Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal

Predicting Underestimation of Invasive Cancer in Patients with Core-Needle-Biopsy-Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Deep Learning Algorithms

The prediction of an occult invasive component in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) before surgery is of clinical importance because the treatment strategies are different between pure DCIS without invasive component and upgraded DCIS. We demonstrated the potential of using deep learning models for differentiating between upgraded versus pure DCIS in DCIS diagnosed by core-needle biopsy. Preoperative axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 352 lesions were used to train, validate, and test three different types of deep learning models. The highest performance was achieved by Recurrent Residual Convolutional Neural Network using Regions of Interest (ROIs) with an accuracy of 75.0% and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.796. Our results suggest that the deep learning approach may provide an assisting tool to predict the histologic upgrade of DCIS and provide personalized treatment strategies to patients with underestimated invasive disease.

Prediction of the histologic upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ using a combined radiomics and machine learning approach based on breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Objective

To investigate whether support vector machine (SVM) trained with radiomics features based on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could predict the upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed by core needle biopsy (CNB) after surgical excision.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included a total of 349 lesions from 346 female patients (mean age, 54 years) diagnosed with DCIS by CNB between January 2011 and December 2017. Based on histological confirmation after surgery, the patients were divided into pure (n = 198, 56.7%) and upgraded DCIS (n = 151, 43.3%). The entire dataset was randomly split to training (80%) and test sets (20%). Radiomics features were extracted from the intratumor region-of-interest, which was semi-automatically drawn by two radiologists, based on the first subtraction images from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection. A 4-fold cross validation was applied to the training set to determine the combination of features used to train SVM for classification between pure and upgraded DCIS. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the model performance using the hold-out test set.

Results

The model trained with 9 features (Energy, Skewness, Surface Area to Volume ratio, Gray Level Non Uniformity, Kurtosis, Dependence Variance, Maximum 2D diameter Column, Sphericity, and Large Area Emphasis) demonstrated the highest 4-fold mean validation accuracy and AUC of 0.724 (95% CI, 0.619–0.829) and 0.742 (0.623–0.860), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC using the test set were 0.733 (0.575–0.892) and 0.7 (0.558–0.842), 0.714 (0.608–0.820) and 0.767 (0.651–0.882), respectively.

Conclusion

Our study suggested that the combined radiomics and machine learning approach based on preoperative breast MRI may provide an assisting tool to predict the histologic upgrade of DCIS.

Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Analysis of 270 Consecutive Patients Treated in a 9-Year Period

Simple Summary

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for 20 to 25% of all breast cancers and its incidence of progression to invasive ductal carcinoma is at least 13 to 50%. The aim of our retrospective observational analysis is to review the issues of this histological type of cancer. We confirmed in a wide population of 270 consecutive patients who underwent surgery in a single institute that the management of DCIS can be difficult and particularly complex. There are many variables to be taken into consideration such as the choice of the diagnostic and bioptical technique. This delicate management must be carried out in specialized centres such as Breast Units involving multiple professional figures to define and guarantee the best possible treatment for each patient.

Abstract

Introduction: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an intraductal neoplastic proliferation of epithelial cells that are confined within the basement membrane of the breast ductal system. This retrospective observational analysis aims at reviewing the issues of this histological type of cancer. Materials and methods: Patients treated for DCIS between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018 were identified from a retrospective database. The patients were divided into two groups of 5 years each, the first group including patients treated from 2009 to 2013, and the second group including patients treated from 2014 to 2018. Once the database was completed, we performed a statistical analysis to see if there were significant differences among the 2 periods. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software for Windows, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: 3586 female patients were treated for breast cancer over the 9-year study period (1469 patients from 2009 to 2013 and 2117 from 2014 to 2018), of which 270 (7.53%) had pure DCIS in the final pathology. The median age of diagnosis was 59-year-old (range 36–86). In the first period, 81 (5.5%) women out of 1469 had DCIS in the final pathology, in the second, 189 (8.9%) out of 2117 had DCIS in the final pathology with a statistically significant increase (p = 0.0001). From 2009 to 2013, only 38 (46.9%) were in stage 0 (correct DCIS diagnosis) while in the second period, 125 (66.1%) were included in this stage. The number of patients included in clinical stage 0 increased significantly (p = 0.004). In the first period, 48 (59.3%) specimen margins were at a greater or equal distance than 2 mm (negative margins), between 2014 and 2018; 137 (72.5%) had negative margins. Between 2014 and 2018 the number of DCIS patients with positive margins decreased significantly (p = 0.02) compared to the first period examined. The mastectomies number increased significantly (p = 0.008) between the 2 periods, while the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) numbers had no differences (p = 0.29). For both periods analysed all the 253 patients who underwent the follow up are currently living and free of disease. We have conventionally excluded the 17 patients whose data were lost. Conclusion: The choice of the newest imaging techniques and the most suitable biopsy method allows a better pre-operative diagnosis of the DCIS. Surgical treatment must be targeted to the patient and a multidisciplinary approach discussed in the Breast Unit centres.

The usefulness of ultrafast MRI evaluation for predicting histologic upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of ultrafast MRI with conventional dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI for predicting histologic upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 53 biopsy-proven DCIS lesions in 53 patients and divided into two groups based on postoperative histopathologic diagnoses: non-upgrade and upgrade to invasive cancer groups. Imaging features of conventional DCE-MRI and ultrafast MRI, and histopathologic features were reviewed and compared between the two groups. Interobserver agreements for MRI features were analyzed by two radiologists. The radiologic and histopathologic parameters for predicting histologic upgrade of DCIS were identified using multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

Seventeen lesions (32.1 %) were histologically upgraded to invasive cancer after surgery. The interobserver agreement for ultrafast MRI parameters was excellent, and maximum slope (MS) and maximum enhancement (ME) showed the highest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.907 and 0.897, respectively). The upgrade group showed significantly larger lesion size on MRI (median 40 mm [25^th to 75^th percentiles 16.0-83.0] vs. 18.5 mm [10.0-29.8], p < 0.001), higher MS (12.1 %/s [8.2-13.9] vs. 8.7 %/s [6.4-11.1], p = 0.004), and higher ME (236.5 % [153.7-253.7] vs. 175.4 % [140.1-207.7], p = 0.027) than non-upgrade group. Lesion size (≥ 20 mm), MS (> 11.5 %), and ME (> 229.1 %) were significant predictors for histologic upgrade, which could predict 10 cases of histologic upgrade (10/17, 58.8 %) without a false-positive case.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative ultrafast MRI with conventional DCE-MRI could be useful in management decisions for DCIS patients.

