1
|
Bannon M, Thivalapill N, Fithian E, Jiang J, Herbert L, Fox S, Warren C, Sharma H, Mahdavinia M, Gupta R, Bilaver L, Assa'Ad A. Differences in Familiarity with Oral Immunotherapy Among Caregivers of White and Black Food-Allergic Children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2024:S1081-1206(24)00534-9. [PMID: 39179104 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 08/15/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Potential racial and ethnic disparities related to oral immunotherapy (OIT) have not been fully described among children with food allergy (FA). OBJECTIVE To characterize the differences in attitudes towards, familiarity with, and utilization of OIT among non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Hispanic or Latino (H/L) caregivers of children with FA. METHODS Surveys were administered to the caregivers of children enrolled in Food Allergy Outcomes Related to White and African American Racial Differences (FORWARD), a prospective, multisite cohort of children with FA. The distribution of responses by caregiver-reported race and ethnicity was described using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous outcomes and chi-squared tests for categorical outcomes. A logistic regression model was used to determine associations between familiarity with OIT as a treatment option and various other covariates. RESULTS NHB and H/L respondents were more frequently not familiar with OIT compared to NHW responders (54.3% and 62.5% vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001). This finding remained true, even after adjusting for household income (OR: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.1, 0.4 for NHB participants and OR: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.0, 0.3 for H/L participants). NHB and H/L participants more frequently reported that they had never heard of OIT before the survey compared to NHW participants (76.7% and 50.0% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.001). None of the NHB and H/L respondents initiated OIT compared to 14.8% of NHW participants (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In the FORWARD cohort, familiarity with OIT was lower among caregivers of minoritized racial and ethnic groups, even after adjusting for household income.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Bannon
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| | - Neil Thivalapill
- Center for Food Allergy & Asthma Research; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eirene Fithian
- Center for Food Allergy & Asthma Research; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jialing Jiang
- Center for Food Allergy & Asthma Research; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Linda Herbert
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, D.C.; Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, D.C
| | - Susan Fox
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Christopher Warren
- Center for Food Allergy & Asthma Research; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Hemant Sharma
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, D.C.; Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, D.C
| | - Mahboobeh Mahdavinia
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ruchi Gupta
- Center for Food Allergy & Asthma Research; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lucy Bilaver
- Center for Food Allergy & Asthma Research; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Amal Assa'Ad
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Randhawa I, Marsteller N. Long-term efficacy and safety of cow's milk anaphylaxis specific immunotherapy: Allergen unresponsiveness via the Tolerance Induction Program. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. GLOBAL 2024; 3:100285. [PMID: 38983112 PMCID: PMC11231699 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
Background Tolerance Induction Program (TIP) immunotherapy applies machine learning contextualized on immunologic and food protein data sets. TIP has established efficacy toward peanut allergy. This form of treatment demonstrates equal efficacy toward cow's milk anaphylaxis. TIP maintains remission outcomes defined as a minimum of 7 days of allergen unresponsiveness to high-dose protein exposures. Furthermore, remission patients openly consume unrestricted amounts of dairy protein. Objective We sought to assess the rate of decline in specific IgE specific whole and component-resolved diagnostics following 1 year of TIP milk immunotherapy. Methods The study comprised 214 cow milk anaphylactic children who underwent TIP at the Translational Pulmonary & Immunology Research Center/Food Allergy Institute. Postintervention changes in cow milk specific IgE, component-resolved diagnostics, and specific IgG4 were assessed. Results After 1 year of 10-g dairy protein weekly sustained unresponsiveness, eosinophil count decreased from 558.38 to 409.26 cells/μL, the mean cow milk IgE decreased from 16.91 to 9.10 kU/L, the mean boiled cow milk IgE decreased from 12.89 to 6.03 kU/L, the mean Bos D4 decreased from 7.38 to 3.52 kU/L, the mean Bos D5 decreased from 6.79 to 3.16 kU/L, and the mean Bos D8 decreased from 13.55 to 6.62 kU/L. Adverse events were rare. Conclusions TIP cow milk immunotherapy significantly reduced cow milk specific IgE and component-resolved diagnostics while increasing specific IgG4 in cow milk anaphylactic children. TIP demonstrates safety and clinical efficacy in cow milk anaphylaxis treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nathan Marsteller
