1
|
Tyagi P, Hafron J, Kaufman J, Chancellor M. Enhancing Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Bladder Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Injectable vs. Intravesical Administration. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:4945. [PMID: 38732167 PMCID: PMC11084450 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25094945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) presents a significant global health burden, characterized by high recurrence rates post-initial treatment. Gender differences in BC prevalence and response to therapy emphasize the importance of personalized treatment strategies. While Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) remains a cornerstone of BC therapy, resistance poses a challenge, necessitating alternative strategies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise, yet systemic toxicity raises concern. Intravesical administration of ICIs offers a potential solution, with recent studies demonstrating the feasibility and efficacy of intravesical pembrolizumab. Although systemic toxicity remains a concern, its localized administration may mitigate adverse events. Additionally, liposomal delivery of ICIs exhibits promises in enhancing drug penetration and reducing toxicity. Novel imaging modalities compatible with Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) and capable of predicting high-grade bladder cancer can aid the pre-operative shared decision making of patient and surgeon. Future research should focus on refining treatment approaches, optimizing dosing regimens, and leveraging advanced imaging techniques to improve patient outcomes. In conclusion, intravesical immunotherapy presents a promising avenue for BC treatment, offering enhanced therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing systemic toxicity. Continued research efforts are essential to validate these findings and optimize intravesical immunotherapy's role in BC management, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pradeep Tyagi
- Departments of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA;
| | - Jason Hafron
- Michigan Institute of Urology, Troy, MI 48084, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schubert T, Motosugi U, Kinner S, Colgan TJ, Sharma SD, Hetzel S, Wells S, Campo CA, Reeder SB. Crossover comparison of ferumoxytol and gadobenate dimeglumine for abdominal MR-angiography at 3.0 tesla: Effects of contrast bolus length and flip angle. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 45:1617-1626. [PMID: 27862577 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Ferumoxytol (FE) has gained interest as an alternative to gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate and optimize ferumoxytol dose and T1 weighting, in comparison to a conventional GBCA. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve healthy volunteers (six women / six men, mean age 44.3 years) were recruited for this study. Scanning was performed on a clinical 3 Tesla (T) MRI system. Gadobenate dimeglumine (GD)-enhanced MRA was performed followed by FE-enhanced MRA 1 month later. Volunteers were randomly assigned to a diluted (n = 6) or undiluted (n = 6) dose of GD (0.1 mmol/kg), and to FE doses of 4 mg/kg (n = 6) or 2 mg/kg (n = 6). First pass and steady-state MRA were performed for GD- and FE-enhanced MRA. Flip-angle optimization was performed after FE administration. Quantitative analysis included relative contrast-to-noise ratio (relCNR) measurements for all acquisitions. First pass GD- and FE-enhanced MRA images were evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS RelCNR was significantly higher with undiluted GD (31.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7-35.9) compared with diluted GD (16.2; 95% CI, 12.2-20.3; P = 0.001) and both 4 mg/kg FE (12.5; 95% CI, 8.5-16.4; P < 0.001) and 2 mg/kg FE (9.1; 95% CI, 5.1-13.2; P < 0.001) during first pass. Relative CNR did not decrease with FE 5 min postinjection compared with GD. Flip-angle analysis revealed relative CNR-peaks at 30° for FE 4 mg/kg and at 20° for FE 2 mg/kg. Diluted GD (P = 0.013) and FE 4 mg/kg (P = 0.01) revealed significantly higher image quality scores compared with undiluted GD during first pass. CONCLUSION This study shows an equivalent image quality of FE and GD for first pass MRA even though GD showed significantly higher relative CNR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;45:1617-1626.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Schubert
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Utaroh Motosugi
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Sonja Kinner
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Timothy J Colgan
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Samir D Sharma
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Scott Hetzel
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Shane Wells
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Camilo A Campo
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Scott B Reeder
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|