Ductal carcinoma in situ current trends, controversies, and review of literature

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor, non-invasive malignancy confined within the basement membrane of the breast ductal system. There is a wide variation in the natural history of DCIS with an estimated incidence of progression to invasive ductal carcinoma being at least 13%-50% over a range of 10 or more years after initial diagnosis. Regardless of the treatment strategy, long-term survival is excellent. The controversy surrounding DCIS relates to preventing under-treatment, while also avoiding unnecessary treatments. In this article, we review the incidence, presentation, management options and surveillance of DCIS. Furthermore, we address several current controversies related to the management of DCIS, including margin status, sentinel node biopsy, hormonal therapy, the role of radiation in breast conservation surgery, and various risk stratification schemes.

Article Commentary: Surgical Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer

This article offers a review of the literature on current surgical management of the axilla in breast cancer. This includes the decision-making process involved in clinically node-negative patients versus clinically node-positive patients, with discussion of the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary dissection. It also examines the surgical axillary management of patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This article will help update practicing surgeons on the evolving research and guidelines for the management of breast cancer axillary disease.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically detected ductal carcinoma in situ

AIM: To study the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (CD-DCIS).

METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 20 patients with an initial diagnosis of pure DCIS by an image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) between June 2006 and June 2012 was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital. The accuracy of performing SLNB in CD-DCIS, the rate of sentinel and non-sentinel nodal metastasis, and the histologic underestimation rate of invasive cancer at initial diagnosis were analyzed. The inclusion criteria were a preoperative diagnosis of pure DCIS with no evidence of invasion. We excluded any patient with evidence of microinvasion or invasion. There were two cases of mammographically detected DCIS and 18 cases of CD-DCIS. All our patients were diagnosed by an image-guided CNB except two patients who were diagnosed by fine needle aspiration (FNA). All patients underwent breast surgery, SLNB, and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if the SLN was positive.

RESULTS: Twenty patients with an initial diagnosis of pure DCIS underwent SLNB, 2 of whom had an ALND. The mean age of the patients was 49.7 years (range, 35-70). Twelve patients (60%) were premenopausal and 8 (40%) were postmenopausal. CNB was the diagnostic procedure for 18 patients, and 2 who were diagnosed by FNA were excluded from the calculation of the underestimation rate. Two out of 20 had a positive SLNB and underwent an ALND and neither had additional non sentinel lymph node metastasis. Both the sentinel visualization rate and the intraoperative sentinel identification rate were 100%. The false negative rate was 0%. Only 2 patients had a positive SLNB (10%) and neither had additional metastasis following an ALND. After definitive surgery, 3 patients were upstaged to invasive ductal carcinoma (3/18 = 16.6%) and 3 other patients were upstaged to DCIS with microinvasion (3/18 = 16.6%). Therefore the histologic underestimation rate of invasive disease was 33%.

CONCLUSION: SLNB in CD-DCIS is technically feasible and highly accurate. We recommend limiting SLNB to patients undergoing a mastectomy.

Incidence and prediction of invasive disease and nodal metastasis in preoperatively diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ

For breast cancer patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy has been proposed as an axillary staging procedure in selected patients with a higher likelihood of having occult invasive lesions. With detailed histological examination of primary tumors and molecular whole-node analysis of SNs, we aimed to validate whether this selective application accurately identifies patients with SN metastasis. The subjects were 336 patients with a preoperative needle-biopsy diagnosis of DCIS who underwent SN biopsy using the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay in the period 2009–2011. The incidence and preoperative predictors of upstaging to invasive disease on final pathology and SN metastasis, and their correlation, were investigated. Of the 336 patients, 113 (33.6%) had invasive disease, and 6 (1.8%) and 17 (5.0%) had macro- and micrometastasis in axillary nodes respectively. Of the 113 patients with invasive disease, 4 (3.5%) and 9 (8.0%) had macro- and micrometastasis. Predictors of invasive disease included palpability, mammographic mass, and calcifications (spread >20 mm), and intraductal solid structure, but no predictor was found for SN metastasis. Therefore, even though occult invasive disease was found at final pathology, most of the patients had no metastasis or only micrometastasis in axillary nodes. Predictors of invasive disease and SN metastasis were not completely consistent, so the selective SN biopsy for patients with a higher risk of invasive disease may not accurately identify those with SN metastasis. More accurate application of SN biopsy is required for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS.

[Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion: pathological review and clinical implications]

PURPOSE

Recent improvements in the detection of breast cancer at an early stage have resulted in a rising incidence of breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. So far, there is no consensus regarding its optimal management. We hereby report on our 10-year single institutional experience in breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion including pathological reviewing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients treated for a ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion at the Institut Claudius-Regaud (Toulouse, France) over a 10-year period were included in this study. We reviewed all available histological materials.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were eligible for this study. Two patients presented with a lymph node invasion at diagnosis. Each patient benefited from initial surgical management, which consisted either in mastectomy (n=25) or conservative resection (n=37). Axillary exploration was performed in 52 patients (82%). After a median follow-up of 61.3 months [46.9;69], the 5-year overall survival and disease free survival were 98.2 (95% CI=[88.2;99.7]) and 89.5% (95% CI=[76.3;95.6]) respectively. Two delayed invasive relapses occurred leading to one specific death. The pathological review highlighted a trend towards a loss of HR and HER2 expression (9%) in the microinvasive component in comparison with its surrounded in situ carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

The risk of initial lymph node involvement and delayed invasive local relapse deserve an optimal locoregional management including lymph node evaluation. The non-negligible discrepancy's rate between in situ and microinvasive components justifies HR status and HER2 expression assessment on the microinvasive component.