- Translational Pulmonary & Immunology Research Center, Long Beach, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zemelka-Wiacek M, Agache I, Akdis CA, Akdis M, Casale TB, Dramburg S, Jahnz-Różyk K, Kosowska A, Matricardi PM, Pfaar O, Shamji MH, Jutel M. Hot topics in allergen immunotherapy, 2023: Current status and future perspective. Allergy 2024; 79:823-842. [PMID: 37984449 DOI: 10.1111/all.15945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
The importance of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is multifaceted, encompassing both clinical and quality-of-life improvements and cost-effectiveness in the long term. Key mechanisms of allergen tolerance induced by AIT include changes in memory type allergen-specific T- and B-cell responses towards a regulatory phenotype with decreased Type 2 responses, suppression of allergen-specific IgE and increased IgG1 and IgG4, decreased mast cell and eosinophil numbers in allergic tissues and increased activation thresholds. The potential of novel patient enrolment strategies for AIT is taking into account recent advances in biomarkers discoveries, molecular allergy diagnostics and mobile health applications contributing to a personalized approach enhancement that can increase AIT efficacy and compliance. Artificial intelligence can help manage and interpret complex and heterogeneous data, including big data from omics and non-omics research, potentially predict disease subtypes, identify biomarkers and monitor patient responses to AIT. Novel AIT preparations, such as synthetic compounds, innovative carrier systems and adjuvants, are also of great promise. Advances in clinical trial models, including adaptive, complex and hybrid designs as well as real-world evidence, allow more flexibility and cost reduction. The analyses of AIT cost-effectiveness show a clear long-term advantage compared to pharmacotherapy. Important research questions, such as defining clinical endpoints, biomarkers of patient selection and efficacy, mechanisms and the modulation of the placebo effect and alternatives to conventional field trials, including allergen exposure chamber studies are still to be elucidated. This review demonstrates that AIT is still in its growth phase and shows immense development prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - Cezmi A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Mübeccel Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Thomas B Casale
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics and Division of Allergy and Immunology, Joy McCann Culverhouse Clinical Research Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Stephanie Dramburg
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Care, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karina Jahnz-Różyk
- Department of Internal Diseases, Pneumonology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Kosowska
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paolo M Matricardi
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Care, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Section of Rhinology and Allergy, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laubach S, Kim EH, Greenhawt M, Bailey S, Anagnostou A. A Review of Shared Decision-Making, Published Protocols, and Post-desensitization Strategies in Oral Immunotherapy (OIT). Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2024; 24:173-197. [PMID: 38441821 PMCID: PMC11008063 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-024-01132-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this review is to highlight key published oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocols and post-desensitization strategies for the major food allergens and to cover important concepts to consider when evaluating OIT for food-allergic patients. Shared decision-making should help identify patient and family values which will help influence the type of evidence-based protocol and maintenance strategy to use. RECENT FINDINGS With food OIT emerging as a treatment option, there is a pressing need for patients, physicians, and other providers to have a nuanced understanding of the management choices available to them. There are now randomized controlled trials (RCT) of OIT for peanut, egg, milk, and wheat, and reports of cohorts of patients who have undergone OIT for tree nuts and sesame clinically. The current published protocols contain significant diversity in terms of starting dose, build-up schedule, maintenance dose, and even the product used for desensitization. Emerging data can help direct the long-term maintenance strategy for patients on OIT. Based on patient and family values elicited through the shared decision-making process, an OIT protocol may be selected that balances the level of desensitization, potential side effects, frequency of clinic visits, and potential to induce sustained unresponsiveness, among other factors. Once maintenance dosing is reached, most patients will need to maintain regular exposure to the food allergen to remain desensitized. The option to transition to commercial food products with equivalent amounts of food protein as the OIT maintenance dose would simplify the dosing process and perhaps improve palatability as well. Less frequent or decreased OIT dosing can provide practical benefits but may affect the level of desensitization and safety for some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Laubach
