, and has shown promising results. STAR-0215 is a long acting anti-activated kallikrein monoclonal antibody. A Phase 1a single ascending dose trial evaluated its safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Lastly, NTLA-2002 is an investigational gene-editing therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The targeted treatment of the dysregulated kinin-kallikrein system with specific inhibitors is promising for the prevention of angioedema attacks. Ongoing phase III studies will provide further insight into the efficacy and long-term safety of these novel therapies, potentially expanding treatment options for HAE treatment.

A phase 2 open-label extension study of prekallikrein inhibition with donidalorsen for hereditary angioedema

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a potentially fatal disease characterized by unpredictable, recurrent, often disabling swelling attacks. In a randomized phase 2 study, donidalorsen reduced HAE attack frequency and improved patient quality-of-life (ISIS721744-CS2, NCT04030598). We report the 2-year interim analysis of the phase 2 open-label extension (OLE) study (ISIS 721744-CS3, NCT04307381).

METHODS

In the OLE, the on-treatment study period consisted of fixed (weeks 1-13, donidalorsen 80 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks [Q4W]) and flexible (weeks 17-105, donidalorsen 80 mg Q4W, 80 mg every 8 weeks [Q8W], or 100 mg Q4W) dosing periods. The primary outcome was incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The secondary outcomes included efficacy, pharmacodynamic, and quality-of-life assessments.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients continued in the OLE study. No serious TEAEs or TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported. Mean monthly HAE attack rate was 96% lower than the study run-in baseline rate (mean, 0.06/month; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.10; median, 0.04 on-treatment vs. mean, 2.70/month; 95% CI, 1.94-3.46; median, 2.29 at baseline). Mean monthly attack rate for Q8W dosing (n = 8) was 0.29 (range, 0.0-1.7; 95% CI, -0.21 to 0.79; median, 0.00). Mean plasma prekallikrein and D-dimer concentrations decreased, and Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire total score improved from baseline to week 105 with donidalorsen.

CONCLUSION

The 2-year interim results of this phase 2 OLE study of donidalorsen in patients with HAE demonstrated no new safety signals; donidalorsen was well tolerated. There was durable efficacy with a 96% reduction in HAE attacks.

Once-Daily Oral Berotralstat for Long-Term Prophylaxis of Hereditary Angioedema: The Open-Label Extension of the APeX-2 Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Berotralstat is a first-line, once-daily oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor approved for prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in patients 12 years or older.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis examined the safety and effectiveness of long-term prophylaxis with berotralstat.

METHODS

APeX-2 was a phase 3, parallel-group, multicenter trial in patients with HAE caused by C1-inhibitor deficiency (NCT03485911). Part 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of 150 and 110 mg of berotralstat over 24 weeks. In part 2, berotralstat-treated patients continued the same treatment, and placebo-treated patients were re-randomized to 150 or 110 mg of berotralstat for 24 weeks. In part 3, all patients were treated with open-label berotralstat at 150 mg, which could be continued for up to an additional 4 years. In part 3, the primary endpoint was long-term safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included HAE attack rates and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients entered part 3. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 82.7% of patients, with most being mild or moderate in severity. The most common TEAEs were nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection, abdominal pain, arthralgia, coronavirus infection, and diarrhea. Drug-related TEAEs occurred in 14.8% of patients, but none were serious. For patients who completed 96 weeks of berotralstat treatment (n = 70), the mean (standard error) change in attack rate from baseline was -2.21 (0.20) attacks/mo. Clinically meaningful improvements in QoL were also observed, with the largest improvements in the functioning domain.

CONCLUSION

Berotralstat was generally well tolerated, provided rapid and sustained reductions in HAE attacks and improved QoL over 96 weeks.

Berotralstat for long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema in Japan: Parts 2 and 3 of the randomized APeX-J Phase III trial

Background

Berotralstat is a once-daily oral inhibitor of plasma kallikrein for the prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) in patients ≥12 years. APeX-J aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of berotralstat in Japan.

Methods

APeX-J was a Phase III trial comprising 3 parts (NCT03873116). Part 1 was a randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of berotralstat 150 or 110 mg over 24 weeks. Part 2 was a 28-week dose-blinded phase in which berotralstat-treated patients continued the same dose and placebo patients were re-randomized to berotralstat 150 or 110 mg. In Part 3, all patients remaining on study received berotralstat 150 mg in an open-label manner for up to an additional 52 weeks. The primary endpoint of Parts 2 and 3 was long-term safety and tolerability, and secondary endpoints examined effectiveness.