Sentinel lymph node status and axillary lymph node dissection in the surgical treatment of breast cancer

Axillary lymph node dissection has been traditionally perceived as a therapeutic and a staging procedure and unselectively removes all axillary lymph nodes. There still remains some controversy as concerns the survival benefit associated with axillary clearance. Sentinel lymph node biopsy removes the most likely sites of regional metastases, the lymph nodes directly connected with the primary tumour. It allows a more accurate staging and a selective indication for clearing the axilla, restricting this to patients who may benefit of it. Axillary dissection was performed in all patients during the learning phase of sentinel lymphadenectomy, but later only patients with metastasis to a sentinel node underwent this operation. Currently, even some patients with minimal sentinel node involvement, including some with macrometastasis may skip axillary clearance. This review summarizes the changes that have occurred in the surgical management of the axilla, the evidences and controversies behind these changes, along with current recommendations. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(6), 203–215.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: from investigational procedure to standard practice

Sentinel lymph node biopsy, popularized in melanoma, has revolutionized the management of breast cancer. While the morbidity associated with axillary node dissection was once thought to be a requisite risk in order to appropriately stage the axilla, large validation studies have demonstrated that sentinel lymph node biopsy is a minimally invasive technique that can accurately predict nodal status. This technique has become an accepted practice in many centers, but there remain many controversies surrounding the technique itself, the pathologic evaluation of the sentinel node and the optimal management of patients with minimal nodal disease. The historic roots of this technique are discussed, along with the controversial issues surrounding the technique and the clinical trials that are currently ongoing.

Incidence and possible pathogenesis of sentinel node micrometastases in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast detected using molecular whole lymph node assay

Background:

The pathogenesis of lymph node metastases in preinvasive breast cancer – ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) – remains controversial. The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay is a novel molecular method that can assess a whole node and detect clinically relevant metastases. In this retrospective cohort study, we determined the performance of the OSNA assay in DCIS and the pathogenesis of node-positive DCIS.

Methods:

The subjects consisted of 623 patients with DCIS who underwent sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy. Of these, 2-mm-sectioned nodes were examined using frozen-section (FS) histology in 338 patients between 2007 and 2009, while 285 underwent OSNA whole node assays between 2009 and 2011. The SN-positivity rate was compared between cohorts, and the characteristics of OSNA-positive DCIS were investigated.

Results:

The OSNA detected more cases of SN metastases than FS histology (12 out of 285, 4.2% vs 1 out of 338, 0.3%). Most of the metastases were micrometastases. The characteristics of high-risk DCIS (i.e., mass formation, size, grade, and comedo) and preoperative breast biopsy (i.e., methods or time to surgery) were not valid for OSNA assay–positive DCIS.

Conclusion:

The OSNA detects more SN metastases in DCIS than FS histology. Further examination of the primary tumours and follow-up of node-positive DCIS are needed to elucidate the pathogenesis.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

The axillary lymph node status is the most reliable prognostic indicator of recurrence and overall survival in patients with breast cancer. The current standard surgical procedure for the management of invasive breast cancer is the complete removal of the cancer with total axillary clearance. However, recently, selective sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy is gaining acceptance as a useful and accurate staging procedure, as it is minimally invasive. The sentinel lymph node is the first node into which a primary cancer drains, and is thus the first node to be involved by metastases. Patients whose sentinel nodes are negative for breast cancer metastases, can be spared a more extensive axillary lymph node dissection, with reduction in the postoperative morbidity. Sentinel node mapping is usually performed by intradermal or peritumoral injection of a combination of blue dye and radiotracer. Sentinel node examination is sometimes done intraoperatively, by imprint cytology and frozen sections, for an immediate assessment, to plan the extent of surgery at a single sitting. Permanent sections of the sentinel node are studied by serial sectioning, and immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin is done to detect micrometastases which are frequently missed on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections. The various aspects of sentinel node examination, and its role to decide further management in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ, and in other clinical settings, are discussed in this review.

Breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy vs mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ: French Survey experience

From March 2003 to April 2004, 77 physicians throughout France prospectively recruited 1289 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients and collected data on diagnosis, patient and tumour characteristics, and treatments. Median age was 56 years (range, 30–84). Ductal carcinoma in situ was diagnosed by mammography in 87.6% of patients. Mastectomy, conservative surgery alone (CS) and CS with radiotherapy (CS+RT) were performed in 30.5, 7.8 and 61.7% of patients, respectively. Thus, 89% of patients treated by CS received adjuvant RT. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and axillary dissection (AD) were performed in 21.3 and 10.4% of patients, respectively. Hormone therapy was administered to 13.4% of the patients (80% tamoxifen). Median tumour size was 14.5 mm (6, 11 and 35 mm for CS, CS+RT and mastectomy, respectively, P<0.0001). Nuclear grade was high in 21% of patients, intermediate in 38.5% and low in 40.5%. Excision was considered complete in 92% (CS) and 88.3% (CS+RT) of patients. Oestrogen receptors were positive in 69.8% of assessed cases (31%). Treatment modalities varied widely according to region: mastectomy rate, 20–37%; adjuvant RT, 84–96%; hormone treatment, 6–34%. Our survey on current DCIS management in France has highlighted correlations between pathological features (tumour size, margin and grade) and treatment options, with several similar variations to those observed in recent UK and US studies.