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
- Division of Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | - Edwin H Kim
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Food Challenge and Research Unit, Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sally Bailey
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- Allergy Associates of Northern Virginia, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Aikaterini Anagnostou
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Immunology, Allergy and Retrovirology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Section of Allergy, Immunology & Retrovirology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sánchez-Fernández S, Lasa EM, Terrados S, Sola-Martínez FJ, Martínez-Molina S, López de Calle M, Cabrera-Freitag P, Goikoetxea MJ. Mobile App/Web Platform for Monitoring Food Oral Immunotherapy in Children: Longitudinal Clinical Validation Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2024; 7:e54163. [PMID: 38477961 DOI: 10.2196/54163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Milk and egg allergies significantly impact the quality of life, particularly in children. In this regard, food oral immunotherapy (OIT) has emerged as an effective treatment option; however, the occurrence of frequent adverse reactions poses a challenge, necessitating close monitoring during treatment. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the ability of a new mobile/web app called OITcontrol to monitor milk and egg OIT. METHODS Patients undergoing milk or egg OIT were recruited and divided into 2 groups: the active group used the OITcontrol app in conjunction with standard written monitoring methods, whereas the control group relied solely on written diaries. Investigators documented hospital doses, hospital reactions, and administered treatments on the website. Patients recorded their daily allergen home-dose intake, home reactions, and administered treatments using the app. The following variables were compared between both groups: number and severity of hospital and reported home reactions, patient's adhesion to the OITcontrol app or written diary or both in terms of daily home-dose intake and home reactions recording, and treatment and dose adjustment compliance at home in case of reaction. RESULTS Sixteen patients were assigned to be monitored using the OITcontrol app along with additional written methods (active group), while 14 patients relied solely on a written paper diary (control group). A similar distribution was observed in terms of sex, age, basal characteristics, allergen treated in OIT, premedication, and sensitization profile. Active patients reported a comparable number of hospital and home reactions compared with the control group. In terms of recording system usage, 13/16 (81%) active patients used the OITcontrol app, while 10/14 (71%) control patients relied on the written diary. Among active patients, 6/16 (38%) used both methods, and 1 active patient used only written methods. However, control patients recorded home reactions more frequently than active patients (P=.009). Among active patients, the app was the preferred method for recording reactions (59/86, 69%), compared with the written diary (15/86, 17%) or both methods (12/86, 14%; P<.001). Treatment compliance in home-recorded reactions was similar between both groups (P=.15). However, treatment indications after an adverse reaction were more frequently followed (P=.04) in reactions recorded solely in the app (36/59, 61%) than in the written diary (29/71, 41%) or both systems (4/12, 33%). Moreover, compliance with dose adjustments after a moderate-severe reaction in home-recorded reactions was higher in the active group than in the control group (P<.001). Home reactions recorded only in the app (16/19, 84%) were more likely to follow dose adjustments (P<.001) than those recorded in the written diary (3/20, 15%) or using both methods (2/3, 67%). CONCLUSIONS The OITcontrol app appears to be a valuable tool for monitoring OIT treatment in children with food allergies. It proves to be a suitable method for recording daily home dose intakes and reactions, and it seems to enhance adherence to treatment indications following an adverse reaction as well as compliance with dose adjustments in home reactions. However, additional studies are necessary to comprehensively grasp the benefits and limitations of using the OITcontrol app in the management of OIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eva María Lasa
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Allergy Service, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Soledad Terrados
- Department of Pediatric Allergy, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Sara Martínez-Molina
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Allergy Service, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Marta López de Calle