Results

Seventeen patients entered Part 2, and 11 continued into Part 3. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 14/17 patients (82.4%) in Parts 2 or 3; the most common were nasopharyngitis, abdominal pain, cystitis, influenza, and vertigo. One patient (5.9%) experienced a drug-related TEAE (Grade 4 increased hepatic enzyme). No drug-related serious TEAEs were reported. For patients who completed 26 months of treatment with berotralstat 150 mg (n = 5), mean (standard error of the mean) monthly HAE attack rates and on-demand medication use decreased from baseline by 1.15 (0.09) attacks/month and 2.8 (0.64) doses/month, respectively. Sustained improvements were also observed in patient quality of life and treatment satisfaction.

Conclusions

Long-term prophylaxis with berotralstat raised no new safety signals and was effective at reducing attacks and improving patient-reported outcomes.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03873116. Registered March 13, 2019. Retrospectively registered.

Assessment of HAE prophylaxis transition from androgen therapy to berotralstat: A subset analysis of the APeX-S trial

Background

Given the recent approval of oral berotralstat in several countries for hereditary angioedema (HAE) prophylaxis, transition from long-term androgens to berotralstat may occur in clinical practice. The open-label, Phase II APeX-S trial provided an opportunity to assess the safety and effectiveness of berotralstat in patients previously treated with differing durations of androgens and shorter transition periods. Therefore, we examined the safety, effectiveness, and impact on quality of life of berotralstat after prior androgen use in patients from the APeX-S trial. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations were also examined because of the association with androgen exposure and hepatic function impairment.

Methods

We conducted an analysis of a subset of 39 patients from the APeX-S trial aged ≥12 years with HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1-INH) with prior androgen use who discontinued androgen therapy within <60 days of receiving berotralstat. Patients received daily berotralstat (150 mg) and were divided into subgroups for this analysis based on time between androgen discontinuation and berotralstat commencement (<14 days versus 14 to <60 days).

Results

Berotralstat was generally well tolerated, with nasopharyngitis (21%), upper respiratory tract infection (15%), nausea (15%), diarrhea (15%), and abdominal pain (10%) being the most common adverse events occurring in ≥10% of the total subset. Only 7/145 (5%) of all APeX-S study patients with a prior history of androgen therapy experienced ALT elevations, 6 of which were grade 3 or 4 toxicities. All 7 patients recovered without sequelae and belonged to the subgroup of patients who transitioned <14 days after discontinuing androgens (n = 18). A reduction in monthly attack rate versus Month 1 was observed over 12 months for all patients who transitioned from prior androgen therapy to berotralstat prophylaxis in under 60 days, irrespective of duration of prior androgen therapy or timing of transition (N = 39). Similarly, meaningful patient-reported improvements from both Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication scores were achieved, with a sustained benefit shown over the berotralstat treatment period.

Conclusions

Berotralstat treatment led to sustained HAE symptom control irrespective of duration of prior androgen therapy or timing of transition. Most patients safely transitioned from long-term androgens to berotralstat. Although occurring in a small group of patients, liver-related adverse events following berotralstat treatment may be associated with a shorter androgen washout period, but further research is required to confirm this.

Clinical trial registration

NCT03472040. Retrospectively registered March 21, 2018.

Hereditary Angioedema: A Review of the Current and Evolving Treatment Landscape

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease characterized by sudden and often unprovoked episodes of swelling that can be potentially life-threatening when it involves the upper airway. The treatment options for both acute episodes of HAE and LTP, used to minimize the frequency and severity of angioedema attacks, were limited historically to very few options, had considerable side effects, and/or had considerable burden of treatment. Fortunately, through the elucidation of the pathophysiology of HAE, the development of newer targeted therapies has been possible both for acute therapy and long-term prophylaxis and even more are on the horizon. Because of the rapid development of these therapies, it can be challenging for clinicians to keep abreast of newer and developing treatments for HAE. This review article will outline the current and potential future treatments for HAE. It will also highlight important considerations when treating special HAE patient populations including women and pediatric patients.

A safety review of prophylaxis drugs for adolescent patients with hereditary angioedema

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by recurrent subcutaneously and/or submucosally localized edematous swellings. The first symptoms often appear in childhood, and they may become more frequent and severe in puberty. Since the appearance of HAE attacks is unpredictable regarding the localization and the frequency, the attacks put a significant burden on the patients and crucially impacts their quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

This review article analyzes the safety data acquired from the clinical trials conducted with the currently available medicinal products for the prophylactic treatment of hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency and the safety data of observatory studies based on clinical practice. A review of the published literature was conducted using the PubMed database, clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, and abstracts published at scientific conferences.