The sentinel lymph node procedure for patients with preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: risk factors for unsuspected invasive disease and for metastatic sentinel lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

Occult invasive disease could be found at definitive histology in patients initially diagnosed with large ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a reliable and minimally invasive procedure providing axillary information and avoiding a second operation in this particular group of patients. The aim of our study was to assess the value of SLN biopsy in patients with large DCIS who are at highest risk for being upstaged to invasive carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 195 patients diagnosed with DCIS upon initial core biopsy and undergoing SLN biopsy. Many features were correlated with the presence of unsuspected invasive disease and positive SLN biopsy using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 110 patients with pure DCIS, seven patients (6%) had a metastatic lymph node; 31 patients (16%) were found to have invasive disease upon final histology. Univariate analysis of predictors of unsuspected invasive carcinoma showed that patients having a preoperative biopsy that indicated DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) or large DCIS were at a higher risk of invasive carcinoma after histological examination of the operative specimen. Of the 31 patients who were upstaged to invasive carcinoma at final histology, seven patients (22%) had a positive SLN biopsy. The analysis of predictors of positive SLN in our study shows that diffuse DCIS requiring mastectomy is the main risk factor for SLN metastasis.

CONCLUSION

There are no real predictive factors for invasive disease in patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS or DCISM. Our study supports the value of SLN biopsy in patients with a preoperative DCISM biopsy or patients with a large pure DCIS biopsy requiring mastectomy.

Recent advances and current controversies in the management of DCIS of the breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is commonly diagnosed today, mainly due to widespread use of screening mammography. Despite a better understanding of its biological behavior, many issues regarding its optimal management remain controversial. The biological behavior of DCIS has been associated with distinct molecular and histological features (such as expression of COX2, Ki67, c-erbB2, p53 mutation, presence or absence of comedonecrosis, nuclear grade, hormone receptor status, etc.). Recent advances in the diagnosis of DCIS include using magnetic resonance imaging, and the use of stereotactic-guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy (DVAB). Ductoscopy and ductal lavage have a limited role in the management of DCIS. Surgical treatment of DCIS includes simple local excision to various forms of wider excision (segmental resection or quadrantectomy), or even mastectomy (either simple or skin-sparing). Radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery significantly reduces local recurrence rates. Axillary lymph node dissection is not required for the management of DCIS; however, during the last decade, sentinel lymph node biopsy is increasingly used to exclude the presence of axillary metastases (when invasive disease is present within the DCIS). This approach has many advantages (including the avoidance of a second surgery if invasive disease is diagnosed within the DCIS) and should be considered when there is an increased probability for the presence of invasive breast cancer within the DCIS. The role of other minimally invasive methods (such as the "therapeutic" application of the DVAB technique, radiofrequency ablation, laser therapy, cryotherapy and brachytherapy) in the management of small DCIS remains unproven. Tamoxifen should be considered in the management of selected patients with DCIS, such as patients with hormone receptor positive DCIS, young patients, and patients without risk factors for potential side effects. Additionally, and controversial, there is evidence that aromatase inhibitors may be better than tamoxifen in the management of DCIS.

Atypical presentations of screen-detected DCIS Implications for pre-operative assessment and surgical intervention

Few series are published on DCIS that forms parenchymal lesions on screening mammograms. The implications of these unusual presentations for pre-operative assessment and surgical intervention are of interest. In the setting of a large, population-based breast cancer screening program, the diagnostic and management implications of DCIS presenting as parenchymal lesions on screening mammograms are investigated. A total of 125 lesions (20.1% of all DCIS) presented as a mass (n=99) or microcalcifications with an associated parenchymal lesion (n=26). Cytology was positive in 47.1% of cases. Core biopsy diagnosed DCIS in 68.4% of cases. Breast surgery after a definite preoperative diagnosis achieved negative initial margins in 69.4% case, versus 54.7% without a pre-operative malignant diagnosis. The mastectomy rate was 26.4%. Axillary surgery was carried out in 32.8% cases, including axillary clearance in 26.4% of cases. One in five cases of DCIS detected during mammographic screening has features other than pure microcalcifications. This has implications for pre-operative assessment and surgical management.

Cancer canalaire in situ du sein avec micro-invasion. Place du ganglion sentinelle

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2001 to January 2006, lymphatic mapping was performed using radiocolloid and/or blue dye technique. Full axillary lymph node dissection was accomplished systematically in 10 instances at the beginning of the study, and furthermore when the sentinel node was involved (macrometastatic or micrometastatic disease).

RESULTS

Identification rate was 98% (40/41), the unsuccessful procedure occurred after incisional biopsy for diagnosis. The number of sentinel nodes removed was 2 in average (1-5). Sentinel node involvement was found in 10% of cases (4/40): 1 sentinel node macrometastasis pN1, 2 sentinel node micrometastases determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining pN1 (mi), 1 sentinel node micrometastasis detected only by immunohistochemical staining pN0 (mi).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node sampling should not be currently applied for management of every ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast but a selective utilization is proposed in documented high risk subset of patients according to clinical, mammographic, and histologic features obtained by percutaneous biopsies. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with proved or suspected microinvasion could be scheduled for sentinel node procedure a fortiori in cases undergoing mastectomy because of extensive DCIS before the occurrence of disturbances of lymphatic drainage induced by surgical breast dissection.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in staging small (up to 15 mm) breast carcinomas. Results from a European multi-institutional study