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Paula Cabrera-Freitag
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Allergy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Goikoetxea
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- RICORS Red De Enfermedades Inflamatorias - RD21/0002/0028, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Upton JEM, Wong D, Nowak-Wegrzyn A. Baked milk and egg diets revisited. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2024; 132:328-336.e5. [PMID: 38151097 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Most children with milk and egg allergy are nonreactive to modified forms of milk and egg in bakery products such as muffins because of conformational changes in proteins. These baked milk (BM) and baked egg (BE) diets have become commonplace in the management of milk and egg allergy, respectively. Current laboratory- and skin test-based diagnostic approaches remain limited in their ability to predict BM/BE tolerance, resulting in various approaches to introduce these foods. One approach to introduce BM/BE is to offer a medically supervised oral food challenge and then advise dietary introduction of baked products for children who have tolerance. Another approach is adapted from a home-based protocol of graded ingestion of BM or BE originally intended for non-IgE mediated allergy, often referred to as a "ladder." The ladder advises home ingestion of increasing amounts of BM or BE. For children who have allergy to BM or BE, the ladder is essentially oral immunotherapy, although not always labeled or recognized as such. Risk assessment and education of patients suitable for home introduction are essential. A home approach that may be called a ladder can also be used to escalate diets after demonstrated tolerance of baked forms by introducing lesser cooked forms of milk or egg after tolerating BM or BE. A randomized controlled trial provided clear evidence that baked diets can hasten the resolution of IgE-mediated milk allergy. Moreover, BM/BE foods have an emerging role in the treatment of non-IgE-mediated allergy. There is tangential evidence for BM and BE diets in the prevention of IgE-mediated allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E M Upton
- SickKids Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Programme, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Dennis Wong
- SickKids Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Programme, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- Department of Pediatrics, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, NYU R. Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hervé PL, Dioszeghy V, Matthews K, Bee KJ, Campbell DE, Sampson HA. Recent advances in epicutaneous immunotherapy and potential applications in food allergy. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2023; 4:1290003. [PMID: 37965375 PMCID: PMC10641725 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1290003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Given the potent immunological properties of the skin, epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) emerges as a promising treatment approach for inducing immune tolerance, particularly for food allergies. Targeting the highly immunocompetent, non-vascularized epidermis allows for the application of microgram amounts of allergen while significantly reducing the risk of allergen passage into the bloodstream, thus limiting systemic allergen exposure and distribution. This makes EPIT highly suitable for the treatment of potentially life-threatening allergies such as food allergies. Multiple approaches to EPIT are currently under investigation for the treatment of food allergy, and these include the use of allergen-coated microneedles, application of allergen on the skin pretreated by tape stripping, abrasion or laser-mediated microperforation, or the application of allergen on the intact skin using an occlusive epicutaneous system. To date, the most clinically advanced approach to EPIT is the Viaskin technology platform. Viaskin is an occlusive epicutaneous system (patch) containing dried native allergen extracts, without adjuvants, which relies on frequent application for the progressive passage of small amounts of allergen to the epidermis through occlusion of the intact skin. Numerous preclinical studies of Viaskin have demonstrated that this particular approach to EPIT can induce potent and long-lasting T-regulatory cells with broad homing capabilities, which can exert their suppressive effects in multiple organs and ameliorate immune responses from different routes of allergen exposure. Clinical trials of the Viaskin patch have studied the efficacy and safety for the treatment of life-threatening allergies in younger patients, at an age when allergic diseases start to occur. Moreover, this treatment approach is designed to provide a non-invasive therapy with no restrictions on daily activities. Taken together, the preclinical and clinical data on the use of EPIT support the continued investigation of this therapeutic approach to provide improved treatment options for patients with allergic disorders in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Dianne E. Campbell
- DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hugh A. Sampson
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|