EXPERT OPINION

The currently available therapeutic products have a good safety and efficiency profile and the international guidelines recommend them as first-line treatments. The choice should be made based on the evaluation of the availability and the preference of the patient.

Prevention of Recurrent Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE): Berotralstat and Its Oral Bioavailability

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a condition characterized by episodes of cutaneous and submucosal edema. Angioedema of the extremities and abdominal attacks are the most common manifestations of the disease. It can also affect the upper airways with the potential of becoming life-threatening. The two most common causes of HAE are a deficiency of C1 inhibitor (classified as type 1 HAE) or a dysfunction of C1 inhibitor (type 2 HAE). A malfunction or deficiency of C1 inhibitor leads to an overactivated plasma kallikrein (an inflammatory vasoactive peptide), that increases bradykinin, mediating the angioedema episodes in patients with HAE. To minimize the difficulties of this pathology and to improve patients' quality of life, prevention of this condition is essential. Berotralstat is a unique option for oral administration for routine prophylaxis. This drug acts by binding to kallikrein and reducing its plasma activity, lowering bradykinin levels. Open-label studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of a single daily dose of berotralstat 150 mg in preventing HAE attacks. This review aims to examine studies performed to elucidate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of berotralstat.

Effectiveness and safety of lanadelumab in ethnic and racial minority subgroups of patients with hereditary angioedema: results from phase 3 studies

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted disparities in healthcare, particularly in the United States, even though disparities have existed since the organization of the modern healthcare system. Recruitment of patients from racial and ethnic minority groups is often minimal in phase 3 clinical trials, and is further exacerbated in the case of trials for rare diseases such as hereditary angioedema (HAE). This can lead to a gap in the understanding of minority patients’ experiences with these diseases and their response to potential treatment options.

Methods

We reviewed data from phase 3 double-blind (HELP) and open-label extension (HELP OLE) trials of lanadelumab, a monoclonal antibody developed for long-term prophylaxis against attacks of HAE. Efficacy (attack rate reduction) and safety (adverse events) results from White patients were compared descriptively to those from Hispanic/Latino patients, Black/African Americans, and other minority Americans.

Results

Not surprisingly, few minorities were recruited across both studies: 9.5% Black, 2.4% Asian, and 7.1% Hispanic/Latino versus 88.1% White and 91.7% non-Hispanic/non-Latino received lanadelumab in HELP, and 4.7% Black, 0.9% Asian, 0.9% other, and 6.1% Hispanic/Latino versus 93.4% White and 93.4% non-Hispanic/non-Latino were enrolled in HELP OLE. Although these studies were conducted in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Jordan, all minorities were from the United States. Despite the number of minority patients being far less than expected for the population, there was no evidence that either efficacy or adverse event profiles differed between ethnic or racial groups.

Conclusions

The HELP and HELP OLE studies described herein recruited far fewer minorities than would be ideal to represent these populations. However, evidence suggests that the effectiveness and tolerance of lanadelumab are similar between the groups. Nonetheless, the disparity in recruitment into research for minorities has significant room for improvement.

Trial registration NCT02586805, registered 26 October 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02586805. NCT02741596, registered 18 April 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02741596.

Shared decision-making in the management of hereditary angioedema: An analysis of patient and physician perspectives

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by recurrent, localized episodes of edema. Current treatment guidelines highlight the importance of shared decision-making (SDM) during implementation of HAE management plans. Objective: To determine what constitutes a successful SDM approach in HAE management. Method: Qualitative telephone interviews, which lasted ∼1 hour, were conducted with four HAE physicians and four patients from the APeX-S trial. The physicians were asked to describe the structure and/or content of typical HAE prophylaxis consultations and factors to consider when selecting medications for long-term treatment. Insights from these interviews were used to develop an SDM process diagram. The patients were interviewed to assess how closely the diagram fit their perspectives on the HAE consultation and their involvement in decisions that concerned their care. Interview transcripts were assessed by the interviewer to determine the degree of SDM involvement in each consultation by using qualitative criteria from the literature. Results: Two physicians followed a high-SDM format, and one physician used a "blended" approach. The fourth physician followed a standard (low SDM) format. A successful SDM approach was found to require pre-visit planning, a commitment on behalf of the physician to use SDM methods to learn more about the patient, and empowerment of the patient to reflect on and vocalize his or her preferences and/or needs. Patients engaged in SDM were more likely to proactively request a treatment switch. Conclusion: The adoption of validated HAE-specific treatment decision aids, as well as measures to change the mindsets of patients and physicians, may facilitate successful implementation of SDM in HAE.Clinical Trial Registration: The APeX-S trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03472040).