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the preferred method for the nodal staging of early breast cancer, but controversy exists regarding its universal use and consequences in small tumors. 2929 cases of breast carcinomas not larger than 15 mm and staged with SLN biopsy with or without axillary dissection were collected from the authors' institutions. The pathology of the SLNs included multilevel hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) was commonly used for cases negative with HE staining. Variables influencing SLN involvement and non-SLN involvement were studied with logistic regression. Factors that influenced SLN involvement included tumor size, multifocality, grade and age. Small tumors up to 4 mm (including in situ and microinvasive carcinomas) seem to have SLN involvement in less than 10%. Non-SLN metastases were associated with tumor grade, the ratio of involved SLNs and SLN involvement type. Isolated tumor cells were not likely to be associated with further nodal load, whereas micrometastases had some subsets with low risk of non-SLN involvement and subsets with higher proportion of further nodal spread. In situ and microinvasive carcinomas have a very low risk of SLN involvement, therefore, these tumors might not need SLN biopsy for staging, and this may be the approach used for very small invasive carcinomas. If an SLN is involved, isolated tumor cells are rarely if ever associated with non-SLN metastases, and subsets of micrometastatic SLN involvement may be approached similarly. With macrometastases the risk of non-SLN involvement increases, and further axillary treatment should be generally indicated.

Técnica del ganglio centinela en la cirugía del cáncer de mama en un hospital sin servicio de medicina nuclear

INTRODUCTION

Knowledge of lymph node stage is the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer. The sentinel lymph node biopsy technique (SLNBT), initially developed to avoid unnecessary dissection in melanoma, has been shown to be able to predict the axillary stage of breast cancer. The difficulty of applying the SLNBT in hospitals without a nuclear medicine service has led to the existence of external teams that allow these hospitals to apply the technique.

OBJECTIVE

To test the application of the SLNBT in our hospital which has no nuclear medicine service.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Coinciding with the validation of the SLNBT in the Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital in Badalona in November 1999, and with their help, the Centre Hospitalari de Manresa began to apply this technique. In 2002, the technique was used in all the hospitals of the ALTHAIA-Xarxa Assistencial de Manresa. From November 1999 to June 2005, the technique was applied in 163 patients.

RESULTS

Of the 163 patients, the technical success rate was 97.55%. In 98% of the patients, the sentinel lymph node was found in the axilla. In 10.7% of the patients, the node was found in the internal mammary basin. Twenty-six percent of the axillas had metastases of over 2 mm, and 16% had micrometastases. One hundred and five patients were spared axillary dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

The SLNBT can be performed in a hospital without a nuclear medicine service. This technique improves and simplifies the surgical technique and reduces length of hospital stay and morbidity.

A critique of the sentinel node concept

The concept of "the sentinel node" is false. In the axilla, the lymphatic system usually first drains into a group of low axillary nodes (level 1). The validity, as a staging procedure, of a 4 node axillary sample was demonstrated 30 years ago by Prof. Sir Patrick Forrest. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) should not become the standard of care for all breast cancer patients. All the various options (axillary sampling, SNB, axillary dissection or simply a watchful attitude) are acceptable and to be advised according to the patient's wishes and conditions and to the tumour characteristics. We would also propose the change of the terminology from SNB to "guided axilary sampling" (GAS).

Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ Treated by Mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely accepted alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in invasive breast cancer. Its role in ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with the subsequent diagnosis of invasive disease and to determine the role of SLNB when performing a mastectomy for DCIS.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of all mastectomies performed on patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS between 2000 and 2005 at a single tertiary-care institution.

RESULTS

Ninety mastectomies for DCIS were included, 54 (60%) of which were performed with concurrent SLNB. Of 44 patients diagnosed preoperatively with DCIS by core biopsy only, 34 patients (63%) had a concurrent SLNB, while 10 patients (28%) were treated with mastectomy alone (P < .01). Overall, 30 patients (33%) had invasive disease, 22 of whom received concurrent SLNB. Seven SLNB patients (13%) had positive SLNs. On univariate analysis, multifocality (P = .03), multicentricity (P = .01), comedonecrosis (P = .01), and diagnosis by core biopsy (P < .001) were associated with invasive disease on pathology. On multivariate analysis, comedonecrosis (P = .04) and diagnosis by core biopsy (P < .01) were independent predictors for invasion. There was no statistically significant predictor for sentinel lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of patients with DCIS treated with mastectomy at our institution later had invasive disease, and factors associated with invasion have been identified. On the basis of our results, routine SLNB is recommended in this patient population.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: Value of sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents about 20% of newly diagnosed breast carcinomas. Axillary metastasis is often related to undiagnosed DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM). The aim of this study was to confirm the interest of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in extensive DCIS.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of DCIS or DCISM and axillary lymph node evaluation were selected. Surgical treatment included SLN biopsy and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Serial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and with an immunohistochemical (IHC) method. When a micrometastasis was found, the breast specimen was revised searching for occult microinvasion.

RESULTS

Hundred and forty patients with initial DCIS were enrolled in the study. Node metastasis was identified in 9 patients (7%) of the 128 patients with DCIS and DCISM. At final histology, 4 (10%) of the 39 patients with pure DCIS and SLN biopsy and 1 (7%) of the 14 patients with DCISM and SLN biopsy had axillary micrometastasis. Four of the 12 patients upstaged to invasive carcinoma had metastatic SLNs.

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is valuable in patients with diffuse DCIS or DCISM who are scheduled for mastectomy in order to search for axillary micrometastases and occult breast microinvasion.

Salvage treatment for local or local-regional recurrence after initial breast conservation treatment with radiation for ductal carcinoma in situ

The present study evaluated the outcome of salvage treatment for women with local or local-regional recurrence after initial breast conservation treatment with radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; intraductal carcinoma) of the breast. The study cohort consisted of 90 women with local only first failure (n=85) or local-regional only first failure (n=5). The histology at the time of recurrence was invasive carcinoma for 53 patients (59%), non-invasive carcinoma for 34 patients (38%), angiosarcoma for one patient (1%), and unknown for two patients (2%). The median follow-up after salvage treatment was 5.5 years (mean=5.8 years; range=0.2-14.2 years). The 10-year rates of overall survival, cause-specific survival, and freedom from distant metastases after salvage treatment were 83%, 95%, and 91%, respectively. Adverse prognostic factors for the development of subsequent distant metastases after salvage treatment were invasive histology of the local recurrence and pathologically positive axillary lymph nodes. These results demonstrate that local and local-regional recurrences can be salvaged with high rates of survival and freedom from distant metastases. Close follow-up after initial breast conservation treatment with radiation is warranted for the early detection of potentially salvageable local and local-regional recurrences.

Acceptance of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy of the Breast by All General Surgeons in Kentucky

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer is now performed routinely in many U.S. medical centers. The acceptance of SLNB in the community and in rural medical centers, however, has not been accurately defined. The purpose of this study was to assess how surgeons in Kentucky, a predominantly rural state, have incorporated SLNB into practice. General surgeons in the state of Kentucky were identified by registration with the state medical association. All general surgeons (n=272) in the state were mailed the questionnaire, with 93% (n=252) responding. Overall, 172 defined themselves as rural surgeons. Among the rural surgeons, 87% perform breast cancer operations and 54% perform SLNB. In comparison, 74% of nonrural surgeons perform breast cancer operations and 80% perform SLNB. A majority of nonrural surgeons (73%) have performed SLNB for more than 2 years when compared to rural surgeons (73% versus 37%, respectively; p<0.0001). Planned backup axillary node dissection was stopped by both rural (26%) and community (39%) surgeons after 10 cases (14% rural, 19% nonrural) or 11--20 cases (12% rural, 20% nonrural). Surgeons reported using SLNB for the following diagnoses: invasive cancer (98%), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (43%), and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (11%). The majority of surgeons (87%) reported a greater than 90% SLN identification rate. SLNB has become widely accepted by surgeons in both rural and nonrural medical centers in Kentucky. However, there has been considerable variability in the number of training cases surgeons have performed prior to abandoning routine axillary dissection. This indicates a need for continuing educational efforts aimed at quality assurance.

Clinicopathologic factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph-node biopsy in breast cancer

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies have suggested a variety of factors that may affect the false negative (FN) rate for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer. Because FN results are relatively rare, no prior studies have had sufficient sample size to allow detailed statistical analysis of factors predicting FN results.

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage T1-2, N0 invasive breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by planned completion axillary dissection regardless of the SLN results, to assess the FN rate. SLN biopsy was performed using radioactive colloid injection in combination with isosulfan blue dye in 94% of cases. Dermal, subdermal, peritumoral, or subareolar radioactive colloid injection techniques were used at the discretion of each institution. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a FN result.

RESULTS

SLNs were identified in 3870 of 4117 patients (94%). There were 1243 true positive, 2521 true negative, and 106 FN results. Age, histologic subtype, the number of non-SLN removed, tumor palpability, type of breast biopsy, and SLN injection technique were not significant factors. On multivariate analysis, tumor size <2.5 cm, upper outer quadrant tumor location, removal of only a single SLN, minimal surgeon experience, presence of a single positive axillary LN, and use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for SLN analysis were independently associated with an increased risk of FN results.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon experience, tumor size and location, and the number of SLN removed are preoperative and intraoperative factors that independently predict the risk of a FN result. In contrast to suggestions from other smaller studies, age does not affect the likelihood of a FN result; a lesser, rather than greater, number of positive axillary nodes was associated with an increased likelihood of a FN result; and IHC analysis of the SLN increases, rather than decreases, the risk of FN results.

Incidence and Clinical Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis Detected by Cytokeratin Immunohistochemical Staining in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

BACKGROUND

This study explored the long-term prognosis of patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) and lymph node metastasis detected by cytokeratin immunohistochemical stains (CK-IHC).

METHODS

Using the Columbia University breast cancer database, we identified all DCIS patients who had eight or more axillary nodes dissected and free of metastasis. Five-micrometer sections from all paraffin blocks containing lymph node tissue were stained with an anticytokeratin antibody cocktail (AE1/AE3 and KL1). The results of the CK-IHC and updated database were anonymized and merged. Survival of CK-IHC-positive and -negative patients was compared by using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

CK-IHC was performed on 301 DCIS patients, who had an average of 16.7 axillary nodes dissected. Eighteen (6%) of 301 patients tested positive by CK-IHC. Seventy patients with bilateral breast cancer and 2 patients without any follow-up data were excluded, for a final study population of 229 patients. Among the 216 patients with negative CK-IHC, 18 patients died, compared with 1 of 13 patients with positive CK-IHC. The median follow-up for the study group was 127 months. Kaplan-Meier overall and breast cancer-specific survival estimates were similar for CK-IHC-positive and -negative patients (P = .81 and P = .73, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

CK-IHC increases the incidence of positive nodes by 6% in DCIS patients. A positive node by CK-IHC does not seem to affect survival in these patients. These results raise concerns regarding the clinical significance of positive nodes by CK-IHC in DCIS patients.

Core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: An indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a minimally invasive, accurate method of evaluating axillary lymph nodes in patients with invasive cancer. The technique has also been applied successfully in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The purpose of this study was to review our experience performing SLNB in patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS.

METHODS

A prospective study of consecutive patients seen at our institution from August 2001 to April 2004 with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS was undertaken. Demographic data, biopsy method, final pathology, and surgical treatment were recorded. Patients undergoing SLNB were identified, and pathologic results were noted.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS were treated. Fifty-five (64.7%) had their diagnosis made by excisional biopsy, and 30 (35.3%) by core biopsy. Forty-four (51.7%) patients underwent SLNB as part of their definitive surgical procedure, and an SLN was successfully identified in 41 (93.2%). Nine (22.0%) patients who underwent successful SLNB had a positive SLN, 2 by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and 7 by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for cytokeratin. Both patients with H&E-positive SLN were ultimately found to have invasive disease in their primary lesion. Final pathologic assessment of all primary lesions revealed invasive carcinoma in 7, 6 of whom had their diagnosis made by core biopsy. Overall, 20.0% of patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS were upstaged to invasive disease. Whether the lesion was palpable, grade and the presence or absence of necrosis were not significantly different in patients ultimately found to have invasive disease versus those who did not.