The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema – The 2021 revision and update

Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) is a rare and disabling disease for which early diagnosis and effective therapy are critical. This revision and update of the global WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE provides up-to-date guidance for the management of HAE. For this update and revision of the guideline, an international panel of experts reviewed the existing evidence, developed 28 recommendations, and established consensus by an online DELPHI process. The goal of these recommendations and guideline is to help physicians and their patients in making rational decisions in the management of HAE with deficient C1-inhibitor (type 1) and HAE with dysfunctional C1-inhibitor (type 2), by providing guidance on common and important clinical issues, such as: 1) How should HAE be diagnosed? 2) When should HAE patients receive prophylactic on top of on-demand treatment and what treatments should be used? 3) What are the goals of treatment? 4) Should HAE management be different for special HAE patient groups such as children or pregnant/breast feeding women? 5) How should HAE patients monitor their disease activity, impact, and control? It is also the intention of this guideline to help establish global standards for the management of HAE and to encourage and facilitate the use of recommended diagnostics and therapies for all patients.

Picomolar Sensitivity Analysis of Multiple Bradykinin-Related Peptides in the Blood Plasma of Patients With Hereditary Angioedema in Remission: A Pilot Study

Background

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal dominant disease; the most well understood forms concern the haplodeficiency of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) and a gain of function mutation of factor XII (FXII). The acute forms of these conditions are mediated by an excessive bradykinin (BK) formation by plasma kallikrein.

Methods

A validated LC-MS/MS platform of picomolar sensitivity developed for the analysis of eleven bradykinin-related peptides was applied to the plasma of HAE-C1INH and HAE-FXII sampled during remission.

Results

In HAE-C1INH plasma, the concentrations of the relatively stable BK1−5 fragment (mean ± S.E.M.: 12.0 ± 4.2 pmol/L), of BK2−9 (0.7 ± 0.2 pmol/L) and of the sums of BK and its tested fragments (18.0 ± 6.4 pmol/L) are significantly greater than those recorded in the plasma of healthy volunteers (1.9 ± 0.6, 0.03 ± 0.03 and 4.3 ± 0.8 pmol/L, respectively), consistent with the previous evidence of permanent plasma kallikrein activity in this disease. Kinin levels in the plasma of HAE-FXII patients did not differ from controls, suggesting that triggering factors for contact system activation are not active during remission.

Conclusion

BK1−5, BK2−9 and the sum of BK and its fragments determined by the sensitive LC-MS/MS technique are proposed as potential biomarkers of HAE-C1INH in remission while this was not applicable to HAE-FXII patients.

The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema-The 2021 revision and update

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare and disabling disease for which early diagnosis and effective therapy are critical. This revision and update of the global WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE provides up-to-date guidance for the management of HAE. For this update and revision of the guideline, an international panel of experts reviewed the existing evidence, developed 28 recommendations, and established consensus by an online DELPHI process. The goal of these recommendations and guideline is to help physicians and their patients in making rational decisions in the management of HAE with deficient C1 inhibitor (type 1) and HAE with dysfunctional C1 inhibitor (type 2), by providing guidance on common and important clinical issues, such as: (1) How should HAE be diagnosed? (2) When should HAE patients receive prophylactic on top of on-demand treatment and what treatments should be used? (3) What are the goals of treatment? (4) Should HAE management be different for special HAE patient groups such as children or pregnant/breast-feeding women? and (5) How should HAE patients monitor their disease activity, impact, and control? It is also the intention of this guideline to help establish global standards for the management of HAE and to encourage and facilitate the use of recommended diagnostics and therapies for all patients.

Angioedema and Fatty Acids

Angioedema is a life-threatening emergency event that is associated with bradykinin and histamine-mediated cascades. Although bradykinin-mediated angioedema currently has specific therapeutic options, angioedema is sometimes intractable with current treatments, especially histamine-mediated angioedema, suggesting that some other mediators might contribute to the development of angioedema. Fatty acids are an essential fuel and cell component, and act as a mediator in physiological and pathological human diseases. Recent updates of studies revealed that these fatty acids are involved in vascular permeability and vasodilation, in addition to bradykinin and histamine-mediated reactions. This review summarizes each fatty acid’s function and the specific receptor signaling responses in blood vessels, and focuses on the possible pathogenetic role of fatty acids in angioedema.