DISCUSSION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be performed accurately in patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS. The rate of axillary disease in patients with pure, completely resected DCIS is low; therefore, SLNB is not indicated in all patients with this biopsy diagnosis. Because of a high rate of invasive disease on the final pathology of patients with DCIS diagnosed by core biopsy, these patients should be offered SLNB.

Cancers canalaires in situ du sein avec micro-invasion

OBJECTIVE

Specify the role of axillary lymph node removal in micro-invasive in situ duct carcinomas (DCIS-MI) of the breast with a series of 107 consecutive cases.

METHODS

Single-centre, retrospective, anatomoclinical study with application of the European guidelines adopting as pathological definition the presence of areas of micro-invasion not exceeding 1mm. Axillary lymph node dissection was systematically complete and was preceded by the search for the sentinel node in 10 patients using the isotope method.

RESULTS

Lymph node invasion was revealed in 8 cases in the global population (7.5%). All the cases except one exhibited typical deleterious histological features: comedo architectural sub-type, high nuclear grade, and size of the lesion>3 cm. The lymph node invasion was of 18.5% in the sub-group of high-grade micro-invasive comedo-carcinomas measuring more than 3 cm.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to those exhibiting pure DCIS, DCIS-MI patients require surgical exploration of the armpit, the most appropriate modalities of which are currently debated: classical axillary lymph node dissection or search for the sentinel lymph node; the selective lymphadenectomy procedure is not yet a consensually validated technique.

Prélèvement de ganglions sentinelles dans les carcinomes intracanalaires du sein (± micro-invasion)

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to define the interest of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for the staging of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with micro-invasion (DCISM) in patients with breast carcinoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From June 1999 to December 2002 we listed, in a retrospective study, 52 patients treated surgically for a DCIS or a DCISM. All except one had an histology before surgery, and all had SLNB. Intraoperative imprint cytology of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) was performed then there were analysed by staining with hematoxylin-eosin. Patients with positive SLN underwent complete axillary dissection.

RESULTS

It was removed an average of three SLNs by patient (extreme 1 to 6). Metastases in the SLN were detected in four (7,7%) of the 52 patients, including three cases had only micrometastases in the SLN. In the four patients treated with complete axillary dissection, the SLN were the only positives nodes.

CONCLUSION

The SLNB for DCIS and DCISM increases the involvement rate of lymph node. Because of the widespread for early detection of breast cancer, it is noted a regular increase in the rate of DCIS. Even if the attitude to be had towards the lymph node metastases in these cases is not yet well defined, and so only 2% of the patients approximately die of this pathology, it is interesting because of increase in absolute value of mortality, to try to improve the prognosis criteria to modify the treatment of this pathology.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy has become an important tool for axillary lymph node staging in women with early-stage breast cancer. This review examines data regarding the staging accuracy, indications and technical aspects of the procedure, and clinical trials investigating the technique. Multiple studies now confirm that sentinel lymphadenectomy accurately stages the axilla and is associated with less morbidity than axillary dissection. Blue dye, radiocolloid, or both can be used to identify the sentinel node, and several injection techniques may be used successfully. Many patient factors previously thought to affect accuracy of the procedure have now been shown to be of limited significance. The indications for the procedure are expanding, and the histopathologic evaluation of the sentinel node and the role of lymphoscintigraphy have been clarified. Clinical trials are now underway that will determine the prognostic significance of micrometastases and the therapeutic benefit of axillary dissection in women with and without sentinel node metastases. Incorporation of sentinel lymphadenectomy into routine clinical practice will maintain accurate axillary staging with lower morbidity and improved quality of life for women with early-stage breast cancer.

Optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents a breast lesion that is diagnosed with increasing frequency, mainly due to the wide use of screening mammography. Today, DCIS comprises 15-25% of all breast cancers detected at population screening programs. Consequently, the concepts of properly managing such patients assume a greater importance in everyday practice. Mammographically detected microcalcifications are the most common presentation of DCIS. Despite recent technological advances (including Stereotactic-guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy), mammographically guided wire biopsy remains the "gold-standard" for obtaining a histological diagnosis in patients with non-palpable, mammographically detected DCIS. Management options include mastectomy, local excision combined with radiation therapy, and local excision alone. Given that DCIS is a heterogeneous group of lesions rather than a single entity, and because patients have a wide variety of personal needs that must be addressed during treatment selection, it is obvious that no single approach will be appropriate for all forms of DCIS or for all patients. Careful patient selection is of key importance in order to achieve the best results in the management of the individual patient with DCIS. Axillary lymph node dissection is unnecessary in the treatment of pure DCIS, but it is indicated when microinvasion is present. In these cases, sentinel lymph node biopsy may be an excellent alternative. In the NSABP B-24 trial, tamoxifen reduced both the invasive and non-invasive breast cancer events in either breast by 37%. Nearly all patients who develop a non-invasive recurrence following breast-sparing surgery are cured with mastectomy, and approximately 75% of those with an invasive recurrence are salvaged. Selected patients initially treated by lumpectomy alone may also undergo breast-conservation therapy at the time of relapse according to the same strict guidelines of tumor margin clearance required for the primary lesion; radiation therapy should be given following local excision. The use of systemic therapy in patients with invasive recurrence should be based on standard criteria for invasive breast cancer.

The relevance of occult axillary micrometastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ: a clinicopathologic study with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents 20% of newly diagnosed breast carcinoma cases. Historically, the incidence of axillary metastasis in DCIS has been small (1-2%) and its significance has been debated. It is widely known that serial sections of lymph nodes coupled with keratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) increases identification of micrometastasis. The advent of sentinel lymph node evaluation underscores the need to reevaluate the significance of occult micrometastases in DCIS.

METHODS

Patients with DCIS and negative axillary lymph nodes from 1974 to 1992 were selected from the Saint Barnabas Medical Center Tumor Registry. All diagnoses were confirmed, and paraffin blocks were retrieved after acceptance into the study. Seven serial sections were obtained from each block and evaluated with two cytokeratin IHC stains. Clinical follow-up ranged from 10 to 28 years.

RESULTS

One hundred two patients were included in the study. Micrometastases were identified in 13 patients (13%), mostly on 1 level and composed of microscopic clusters in the subcapsular sinus. Seven of these lymph node-positive patients (58%) had high-grade comedo DCIS, 4 (33%) had intermediate grades of various types of DCIS, and one had a low-grade micropapillary DCIS. The overall disease recurrence rate was 12%, but micrometasis was not detected in any of the patients who developed disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial IHC evaluation of lymph nodes dramatically increased the identification of occult micrometastasis. However, IHC detected micrometastasis has no apparent clinical significance in DCIS, based on the current long-term clinicopathologic study. Therefore, the authors questioned the significance of occult micrometastasis, identified by IHC, in DCIS of any type and extent. Further evaluation and follow-up of lymph node micrometastases in patients with invasive tumors of various sizes are needed. The current findings would not support altering the stage of patients with DCIS and micrometastasis detected by IHC only.

Axillary lymph node metastases in patients with a final diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

Recent studies report the incidence of axillary metastases in patients with ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) approaches 13%. The purpose of this study was to define the incidence of axillary micrometastases in patients with pure DCIS before and after the introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy.

METHODS

Patients with a final diagnosis of DCIS form the basis of this study. Data were entered prospectively into an Institutional Review Board approved Oracle database from January 1997 through July 2002.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-four patients had lymph nodes evaluated. Ninety-eight percent of patients had no evidence of metastatic disease and 2% were found to have micrometastases. This was consistent in those who had level I or II lymph node sampling or both and those who had lymphatic mapping and a sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

These data do not support axillary lymph node removal of any type in patients with pure DCIS.

Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for nearly 20% of new breast cancer diagnoses and ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCIS-MI) is found in 5% to 10% of DCIS. Controversy exists regarding the appropriate local treatment as well as whether or not examination of the axilla should be performed either by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or not at all.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed using the keywords ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasion. Recent articles pertaining to the definition and characterization of DCIS-MI as well as treatment and prognosis were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

The data at this time demonstrate no survival benefit for patients undergoing mastectomy versus lumpectomy and radiation. Numerous studies demonstrate axillary lymph node involvement to be as high as 20% with DCIS-MI; therefore, we believe that axillary sampling is essential. We recommend SLNB, which is accurate, provides information necessary for staging and treatment, and is associated with less morbidity than traditional ALND.

Evaluation of immunohistochemistry and multiple-level sectioning in sentinel lymph nodes from patients with breast cancer

CONTEXT

Previous investigations on sentinel lymph node biopsies have demonstrated their importance in nodal staging of patients with breast cancer. However, sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer is currently a controversial procedure and continues to provoke debate.

OBJECTIVES

We designed our study to determine the usefulness of a standard protocol for evaluating sentinel lymph node metastases and to assess the value of sentinel node biopsy as the only procedure in nodal staging in breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 84 breast cancer patients with sentinel node biopsies, who also underwent axillary dissection, was conducted using a standard protocol (3 levels of immunohistochemical stains for keratin and 2 levels of hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stains on the first 3 negative lymph nodes).

RESULTS

Hematoxylin-eosin staining identified 20 patients (23.8%) with sentinel node metastases. The remaining 64 negative patients (76.1%) were tumor free on sentinel lymph nodes at level 1 HE. Additional immunohistochemical stains for keratin and HE stains on specimens from these 64 patients showed an additional 5 patients (7.8%) to be positive for lymph node micrometastases (<2 mm). The total percentage of cases with sentinel lymph node metastases detected by HE staining and immunohistochemistry was 29.7%. Of the remaining 59 cases that were negative on HE and immunohistochemistry, axillary dissection revealed 3 cases that had metastases in the axillary lymph nodes. The false-negative rate was 10.7%. The concordance rate between sentinel lymph nodes and axillary lymph nodes was 96.4%. The sensitivity was 89% and specificity was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemistry and multiple-level sectioning increased detection of metastases by 7.8% in sentinel lymph nodes. Caution should be used in accepting sentinel node biopsy alone as the only procedure for staging due to a high false-negative rate (10.7%). A predictive value of 96.4% confirms that sentinel lymph node biopsy is most likely to contain metastatic carcinoma. Sentinel lymph node examination with the protocol we describe, combined with axillary dissection, increased the yield of metastatic disease by identifying 8 additional cases of nodal metastatic disease (an increase of 28%), as compared to standard axillary nodal dissection and single-section sentinel lymph node examination alone.

[Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: technical aspects and results]

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer has been introduced in the mid-1990s and it has now been performed on thousands of patients. Although this procedure has not been validated by randomised clinical trials, it has been rapidly adopted around the world by surgical specialists in clinical practice as a diagnostic procedure instead of the axillary lymph node dissection. The critical issue in sentinel lymph node biopsy is the false negative results which could expose the patients to axillary recurrence and lead to understaging and incorrect adjuvant therapy decisions. The current problem is to perfect the procedure for an optimal use in routine reducing this risk of false negative results. This false negative rate declines sharply when the technique is performed in selected patients by experienced surgeons using a combined detection. In this article, we review the technical aspects and results of the sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer and discuss the recommendations for the optimal clinical practice.